Speech Analysis: How To Study and Critique A Speech
Speech Analysis: How To Study and Critique A Speech
Andrew Dlugan
Studying other speakers is a critical skill, one of the 25 essential skills for a public speaker. The
ability to analyze a speech will accelerate the growth of any speaker.
The Speech Analysis Series is a series of articles examining different aspects of presentation
analysis. You will learn how to study a speech and how to deliver an effective speech evaluation.
Later articles will examine Toastmasters evaluation contests and speech evaluation forms and
resources.
The first in the series, this article outlines questions to ask yourself when assessing a
presentation. Ask these questions whether you attend the presentation, or whether you view a
video or read the speech text. These questions also apply when you conduct a self-evaluation of
your own speeches.
Things to Analyze:
Due to the primacy effect, words, body language, and visuals in the speech opening are all
critical to speaking success.
Was a hook used effectively to draw the audience into the speech? Or did the speaker
open with a dry “It’s great to be here today.“
Did the speech open with a story? A joke? A startling statistic? A controversial
statement? A powerful visual?
Did the speech opening clearly establish the intent of the presentation?
Was the opening memorable?
Humor
Was humor used?
Was it safe and appropriate given the audience?
Were appropriate pauses used before and after the punch lines, phrases, or words?
Was it relevant to the speech?
Visual Aids
Were they designed effectively?
Did they complement speech arguments?
Was the use of visual aids timed well with the speaker’s words?
Did they add energy to the presentation or remove it?
Were they simple and easy to understand?
Were they easy to see? e.g. large enough
Would an additional visual aid help to convey the message?
Vocal Variety
Was the speaker easy to hear?
Were loud and soft variations used appropriately?
Was the speaking pace varied? Was it slow enough overall to be understandable?
Were pauses used to aid understanding, heighten excitement, or provide drama?
Language
Was the language appropriate for the audience?
Did the speaker articulate clearly?
Were sentences short and easy to understand?
Was technical jargon or unnecessarily complex language used?
What rhetorical devices were used? e.g. repetition, alliteration, the rule of three, etc.
Intangibles
Sometimes, a technically sound speech can still miss the mark. Likewise, technical deficiencies
can sometimes be overcome to produce a must-see presentation. The intangibles are impossible
to list, but here are a few questions to consider:
How did the speech make you feel?
Were you convinced?
Would you want to listen to this speaker again?
Were there any original ideas or techniques?