Scribd
Upload
63 views

CE 46B/L Hydraulics Laboratory Report Evaluation Rubric Name: Mangalino, Kent Aldwin Navarra, Alprays Jake Vivero, Maria Angelica

This document provides a rubric for evaluating lab reports in a hydraulics course, including sections on procedures, observations, conclusions, and presentation. It assesses students' work on an analysis of a pipe network lab where they used the Hardy Cross method to calculate pipe discharges and determine how well they matched experimental values. The rubric awards points for clearly showing calculations, summarizing results, and neat report presentation.

Uploaded by

Kent Mangalino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
63 views

CE 46B/L Hydraulics Laboratory Report Evaluation Rubric Name: Mangalino, Kent Aldwin Navarra, Alprays Jake Vivero, Maria Angelica

This document provides a rubric for evaluating lab reports in a hydraulics course, including sections on procedures, observations, conclusions, and presentation. It assesses students' work on an analysis of a pipe network lab where they used the Hardy Cross method to calculate pipe discharges and determine how well they matched experimental values. The rubric awards points for clearly showing calculations, summarizing results, and neat report presentation.

Uploaded by

Kent Mangalino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

CE 46B/L Hydraulics Laboratory Lab #:10

Report Evaluation Rubric


Name: Mangalino, Kent Aldwin
Navarra, Alprays Jake Title: Analysis of Pipe
Vivero, Maria Angelica Network

Lab Group #: Official Grade:

Instructions: (1) This analytic rubric is used to verify that specific tasks have been performed. (2) if a task has
been successfully completed, all points are awarded. (3) No points are awarded if a task is not complete. (4)
Awarding partial points is not an option.

Category Scoring Criteria Points Student Teacher


Evaluation Evaluation

Procedures Specific formula or equations during the lab are 25


25 Points shown.
(Write these as procedures on the lab report.)

“Results” of a procedure are clearly recorded. 15


Observations (Some procedures might not have observations)
30 Points
Calculations, when required, are clearly shown. 15
(Show these as observations on the lab report.)

Conclusion Summarize the essential lab data and state how the 15
15 Points essential data answers the lab question.

Report is neatly printed in ink, with no visible 15


Presentation corrections.
30 Points A diagram of the essential apparatus used in the lab
is drawn in the largest white space on the lab report. 15
(There is always something to draw.)

Score Total Points 100

Self-evaluation Students are expected to honestly evaluate their own work. If the difference between the
student evaluation and the teacher evaluation is more than 10 points, 5 points will be
deducted from the teacher’s score when the grade is recorded.

Deadline Lab reports are due at the beginning of class after lab. Reports will be accepted at the
beginning of the class in the succeeding meetings with a deduction of ten (10) points for every
meeting.
PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Puerto Princesa City

Civil Engineering Department


Hydraulics
Experiment No.10
Name: Kent Aldwin M. Mangalino Course &Year: BSCE 4th Year

Group: No.13 Date: February 06,2019

I. Title: Analysis of Pipe Network

II. Objective: To correlate the calculated results of discharges using Hardy Cross
solution to the experimental values.

III. Apparatus:
1. Pipe assembly
2. Stop watch
3. Graduated cylinder

IV. Theory:
City water supply distribution systems are constructed in the form of many loops and
branches. Such a system is called a pipe network. A practical procedure is the method
of successive approximations by which the distribution of flown can be determined, is
introduced by Hardy Cross. Nevertheless, the flow in any network, however
complicated must satisfy the basic relations of continuity and energy as follows:
a. The flow into any junction must equal the flow out of it.
b. The flow in each pipe must satisfy the pipe friction laws for flow in a
single pipe.
c. The algebraic sum of head losses around any closed conduit must be
zero.
By Hardy Cross method first assume a reasonable distribution as flows that
satisfies condition 1.
Write condition 2.
Δc K(Qc)n = Δ cc K (Qcc)n
The amount of the flow correction ΔQ which was subtracted from ΔQc and
added to ΔQcc will equaize the head losses in two directions and must satisfy the
equation
Δc K ( Qc – Q )n = Δ cc K ( Qcc + Q )n
Simplifying
Q = Δc K Qcn – Δcc KQcc n / n (Δc KQcn-1 + Δcc KQccn-1 )
From equation 1 dividing by Q
KQn-1 = hf/Q
Therefore,
Δc hf Δcc hf
Q = -------------------------------
n( Δc hf/Q + Δcc hf/Q )
V. Computations
Assume the discharge in and out of the pipe network.
Apply the formula until conditions 1 till 3 is satisfied.

Problem: Find the flow in each pipe. Assume C1 = 120 for all pipes

0.4m3/s
100m - 200mm 100m - 200mm 100m - 200mm

100m - 200mm 100m - 200mm 100m - 200mm

0.1m3/s 0.1m3/s 0.1m3/s 0.1m3/s

Tabulated Values
PIPE K Qa KQa0.85 KQa1.85
AB
AH
HG
BG
BC
GF
CF
FE
CD
DE

Second Cycle (using the corrected flow)


PIPE K Qa KQa0.85 KQa1.85
AB
AH
HG
BG
BC
GF
CF
FE
CD
DE
VI. Results and Observation:
1. How many cycles of corrections did you make until you arrived to the value that
satisfied conditions 1 to 3?
2. Compare results of your computation with values derived from actual experiment.

You might also like