Guide To Appointing An Architect
Guide To Appointing An Architect
an Architect
2 1 The RIBA Work Stages and what the architect is being appointed to do
Stephen Homer, Lianne Edwards – Ashfords LLP
8 2 Form of Appointment
RIBA standard form or bespoke – a brief comparison
Anna Wood – BPE Solicitors LLP
6 5 Copyright
1
The client’s rights including copyright in the BIM model
Alan Tate, Jo Morris – Michelmores LLP
4 9 Dispute resolution
2
Mediation and ADR
Christopher Reeves – Mediation for Construction
8 10 Dispute resolution
2
Adjudication, arbitration or litigation – understanding the differences
Stephen Homer, Lianne Edwards – Ashfords LLP
Guide to
appointing
an Architect
Constructing Excellence South West This Guide covers subjects such as:
has identified that construction • an explanation of the different stages of a construction
project and the input to be expected from the architect at
clients often seek the assistance each stage;
of an architect prior to that of any • a comparison between RIBA forms of architect appointment
other construction professional and bespoke forms of architect appointment not published
by the RIBA;
and yet, particularly (but not
• an explanation of what you might expect if you appoint
exclusively) those carrying out their
your architect as lead consultant on the one hand and lead
first construction project, may not designer on the other;
fully understand the process and • a commentary on the architect’s role in relation to the CDM
implications of appointing a firm Regulations relating to health and safety;
Of course, if there are any specific points you would like to
discuss then please contact Constructing Excellence South
West or any of the authors.
Constructing Excellence South West would like to thank
everyone who has made this Guide possible.
The RIBA Plan of Work 2013 sets out and describes the Use of the Plan of Work is not obligatory but it is widely
various stages of a construction project. Whilst the Plan adopted. It can be used across all sectors and a range of
of Work is a holistic framework (encompassing the entire project sizes. Aligned to each stage are task bars, outlining
project lifecycle, and wider than the architect’s role alone), the typical tasks you might expect to be carried out in the
it is often used as the basis for structuring an architect’s various stages. Whilst the RIBA Plan of Work itself is not a
services and fees. An architect can be appointed to contract document, it is often the case that the architect’s
provide a full service across all or most of the stages, specific services (commonly set out in a schedule of
or a more tailored service for a lower fee, usually where services forming part of the architect’s appointment)
the client is more experienced and does not need are based on, and refer back to, the RIBA stages.
a full service.
RIBA also publishes the RIBA Job Book (the latest being
The earlier (2007) version of the Plan of Work was the 2013 edition) which acts as a standard reference for
overhauled in 2013, and an overview document running projects, providing an operational framework and
was published giving guidance on each stage. examining the step by step obligations of an architect in
The documents, and useful toolkits, are readily line with each of the RIBA work stages. It is accompanied
accessible from the RIBA website. by checklists and templates many of which can be freely
downloaded from the RIBA Bookshop website.
RIBA has since published the RIBA Small Project Plan
of Work in 2016 to cover small projects for new clients. So, what are the stages?
The 2016 Small Project Plan of Work adopts the same
stages as the 2013 Plan for larger projects, but as one
might expect the tasks aligned to those stages in the
Small Project Plan are tailored to suit a smaller scale project.
RIBA Stages
Why does the form of Upon closer inspection of each tender, you may notice
that the architect expects the form of appointment to be
appointment matter? either the RIBA Standard Form of Agreement 99 (‘SFA 99’)
Having considered the extent of the or the more recent RIBA Professional Services Contract
2018 (‘PSC 2018’). Before agreeing to this contract, you
architectural services you require should consider:
(see Chapter 1) and invited a number
1) What is my procurement structure?
of practices to submit fee proposals, 2) Who is funding my project?
you will move to formally appoint 3) What is my ‘exit plan’?
your architect. Your source of funding and intentions for disposal are
also highly relevant to the drafting of your architect
appointment: high street and other institutional lenders
will expect to see certain terms in the contract that
will make the project bankable, either for you or your
prospective purchaser.
RIBA vs bespoke
Broadly speaking, for self-funded projects procured via a
traditional route, a RIBA standard form may suit the parties
adequately. However, funders generally perceive the RIBA
standard forms to be too ‘pro-architect’. Further, the SFA
99 was not drafted to novate comfortably to a design and
build contract such as the JCT Design and Build 2016 and
although some tweaks have been made, the PSC 2018
does not align perfectly with the standard form and by
its very nature cannot align perfectly with any bespoke
amendments to a standard building contract that you may
be using for your project.
The remainder of this chapter considers some of the key
issues covered by an architect appointment and compares
and contrasts the wording of the RIBA standard forms
with a ‘typical’ bespoke architect appointment document.
Unless specified, the observations relate to both the
SFA99 and the PSC 2018.
Duty of care
Contractual obligations can be ‘absolute’ (e.g., must be done) or subject to a duty of care (e.g., must use reasonable skill and
care to do something). The terms of the appointment can make specific points regarding what that duty of care relates to.
Copyright
How the client is legally entitled to use the design produced by the architect under the appointment is critical: this is, after
all, what the client is paying for. For more information on copyright, see Chapter 5.
RIBA Typical Bespoke
Architect owns the copyright and grants a licence to client Architect owns the copyright and grants a licence to client
Licence excludes the reproduction of the designs for Allows use but not reproduction for extension of the
extension of the project unless a licence fee is paid property
Architect asserts his moral rights Usually moral rights are waived
Architect not liable for use other than intended use Architect not liable for use other than intended use
SFA 99 – A licence fee may be payable for continued use Licence is always ‘royalty free’
(including prior to practical completion)
SFA 99 – If the client is late paying an instalment of the fee, Licence is always ‘irrevocable’ (the architect has other
the Architect can suspend the licence rights in respect of late payment)
PSC 2018 – The copyright licence referred to above is
subject to fees having been paid
(i.e., subtle difference in wording between the two)
Collateral Warranties
For more information on collateral warranties please see Chapter 8.
RIBA Typical Bespoke
SFA 99 – No express obligation to procure collateral Express obligation to procure collateral warranties from
warranties from sub-consultants sub-consultants
PSC 2018 – Allows parties to specify requirements
Only to be provided within a reasonable period once fees Gives time limit for returning warranties (usually 14
have been paid days) and can make this a condition precedent to
further payment
Dispute resolution
For more information on dispute resolution please see Chapters 9 and 10.
RIBA Typical Bespoke
Parties may use RIBA mediation service May include a tiered dispute resolution clause requiring
the parties to go through certain steps before instigating
formal proceedings
Sets out rules for adjudication Sets out rules of adjudication
The SFA 99 sets out rules for arbitration Parties can choose whether the appointment will use
litigation OR arbitration for dispute resolution
The PSA 2018 allows the parties to select litigation or
arbitration
SRA Architects
Every successful project needs Whether it’s a building, a product or a service, a ‘project’
involves many parties all of whom will be a specialist in
someone with a vision and the grit their ‘part’. Then someone needs to assemble those ‘parts’
and determination to see it delivered and make them fit together carefully and beautifully. And
– and that’s no easy task! It needs a someone needs to make sure there is a good end-to-end
responsibility trail with no gaps.
designer and leader. An architect’s
On a building, there are many designers: architects,
appointment might state that the different kinds of engineers, trade contractors and others.
architect is to act as lead designer or One of these designers needs to be the lead designer. On
a building it is usually the architect; on a civils or complex
lead consultant but what do these M&E project, it is usually the engineer. Someone needs
terms mean? to make sure the client’s needs are communicated to the
team and that the designers’ questions are answered by
the client. This is one of the management roles of the lead
consultant. On smaller projects, the client might do away
with the lead consultant and communicate directly with
the designers. On larger projects, there might instead be a
‘project manager’ or ‘employer’s agent’ undertaking the role.
For a building, who’s best placed to do these roles?
The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations When do a designer’s duties apply?
2015 (the CDM Regulations) manage the health, safety The designer’s duties apply as soon as designs are started
Architect
and welfare of construction fined
projects from start to finish which includes concept design, competitions, bids for
and define the responsibilities according to specific roles. grants, modification of existing designs and relevant work
£180,000 after breaches
Architects fall within the category of designers. Indeed, Timber
carried out as part of feasibility studies.frame
A designer must
of CDM
the lead architect ledbeto
will often deathas the principal
appointed not start any work until they are satisfied that the client
designer found guilty
designer. of maintenance knows their obligations under the CDM Regulations.
Holding meetings orand liaisingfined
with the£1500
client to even
discuss
The CDM regulations worker
Regulations 9 and 10 of the CDM Regulations set out the though no incident a
the project can fulfil this obligation. When designing,
designer must consider the health and safety risks people
duties placed upon designers. Such duties include the
may be exposed to through the occurred
course of construction
responsibility to eliminate, reduce or control foreseeable
and its use thereafter. Designers should liaise with
health and safety risks through the design process
contractors, the principal contractor and with any other
including those that may arise during construction work or
designers, including the principal designer, so that work
in maintaining and using the building once it is built.
can be coordinated to establish how different aspects of
Who is a designer? design interact and influence health and safety.
Under
A Guidetheto
CDM Regulations
Excellence seriesa designer is an organisation Venue
The role of a Principal Designer
or individual who prepares or modifies a design for a
A principal designer is definedConstruction Skills and Innovation Centre
Staying out of jail (and in business)
construction project (including the design of temporary
works) or arranges for or instructs third parties to do so.
in Regulation 2(1) as the
Bridgwater and Taunton College
designer with control over the pre-construction phase
Rodway
Health, safety and CDM 2015
Design includes drawings, design details, specifications,
of the project, being the earliest stage of a project from
Cannington
concept design through to planning the delivery of
bills of quantity and calculations prepared for the purpose TA5 2LS
the construction work. The principal designer must be
of a design. Designers include architects, architectural Date
Wednesday 15 March 2017 appointed in writing by the client.
technologists, consulting engineers, quantity surveyors, Wednesday 15 March 2017
Timedesigners,
interior 6.30pmtemporary
to 8.30pm work engineers, chartered The principal designer can beTime
an organisation or an
surveyors, technicians or anyone who specifies or alters a individual that has:
We will cover: 6.30pm to 8.30pm
design.
• The terrifying things that can happen: jail, huge fines, no work pipeline Cost
• What the HSE is doing in 2017 £5 for members and
£10 for non-members
• An
14 overview
Guide of business
to appointing H&S requirements
an Architect
How to book
• An overview of risk assessment
Book your place at Eventbrite
Lydia Stuart-Banks
Trowers & Hamlins LLP
Two-year jail term
for plant hire boss £300,000 fine for
after unsafe MEWP crane company after
killed worker worker killed trying
to free jib
Architect fined
£180,000 after breaches
Timber frame
of CDM led to death
designer found guilty
of maintenance
and fined £1500 even
worker
though no incident
occurred
2
http://cic.org.uk/admin/resources/bim-protocol-2nd-edition-2.pdf
More and more, we are seeing architects being engaged Percentage of construction cost
on the basis of new and creative fee structures. So, don’t This fee mechanism allows your architect to be paid a
be afraid to suggest some of the below options when percentage of the overall build costs that are estimated
negotiating fees with your architect to best suit the needs at the start of the project and crystallised at the end of
of your project. the project when final construction costs are known.
Whilst this is a common mechanism for an architect to
Architect’s fee
calculate its fee it is often resisted by clients, again for
The fee could be calculated on a time-charge basis; as a
cost uncertainty and the risk that escalating construction
percentage of construction cost; as a fixed fee / lump sum
costs mean an increase in your architect’s fees.
basis; or the fee could be linked to value added.
Lump Sum
Time-charge basis
This fee mechanism allows your architect to be paid a fixed
This fee mechanism allows your architect to be paid by
lump sum that is agreed / set at the outset of the project.
reference to the amount of time spent carrying out the
Your architect will usually take into account the estimated
services. It is simply calculated at an agreed daily / hourly
overall construction cost, calculate a percentage and then
rate. It is rare that we see an architect being paid on a
fix the fee. This is favourable to the client because of cost
time-charge basis, the simple reason being that every
certainty and is by far the most popular fee option.
project is different, you will not always know how much
time your architect will need to spend on the project Key to this fee option is accurately scoping out the architect’s
and there is no certainty as to the amount of fee. services (see further below). For example, some thought
about what services are to be covered in the event of
a dispute with your contractor could be an easy way to
avoid additional unforeseen costs outside of the fixed fee
arrangement further on in the project’s life span.
Benefits
By comparison to more adversarial methods of dispute
resolution such as litigation, arbitration or adjudication
mediation is:
• Quick
• Low cost
• Collaborative
• Less risky
Mediation in contracts
From an employer’s point of view there are therefore
clear benefits in promoting mediation in not only the
architect appointment documents but also the contract
with the contractor. Employers ought to consider taking
this up with the architect in the early stages of preparing
contract packages.
Contract publishers such as the JCT also include
provisions within its contracts which encourage the use
of mediation. Given its opening emphasis on “a spirit of
mutual trust and co-operation” it is perhaps surprising
that the NEC suite of contracts has not built in any forms
of alternative dispute resolution, however parties may
consider provision for mediation by the addition of a
mediation incorporation clause as an amendment to
contract documents from the architect’s appointment to
the contract with the contractor. A model form of clause
is at item A in the section on resources below.
When to mediate?
Mediation can take place at any time but generally
mediation should be used when the parties to the
dispute recognise that they have an incentive to settle.
This usually occurs once the issues are properly defined
and there has been a proper exchange of information
and documents. If the parties need further information
to properly understand the nature of each other’s cases,
then it is possible to agree provision of information as
part of the mediation process.
If the benefits of mediation are to be realised it
is wise to engage in mediation at the earliest
possible stage.
