What Is A Break-Even Analysis?
What Is A Break-Even Analysis?
A break-even analysis is a financial tool which helps you to determine at what stage your company, or a
new service or a product, will be profitable. In other words, it’s a financial calculation for determining the
number of products or services a company should sell to cover its costs (particularly fixed costs). Break-
even is a situation where you are neither making money nor losing money, but all your costs have been
covered.
Break-even analysis is useful in studying the relation between the variable cost, fixed cost and revenue.
Generally, a company with low fixed costs will have a low break-even point of sale. For an example, a
company has a fixed cost of Rs.0 (zero) will automatically have broken even upon the first sale of its
product.
Pricing analysis: Minimize or eliminate the use of coupons or other price reductions offers,
since such promotional strategies increase the breakeven point.
Technology analysis: Implementing any technology that can enhance the business
efficiency, thus increasing capacity with no extra cost.
Cost analysis: Reviewing all fixed costs constantly to verify if any can be eliminated can
surely help. Also, review the total variable costs to see if they can be eliminated. This analysis will increase
the margin and reduce the breakeven point.
Margin analysis: Push sales of the highest-margin (high contribution earning) items and pay
close attention to product margins, thus reducing the breakeven point.
Outsourcing: If an activity consists of a fixed cost, try to outsource such activity (whenever
possible), which reduces the breakeven point.
PROJECT APPRAISAL
Definition
Project appraisal is the structured process of assessing the viability of a project or proposal.
It involves calculating the feasibility of the project before committing resources to it. It is a
tool that company’s use for choosing the best project that would help them to attain their
goal. Project appraisal often involves making comparison between various options and this
done by making use of any decision technique or economic appraisal technique.
Project appraisal is a tool which is also used by companies to review the projects completed
by it. This is done to know the effect of each project on the company. This means that the
project appraisal is done to know, how much the company has invested on the project and in
return how much it is gaining from it.
Project Appraisal is a consistent process of reviewing a given project and evaluating its content to approve
or reject this project, through analyzing the problem or need to be addressed by the project, generating
solution options (alternatives) for solving the problem, selecting the most feasible option, conducting a
feasibility analysis of that option, creating the solution statement, and identifying all people and
organizations concerned with or affected by the project and its expected outcomes. It is an attempt to justify
the project through analysis, which is a way to determine project feasibility and cost-effectiveness.
Project appraisal follows the project formulation phase resulting in the preparation of feasibility report (FR). The
main objective of project appraisal is to ultimately decide whether the project proposed/sponsored in the FR has to
be accepted for Capital Investment, or be rejected. The initial appraisal of the project sponsored also aims at, if need
be, recommending the steps or ways in which the project can be redesigned or reformulated with a view to better
technical, financial, commercial and economic viabilities; also mitigate or minimize any adverse on negative
environmental impact. Thus, project appraisal is an essential tool for judicious investment decision-making, full and
complete data and information need to be documented/presented, and analyzed in the FR so as to facilitate the
appraisal authorities to carry out:
(i) Demand analysis to establish convincingly the need for the project,
(ii) (ii) Check on optimal location,
(iii) (iii) Technical analysis to determine whether the specification of technical parameters are
sound and realistic,
(iv) (iv) Financial analysis to assess whether the project proposal is financially viable,
(v) (v) Commercial analysis to establish the soundness of product or service specifications,
marketing plans, organization structure (both project and for operation),
(vi) (vi) Socio-economic analysis to determine whether the project is worthwhile to implement
from the point of view of the nation that is society at large and the economy as a whole, and
(vii) (vii) Environment and physiographical and ecological thresholds analysis which is concerned
with the identification of these constraints, and make the evaluation of chances of success (or
otherwise) which the project may have to face (these constraints). Internal consistency and
external compatibility are two basic attributes of a viable project.
Development oriented administration and forward looking management may have under
consideration, at any juncture or time, a number and variety of projects, resources being limited, a
choice has to be made. Project appraisal is warranted to assess the material attributes of an
investment proposition and to confirm the implications the project will pose for the sponsoring
authorities (system) as well as for systems with which it will have to co-exist after its
implementation
Capital Rationing
Capital rationing is essentially a management approach to allocating available funds across
multiple investment opportunities, increasing a company's bottom line. The company accepts
the combination of projects with the highest total net present value (NPV). The number one
goal of capital rationing is to ensure that a company does not over-invest in assets. Without
adequate rationing, a company might start realizing decreasingly low returns on investments
and may even face financial insolvency.
Capital rationing is a situation where a constraint or budget ceiling is placed on the total size
of capital expenditures during a particular period. Often firms draw up their capital budget
under the assumption that the availability of financial resources is limited.
Capital rationing refers to the selection of the investment proposals in a situation of constraint
on availability of capital funds, to maximize the wealth of the company by selecting those
projects which will maximize overall NPV of the concern.
In capital rationing situation a company may have to forego some of the projects whose IRR
is above the overall cost of the firm due to ceiling on budget allocation for the projects which
are eligible for capital investment. Capital rationing refers to a situation where a company
cannot undertake all positive NPV projects it has identified because of shortage of capital.
Under this situation, a decision maker is compelled to reject some of the viable projects
having positive net present value because of shortage of funds. It is known as a situation
involving capital rationing.
For example, suppose ABC Corp. has a cost of capital of 10% but that the company has
undertaken too many projects, many of which are incomplete. This causes the company's
actual return on investment to drop well below the 10% level. As a result, management
decides to place a cap on the number of new projects by raising the cost of capital for these
new projects to 15%. Starting fewer new projects would give the company more time and
resources to complete existing projects.