Reading Passage 1: IELTS Recent Actual Test With Answers (Vol 5)
Reading Passage 1: IELTS Recent Actual Test With Answers (Vol 5)
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on
Reading Passage 1 below.
Athfield had this unique opportunity because her team, comprised of scientists
and filmmakers, were in Cambodia working on a documentary. The team was
trying to discover evidence to prove a controversial claim in history: that
Cambodia was the resting place for the famous royal family of Angkor. At that
time, written records and historic accounts conflicted on the true resting
place. Many people across the world disagreed over where the final resting
place was. For the first time, Athfield and her team had a chance to use
radiocarbon dating to find new evidence. They had a chance to solve the
historic mystery that many had been arguing over for years.
Athfield and her team conducted radiocarbon dating of many of the ancient
objects found in the historic site of Angkor Wat. Nancy found the history of
Angkor went back to as early as 1620. According to historic records, the
remains of the Angkor royal family were much younger than that, so this
evidence cast a lot of doubt as to the status of the ancient remains. The
lesearch ultimately raised more questions. If the remains were not of the royal
family, then whose remains were being kept in the ancient site? Athfield’s team
left Cambodia with more questions unanswered. Since Athfield’s team studied
the remains, new remains have been unearthed at the ancient site of Angkor
Wat, so it is possible that these new remains could be the true remains of the
royal family. Nancy wished to come back to continue her research one day.
In her early years, the career of Athfield was very unconventional. She didn’t
start her career as a scientist. At the beginning, she would take any kind of job
to pay her bills. Most of them were low-paying jobs or brief Community service
opportunities. She worked often but didn’t know what path she would
ultimately take. But eventually, her friend suggested that Athfield invest in
getting a degree. The friend recommended that Athfield attend a nearby
university. Though doubtful of her own qualifications, she applied and was
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 2
eventually accepted by the school. It was there that she met Willard Libby, the
inventor of radiocarbon dating. She took his class and soon had the opportunity
to complete hands-on research. She soon realised that science was
her passion. After graduation, she quickly found a job in a research institution.
But Athfield’s interest in scientific laboratories wasn’t her only interest. She
didn’t settle down in New Zealand. Instead, she expanded her areas of
expertise. Athfield eventually joined the field of Anthropology, the study of
human societies, and became a well-qualified archaeologist. It was during her
blossoming career as an archaeologist that Athfield became involved with
the famous Cambodia project. Even as the filmmakers ran out of funding and
left Cambodia, Athfield continued to stay and continue her research.
In 2003, the film was finished in uncertain conclusions, but Nancy continued
her research on the ancient ruins of Angkor Wat. This research was not always
easy. Her research was often delayed by lack of funding, and government
paperwork. Despite her struggles, she committed to finishing her research.
Finally, she made a breakthrough. Using radiocarbon dating,
Athfield completed a database for the materials found in Cambodia. As a
newcomer to Cambodia, she lacked a complete knowledge of Cambodian
geology, which made this feat even more difficult. Through steady
determination and ingenuity, Athfield finally completed the database.
Though many did not believe she could finish, her research now remains an
influential and tremendous contribution to geological sciences in Cambodia. In
the future, radiocarbon dating continues to be a valuable research skill.
Athfield will be remembered as one of the first to bring this scientific method to
the study of the ancient ruins of Angkor Wat.
Questions 1-7
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 3
Passage 1?
Questions 8-13
Complete the flow-chart below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer. Write your
answers in boxes 8-13 on your answer sheet.
Willard Billy later helped Nancy to find that she was interested in science.
Her PhD degree was researching when a kind of 9 , first went into New
Zealand.
Her research showed that the subject’s 10 accounted for the fault in
the earlier research.
When she returned Cambodia, the lack of 12 was a barrier for her
research.
After that, the lack of a detailed map of the geology of Cambodia became a
hindrance of her research.
Stress of Workplace
A
How busy is too busy? For some it means having to miss the occasional long
lunch; for others it means missing lunch altogether. For a few, it is hot being
able to take a “sickie” once a month. Then there is a group of people for whom
working every evening and weekend is normal, and franticness is the tempo of
their lives. For most senior executives, workloads swing between extremely
busy and frenzied. The vice-president of the management consultancy AT
Kearney and its head of telecommunications for the Asia-Pacific region, Neil
Plumridge, says his work weeks vary from a “manageable” 45 hours to 80
hours, but average 60 hours.
Three warning signs alert Plumridge about his workload: sleep, scheduling and
family. He knows he has too much on when he gets less than six hours of sleep
for three consecutive nights; when he is constantly having to reschedule
appointments; “and the third one is on the family side”, says Plumridge, the
father of a three-year-old daughter, and expecting a second child in October.
“If I happen to miss a birthday or anniversary, I know things are out of control.”
