GPS System To Boost Accuracy: Track Geometry Measurement
GPS System To Boost Accuracy: Track Geometry Measurement
Reprinted from the September 2000 issue of International Railway Journal www.railjournal.com
Track Geometry Measurement
along the track stores either its unique Worldwide Coverage GPS position noise to be smoothed out.
identification number, which corre- Compared with the other methods, we
sponds to an entry in a database contain- GPS is a service that was originally believe that GALS processing is the
ing the location and header information, developed for the US military and is most advanced and reliable location syn-
or it contains the complete location and now available to the public. With its 24 chronisation method currently available.
header information, which it sends to the satellites orbiting the Earth, GPS pro- It combines all the advantages and
host. vides users with worldwide coverage eliminates all the disadvantages of other
As the car drives by a coded automatic and position accuracy to within a few existing synchronisation methods.
location detector, the location and meters. The hardware required for GALS proc-
header are automatically updated to the If a better position accuracy is required, essing is comprised the Plasser Com-
correct values. However, a disadvantage as is the case for the location synchroni- puter System, the Applanix POS/TG
of this method is that it is costly to in- sation, differential GPS is used. Differ- track geometry measuring system (with
stall the transponders across the rail ential GPS’ accuracy to within a few embedded GPS receiver) and a differen-
network. Track maintenance machines decimeters or better can be achieved in tial GPS receiver. It is not necessary to
can also easily damage or dislocate the real time operation. install any hardware devices along the
detectors. There are several advantages of using railway.
To overcome the disadvantages of the blended GPS-inertial position from Reference (synchronisation) locations
these location synchronisation ap- POS/TG compared with using the posi- can be determined from track surveying
proaches, Plasser American Corporation tion from the GPS receiver. First and using POS/TG (with enhanced accuracy,
and Applanix Corporation, Canada, have most important is data integrity. GPS if needed, provided by post-processing
developed and deployed a GPS-aided position may not always be available of recorded data). The procedure is
Location Synchronisation (GALS) proc- due to outages typically caused by the automatic and accurate and eliminates
ess. obstruction of the line of sight between the need for manual surveying. Alter-
GALS’ functionality is implemented the GPS antenna and the satellites. nately, the synchronisation points can be
in the Applanix position and orientation This often happens when bridges, tun- derived from a geographic information
system for track geometry (POS/TG) nels and other infrastructure prevents the system (GIS), if available.
measuring system. satellite signals from reaching the GPS The standard Plasser American Corpo-
The GALS approach is to first store antenna. Unlike the GPS, POS/TG posi- ration facility database incorporates syn-
the geographic locations (latitude and tion is available continuously, as the chronisation points in addition to way-
longitude) of the points of interest - the inertial component of the integrated iner- side events and header information for
synchronisation points - in a database. tial navigation provides the position data the entire rail network. This draws an
Then, during a measurement run, GALS even when the GPS signal is unavailable association between each synchronisa-
continuously minimises the distance (with some degradation of accuracy dur- tion point and the corresponding header
between the current location of the car ing long outages). and it enables extraction of the header
and the appropriate synchronisation lo- The second advantage is the band- information when the car passes a syn-
cations. Once the minimum is reached, width of the position output. Most GPS chronisation point.
GALS issues a synchronisation message receivers provide position samples every GALS is currently employed by Aus-
and a synchronisation signal. The proc- second. For example, if the car speed is trian Federal railways (ÖBB), which has
ess is fully automatic and reliable. 80km/h (or approximately 22m/second), been using the system since the begin-
Using the Integrated Inertial Naviga- then GPS provides a position sample ning of the year. This operation on a
tion algorithm, the Applanix POS/TG every 22m. POS/TG computes its navi- daily basis has proved that GALS is a
computes the current location of the car. gation data 200 times/second. At valuable tool for maintaining location
Integrated Inertial Navigation optimally 80km/h, the car’s position is thus sam- and header information, and dependably
blends the inertial data with the data pled every 11cm. The third advantage is referencing the geometry data and track
from the aiding sensors, such as the GPS the attenuation of the noise, as blending related measurement parameters to their
receiver. of GPS data with inertial data causes the locations of validity. IRJ
Reprinted from the September 2000 issue of International Railway Journal www.railjournal.com