Solutions To End-Of-Chapter Problems 11
Solutions To End-Of-Chapter Problems 11
Dp $3.80
rp = = = 8%.
Pp $47.50
11-3 40% Debt; 60% Common equity; rd = 9%; T = 40%; WACC = 9.96%; rs = ?
D1 $3.00
a. rs = +g= + 0.05 = 15%.
P0 $30.00
b. F = 10%; re = ?
D1 $3.00
re = +g = + 0.05
P0 (1 F) $30(1 0.10)
$3.00
= + 0.05 = 16.11%.
$27.00
11-5 Projects A, B, C, D, and E would be accepted since each project’s return is greater than the firm’s
WACC.
D1 $2.14
11-6 a. rs = +g= + 7% = 9.3% + 7% = 16.3%.
P0 $23
d. Since you have equal confidence in the inputs used for the three approaches, an average of
the three methodologies probably would be warranted.
D1
11-7 a. rs = +g
P0
$3.18
= + 0.06
$36
= 14.83%.
D1 $2.14
rs = +g= + 7% = 16.51%.
P0 $22.50
11-10 If the investment requires $5.9 million, that means that it requires $3.54 million (60%) of
common equity and $2.36 million (40%) of debt. In this scenario, the firm would exhaust its $2
million of retained earnings and be forced to raise new stock at a cost of 15%. Needing $2.36
million in debt, the firm could get by raising debt at only 10%. Therefore, its weighted average
cost of capital is: WACC = 0.4(10%)(1 – 0.4) + 0.6(15%) = 11.4%.
11-11 rs = D1/P0 + g
= $2(1.07)/$24.75 + 7%
= 8.65% + 7% = 15.65%.
rs = $2(1.04)/$20 + 4% = 14.40%.
c. Since the firm’s WACC is 10.62% and each of the projects is equally risky and as risky as the
firm’s other assets, MEC should accept Project A. Its rate of return is greater than the firm’s
WACC. Project B should not be accepted, since its rate of return is less than MEC’s WACC.
11-13 If the firm's dividend yield is 5% and its stock price is $46.75, the next expected annual dividend
can be calculated.
Next, the firm's cost of new common stock can be determined from the DCF approach for the
cost of equity.
re = D1/[P0(1 – F)] + g
= $2.3375/[$46.75(1 – 0.05)] + 0.12
= 17.26%.
$11
11-14 rp = = 11.94%.
$92.15
11-15 a. Examining the DCF approach to the cost of retained earnings, the expected growth rate can
be determined from the cost of common equity, price, and expected dividend. However,
first, this problem requires that the formula for WACC be used to determine the cost of
common equity.
From the cost of common equity, the expected growth rate can now be determined.
rs = D1/P0 + g
0.17667 = $3/$35 + g
11-16 a. With a financial calculator, input N = 5, PV = -4.42, PMT = 0, FV = 6.50, and then solve for
I/YR = g = 8.02% 8%.
D1
11-17 a. rs = +g
P0
$3.60
0.09 = +g
$60.00
0.09 = 0.06 + g
g = 3%.
c. Projects 1 and 2 will be accepted since their rates of return exceed the WACC.
b. With only $13 million to invest in its capital budget, Ziege must choose the best combination
of Projects A, C, E, F, and H. Collectively, the projects would account for an investment of
$21 million, so naturally not all these projects may be accepted. Looking at the excess
return created by the projects (rate of return minus the cost of capital), we see that the
excess returns for Projects A, C, E, F, and H are 2%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 2.5%, and 3.5%. The
firm should accept the projects which provide the greatest excess returns. By that rationale,
the first project to be eliminated from consideration is Project E. This brings the total
investment required down to $15 million, therefore one more project must be eliminated.
The next lowest excess return is Project C. Therefore, Ziege's optimal capital budget
consists of Projects A, F, and H, and it amounts to $12 million.
c. Since Projects A, F, and H are already accepted projects, we must adjust the costs of capital
for the other two value producing projects (C and E).
If new capital must be issued, Project E ceases to be an acceptable project. On the other
hand, Project C's expected rate of return still exceeds the risk-adjusted cost of capital even
after raising additional capital. Hence, Ziege's new capital budget should consist of Projects
A, C, F, and H and requires $15 million of capital, so an additional $2 million must be raised
above the initial $13 million constraint.