Scribd
Upload
70 views

Lutgarda Pearl Joy Soriano,: Plaintiff

This document is a reply filed in a civil case in Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 76 between plaintiff Lutgarda Pearl Joy Soriano and defendant Donna Mae Dumaliang regarding collection of a sum of money. The plaintiff admits some allegations in the answer but denies others, specifically denying allegations that payment was made as admitted in a letter by the defendant. The plaintiff prays for a judgement ordering the defendant to pay all monetary claims stated in the complaint plus costs. The reply was served on the defendant's counsel by registered mail due to time constraints and distance.

Uploaded by

Roland Mark Colobong Dumaliang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views

Lutgarda Pearl Joy Soriano,: Plaintiff

This document is a reply filed in a civil case in Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 76 between plaintiff Lutgarda Pearl Joy Soriano and defendant Donna Mae Dumaliang regarding collection of a sum of money. The plaintiff admits some allegations in the answer but denies others, specifically denying allegations that payment was made as admitted in a letter by the defendant. The plaintiff prays for a judgement ordering the defendant to pay all monetary claims stated in the complaint plus costs. The reply was served on the defendant's counsel by registered mail due to time constraints and distance.

Uploaded by

Roland Mark Colobong Dumaliang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION


REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
QUEZON CITY
BRANCH 76

LUTGARDA PEARL JOY SORIANO,

Plaintiff,

CIVIL CASE NO. Q:12271994

VS., Collection of Sum of Money

DONNA MAE DUMALIANG

Defendant.

x------------------------------------------x

REPLY

COMES NOW, THE PLAINTIFF, through the undersigned


counsel and unto to this Honorable Court, most avers:

1. That the plaintiff ADMITS the allegations in paragraphs 1 and 3


of the Answer

2. That plaintiff specifically deny the allegation in paragraphs


2,4,5,6 of the answer as the truth of the matter is that there was
no payment made by the said defendant as per admission in
the letter he executed.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgement


1. Ordering the defendant all his monetary claims as stated in
her complaint

2. Cost of suit

Other relief and remedies as may be deemed just and equitable


under the premises are likewise prayed for.

Quezon City November 27, 2017

ATTY. KARINA BASSIG

Counsel for Petitioner

Bassig-Soriano Law Offices

Roll of Attorneys No. 12345

PTR NO. 678911, 12/30/16, Manila

IBP NO. 121314, 12/30/16, Manila

MCLE Comp. No. IV-000888, 12/30/16

CC: Atty. Raven Malaca


Counsel for Defendant
123 Pusong Bato
Espanya, Manila.

EXPLANATION OF THE SERVICE


Copy of the reply was served to the counsel for the
defendant by registered mail due to time contains and distance,
and for lack of the undersigned’s staff who can serve the same
in person

Atty. Ma. Karina Bassig


Counsel

You might also like