Political Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) : The State-Like Role of Business To Address Governance Gap
Political Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) : The State-Like Role of Business To Address Governance Gap
Abstract
This article focuses on a novel idea newly introduced in the domain of Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) popularly known as Political Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR). In today’s globalized world,
business organizations are voluntarily addressing various socio-political concerns and engaging in activities
that previously were considered as the responsibilities of the government such as eradication of poverty,
supply of public goods, protection of environment, and reduction of gender, racial or ethnic inequality. It is
generally perceived that governments of different countries (in particular, developing and underdeveloped
countries) fail to perform these responsibilities in an efficient manner because of ‘governance gap’. As
business organizations have enough resources and money, they can contribute in narrowing the governance
gaps by performing state-like functions. By presenting evidences extracted from CSR or sustainability reports
of few Fortune 500 companies, this paper sheds light on the way these corporations are performing PCSR
and helping the governments to mitigate those gaps.
Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Political Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Political
Activity, Governance Gap, Fortune 500.
to address different social challenges in an efficient Donaldson, T. (2010). The values realignment in modern industrial
society. Business Ethics Quartrly, 20(4), 728-729.
manner because of ‘governance gaps’. As business
organizations have ample physical and financial Faleg, G. (2013). The governance gap in European Security and
Defence. CEPS Policy Briefs. No. 310. Brussels: Centre for
resources, they are expected to take social issues European Policy Studies.
into their consideration and help narrowing the Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to
governance gaps by performing certain state-like increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September, 30,
functions. This paper clearly and lucidly explains 126-127.
this new concept 'PCSR' in the domain of CSR. It Frynas, J. G. and Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social
responsibility: reviewing theories and setting new agendas.
also highlights few evidences from Global Fortune International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483-509.
500 companies to show that how PCSR activities
Getz, K. A. (1997). Research in corporate political action: Integration
can be used to mitigate governance gap. The and assessment. Business & Society, 36(1), 32-72.
evidences clearly demonstrate that these giant Gond, J. P. and Matten, D. (2007). Rethinking the business-society
companies in the world are involved in several interface: beyond the functionalist trap. ICCSR Research Paper
kinds of PCSR activities such as infrastructural Series No. 47-2007.
development, entrepreneurship development, Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political
activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management,
women empowerment and providing health and 30(6), 837-857.
education facilities. In general, these activities are
Hossain, D. M. (2011). Social responsibility practices of business
considered as the responsibilities of the government. organizations: Bangladesh perspective. In Williams, G. (ed.).
However, because of several obstacles on the way Responsible Management in Asia (pp.44-64). UK: Palgrave
Macmillan.
of good governance, the governments around the
Lawton, T., Mcguire, S., & Rajwani, T. (2013). Corporate political
world cannot even satiate the basic needs of their
activity: A literature review and research agenda. International
general people. Through PCSR, companies can Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105.
come forward to mitigate this governance gap and Moura-Leite, R. C. and Padgett, R. C. (2011). Historical background of
contribute in sustainable development of a particular corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(4),
528-539.
locality or country. We have two implications in this
study. First, demonstrating global evidences, we try Nelson, J. (2008). CSR and public policy: New forms of engagement
between business and government. Working Paper No. 45.
to highlight how business firms are contributing to Corporate social responsibility initiatives. John F. Kennedy School
mitigate the governance gap through PCSR around of Government. Harvard University. USA.
the world. Second, as governance problems are more Raimi, L. and Adeleke, I. A. (2010). Using entrepreneurship
acute in the developing nations, we believe that PCSR development and corporate social responsibility as strategies for
conflict resolution in the Niger-Delta region in Nigeria. Society for
practices of global firms would provide an impetus Petroleum Engineers- Nigeria Annual International Confernence
to their counterparts in the developing nations to and Exhibition 2010. NAICE: 2837-2846.
engage themselves in mitigating governance gaps and Rasche, A. (2015).The corporation as a political actor - European and
North American perspectives. European Management Journal,
achieving sustainable developments. 33(1), 4–8.
References: Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business
in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and
Adelopo, I., Yekini, K. and Raimi, L. (2015). Political corporate social
its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal
responsibility and development. In Jamali, D., Karam, C. and
of management studies, 48(4), 899-931.
Blowfield, M. (eds.). Development-oriented Corporate Social
Responsibility (pp. 29-49). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing
for political corporate social responsibility: New Challenges and
Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility,
Directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3),
and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management
273–298.
Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of
responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics
corporate performance. Academy of Management Review,
Quarterly, 22(4), 709–737.
October, 479-505.
Whelan, G. (2016). Political CSR: the Corporation as a political actor.
Davis, K. (1975). Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility
Retrieved fromhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_
(3rd edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
id=2726174 (accessedon April 29, 2017).
Detomasi, D. (2015). The multinational corporation as a political
actor: “Varieties of Capitalism” Revisited. Journal of Business