The Daily Rhythm of Activity of The Cockroach, Blatta Orientalis L
The Daily Rhythm of Activity of The Cockroach, Blatta Orientalis L
BY D. L. GUNN
From the Zoology Department, University of Birmingham
I. INTRODUCTION
IN the last few years there has been an increasing interest in animal rhythms.
Various aspects of the subject have been reviewed by Szymanski (1920), Fox (1923),
Hoffmann (1926), Richter (1927), AmirthaUngam (1928), Stein-Beling (1935),
Scott (1936), Gunn et al. (1937), Pie'ron (1937) and Kalmus (1938a, b). This paper
is concerned with the daily rhythm in the locomotory activity of the cockroach,
Blatta orientaUs L. Those who are familiar with this insect in its natural haunts
are agreed that it comes out and is active only at night. Can this rhythm of nocturnal
activity be reproduced under experimental conditions and can it be controlled
experimentally? Szymanski (1914) and Wille (1920) showed that it could be
reproduced but they did not attempt to control it.
20 10 20 10 20
1938 Nov. Mar. Apr. 1939
Fig. 1. Daily activity, measured with the aktograph, of two cockroaches from just after the last
moult until death. Indications for both parts of the figure: Alt. = alternating light and darkness,
12 hr. each per day; Alt. noise = rattling noise for la hr. per day, in continuous darkness; Light
and Dark = continuous light and darkness respectively; the spots near the top of the figure indicate
the dates on which the food was changed, etc.
experiments. The distance they walked in a day varied from six to 1300 journeys,
with an average of about 150, corresponding very roughly to 1^-300 m. per day
(average about 40 m. per day). Fig. 1 shows the relation of this daily activity to the
age of the animals and the conditions of light.
It is easy to read several long-period rhythms into these two records, but such
rhythms do not coincide for the two animals, and in any case cannot be correlated
with any external changes. There are, however, two points of resemblance: for
about a week after the cerci of the two cockroaches were cut off (12 December)
both animals were rather inactive; in the second place, in each case impending
jBB-xviiiii *"
270 D. L. GUNN
death was signalized by a few days of tremendous activity about a fortnight before
death.
It is surprising to find that light had little, if any, effect on the total activity
per day. Thus, for these two animals, omitting the periods which were exceptional
because of amputations or approaching death, the average number of journeys per
day for the whole period was 146 (4876 hr.). The average for alternating light and
darkness was 156, for continuous light for periods of upwards of a fortnight at a
time it was 158 and for continuous darkness it was 125 journeys per day. The figure
for continuous darkness is for one animal only, and that towards the end of its
life. For the first month in continuous darkness the average is 145 journeys per day,
so it would not be proper to conclude that continuous darkness has any depressing
effect.
It can be stated, however, that prolonged illumination under these experimental
conditions has no great depressing effect on activity. Neither did the onset of
continuous light have any observable effect (Fig. 1). The rise in activity on one of
the two occasions when continuous light was replaced by alternating light and
darkness can be correlated just as well with recovery from the depressing effect of
cereal amputation. Light, then, appears to have no effect on total activity per day
but, as is shown below, daily variations in light certainly have a great effect on the
time of day at which the activity occurs.
In passing, it may be placed on record that in these experiments one animal
walked very approximately 3^ km. (14,500 journeys) in 100 days and the other
5^ km. (22,000 journeys) in 155 days.
38 AM 2
38AM3
between the rhythmical occurrence of darkness, whenever that starts during the
day (04, 11 or 18 hr.), and the rhythm of high activity. In fact, by suitable adjust-
ment of the time of darkness, the high daily activity of the cockroach can be made
to occur when one pleases. Mellanby (1940) has obtained a similar result in a study
of cockroaches in a natural infestation. Fig. 3 a shows that this rhythm starts
without delay as soon as continuous light is replaced by alternating light and
darkness (see below).
Time
Fig. 3 a. The initiation of rhythmic activity immediately the alternation of light and darkness begins.
Average number of journeys in each hour in four experiments which were put together irrespective
of the time by the clock; the onset of darkness (diagonal shading) on the fourth day was made to
coincide for the four experiments.
Time
Fig. 3 b. The slow disappearance of the daily rhythm of activity in continuous light. In the first
week shown there was an altematiot of light and darkness. Average of four experiments put
together as in Fig. 3 a. Diagonal lines indicate the dark periods.
