5 CONTENTS 1 INFANTILE SEXUALITY age 178 [1] The Period of Serual Lateney ia Childhood and itr otereuptons [2] ‘The Manifatations of Infantile Sexusity [3] The Serial Aim of Infantile Sexuality [4] Manurhatory Sexual Manifestations [5] The Sexual Researcher of Childhond [6] ‘The Phases of Development ofthe Sexual Organiza: [71 The Sources of Tafanle Sexuality TE THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF PURERTY [1] The Primacy ofthe Genital Zones and Fore pleasure [2 The Problem of Sexual Bacitation [3] The Libido Theory [4] The Diftxentation between Men and Women [5] The Finding of an Object, SUMMARY APPENDIX: Lis of Writings by Freud dealing pre- ominanly ingly with Sexi FREUD'S PSYCHO-ANALYTIC PROCEDURE, (1904 [1903)) (ON PSYCHOTHERAPY (1905 [1904)) MY VIEWS ON THE PART PLAYED BY SEXU- ALITY IN THE ABTIOLOGY OF THE. NEUROSES (1906 [1905}) PSYCHIGAL (OR MENTAL) TREATMENT (1805) PSYCHOPATHIG CHARAGTERS ON THE STAGE (1942 [1905 oF T906}) BIBLIOGRAPHY AND AUTHOR INDEX LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ADDENDA (GENERAL INDEX v6 179 1a 135, 194 97 200 207 208 22 2i7 219 mm 231 a 20 257 m 03 305, a sai se ws FRAGMENT OF AN ANALYSIS OF A GASE OF HYSTERIA (1905 [1901])EDITOR'S NOTE arucust EINER HYSTERIE-ANALYSE, () Genseaw. Erion (1901 Jan. 24. Completion of fist draft under tide “Traum rand Hiysterie’ [Dreams and Hysteria’ 1905 Mate, Pyehin, Newol, 18 (4 and 5), Oct. and Novy "285-310 and 408-467, 1909 S.K.S.% Hy T-1ID. (1912, nd. ed 1921, rd. ed) 192 GS, 8, 3-126. 1082 Vier Rronkegescihten, 5-141, 102 G.I, 8, 168-286, (6) Bouse Trasstation: “Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria’ 1925 GP. 3, 13-146. (Te. Alix and James Strachey.) The present tansation is a corrected version of the one published in 1925. ough this case history was not published until October and November, 1905, the greater part of i wat written January, 1901. The recovery of Freud's letere to. Wilhelat Flies (Freud, 19504) has given usa quantity of eantemporary ‘evidence on the abject ‘On October 1, 1900 (Letter 198), Freud tells Flies that he has secently begun work with a neve patient, ‘an eighteen year-old gi This gst was evidently ‘Dora’, and, as we know frown the case history itself (p [3% below), her treatment came ‘oan end some three month later, on December SI. All through the same autumn he had been engaged on his Pockrpatilgy of Evrpdey Life (19018), and on January 10 he waits (in an un pulled leer) that he is nov engaged simaltaneosaly on fo ‘Works the Keepy Life and ‘Dreams and Hysteria, a Fragment ‘ofan Analyse, which a we are ald in Freu’s preface (p. 10), ‘was the ovigital tle of the present paper, On January 25 (Lester 140) he writes: "Dreams and Hysteria” was completed‘ ‘A CASE OF HYSTERIA yesterday, Ieie a fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria, in which the explanations are grouped round twe dreams So that itisin fact a continuation ofthe dream book [The Inleprettion 1 Dreams (19003) had been published a year earlier} Ie farther ontait solutions of hysteria symptoms and considerations on the seual-organic basis of the whole condition. Anyhow, it 8 the moat eubtle thing I have yet svtten and wil produce an ven more horsffing effec dan usual. One does one's duty, fowever, and what one writes isnot for the passing day. The work ha already been accepted by Zichen." The latter was joint fair, with Wericke, of the Monatuclift fir Pyctiatie and Noarelei in which the paper ultimately appeared. A few days iater, om January 80 (Letter 141), Freud continues: ‘T hope you will ot be disappointed by “Dreams and Hysteria". Is {tai concer ie tll with psychology—an estimation of the foe portance of dreams and an aecount of some ofthe pecalartes ‘funconsciows thinking. There ae ony glimpses af the organic $ide—the erotogenie zones and bisexuality. Buti [the organic fide] is definitely mentioned and recognized and the way 5 ppived for an exhnusivedisention oft another Gm. The ease a hysteria with tunis areezy and aphonia, which can be thaced back to the characteristis ofa thumbucke; and the principal part inthe confiting mental procewesf played by the opportion between an attraction towards men aad one fowatte women. These extracts show hove this paper forme 9 link between The Jaleprition of Draons andthe Theee Ess looks back tothe one and forward to the other (On February 15 (Letter 142) he announces to Files that The Pryhapaslogy of Eoepay Life will be fished in a few days land that chen the to works Wil be ready o be creected and fent off to the publishers. But actually