Scribd
Upload
18 views

4.1 Demographic Profile:: Table 1

This document summarizes demographic data and descriptive statistics from a survey of 622 respondents working in NGOs. Key findings include: - 61.6% of respondents were male and 38.4% were female. - 44.5% of respondents were aged 25 or younger, 49.7% were 26-45, and 5.3% were 46-55. - 42.4% had a bachelor's degree, 56.1% had a master's degree, and 1.5% had a PhD. - Mean scores and standard deviations are provided for study variables like surface acting, deep acting, job satisfaction, and emotional intelligence. - Reliability coefficients ranging

Uploaded by

Alpha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views

4.1 Demographic Profile:: Table 1

This document summarizes demographic data and descriptive statistics from a survey of 622 respondents working in NGOs. Key findings include: - 61.6% of respondents were male and 38.4% were female. - 44.5% of respondents were aged 25 or younger, 49.7% were 26-45, and 5.3% were 46-55. - 42.4% had a bachelor's degree, 56.1% had a master's degree, and 1.5% had a PhD. - Mean scores and standard deviations are provided for study variables like surface acting, deep acting, job satisfaction, and emotional intelligence. - Reliability coefficients ranging

Uploaded by

Alpha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

4.

1 Demographic Profile:
This part of study deals with demographic information covered by survey. Descriptive
statistics includes frequency distribution, percentile description, cumulative percentage,
mean, standard deviation and skewness of all demographic variables as gender, age,
education level, nature of job and length of service shown in following tables.

Table 1:
Gender Distribution of the Respondents (N= 622)
Category Frequency Percentage Cumulative Percentage
Male 383 61.6 61.6

Female 239 38.4 100

Table 1 signifies the demographic statistics with respect to gender of respondents in terms of
frequency distribution, percentage and cumulative percentage. Table 1 shows that out of 622
respondents, 61.6% (383) were male and 38.4% (239) were female. Female respondents’ rate
is less than male respondents but still there is large number of women in NGOs sector which
indelicate the women participation is increasing in this sector.

Table 2:
Age Distribution of the Respondents (N= 622)

Age Frequency Percentage Cumulative Percentage


Up to 25 277 44.5 44.5
26 to 45 309 49.7 94.2

46 to 55 33 5.30 99.5

56 + 3 0.5 100

Table 2 indicates the distribution of respondents with respect to age. Survey accounted
44.5% (277) respondents who had their age up to 25 years. Moreover 49.7% (309)
respondents were between age group 26 to 45, 5.30% (33) respondents were between age
group 46 to 55 and remaining 0.5% (3) respondents were more that 56 years age. Results
signifies that majority of respondents are between age group of 26 to 45.
Table 3:

Distribution of the Respondents with respect to their education (N= 622)

Education Level Frequency Percentage Cumulative Percentage

Bachelors 264 42.4 42.4

Masters 349 56.1 98.5

100
PhD 9 1.5

Table 3 demonstrates demographic characteristics of survey participants in terms of their


educational level. It is evident from Table 3 that 42.4% (264) of the respondents possessed
the bachelor degree, 56.1% (349) participants hold the masters degree whereas only 1.5% (9)
of the respondents got their PhD degree. Analysis further implies that majority of participants
hold masters degree.

Table 6
Descriptive Statistics of All Variables (N= 311)
Variables Mean S.D Skewness Kurtosis

Surface Acting 2.35 1.00 .90 -.51

Deep Acting 3.37 1.15 -.57 -1.18

Display of Genuine Emotion 3.57 1.00 -.71 -.58

Leaders’ Job Satisfaction 3.45 1.25 -.65 -1.20

Leaders’ Emotional Exhaustion 2.61 1.17 .31 -1.38

Emotional Intelligence 2.65 1.38 .41 -1.63

Followers’ Job Satisfaction 3.43 1.27 -.65 -1.20

Table 6 presents the descriptive statistics of the study variables. It shows the mean values,
standard deviations of all under study variables with acceptable range of skewness and
kurtosis. Mean values of surface acting, deep acting and display of genuine emotions are
2.35, 3.37, 3.57 respectively. Table 6 also demonstrates skewness and kurtosis values which
are in acceptable range. Normality was examined through skewness, kurtosis and histograms
(Munro, 2005). Scores all constructs were normally distributed because the values for
skewness and kurtosis between -2 to +2 are acceptable to prove the normal distribution.

Table 7:
Alpha Reliability Coefficients of All Scales (N= 311 )
Variables No. of Items Alpha Coefficient

Surface Acting 7 0.86

Deep Acting 4 0.88

Display of Genuine Emotion 8 0.88

Leaders’ Emotional Exhaustion 6 0.89

Leaders’ Job Satisfaction 3 0.92

Emotional Intelligence 16 0.89

Perceived Transformational Leadership 20 0.92

Followers’ Emotional Engagement 4 0.93

Followers’ Job Satisfaction 3 0.92

Reliability implies inter-item consistency of scale. Reliability of instruments assessed by


calculating the alpha coefficients and inter-item correlation of under study variables. Table 7
indicates the reliability analysis by using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Data of this study
yields the coefficient alpha value are ……..
Table 8:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Surface Acting 1
2 Deep Acting -.252** 1
3 Display of Genuine Emotion -.279** .664** 1
4 Leaders’ Emotional Exhaustion .570** -.364** -.390** 1
5 Leaders’ Job Satisfaction -.530** .500** .537 **
-.681** 1
6 Emotional Intelligence -.103 .289** .223 **
-.146 .365**
**
1
7 Followers’ Job Satisfaction -.531** .502** .548 ** **
-.540 .582 **
.375** .588**
Correlation Matrix

Table 8 signifies the correlation between under study variables. This correlation matrix
identifies that surface acting has highly significant positive correlation with leaders’
emotional exhaustion (r=0.57, p<.05). In addition correlation matrix indicates that display of
genuine emotions has significant negative correlation with leaders’ emotional exhaustion (r=
-0.39, p<.05).

You might also like