0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views

Peer-Self-Eval Drex

The document provides an evaluation sheet to assess the teamwork of 4 members - Benatain, Bulawan, Caguioa, and Mejia - on a research project. It rates each member on 6 criteria: quantity of work, quality of work, job knowledge, cooperation, dependability, and enthusiasm. Benatain and Mejia received the highest overall scores of 24, while Bulawan scored 22 and Caguioa 18. The evaluator provides no additional comments.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views

Peer-Self-Eval Drex

The document provides an evaluation sheet to assess the teamwork of 4 members - Benatain, Bulawan, Caguioa, and Mejia - on a research project. It rates each member on 6 criteria: quantity of work, quality of work, job knowledge, cooperation, dependability, and enthusiasm. Benatain and Mejia received the highest overall scores of 24, while Bulawan scored 22 and Caguioa 18. The evaluator provides no additional comments.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Evaluation Sheet on Teamwork

Research Title: Practice and Preference to Aacupuncture Theraphy of Patients in SMIC________________________________________________________________________


Section/ Group No. Group 1______________________________

Evaluator:Drexler Justine A. Buenafe ______________________________________ Date:


4/__________________________________________

Criteria
Quantity of Work Quality of Job Knowledge Cooperation Dependability Enthusiasm
(amount of Work (understanding of (willingness to (conscientiousness (initiative in
Team Members work/individual’s (accuracy job requirements accept in attendance and offering new ideas Total
contribution) and quality and task demands assignments and completion of work and seeking
of work) work with others) or assigned task) increased
responsibilities)
Evaluator:

Benatain, Katarina 4 4 4 4 4 4 24
Bulawan, Gemalyn 4 3 4 4 3 4 22
Caguioa, Angelica 4 3 3 4 2 2 18
Mejia, Jim 4 4 4 4 4 4 24

Ratings:
4 – Outstanding 2 - Satisfactory
3 – Very Satisfactory 1 – Needs improvement in working with the team
Comments/Suggestions: (use the back page if necessary)

You might also like