0 L
\
Jl JL A
5 Feb.
iJ 1
I
11 _L u
9 Feb.
r
ilk
a
.5
20
i Time
k
Fig. 4. The disappearance of the daily rhythm of activity in constant darkness. Individual record
from animal numbered 38 AM 3. During the first week (top) there was an alternation of light and
darkness (iz hr. each) and from 04 hr. on 4 February onwards there was continuous darkness.
between 03 and 15 hr. in the first two and between 12 and 24 hr. in the last two
periods. During the latter, there was a motor making a continuous rattling noise
between 06 and 18 hr.; but it seems unlikely that this could have affected the
animal, for the aktograph was well buffered and the cerci had been cut off. Hair
sensilla on the cerci have an auditory function (Pumphrey, 1940).
The excess over 50% shown by the activity during the 12 hr. period of greatest
activity is statistically significant. The active period did not tend to fall into the
same part of the day in different experiments, but most of the experiments were
not carried on for long enough to allow the period of slightly higher activity to
Daily Rhythm of Activity of the Cockroach 275
In one experiment lasting 4 days, the 12 hr. darkness was followed each day
by only 8 hr. of light, so that darkness came on 4 hr. earlier each day. On the
first 2 days activity started 2 hr. after dark, on the third day 4 hr. after dark and
on the fourth day 8 hr. after dark. Thus the onset of activity did occur earlier
than previously, but it did not shift as much as the onset of darkness.
A number of individuals were first tested in continuous light (250 C ) ; of these,
three trapped specimens which had been kept in an open dish in an ordinary room
did not show any rhythm from the start. Perhaps the rise of temperature to 25° C.
upset the internal "clock" of these animals. On the other hand, of seven animals
which had been bred from the egg inside a dark oven at 250 C , three showed a
clear rhythm in continuous light, two a doubtful one, one none at all, while the
remaining animal was quite inactive. No doubt the oven was not quite light proof,
while all manipulation during rearing—cleaning, feeding, etc.—was carried out in
daylight hours, so these experiments cannot safely be used as evidence about the
method of acquisition of the tendency to show a rhythm.
VII. DISCUSSION
Szymanski (1914) with Blatta orientaUs and Wille (1920) with Blatella (Phyllo-
dronria) germanica did ten aktograph experiments each, each with one animal at
a time and lasting 24 hr. Both found an average of 3 hours' activity, starting at
15.30 hr. at the earliest and ending at 00.30 hr. at the latest. The temperature varied
around 200 C. In my experiments at 250 C. the active period lasted longer than
this, being seldom less than 6 hr. Szymanski also recorded a short period of activity
at about 06 hr. in the morning, and because of this second period he regarded the
cockroach a9 polyphasic (Szymanski, 1920). Truly polyphasic animals, like mice,
have many short periods of activity each day. My experiments indicate that the
cockroach is really monophasic.
Neither of these authors attempted to analyse the cockroach's activity rhythm.
A number of authors, on largely or entirely theoretical grounds, have considered
that diurnal changes of temperature and humidity provide both the stimulus for
the rhythm and the evolutionary reason for its existence (Picard, 1912; Necheles,
1927; Crawford, 1934). It may be that factors other than light can be used to
control the rhythm, but so far light has been found to be potent and other factors
impotent in a number of cases (Kalmus, 1938a, b). I hope to investigate these and
other questions at a more suitable time. For example, can rhythms of periods other
than 24 hr. be set up? Will a short pulse of half an hour's darkness each day suffice
to maintain a rhythm? Would rhythm9 occur if there were no correlation between
danger and light in the life of the individual ? What is the internal clock, especially
for a persistent rhythm? Does the light act through the compound eyes?
Szymanski (1914) carried out two experiments which are of considerable
importance. In one of these, half the aktograph chamber was shaded and half
lighted all the time, while in the other, half was warmed and the other half not
warmed. In both experiments, during its active period the cockroach walked
276 D. L. GUNN
indifferently in the two halves of the chamber. During this time, the well-known
responses to light and temperature seem to have disappeared. Mellanby (1940)
found, however, that in a natural infestation—in a less limited space than is
available in an aktograph—cockroaches did not emerge into a continuously lighted
room. They may have emerged in other rooms nearby or they may have been active
inside the cavities in the wall.
