Benchmarking Process
Benchmarking Process
ME14 1329
Maintenance Management
Gilang Rahadian (04211740000020)
Work Book 5:
5
Major Maintenance Business Process
Part 2
Course
Instructor:
Dwi
Priyanta
Department of Marine Engineering – ITS
CONTENTS
1. Introduction.................................................................................................3
2. Maintenance Management Process and Equipment Criticality Overview...4
3. Methodology for Risk-Based Maintenance Management...........................5
4. Maintenance Management Process: A Global View....................................6
4.1. Maintenance Planning.........................................................................7
4.2. Spare Parts...........................................................................................7
4.3. Personnel and Resources.....................................................................7
5. Consequence Classification / Criticality Analysis.........................................8
6. Establishing Maintenance Program.............................................................9
7. Reference..................................................................................................10
The Icon
Information icon; instruction icon
1. Introduction
Read Norsok Z-008 (Edition 3, June 2011) Risk based maintenance and
consequence classification carefully.
1. Determine the purpose of NORSOK Z-008.
Answer :
Answer :
Figure 1 : Maintenance Management Process
Figure 2 : Consequence Classification Process
Figure 3 : Establishing maintenance programme for new plant
The relations among those figures are figure 2 explain how to classified
the equipment based on its function. After we classified the
equipment, we must determine what kind of maintenance that
needed for each classification.
3. Methodology for Risk-Based Maintenance
Management
Answer :
Answer :
12. Redraw work flow for evaluation of spare parts (Figure 6).
13. Explain detail content in each box of work flow for evaluation of
spare parts (the category of spare parts; location and holding;
reorder level and order quantity).
Answer:
11. The spare part assessment shall be based on results from the
consequence classification. The demand rate and which spare
parts are needed for corrective maintenance is more challenging
to be estimated.
12. Workflow for Evaluation of Spare Parts
13. Spare parts can be categorized as follows:
a. Capital Spare parts:
Vital to the function of the plant, but unlikely to suffer a
fault during the lifetime of the equipment.
Delivered with unacceptably long lead time from the
supplier and usually very expensive
Often these spare parts are characterized by a
substantially lower cost if they are included with the initial
order of the system package.
b. Operational Spare Parts
Spare parts required to maintain the operational and
safety capabilities of the equipment during its normal
operational lifetime.
c. Consumables
Item or material that is not item specific and intended for
use only once (non-repairable).
Answer :
The type of personnel should be involved, are:
a. Maintenance personnel with specific experience from
different type of systems/equipment. Typically this will
involve mechanical, instrument, electrical and corrosion
inception qualification on senior level.
b. Maintenance planners and maintenance supervisors.
c. Operation and process personnel with process experience
handling the production impact of a failure.
d. Personnel with specific experience related to risk assessment
and maintenance analysis.
e. Maintenance engineers.
5. Consequence Classification / Criticality Analysis
15. Read and Study carefully section 7 of Norsok Z-008 (edition 3, June
2011) and redraw Figure 2. This Figure shows the flow on how to
classify the equipment before its maintenance program
established.
17. Read and Study carefully section 7 of Norsok Z-008 (edition 3, June
2011), briefly explained what activities should be done in each
block listed in Figure 2.
Answer:
15.
17. The Steps :
1. Technical Hierarchy Established the technical hierarchy used
to identify systems and equipment.
2. Identify MF’s Each plant system should be divided into a
number of MF’s covering the entire system.
3. Identify Sub Functions MF’s are split into sub functions by
standardized for typical process equipment.
4. Assign MF Redundancy This step shall be specified.
5. Assign MF Consequences The entire MF failure
consequences is no longer be able to perform its required
functions.
6. Assign Sub Function Redundancy The number of parallel
units and capacity per unit shall be stipulated.
7. Assign Sub Function Consequences Sub function is assessed
with respect to HSE, production and cost.
8. Input from other analyses Structures/pipelines and risers.
9. Equipment mapping to function The equipment carrying out
the sub functions shall be assigned to the respective sub
functions.
6. Establishing Maintenance Program
Answer :
B. Safety functions
For safety functions with given availability requirements, there
exists models for how to estimate testing time, see OLF 070 or IEC
61508.
C. Generic Concepts
The next step is to assess if the equipment has common definitions.
D. Adjustment of GMCs
In the actual case, the generic concepts should be evaluated in view
of the plant's production value (deferred production) and its repair
capacity (manufacturing, spare parts and equipment) to manage the
most common defects.