0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views

Instance: - Problem:: A Formula To Decide If Is Satisfiable

Uploaded by

seetarampandey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views

Instance: - Problem:: A Formula To Decide If Is Satisfiable

Uploaded by

seetarampandey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

2SAT

• Instance: A 2-CNF formula ϕ


• Problem: To decide if ϕ is satisfiable

Example: a 2CNF formula

(¬x∨y)∧(¬y∨z)∧(x∨¬z)∧(z∨y)
(¬x∨y)∧(¬y∨z)∧(x∨¬z)∧(z∨y)

Complexity 1
©D.Moshkovits
PAP 184-185

2SAT is in P
Theorem: 2SAT is polynomial-time
decidable.
Proof: We’ll show how to solve this
problem efficiently using path
searches in graphs…

Complexity 2
©D.Moshkovits
Searching in Graphs
Theorem: Given a graph G=(V,E) and
two vertices s,t∈V, finding if there is
a path from s to t in G is polynomial-
time decidable.
Proof: Use some search algorithm
(DFS/BFS). „

Complexity 3
©D.Moshkovits
Graph Construction
• Vertex for each variable and a
negation of a variable
• Edge (α,β) iff there exists a clause
equivalent to (¬α∨β)

Complexity 4
©D.Moshkovits
Graph Construction: Example
(¬x∨y)∧(¬y∨z)∧(x∨¬z)∧(z∨y)
(¬x∨y)∧(¬y∨z)∧(x∨¬z)∧(z∨y)

¬x
y
x

¬y
¬z
z

Complexity 5
©D.Moshkovits
Observation
Claim: If the graph contains a path
from α to β, it also contains a path
from ¬β to ¬α.
Proof: If there’s an edge (α,β), then
there’s also an edge (¬β,¬α).

Complexity 6
©D.Moshkovits
Correctness
Claim:
a 2-CNF formula ϕ is unsatisfiable iff
there exists a variable x, such that:
1. there is a path from x to ¬x in the
graph
2. there is a path from ¬x to x in the
graph

Complexity 7
©D.Moshkovits
Correctness (1)
• Suppose there are paths x..¬x and
¬x..x for some variable x, but there’s
also a satisfying assignment ρ.
• If ρ(x)=T (similarly for ρ(x)=F):

(¬α∨β) is false!

x α . . .β ¬x

T T F F
Complexity 8
©D.Moshkovits
Correctness (2)
• Suppose there are no such paths.
• Construct an assignment as follows:
¬x 2. assign T to
1. pick an all reachable
unassigned y vertices
vertex and x
assign it T 3. assign F to
their negations
¬y
¬z 4. Repeat until all
z vertices are assigned
Complexity 9
©D.Moshkovits
Correctness (2)
Claim: The algorithm is well defined.
Proof: If there were a path from x to
both y and ¬y,
then there would have been a path
from x to ¬y and from ¬y to ¬x.

Complexity 10
©D.Moshkovits
Correctness
A formula is unsatisfiable iff there are
no paths of the form x..¬x and ¬x..x.
„

Complexity 11
©D.Moshkovits
2SAT is in P
We get the following efficient
algorithm for 2SAT:
– For each variable x find if there is a
path from x to ¬x and vice-versa.
– Reject if any of these tests succeeded.
– Accept otherwise
⇒ 2SAT∈P. „

Complexity 12
©D.Moshkovits

You might also like