Revisiting Agile Teams After An Abrupt Shift To Remote
Revisiting Agile Teams After An Abrupt Shift To Remote
© AleksandarNakic/Getty Images
April 2020
As organizations adapt to the ongoing COVID-19 kinds of targeted actions agile leaders can take
crisis, their agile teams can be a real source of to sustain their people and culture and recalibrate
competitive advantage. Such teams1 are typically their processes.
well suited to periods of disruption, given their
ability to adapt to fast-changing business priorities,
disruptive technology, and digitization. Sustaining the people and culture
of a remote agile team
But the abrupt shift to remote working in response Remote work for agile teams requires a
to the coronavirus has challenged the typical considerable shift in work culture. Without the
approach to managing agile teams. Traditionally, seamless access to colleagues afforded by frequent,
such teams thrive when team members are in-person team events, meals, and coffee chats, it
co-located, with close-knit groups all working in the can be harder to sustain the kind of camaraderie,
same place. Co-location allows frequent in-person community, and trust that comes more easily to
contact, quickly builds trust, simplifies problem co-located teams. It also takes more purposeful
solving, encourages instant communication, and effort to create a unified one-team experience,
enables fast-paced decision making.2 And while we encourage bonding among existing team members,
know from experience that agile teams that have or onboard new ones, or even to track and develop
worked remotely from the start can be as effective, the very spontaneous ideas and innovation
the sudden transition of co-located teams to a fully that makes agile so powerful to begin with. And
remote approach can reduce cohesion and increase these challenges are complicated by the unique
inefficiency (Exhibit 1). circumstances of the current health crisis. Teams
working from their living rooms or their dining-room
The good news is that while it takes real work, much tables are often sharing that space with children or
of what leads agile teams to lose productivity when other family members also working remotely.
they go remote can be addressed. In fact, if the
necessary technology is in place, a talented remote Teams already operating remotely before the
GEScan
team 2020deliver just as much value as co-located crisis are less likely to struggle, given their ability
Revisiting
teams. agile
Assuming teams
a firm’s after an
IT function will abrupt shift to
handle the tohandle
remote ambiguity without losing focus and to
organization’s
Exhibit 1 oftechnology,
3 we’ll focus here on the concentrate on outcomes over processes. But many
Exhibit 1
The experience of remote working can lead to inefficiency and reduced cohesion.
Experience of remote work, % of respondents
Source: Harvard Business Review; Workplace Trends; Zoltán Lippényi and Tanja van der Lippe, “Co-workers working from home and
individual and team performance,” New Technology, Work and Employment, March 2020, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp. 60–79
1
Small, independent, multidisciplinary organizational units focused on agile, high-value, project-based work.
2
Daniel Brosseau, Sherina Ebrahim, Chistopher Handscomb, and Shail Thaker, “The journey to an agile organization,” May 2019, McKinsey.com.
Exhibit 2
Sprint Agree on goals and Decentralization is a barrier for Break longer meetings into two—
planning scope of commitment dynamic communication one to discuss stories and the other
Split up the work agree on refined stories
Encourage prep work ahead of
time, and agree on what can be
done offline
Backlog Update and refine Difficult to drive complex problem- Ensure access and familiarity with
refinement backlog solving with content-heavy whiteboarding or collaboration
Define plan to mitigate whiteboarding tools and document information
impediments Difficult to align a large group in real time so team members can
follow along
Host smaller sessions with
functionally aligned groups and then
share progress with the larger group
Sprint Reflect on team Video might affect the perception of Use anonymous digital tools and
retrospective interaction safe environment for retrospective make sure team members know
Identify opportunities conversations about it
to improve working Let team members pick video or
style audio interaction mode
But approaches to keep team members engaged They also need to be purposeful at engaging
aren’t unique to agile teams, even if the imperative external customers and stakeholders. They must be
may be more acutely felt. At one US financial transparent and reassuring in their communication
institution, for example, a scrum master realized that about team performance and objectives. The
staring at a video screen for more than a couple of tools and approaches can vary (Exhibit 3). But the
hours was draining without the dynamic interaction individuals and interactions should be the main
of an in-person workshop. Her solution? For longer consideration. Leaders need to show, in their tone
meetings, she began to schedule in a ten- to and approach, that everyone is in this together.
15-minute exercise break every 90 minutes—with
a shared videoconference tool to recommend At one insurance company, for example, the product
different exercises. owner does five-minute individual check-ins with
her team members throughout the week, asking if
Adapting leadership approach there’s anything she can assist with or any problems
GES 2020
The core mission of leadership stays the same, she can help trouble shoot. She’s also scheduled
Revisiting agile teams after an abrupt shift to remote
whether co-located or remote. But leaders need to sessions with customers and stakeholders every
Exhibit 3 of 3
Exhibit 3
Various approaches can help teams engage customers and external stakeholders.
Tools Virtual sessions to continue to Emails and broadcast messaging Rethinking customer and external
engage and solicit feedback from Social media stakeholder engagement model
individual customers, focus Live portals for updated health, Simplified surveys and polls, that
groups, suppliers, partners, and operations, and engagement help provide deeper insights
other stakeholders guidelines 1–1 calls with customers and
Proactive sprint demos partners
Offering specialized perks and
services
Santiago Comella-Dorda is a partner in McKinsey’s Boston office, Lavkesh Garg is an associate partner in the Silicon Valley
office, and Suman Thareja and Belkis Vasquez-McCall are partners in the New Jersey office.
The authors wish to thank Geet Chandratre, Alex Guo, Ashok Mohanty, Ahmad Zaidi, and the McKinsey Agile Tribe for their
contributions to this article.