Scribd
Upload
35 views

Proposal Report Evaluation - May 2020

This document provides a rubric for evaluating a student's proposal report. It rates the report on a scale of 1 to 5 in several categories, including the introduction and background chapter, literature review chapter, methodology chapter, activity plan, formatting, referencing, and quality of writing. For each category, the evaluator indicates the rating by ticking the appropriate box. The document also includes spaces for the supervisor's name, date, and signature.

Uploaded by

risriz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
35 views

Proposal Report Evaluation - May 2020

This document provides a rubric for evaluating a student's proposal report. It rates the report on a scale of 1 to 5 in several categories, including the introduction and background chapter, literature review chapter, methodology chapter, activity plan, formatting, referencing, and quality of writing. For each category, the evaluator indicates the rating by ticking the appropriate box. The document also includes spaces for the supervisor's name, date, and signature.

Uploaded by

risriz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Proposal Report Evaluation – May 2020

Student Name Registration No


Project Title

Key to Scale
Classification Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
Rating 5 4 3 2 1

Please indicate the rating from 1 ~ 5 by ticking off ‘ √ ’ in the appropriate box

Proposal Report Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

Introduction and Background Chapter:


• Logically established the relevance/significance of the research
• Clearly stated the objectives of the study accordingly

Literature Review Chapter:


•

• Key points were supported by number of appropriate and up-to-date citations from published literature.
• Content of the literature were related to the objective of the study and logically connected

Methodology Chapter:
• Clearly explained the methods and included essential methodological details
• Clearly explained the data processing and analysis techniques and their appropriateness

Activity Plan:
• Provided realistic and feasible activity plan project in line with the research objectives
Formatting, Table, Figures and Graphics
• Report included all the sections/chapters as per the given format (Front page, Contents, Preface,
Acknowledgements, Relevant Chapters, References, etc)
• Adherence to the provided format (eg: font type, size, chapter and section numbering, page numbering, etc)
• Tables, Figures, Maps, Graphics, etc were clear and simple enough and efficiently used in correct format
Referencing and Citation
• Strictly followed the Harvard Referencing and Citation system
Quality of Writing

• Report was well written clearly and concisely and coherently organized
• Report had minimum grammar and spelling mistakes

Supervisor / Examiner’s Name Date Signature

You might also like