Scribd
Upload
460 views

Layered Approach Using Conditional Random Fields For Intrusion Detection

The document proposes a layered approach using conditional random fields for intrusion detection that addresses accuracy and efficiency challenges. It trains separate CRF models for each of four attack layers (probe, DoS, R2L, U2R) using selected relevant features. When testing, connections are sequentially run through each layer's CRF model and labeled as normal or an attack type. If labeled as an attack, it is blocked and identified by the detecting layer without proceeding further, improving efficiency over alternatives. Experimental results show this approach outperforms other methods with high improvement in detecting certain attack types.

Uploaded by

Jayaraman Anandan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
460 views

Layered Approach Using Conditional Random Fields For Intrusion Detection

The document proposes a layered approach using conditional random fields for intrusion detection that addresses accuracy and efficiency challenges. It trains separate CRF models for each of four attack layers (probe, DoS, R2L, U2R) using selected relevant features. When testing, connections are sequentially run through each layer's CRF model and labeled as normal or an attack type. If labeled as an attack, it is blocked and identified by the detecting layer without proceeding further, improving efficiency over alternatives. Experimental results show this approach outperforms other methods with high improvement in detecting certain attack types.

Uploaded by

Jayaraman Anandan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Layered Approach Using Conditional Random Fields

for Intrusion Detection

Abstract:

Intrusion detection faces a number of challenges; an intrusion detection


system must reliably detect malicious activities in a network and must
perform efficiently to cope with the large amount of network traffic. In
this project, we address these two issues of Accuracy and Efficiency
using Conditional Random Fields and Layered Approach. We
demonstrate that high attack detection accuracy can be achieved by
using Conditional Random Fields and high efficiency by implementing
the Layered Approach. Finally, we show that our system is robust and is
able to handle noisy data without compromising performance.

Existing System:-

The field of intrusion detection and network security has been


around since late 1980s. Since then, a number of methods and
frameworks have been proposed and many systems have been built to
detect intrusions. Various techniques such as association rules,
clustering, naive Bayes classifier, support vector machines, genetic
algorithms, artificial neural networks, and others have been applied to
detect intrusions. In this section, we briefly discuss these techniques and
frameworks.

Experimental results on the benchmark KDD ’99 intrusion data set


show that our proposed system based on Layered Conditional Random
Fields outperforms other well-known methods such as the decision trees
and the naive Bayes.
The improvement in attack detection accuracy is very high,
particularly, for the U2R attacks (34.8 percent improvement) and the
R2L attacks (34.5 percent improvement). Statistical Tests also
demonstrate higher confidence in detection accuracy for our method.

Proposed System:-

Other approaches for detecting intrusion include the use of


autonomous and probabilistic agents for intrusion detection. These
methods are generally aimed at developing a distributed intrusion
detection system. To overcome the weakness of a single intrusion
detection system, a number of frameworks have been proposed, which
describe the collaborative use of network-based and hostbased systems .
Systems that employ both signature based and behavior-based
techniques are discussed in the authors describe a data mining
framework for building adaptive intrusion detection models.

The data analyzed by the intrusion detection system for classification


often has a number of features that are highly correlated and complex
relationships exist between them. when classifying network connections
as either normal or as attack, a system may consider features such as
“logged in” and “number of file creations.” When these features are
analyzed individually, they do not provide any information that can aid
in detecting attacks. However, when these features are analyzed
together, they can provide meaningful information, which can be helpful
for the classification task. And connection level feature such as the
“service invoked” at the

Two Approach

INTEGRATING LAYERED APPROACH WITH CONDITIONAL


RANDOM FIELD

We now describe the Layer-based Intrusion Detection System (LIDS) in


detail. The LIDS draws its motivation from what we call as the Airport
Security model, where a number of security checks are performed one
after the other in a sequence. Similar to this model, the LIDS represents
a sequential Layered Approach and is based on ensuring availability,
confidentiality, and integrity of data and (or) services over a network.

The goal of using a layered model is to reduce computation and the


overall time required to detect anomalous events. The time required to
detect an intrusive event is significant and can be reduced by eliminating
the communication overhead among different layers. This can be
achieved by making the layers autonomous and self-sufficient to block
an attack without the need of a central decision-maker. Every layer in
the LIDS framework is trained separately and then deployed
sequentially. We define four layers that correspond to the four attack
groups mentioned in the data set.

Each layer is then separately trained with a small set of relevant


features. Feature selection is significant for Layered Approach and
discussed in the next section.
In order to make the layers independent, some features may be present in
more than one layer. The layers essentially act as filters that block any
anomalous connection, thereby eliminating the need of further
processing at subsequent layers enabling quick response to intrusion.
The effect of such a sequence of layers is that the anomalous events are
identified and blocked as soon as they are detected.

Main Modules:-

CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD

The CRFs have proven to be very successful in such tasks, as they


do not make any unwarranted assumptions about the data. Hence, we
explore the suitability of CRFs for intrusion detection. system may
consider features such as “logged in” and “number of file creations.”
When these features are analyzed individually, they do not provide any
information that can aid in detecting attacks.

However, when these features are analyzed together, they can


provide meaningful information, which can be helpful for the
classification task. Taking another example, the connection level feature
such as the “service invoked” at the
Probe layer

The probe attacks are aimed at acquiring information about the


target network from a source that is often external to the network.
Hence, basic connection level features such as the “duration of
connection” and “source bytes” are significant while features like
“number of files creations” and “number of files accessed” are not
expected to provide information for detecting probes

DoS layer,

For the DoS layer, traffic features such as the “percentage of


connections having same destination host and same service” and packet
level features such as the “source bytes” and “percentage of packets with
errors” are significant. To detect DoS attacks, it may not be important to
know whether a user is “logged in or not.”

R2L layer

The R2L attacks are one of the most difficult to detect as they
involve the network level and the host level features. We therefore
selected both the network level features such as the “duration of
connection” and “service requested” and the host level features such as
the “number of failed login attempts” among others for detecting R2L
attack.

U2R layer ( User to Root attacks)

The U2R attacks involve the semantic details that are very difficult
to capture at an early stage. Such attacks are often content based and
target an application. Hence, for U2R attacks, we selected features such
as “number of file creations” and “number of shell prompts invoked,”
while we ignored features such as “protocol” and “source bytes.”

Algorithm & Training:

Step 1: Select the number of layers, n, for the complete system.

Step 2: Separately perform features selection for each layer.

Step 3: Train a separate model with CRFs for each layer using the
features selected from Step 2.
Step 4: Plug in the trained models sequentially such that only the
connections labeled as normal are passed to the next layer. Testing
Step 5: For each (next) test instance perform Steps 6 through 9.
Step 6: Test the instance and label it either as attack or normal.
Step 7: If the instance is labeled as attack, block it and identify it as an
attack represented by the layer name at which it is detected and go to
Step 5. Else pass the sequence to the next layer.
Step 8: If the current layer is not the last layer in the system, test the
instance and go to Step 7. Else go to Step 9.
Step 9: Test the instance and label it either as normal or as an attack. If
the instance is labeled as an attack, block it and identify it as an attack
corresponding to the layer name

System Specifications:

Hardware Requirements

• SYSTEM : Pentium IV 2.4 GHz


• HARD DISK : 40 GB
• FLOPPY DRIVE : 1.44 MB
• MONITOR : 15 VGA colour
• MOUSE : Logitech.
• RAM : 256 MB
• KEYBOARD : 110 keys enhanced.

Software Requirements

• Operating system :- Windows XP Professional


• Front End :- JAVA, RMI, JDBC, Swing
• Tool :Eclipse 3.3

You might also like