Agricultural Robot Seminar Report
Agricultural Robot Seminar Report
Presented by
VISHNU. VP
Place: Date:
Submitted for the public examination held on ………………….
Reg.No 17041809
Internal examiner External examiner
SEMINAR 2019-20 AGRICULTURE ROBOT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
First and foremost, I would like to thank GOD almighty for his grace and
blessings. I extend my deep and sincere gratitude to Mr. Manuel George
(Principal, JDT Islam polytechnic) and Mrs.Sabna.K (HOD, Dept of
Electronics) for giving me this opportunity to widen my knowledge in the
field of technology. I express my sincere thanks to Mrs. Huda Jumana (Lr
in Electronics) for her advice and support. I would like to thank all teaching
and non-teaching staff of our department for providing necessary help
towards the completion of this seminar.
ABSTRACT
Current methods for off-road navigation using vehicle and terrain models to
predict future vehicle response are limited by the accuracy of the models
they use and can suffer if the world is unknown or if conditions change and
the models become inaccurate .In this paper, an adaptive approach is
presented that closes the loop around the vehicle predictions. This approach
is applied to an autonomous vehicle known as field robots used in
agriculture Agricultural Robotics is the logical proliferation of automation
technology into biosystems such as agriculture, forestry, green house,
horticulture etc. Presently a number of researchs are being done to increase
their applications. Some of the scientist contributions are mobile robot,
flying robot, forester robot, Demeter which are exclusively used for
agriculture. A brief discussion is being done about the types of robots which
increase the accuracy and precision of the agriculture. Experiments are
being done on newly proposed world’s smallest, weightless robot for using
them as scouts in fields. Even in developing countries, such as India and
Brazil, farmers are interested in using robots to tend fields of crops, pick
fruit, or even maintain animal. At present time, agriculture robots must have
human interaction in order to compensate for programming complexity
issues.
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Weed Controller:
Robot In Horticulture:
HAZARDS TO HUMANS:
FUTURE SCOPE:
Advantages/Disadvantages
CONCLUSION:
REFERENCES:
INTRODUCTION
The idea of applying robotics technology in agriculture is very new. In
agriculture, the opportunities for robot-enhanced productivity are immense -
and the robots are appearing on farms in various guises and in increasing
numbers. We can expect the robots performing agricultural operations
autonomously such as spraying and mechanical weed control, fruit picking,
watching the farms day & night for an effective report, allowing farmers to
reduce the environmental impact, increase precision and efficiency, and
manage individual plants in novel ways. The applications of instrumental
robotics are spreading every day to cover further domains, as the opportunity
of replacing human operators provides effective solutions with return on
investment. This is specially important when the duties, that need be
performed, are potentially harmful for the safety or the health of the workers,
or when more conservative issues are granted by robotics.Heavy chemicals
or drugs dispensers, manure or fertilizers spreaders, etc. are activities more
and more concerned by the deployment of unmanned options.
information about the crop such as the presence of diseases, weeds, insect
infestations and other stress conditions. The lightweight of the robots is a
major advantage, since they do not compact the soil as larger machinery
does. Robo will Roam on fields to take care for plants.
then follow that path using its on board sensors and computer control
systems. It canfollow the path with an accuracy of up to 3 centimeters.
The picture shows the robot moving wood out of the forest. The leg
coordination is
automated but still the navigation is done by the human operator on the
robot.
To start with, the fruit picking robots need to pick ripe fruit without
damaging the branches or leaves of the tree. Mobility is a priority, and the
robots must be able to access all areas of the tree being harvested. It goes
then without saying that the robots must be intelligent, and have a human-
like interaction with their surroundings through senses of touch, sight, and
image processing. The fundamental blocks of these robots are shown in the
(fig.5) The robot can distinguish between fruit and leaves by using video
image capturing. The camera is mounted on the robot arm, and the colours
detected are compared with properties stored in memory. If a match is
obtained, the fruit is picked. If fruit is hidden by leaves, an air jet can be
used to blow leaves out the way so a clearer view and access can be
obtained.The robot arm itself is coated in rubber to minimize any damage to
the tree. It has 5degrees of freedom, allowing it to move, in, out, up, down,
and in cylindrical and spherical motion patterns. The pressure applied to the
fruit is sufficient for removal from the tree, but not enough to crush the fruit.
This is accomplished by a feedback process from the gripper mechanism,
which is driven by motors, hydraulics, or a pneumatic system. The shape of
the gripper depends on the fruit being picked, as some fruits, such as plums,
crush very easily, while others, like oranges are not so susceptible to
bruising. The robots should have access to all areas of the orchard in order
to reach all of the fruit.Significant work has been done in the production of
end effectors in France. They are capable of harvesting apples and citrus.
The limitations of these systems were mainly in their inability of picking the
fruits, whichwere covered by the branches. This resulted in robots being in
capable of harvesting morethan 75%.
The multi grasping system proposed aims at picking single leaves from a
plant; the operation, actually, is performed by men using two hands one to
hold the stem and the
other to tear the leaf. The fixture has two pickers; when they approach the
leaf to be detached, the connecting link of the lower picker keeps the leaf
against the upper one, until the carried blade cuts the sample. The sprinklers
or nebulisers are other rigs required for the specialized delivering of
chemicals; a tip clamp is endowed with a nozzle, so that administration is
localized (with proper dose), while holding the piece to be vaporized. The
different mechanical components, due to dust and dirty scattered into the
glasshouses surrounding, are protected by tyre hulls, that can be tided with
compressed air at beginning of the duty cycles or whenever required.
FUTURE SCOPE:
Flying micro robot: (a newly proposed robot):
Scientists from around the world are reverse-engineering the mechanics of
insects
as they design midget robots to scout battlefields, search for victims trapped
in rubble,
and record images in agricultural fields
The world’s smallest micro robot was placed in the geniuses book o world
record. The experiments have been conducted so as to know the fields of
operation.. The micro robot consists of propeller by which it can fly to
heights these features include the ability to zero in and land precisely on a
potato chip and then flap their wings to buzz off with blazing speed. It is
expected that it can be used in agriculture for the control of weed and
insects.
Advantages/Disadvantages
ADVANTAGES:
1. The Robo does not get sick or tired and does not need time off.
2. It can operate with closer tolerances (so every round is at full field
capacity), Fewer errors and at higher speeds
3. Because machines can be made lighter and cheaper if the drivers seat,
controls and cab can be eliminated.
4. It can be used in various fields like agriculture, medicine, mining, and
space
research .
5. It can be sent to another planet to study their environmental
conditions.
6. The machines could easily work around trees, rocks, ponds and other
obstacles.
7. Small suburban fields could be worked almost as efficiently as large
tracts of land.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. One of the key disadvantages of driverless machines for agriculture is
liability.
2. Access to the technology.
3. Not currently scale neutral.
4. Better sensors would help. Improved scouting programs would be
essential. Nevertheless, a periodic human presence in the field is
likely to be necessary for the near future.
5. Robots could change the culture /emotional appeal of agriculture.
6. Energy issues,costly.
CONCLUSION:
REFERENCES: