Group 3 Draft 645939163506197
Group 3 Draft 645939163506197
Group members:
Introduction
Substitutes are two goodsc for which an increase in the price of one leads to an increase in
the quantity demanded of the other. However, the underlying factors in selecting substitutes are
availability and price. The carbonated soft drinks industry is majorly dominated by two brands,
Coke and Pepsi. The two soft drinks brands are substitutes in nature such that a consumer has a
Both products are successful in the soft drink market. Therefore, Coca Cola and Pepsi are
perfect substitutes yet lacking any noticeable taste difference. Moreover, Cola soft drink product
has a very low involvement in the consumers market. Pepsi and Coca Cola are continuously
promotions.
Consequently, a nice look at the marketing actions for the two products as well as the
consumer reactions gives more insights to the products. In high consumption markets, price cuts
on the 300-ml segment as a strategy can help the two products. This is because the 300-ml
1
This chapter is adapted from Moraru, Mădălina. "The “positioning” concept and the fight between two
well-known brands Coca-Cola and Pepsi." Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media 3, no. 07
(2010): 47-62
segment is heavily dependent on returnable glass bottles. And Industry sources indicate that
Pepsi’s latest move to cut its prices was a critical decision meant to increase its volume sales. 2
The price cut by Pepsi to its returnable glass bottle of 300-ml to Rs 6 came during the
summer competition with its close competitor Coca Cola, and the price cut strategy is expected
to be extended to other markets. Whereas Pepsi has embarked on price cuts, Coca Cola still sells
its 300-ml glass bottle at Rs 8. Due to this price cut advantage, consumers are most likely going
to buy Pepsi as opposed to Coca Cola, leading to brand loyalty and continued consumption of
Pepsi. 3
Coca-Cola and Pepsi represent the same market and offer non-alcoholic beverages with
different flavors. This makes these brands competitive because they have the same target
audience and offer similar products. It is worth mentioning that Pepsi and Coke have been rivals
on the market of soda drinks, and throughout history, both brands used different marketing
Pepsi and Coca-Cola have similar demand curves due to the fact that they operate in the
same industry and set similar prices on their goods. It allows customers to choose the product to
their liking. It is safe to say that both brands are large corporations and do not have many other
2
This chapter is adapted from Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna. 2012. Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke?
Market Definition in Antitrust and IP. Georgetown Law Journal, 100, 2055. 1 U.S. DOJ and FTC (1992)
3
This chapter is adapted from Moraru, Mădălina. "The “positioning” concept and the fight between two
well-known brands Coca-Cola and Pepsi." Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media 3, no. 07
(2010): 47-62.
competitors on the market. However, Coca-Cola is the leader because they spend more on
advertising, and its market capitalization is over 30% more than Pepsi’s (Lovejoy sec.2). Also,
Coke has more followers on their social media pages than Pepsi. It is crucial because social
media platforms became a crucial tool that helps brands promote their goods and create unique
advertising campaigns that do not require much budget. At the same time, demand for these
As a result, Coca-Cola and Pepsi operate in the same industry and offer similar goods for
similar prices, which makes their demand curves similar. These are two large brands and main
rivals in the beverage market. However, according to statistics, the demand for Coke is more
considerable than for Pepsi. Also, it is worth mentioning that the demand for these products
Coca-Cola and Pepsi are long-time competitors, and two of the largest companies in the
beverage market. They take a considerable amount of the market share, and as they offer similar
goods, both brands have a similar primary goal, which is to attract customers and convince them
that their products are better. However, even though nowadays companies have more
possibilities for advertising, people tend to choose Coca-Cola over Pepsi more often.
Everybody knows that the Coca-Cola company operates for more than a century now.
Nonetheless, despite Pepsi being created eleven years after their competitor, they are still treated
as a young company, and people assume that younger generations always choose Pepsi over
Coke (Paracha et al. p.7). Both companies provide a wide range of beverages that allows
consumers to choose their favorite brand. The Coca-Cola company even tried to buy the Pepsi
Cola company and united them, but Pepsi declined the offer. According to the research, 259 out
of 400 questionnaires prefer Coca Cola, and 141 prefer Pepsi, which is 64.75% and 35.25%
considerably (Paracha et al. p.9). It shows that Coca-Cola has leading positions on the market. It
is worth noting that questionnaires belong to different populations, including both men and
Consumers have a wide range of opportunities to choose from, and sometimes it is hard
to predict an outcome and the leader of the market. However, the research shows that 64.75% of
soda drinkers prefer Coca-Cola over Pepsi for various reasons. These reasons might include
taste, advertising, habits, and personal preferences. As the Coca-Cola company spends more on
advertising, it might be a reason why consumers prefer their drinks more often.
