The document is a rubric evaluating the actual teaching of pre-service teacher Javier B. Amor who taught TLE-EIM/TVL-EIM NC2. Across six criteria including teacher personality, lesson planning, content, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills, Mr. Amor received ratings averaging 94.6 out of 100. Specific strengths included his preparation, knowledge of content, ability to relate lessons to real life, use of examples and visual aids, and systematic classroom management.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views1 page
Surigao State College of Technology
The document is a rubric evaluating the actual teaching of pre-service teacher Javier B. Amor who taught TLE-EIM/TVL-EIM NC2. Across six criteria including teacher personality, lesson planning, content, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills, Mr. Amor received ratings averaging 94.6 out of 100. Specific strengths included his preparation, knowledge of content, ability to relate lessons to real life, use of examples and visual aids, and systematic classroom management.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Surigao State College of Technology
Surigao City
Rubric for Pre-service Teacher’s Actual Teaching
Name: JAVIER B. AMOR Subject Taught: TLE-EIM/TVL-EIM NC2 Program: TEACHER CERTIFICATE CURRICULUM Date: March 10, 2020 Criteria Rating I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed. 95 B. The teacher is free from mannerism that tend to disturb the student’s attention. 95 C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention. 94 D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm. 94 E. The teacher has a well-modulated voice. 94 Average Rating: 94.4 II. LESSON PLANNING A. Lesson plan is well-prepared. 95 B. There is congruence between: Objective and Subject Matter 95 Objective and Teaching Procedure 95 Objective and Formative Test 95 Objective and Assignment 95 Average Rating: 95 III. CONTENT A. The teacher demonstrates in depth knowledge of the subject matter. 94 B. He/ She is able to relate to lessons to actual life situations. 95 C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding in the field. 95 D. Gives sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning experience. 95 Average Rating: 94.8 IV. TEACHING METHODS A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the students. 95 B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/ her methods to the students’ capabilities. 94 C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lessons. 95 D. The teacher made effective use of formative test after teaching. 95 Average Rating: 94.8 V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT The teacher had a systematic way of checking: 1. Attendance 95 2. Assignment/homework/Agreement 95 3. Practice Exercises 95 4. Group work/ projects 95 5. Passing in and out of the room 94 6. Correcting, distributing, and collecting paper. 95 7. Order and discipline are ready in the classroom. 94 8. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher during his/her teaching. 95 Average Rating: 94.7 VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS The teacher’s questioning skills stimulates discussion in different ways such as: 1. Probing for learner’s understanding. 94 2. Helping students articulate their ideas and thinking process. 94 3. Promote risk-taking and problem-solving. 93 4. Facilitate factual recall. 93 5. Encourage convergent and divergent thinking. 94 6. Stimulate curiosity. 95 7. Helps students to ask questions. 95 Average Rating: 94 TOTAL 94.6
These Are Sheet Metal Troughs With Hinged or Removable Covers For Housing and Protecting Electrical Wires and Cables and in Which Conductors Are Laid in Place