Esterley (1917) showed that certain marine plankton copepods tended to come
to the top of a long vertical tube in the evening, even though kept in continuous
darkness at an even temperature for 2 days. This accentuation of geo-negative
behaviour occurred with a diurnal rhythm even in the absence of external clues.
Broadly speaking, it is thus to be expected that many animals which show a
diurnal rhythm will behave differently according to the phase in which they are
tested. Most of the work on behaviour is done during the daytime, and this work
on the cockroach suggests that the nocturnal phase can be investigated without
doing more than check experiments at night. In the cockroach, at any rate, the
rhythm can be reversed by a suitable alternation of light and darkness and then
for a few days the rhythm persists almost in full in continuous light. Experiments
on behaviour during the active phase can then be done in the daytime during these
few days. In the experiments described here, the institution of a new rhythm was
always preceded by a period of continuous light; this may not be necessary.
VIII. SUMMARY
1. In an aktograph at 25-5° C , at upwards of 75 % relative humidity and with
food present, the average locomotory activity of the cockroach per day does not
depend on whether there is continuous light for weeks, or continuous darkness, or
a daily alternation of light and darkness.
2. When temperature and humidity do not vary during the day and other
factors are kept as constant as possible, the cockroach's activity can be largely
concentrated into any desired half of the day, simply by suitably adjusting the time
of onset of the half-day's darkness. A rhythm can thus be set up, so that the main
activity occurs at the same hours each day.
3. This activity rhythm persists for some days in continuous light or con-
tinuous darkness, but eventually activity becomes much more evenly spread over
the whole day, leaving only a slight residual rhythm which is unrelated to the
previous conspicuous one. A new conspicuous rhythm can then be started at once
by alternation of light and darkness.
4. There are indications that animal responses to physical stimuli may depend
to a considerable extent on whether the animal is in the active or the inactive phase
of its daily cycle. A method is suggested for making it possible to study the
nocturnal phase during the daytime.
I have enjoyed the pleasure and benefit of discussing this work with Dr Kenneth
Mellanby and of comparing his unpublished results with mine.
Daily Rhythm of Activity of the Cockroach 277
REFERENCES
AMIRTHALINGAM, C. (1938). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 18, 605-41.
CRAWFORD, S. C. (1934). Quart. Rev. Biol. 9, 201-14.
ESTERLEY, C. O. (1917). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 16, 393-400.
Fox, H. M. (1923). Proc. roy. Soc. B, 95, 523-50.
GUNN, D. L. (1934). Z. vergl. Pkysiol. 20, 617-25.
(i937)- J- exp- Biol. 14, 178-86.
GUNN, D. L., JENKIN, P. M. & GUNN, A. L. (1937). J. Obstet. Gynaec. 35, 839-79.
GUNN, D. L. & KENNEDY, J. S. (1936). J. exp. Biol. 13, 450-9.
HOFFMANN, R. W. (1926). Handb. norm. path. Physiol. 17, 644-58.
KALMUS, H. (19380). Riv. Biol. 24, 191-225.
(19386). Z. vergl. Pkysiol. 25, 494-508.
MELLANBY, K. (1940). J. exp. Biol. 17, 278-85.
NECHELES, H. (1927). Chin. J. Physiol. 1, 143-56.
PICARD, F. (1912). Bull. set. Fr. Belg. 46, 235-47.
PIERON, H. (1937). J. Psychol. norm, pathol. 34, 398-412.
PUMPHREY, R. J. (1940). Biol. Rev. 15, 107-32.
RAU, P. (1924). Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis, 25, 57-79.
RICHTER, C. P. (1927). Quart. Rev. Biol. 2, 307-43.
SCOTT, W. N. (1936). Trans, roy. ent. Soc. 85, 303-30.
STEIN-BELING, I. VON (1935). Biol. Rev. 10, 18-41.
SZYMANSKI, J. S. (1914). Pfltig. Arch. ges. Physiol. 158, 343-85.
(1920). Z. allg. Physiol. 18, 105-62.
WILLE, J. (1920). Biologie und Bekfimpfung der deutschen Schabe (Phyllodromia germanica L.)
Pp. 140. Berlin: Paul Parey. Beiheft zu Z. angew. Ent. 7.