their history was very ‘iferent, On May 8 (Lotter 143) he i already correcting the fit proof of The Pyelapatilory of Everday Life (which was duly published in the July and’ August lasues of the Menatc ‘erf}; but he now says that he has not yet made up his mind about publishing the ease history. On June 9, however (in nother unpublished letter), he reports that °"Dreame and Hysteria” has been sent off, and will meet the gaze of an stoned public fn the autumn’. We have no information as to how it happened that Freud once more changed his mind and deferred publication for another four year. See p. 522, EDITOR'S NOTE, 5 ‘There is no means of deciding the extent to which Freud revited the paper before it uldmate publication in 1905. All the intemal evidence suggests, however, that he changed it very lie, The last section of the "Posucrpt (pp. 120 to 122) twat certainly added, ae well at some pastages at leat fn the "Drefstory Remarls” and. certain of the lootnotes, But aps from thete small addons it it fair to regard the paper as representing Freud’ technical methods and theoretical views at the period immediately after the publication of The ftepetaton tf Dreens, 1 may seem surprising that his theory of sexoaicy Iaad reached suck a point of development so many years before the appearance ofthe Tie Essys (19084), which were actually published almost simoltaneouly with this paper, It the Footnote on p. 81 explicidy vouches for the fact Moreover, readers of the Flas correspondence will be aware that much fof ths theory was in existence at an even easier date. To take fonly a single instance, Froud’s dictum about prychoncuroses Deing the negative’ of perversions (p. 30) occurs in almost same words ia Teter t Mies of Fanuary 24, 1097 (Letter 5 Even before this the dea ishinted at, ina letter of December 12, 1896 (Letter 52), which also introduces the notion of'erotogenic| zones and adumbrates the theory of ‘component instinct Tie curious that dice times in his later writing Freud assigns his treatment of ‘Dora’ to the wrong year to 1800 {nstead of 1900. ‘The mistake occurs in the frst section of his “Mfistory- of the Prycho-Analytie Movement” (1914) and is repeated twice in the foomote which he added to the ease history in 1923 (p. 13.2). There ean be no question thatthe szutunin of 1900 was the corect date, since, quite apart from the extemal evidence quoted above, the date is absolutely fixed by the “1902" given at the end of the paper itself (. 123), “This chronological summary, base on the data given in the cate history, may make iteascr for the reader to follow the tevente inthe narrative: 1882 ‘Dora born. 1889 (det, 6) Father il with T.B, Family move to B—. 1889 (det, 7) Bed-weting, 1890 (4et. 8) Dyspnoea. 1992 (der 10) Father's detached retina,‘ A CASE OF HYSTERIA Migraine and tussis nervosa. ae i 8 mae i pair a rer eee a tease FRAGMENT OF AN ANALYSIS OF A CASE OF HYSTERIA PREFATORY REMARKS 1 1895 and 1695 +1 put rwaed certain views upon he pator fons of hysterical symptoms and spon the ental process ecurcing in hysteria: Since that time several: years have pasted, Lnow proposing, therlore, oebtantte the views By eivng a detailed repre of the history of case aad is wete ‘ment canot avoid making a fw inrodtory remark, for the purpose party of jusying ftom various standpoats the ep {a ang, and party of Gininshing the expettaton o eich wl give ie ‘No dul was strand that Twas obliged to publi the cele of my enquires without tere beigany posibty of thr workers nthe field testing and checking them, parce Inny as those rela wee of serpidag and by bo meas tralljing character. But wil be sareny Tes awkward now Tea beginning to bring bevard some ofthe watera upon ch my conclsons were based and make ie accsble othe judgement ofthe world: Tshall not eae blame bythe means nly wheres etre Twas accsed of giving Information ‘tots patient, now Lal be accused of giving information Slut my patents ich ought not o be gves Tea oly hope {hatin both cae the code wil be the same, and that they til merely ve led the pretext fr their epracher iy T can resign in advance any posblity of ever moving thelr clei, "Even IF ignore the Ul of narrow minded erica ch 8 Acar, the preentsion of my cate hitores remains 2 peoblere ‘euch is lard fre to elves The dices ae pay of tell Kind, but are pry de to the nature ofthe cere ‘ances themecven 1K tre thatthe cameo tysteia frders are to be fond i he aii of the paint payho= ‘Soul i and that hysterical symptoms are the expresion * (he. jo Sil Ha (Breer and Fred, 195) aod “The eilay ager fa HO) tee 7