Scribd
Upload
85 views

Existing System and Proposed System

The document describes an existing spatial-temporal provenance (STP) proof system and its disadvantages. It then proposes a new STP proof scheme called STAMP. STAMP aims to ensure integrity and non-transferability of STP proofs while protecting user privacy. It uses distributed generation of proofs between co-located devices and requires only a single semi-trusted third party. STAMP is designed to maximize user anonymity and allow control over location information revealed. It integrates distance bounding to prevent collusion attacks and uses an entropy-based model to detect fake proof generation between colluding users. The analysis shows STAMP achieves security and privacy objectives with low overhead.

Uploaded by

vaddeseetharamaiah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
85 views

Existing System and Proposed System

The document describes an existing spatial-temporal provenance (STP) proof system and its disadvantages. It then proposes a new STP proof scheme called STAMP. STAMP aims to ensure integrity and non-transferability of STP proofs while protecting user privacy. It uses distributed generation of proofs between co-located devices and requires only a single semi-trusted third party. STAMP is designed to maximize user anonymity and allow control over location information revealed. It integrates distance bounding to prevent collusion attacks and uses an entropy-based model to detect fake proof generation between colluding users. The analysis shows STAMP achieves security and privacy objectives with low overhead.

Uploaded by

vaddeseetharamaiah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

EXISTING SYSTEM:

Existing schemes which require multiple trusted or semi-trusted third parties,


STAMP requires only Single semi-trusted third party which can be embedded in a
Certificate Authority (CA). We design our system with an objective of protecting
Users' anonymity and location privacy. No parties other than verifiers could see
both a user's identity and STP information (verifiers need both identity and STP
Information in order to perform verification and provide services). Users are given
the flexibility to choose the location granularity level that is revealed to the
Verifier. We examine two type s of collusion attacks: (1) A user who is at an
Intended location masquerades s another colluding user and obtains STP proofs for
. This attack has never been addressed in any existing STP proof schemes.
(2)Colluding users mutually generate fake STP proofs for each other. There have
beenefforts to address this type of collusion. However, existing solutions suffer
fromhigh computational cost and low scalability. Particularly, the latter collusion
scenario is in fact the challenging Terrorist Fraud attack, which is a critical issue
for our targeted system, but none of the existing systems has addressed it. We
Integrate the Bussard-Bagga distance bounding protocol into STAMP to protect
our scheme against this collusion attack. Collusion scenario (1) is hard to prevent
without a trusted third party. To make our system resilient to this attack, we
propose an entropy-based trust model to detect the collusion scenario. We
implemented STAMP on the Android platform and carried out extensive validation
experiments. The experimental results show that STAMP requires low
computational overhead.
.

DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM:


 Most of the existing STP proof schemes rely on wireless infrastructure (e.g.,
WiFi APs) to create proofs for mobile users. However, it may not be feasible for
all types of applications, e.g., STP proofs for the green commuting and battlefield
examples certainly cannot be obtained from wireless APs.
 Most of the existing schemes require multiple trusted or semi-trusted third
parties.
PROPOSED SYSTEM:

In this paper, we propose an STP proof scheme named Spatial-Temporal


provenance Assurance with Mutual Proofs (STAMP). STAMP aims at ensuring the
integrity and non-transferability of the STP proofs, with the capability of
protecting users' privacy. Most of the existing STP proof schemes rely on wireless
infrastructure (e.g., WiFi APs) to create proofs for mobile users. However, it may
not be feasible for all types of applications, e.g., STP proofs for the green
Commuting and battlefield examples certainly cannot be obtained from wireless
APs. To target a wider range of applications, STAMP is based on a distributed
architecture. Co-located mobile devices mutually generate and endorse STP proofs
for each other, while at the same time it does not eliminate the possibility of
utilizing wireless infrastructures as more trusted proof generation sources. In
addition, in contrast to most of the existing schemes which require multiple trusted
or semi-trusted third parties, STAMP requires only a single semi-trusted third party
which can be embedded in a Certificate Authority (CA). We design our system
with an objective of protecting users' anonymity and location privacy. No parties
other than verifiers could see both a user's identity and STP information (verifiers
need both identity and STP information in order to perform verification and
provide services). Users are given the flexibility to choose the location granularity
level that is revealed to the verifier.
 In this paper, we define the past locations of a mobile user at a sequence of
time points as the spatial-temporal provenance (STP) of the user, and a digital
proof of user’s presence at a location at a particular time as an STP proof.
 In this paper, we propose an STP proof scheme named Spatial-Temporal
provenance Assurance with Mutual Proofs (STAMP). STAMP aims at ensuring the
integrity and non-transferability of the STP proofs, with the capability of
protecting users’ privacy.
 We propose an entropy-based trust model to detect the collusion scenario.
 A distributed STP proof generation and verification protocol (STAMP) is
introduced to achieve integrity and non-transferability of STP proofs.
 STAMP is designed to maximize users’ anonymity and location privacy.
Users are given the control over the location granularity of their STP proofs.
 STAMP is collusion-resistant. The Bussard-Bagga distance bounding
protocol is integrated into STAMP to prevent a user from collecting proofs on
behalf of another user.
 An entropy-based trust model is proposed to detect users mutually
generating fake proofs for each other.
 STAMP uses a entropy-based trust model to guard users from prover-
witness collusion. This model also encourages witnesses against selfish behavior.
ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM:

 No additional trusted third parties are required except for a semi-trusted CA.
 STAMP requires only a single semi-trusted third party which can be
embedded in a Certificate Authority (CA).
 We design our system with an objective of protecting users’ anonymity and
location privacy.
 No parties other than verifiers could see both a user’s identity and STP
information (verifiers need both identity and STP information in order to perform
verification and provide services).
 A security analysis is presented to prove STAMP achieves the security and
privacy objectives.
 Our security analysis shows that STAMP achieves the security and privacy
objectives. Our implementation on Android smart phones indicates that low
computational and storage resources are required to execute STAMP. Extensive
simulation results show that our trust model is able to attain a high balanced
accuracy with appropriate choices of system parameters.

You might also like