Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Presented By: Dr. Hal Stern
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Presented By: Dr. Hal Stern
Major Accomplishments:
• Published two freely available datasets (impact bloodspatters) available at forensicstats.org/data
• Attinger et al., 2018, Data in Brief – Impact beating spatters
• Attinger et al., 2019, Data in Brief – Gunshot backspatters
• Framework for determining the region of origin of blood spatters considering fluid dynamics and statistical uncertainties
(Attinger et al., 2019, Forensic Science International)
• Framework to automatically classify bloodstain patterns caused by gunshot and blunt impact at various distances
(Liu et al., 2020, Journal of Forensic Sciences)
• Image processing pipeline to approximate bloodstain patterns as a set of elliptical-shaped stains (Zou et al., submitted
manuscript)
• Preliminary work developing videos of blood spatter formation and statistical tools for analysis of the videos
(manuscript in progress)
Impact:
• The high-resolution blood spatter database provides a consistent set of data using controlled and carefully documented
experiments available to researchers worldwide
• First work on determine of region of origin with quantification of uncertainty
• Computer based decision process for distinguishing bloodstain patterns caused by blunt or gunshot impacts
forensicstats.org | 2
Data
Bloodstain patterns generated by blunt impact & gunshots
(Attinger et al. 2018, 2019 in Data in Brief)
forensicstats.org | 3
Classification of bloodstain patterns
• Application of data
• Distinguishing mechanisms
• Examine distance of stains
around center
centroid
forensicstats.org | 4
Experimental system to capture
high-speed video of bloodspatter
forensicstats.org | 5
Research Area Objectives
• Two main questions arise with BPA: determination of mechanism and origin.
• There has been limited analysis of the accuracy of bloodstain pattern analysts in
determining the causal mechanism for a particular bloodstain pattern.
• Laber et al. (2014) describe the results of several studies and find many inconclusive
opinions, incorrect mechanisms identified in 10% or more of cases, and the dependence
of analyst performance on the context in which they carried out the analysis.
• Goal of CSAFE 2.0 research project: Develop objective analytic approaches to enhance
the practice of BPA.
• Analysis tools for bloodstain pattern images
• Definition and refinement of relevant features to distinguish mechanisms
• Methods and models for probabilistic analysis of mechanism and origin
forensicstats.org | 6
forensicstats.org | 6
CSAFE 2.0 Bloodstain Projects and
Lead Investigators
Other participants:
Kris de Brabanter, Iowa State
Tong Zou, UCI (graduate student)
Michael Taylor, EZR (New Zealand) (collaborator)
forensicstats.org | 7
CSAFE 2.0
Proposed Activities:
• Image processing pipeline
• Starts with a bloodstain pattern image
• Approximates it by a collection of one or more ovoid/elliptical shapes
• Develop features from these approximations
• Develop score-based or feature-based likelihood ratio for assessing alternative
hypotheses about the mechanism causing the pattern.
• Builds on the CSAFE 1.0 work of the Iowa State group (De Brabanter)
• Collaborate with practitioners to assess the practicality of the approach in casework.
Potential Impact:
• Current evaluation of mechanism for bloodstain pattern analysis is subjective.
• First steps in assessing a likelihood ratio approach to bloodstain pattern analysis.
forensicstats.org | 8
Resources and Needs
forensicstats.org | 9