One element of the appointment of your architect will be the dispute resolution
provisions. Whilst parties would no doubt hope to have a smooth running
project, disputes are a fact of life. If mediation and other ADR methods (see
Chapter 9) have not resulted in a resolution of a dispute, which of the formal
procedures (litigation, arbitration or adjudication) is right for your dispute?
is usually available to the parties to resolve a dispute. In The perceived advantages of arbitration
these circumstances, even if the contract does not specify Flexibility – Just as the parties must agree to arbitrate, they
adjudication as a possible dispute resolution option, the right can also agree which procedural rules apply, and the identity
is conferred by statute. If the client is a residential occupier of the arbitrator. This allows the parties to tailor the arbitration
(someone who lives in, or is going to live in, the property as to their particular dispute.
their main home) then the right to adjudicate isn’t implied
Confidentiality and Finality – A key consideration is the
by statute, but can still be expressly included in the contract.
confidential and final nature of the arbitration process.
The process of adjudication is generally a very speedy Litigation is rarely private, with court proceedings usually
process involving the appointment of an adjudicator and open to the public and court documents relating to the
written submissions and responses from each of the parties. dispute often publicly available (even to non-parties).
Conversely, arbitration hearings are usually held in private
Once the written submissions are considered (and in rare
and there is no public record of the dispute. Arbitration also
cases a site visit or meeting undertaken) the adjudicator
arguably offers greater finality with only very limited scope
issues his or her decision. The decision is binding until
for challenging an arbitral award in the courts.
finally determined by court proceedings, arbitration or by
agreement. Arbitration Pitfalls
Arbitrator’s Lien – An arbitrator’s lien allows the arbitrator to
In the event the losing party doesn’t honour an adjudication
refuse to release his decision until any outstanding fees have
decision it is readily enforced by the courts through a short
been paid. If the other party refuses to pay, one party can
procedure in the Technology and Construction Court and
be left to pay all the outstanding fees to obtain the decision
adjudication is a useful procedure for a quick resolution of
leaving the paying party with the issue of trying to recover
a dispute. However, there are substantial time constraints
from the non-paying party.
on the process and limited evidence can be prepared
compared to that which would be prepared in arbitration Arbitrator’s fees and venue costs – Whilst the parties’
or litigation. Adjudication is therefore considered to be legal fees are likely to be similar in litigation and arbitration,
‘rough justice’ in some cases. in arbitration the parties must also pay the arbitrator’s fees
plus administrative costs (such as room hire for hearings
It is also worth bearing in mind that advisers’ costs incurred
and travel expenses of the arbitrator). This can be a relatively
in adjudication are generally not recoverable as part of the
substantial outlay compared to the cost of court proceedings.
adjudication process or in subsequent litigation or arbitration.
What dispute resolution method should you use?
Litigation or arbitration?
Simply put, this is dependent on the dispute at hand and the
The default position is that unless the parties have agreed
parties involved. Adjudication is popular because of its speed
otherwise in writing the courts will finally determine any
and relative cost effectiveness. The main downside is the
claim between the parties. However, either at the outset
element of ‘rough justice’ inherent in a fast track process and
or later, the parties can agree to any future dispute being
the fact that the other party can still take the original dispute
decided by an arbitrator (essentially a private judge) instead
to litigation or arbitration should they choose to do so. The
and one reason cited for doing this is to appoint an arbitrator
choice between litigation or arbitration in respect of a final
with technical expertise, for example, an architect arbitrator.
determination of any dispute is finely balanced and you may
want to take advice before agreeing to an arbitration clause
in any appointment document.
Anna Wood
[email protected]
John Rich
[email protected]
Disclaimer
This guide is for information purposes only and
does not constitute advice including legal advice.
Lydia Stuart-Banks It is recommended that specific professional advice
is sought through your professional advisor before
[email protected] acting on any of the information or opinion given.
Oliver Williams
The views and opinions expressed in the articles
[email protected] in this guide are those of the relevant authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of
Constructing Excellence South West Limited nor the
other authors.
Alan Tate Copyright
[email protected] Copyright in all and every part of this publication rests
with Constructing Excellence South West Limited,
Jo Morris Ashfords LLP, BPE Solicitors LLP, SRA Architects,
[email protected] Trowers & Hamlins LLP, Michelmores LLP, Stackhouse
Poland and Mediation4Construction and all rights
are reserved. Save by prior consent of the authors,
no part or parts of this publication may be reproduced
in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical,
Marcus Saunders including photocopying, recording or any information
storage or retrieval system now known or to be
[email protected] devised.
A Gallagher Company
Design: instagram.com/walkerjansseune