Performance Review Reference Guide 2 Example Feedback Comments
Performance Review Reference Guide 2 Example Feedback Comments
This guide was created to assist supervisors with understanding how to identify the best rating and example feedback statements for each competency
measured in Workday’s electronic performance review process. There are only 5 standard competencies required for each position which are Service,
Teamwork/Collaboration, Diversity & Respect, Initiative, and Accountability. If the employee is responsible for supervising other staff members then there are
two (2) additional competencies for Supervision and Organizational Leadership. Feedback comments are required for Level 1, 2 and 5 ratings, however,
feedback is highly encouraged for each performance competency. Our hope is that the guide will provide ideas on how to articulate performance details that the
supervisor wants and/or needs to communicate to the employee.
MEETS (3)
Performance is consistently acceptable and meets expectations. Good performance allowing core position requirements to be successfully fulfilled.
EXCEEDS (4)
Performance is above expected level or requirement. Exceeds satisfactory in some core functions or has shown aptitude outside of core area. Consistently
generates results above those expected of the position. Contributes in a superior manner to innovations both technical and functional.
Page 1 of 5
STANDARD Examples of Feedback Comments based on Competencies and Ratings:
SERVICE TEAMWORK / COLLABORATION
Definition: Promotes a culture of service. Definition: Promotes cooperation and effective relationships.
Page 2 of 5
DIVERSITY & RESPECT INITIATIVE
Definition: Promotes an inclusive, welcoming and diverse climate. Definition: Exhibits resourcefulness, independent action and professional
judgment that are position appropriate.
DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS:
• Talks down to and belittles individuals. DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS:
• Makes decisions that intentionally impact diverse individuals or groups • Deadlines aren’t being met on a consistent basis.
of people in a negative manner. • Creates additional work and stress for others by not meeting deadlines
• Interpersonal relationships are counter-productive to work unit or team as it causes others to have less time to complete their task.
functions. • Initiates tasks or projects but does not follow up, or see them through
to completion on a consistent basis.
PARTIALLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS:
• Gets flustered in unusual situations. PARTIALLY MEETS EXPECTATIONS:
• Often has difficulty getting along with others. Allows personal bias to • Has energy, drive and performance levels that are inconsistent and
affect job responsibilities. unpredictable.
• Requires reminders regarding needs and sensitivities of others. • Must be reminded about tasks more than once (for same task) on a
• Inconsistently adheres to EEO/diversity standards of the University. consistent basis.
Page 3 of 5
ACCOUNTABILITY
MEETS EXPECTATIONS:
• Does not require constant supervision.
• Error rate is acceptable, and all work is completed timely.
• Forms and required paperwork are completed on time with minimal
errors.
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS:
• Managers and co-workers have commented on high levels of accuracy
and work productivity.
• Takes pride in work and strives to improve work performance.
• All memos, reports, forms and correspondence are completed on time
with no errors.
Page 4 of 5
SUPERVISORY Examples of Feedback Comments based on Competencies and Ratings:
SUPERVISION ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Definition: Acts responsibly and takes ownership of own behavior, actions UNSATISFACTORY:
and decisions. • Frequently comes to the wrong conclusions and assumes things.
• Did not make sure that all subordinates were productive at all times,
UNSATISFACTORY:
which is a daily requirement of this job.
• Dictates to others rather than involving them in the decision making.
•
• Has reduced subordinates to tears. MARGINAL – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT:
• Yells and screams at subordinates. • Needs to develop analytical skills necessary to weigh options and
choose the best way to deal with situations.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT:
• Spends too much time focusing on less important aspects of daily job.
• Assumes others should know what to do and how to do it with little or
no training. SATISFACTORY:
• Frequently becomes impatient when things aren't done their way. • Often offers workable solutions to problems.
• Uses good judgment in solving problems and working with others.
SATISFACTORY:
• Uses PPR ratings in making decisions related to new hires, promotions
• Draws on the knowledge and skills of others.
and merit increases.
• Available when needed and has an open door policy for subordinates.
• Assigns work fairly and resolves disputes and grievances of COMMENDABLE:
subordinates fairly. • Can zero in on the cause of problems and offer creative solutions.
• Displays strong analytical skills.
COMMENDABLE:
• Very supportive of coworkers and subordinates attempts at DISTINGUISHED:
improvement.
• Always offers ideas to solve problems based on good information and
• Sets an example for subordinates in following departmental and sound judgment.
university policy and procedures.
• Displays initiative and enthusiasm during every day work.
DISTINGUISHED: • Conducts research or seeks counsel of experts to gather information
needed in making actual decisions.
• Outstanding ability to explain and teach.
• guidance.
• Inspires others to do better.
Page 5 of 5