Being “too busy” is highly subjective. But for any individual, the perception of
being too busy over a prolonged period can start showing up as stress:
Recent research, such as last year’s study of public servants by the British
epidemiologist Sir Michael Marmot, shows the most important predictor of
stress is the level of job control a person has. This debunks the theory that
stress is the prerogative of high-achieving executives with type-A
personalities and crazy working hours. Instead, Marmot’s and other research
reveals they have the best kind of job: one that combines high demands
(challenging work) with high control (autonomy). “The worst jobs are those that
combine high demands and low control. People with demanding jobs but little
autonomy have up to four times the probability of depression and more than
double the risk of heart disease,” LaMontagne says. “Those two alone count for
an enormous part of chronic diseases, and they represent a potentially
preventable part.” Overseas, particularly in Europe, such research is leading
companies to redesign organisational practices to increase employees’
autonomy, cutting absenteeism and lifting productivity.
Questions 14-18
Look at the following statements (Questions 14-18) and the list of people
below. Match each statement with the correct person, A-D.
Write the correct letter, A-D, in boxes 14-18 on your answer sheet.
14
Work stress usually happens in the high level of a
business.
15
More people involved would be beneficial for stress
relief.
16
Temporary holiday sometimes doesn’t mean less work.
17
Stress leads to a wrong direction when trying to satisfy
customers.
18
It is commonly accepted that stress at present is more
severe than in the future.
List of People
A Jan Eisner
B Vanessa Stoykov
C Gal Zauberman
D Neil Plumridge
Questions 19-21
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 9
Questions 19-21
Choose the correct letter, A,B,C or D.
D alteration of appointment
C lower expectation
A Medical test can only reveal part of the data needed to cope
with stress
Questions 22-26
Complete the summary below.
The literary pendulum has swung these days. Different critics have different
opinions towards Robert Louis Stevenson’s works. Though today, Stevenson is
one of the most translated authors in the world, his works have sustained a
wide variety of negative criticism throughout his life. It was like a complete
reversal of polarity—from highly positive to slightly less positive to clearly
negative; after being highly praised as a great writer, he became an example
of an author with corrupt ethics and lack of moral. Many literary critics passed
his works off as children’s stories or horror stories, and thought to have little
One of the main reasons why Stevenson’s literary works attracted so much
criticism was due to the genre of his writing. Stevenson mainly wrote
adventure stories, which was part of a popular and entertaining writing fad at
the time. Many of us believe adventure stories are exciting, offers engaging
characters, action, and mystery but ultimately can’t teach moral principles.
The plot points are one-dimensional and rarely offer a deeper moral meaning,
instead focusing on exciting and shocking plot twists and thrilling events. His
works were even criticised by fellow authors. Though Stevenson’s works have
deeply influenced Oscar Wilde, Wilde often joked that Stevenson would have
written better works if he wasn’t born in Scotland. Other authors came to
Stevenson’s defence, including Galsworthy who claimed that Stevenson is a
greater writer than Thomas Hardy.
Despite much debate of Stevenson’s writing topics, his writing was not the only
source of attention for critics. Stevenson’s personal life often attracted a lot of
attention from his fans and critics alike. Some even argue that his personal life
eventually outshone his writing. Stevenson had been plagued with health
problems his whole life, and often had to live in much warmer climates than
the cold, dreary weather of Scotland in order to recover. So he took his family
to a south pacific island Samoa, which was a controversial decision at that
time. However, Stevenson did not regret the decision. The sea air and thrill of
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 13
adventure complimented the themes of his writing, and for a time restored his
health. From there, Stevenson gained a love of travelling, and for nearly three
years he wandered the eastern and central Pacific. Much of his works reflected
this love of travel and adventure that Stevenson experienced in the Pacific
islands. It was as a result of this biographical attention that the feeling grew
that interest in Stevenson’s life had taken the place of interest in his works.
Whether critics focus on his writing subjects, his religious beliefs, or his
eccentric lifestyle of travel and adventure, people from the past and present
have different opinions about Stevenson as an author. Today, he remains a
controversial yet widely popular figure in Western literature.
Questions 27-31
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Questions 32-35
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading
Passage 3?
32
Although Oscar Wilde admired Robert Louis
Stevenson very much, he believed Stevenson could have written greater
works.
33
Robert Louis Stevenson encouraged Oscar Wilde to
start writing at first.
34
Galsworthy thought Hardy is greater writer than
Stevenson is.
35
Critics only paid attention to Robert Louis
Stevenson’s writing topics.
Questions 36-40
Complete the notes using the list of words, A-I, below.
Write the correct letter, A-I, in boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet.
A natural ability
B romance
C colorful language
D critical acclaim
E humor
F technical control
G storytelling
H depth
I human nature
7 TRUE 8 university/college
9 rat 10 diet
11 archaeologist 12 funding
13 database 14 A
15 D 16 B
17 D 18 C
19 B 20 D
21 A 22 workplace injury
25 golf 26 massage
27 D 28 D
29 B 30 A
31 C 32 TRUE
35 FALSE 36 F
37 A 38 H
39 G 40 I
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 17