It is no surprise that price plays a crucial role in the decision-making process when
potential consumers think about which product they want to choose. People consider different
factors, which are price, quality, the popularity of the product, taste, and the number of positive
emotions that they expect to have after the purchase. Companies set goals for their revenues, but
The term “consumer utility” represents the value that a particular product provides to the
customer. However, when the price does not significantly change between different brands,
consumers make decisions based on other options. For instance, in terms of revenue, Pepsi is a
more significant business, but the Coca-Cola company is more profitable. At the same time, in
2018, Coca-Cola had an operating margin of more than 27% over the past year, and Pepsi had
16.4%, which makes their operating profits similar (Tenebruso sec.3). Also, Pepsi has not much
more considerable amount of free cash flow, which shows that both of these large beverage
corporations have similar balance sheets. However, according to Wall Street, they expect Pepsi
to increase their annual earnings by 7.54% in the next five years, while Coca-Cola's earnings per
share are expected to rise by 7.23% annually (Tenebruso sec.3). Therefore, neither company has
Both companies are large corporations that know how to maintain their business, as they
operate for more than a century. Even though statistics show that Pepsi has more revenue, still,
the Coca-Cola company is more profitable. It means that considering different options, both
companies have similar balance sheets and the amount of their profits is also similar. As a result,
despite one company being a leader in some financial fortitude and the second being a leader in
Derive the income-consumption curve and the price-consumption curve and discuss.
the shape of these two graphs
For Price-Consumption Curve, an increase of the price of Coca Cola makes consumers to buy
less of it and more of Pepsi.
For Income-Consumption Curve, an increase in income makes consumers buy more Pepsi and
Coca Cola.
Conclusion
Various researches show that people prefer Coca-Cola over Pepsi. As mentioned before,
both companies represent the same industry, offer similar products, and set similar prices.
However, many people cannot tell the difference between flavors and often make the decision to
buy a soda drink based on their preference and loyalty to the brand.
Both companies operate for a long time and are primary competitors in the beverage
market. Also, both the Coca-Cola company and the Pepsi-cola company have experienced a
global expansion of their markets. Often, people consider Pepsi a younger brand that targets
students and children, although Coca-Cola is older for only eleven years. It is worth mentioning
that the Coca-Cola company likes to use this fact as a reference in their marketing campaigns,
which affect consumer’s perception. Coca-Cola spends more on advertising and promotion
campaigns than Pepsi, which results in a more considerable amount of loyal customers and more
social media followers. On the other hand, Pepsi fell for bankruptcy twice during its history, in
1923 and 1931 (Planes sec.1). However, the statistics show that nowadays, Coca-Cola and the
Pepsi-cola companies have similar financial fortitude and are the leaders between non-alcoholic
beverage manufacturers.
Therefore, the choice between Coca-Cola and Pepsi depends on the person’s individual
preferences. As Coca-Cola spends more on advertising, they have more profits, but Pepsi
maintained to get more substantial revenues. It is worth noting that Wall Street expects both
companies to increase their sales by similar percentages in future years, which means that
economists are positive that Coca-Cola and Pepsi are equally successful corporations. Thus, even
though Coca-Cola has a reputation for a more successful company, Pepsi is a decent rival for
them.
Works Cited
Moraru, Mădălina. "The “positioning” concept and the fight between two well-known brands
Coca-Cola and Pepsi." Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media 3, no. 07
(2010): 47-62.
Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke? Market Definition in Antitrust and IP. Georgetown Law
Journal, (2011): 100, 2055.
Lovejoy, James. “The Coke vs Pepsi Social Presence Showdown.” Brandwatch, 22 Mar. 2015,
www.brandwatch.com/blog/the-coke-vs-pepsi-social-presence-showdown/.
Paracha, Abdul Munam Jamil, et al. “Consumer Preference Coca Cola versus Pepsi-Cola .”
Global Journal of Management and Business Research, vol. 12, no. 12, 2012, pp. 7–10.,
https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume12/2-Consumer-Preference-Coca-Cola-
versus.pdf.
Planes, Alex. “How Coke Helped Create Pepsi, and Other Historic Market Moments.” The
known-story-of-how-coke-helped-create-p.aspx.
Tenebruso, Joe. “Better Buy: Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi.” The Motley Fool, 20 July 2018,
www.fool.com/investing/2018/07/20/better-buy-coca-cola-vs-pepsi.aspx.