Assignment 4
Assignment 4
1
Certificate in Personnel Practice
NAME
COHORT NUMBER
ASSIGNMENT
NUMBER CPP Assignment 4
ASSIGNMENT TITLE
Performance Management and Employee
Relations
DATE COMPLETED
2 Performance management process
1. what is involved :
Whereas both Strategy and Development plans are somehow absent. Therefore,
agreement among employees and superior is also absent.
Financial rewards, evaluation, and Key Result Area are also involved in
Performance management in my company.
2. How it is run:
First thing to be done in the formal process is to; agree on strategy and objectives
as best practice. This approach is known as Goal –setting theory, “what a person
is trying to accomplish or intend to do” Locke and Ltham (1984). In this process,
the manager is to discuss the intended objectives to be accomplished with his/her
employees. However, the majority of department heads do not do this at the
moment.
Many department heads follows the SMART objective concept in which the
objective must be simple, measurable, achievable, and realistic and time scaled. “
The process, as a management too, is established on the basis that organizational
objectives can be broken down and translated into individual goals, the attainment
of which can then be effectively measured” (Beardwell, Holden, and Clayldon,
2004).
However, they forget to communicate their plans to their subordinates which lead
to control rather than cooperation.
□ The objectives sets is that the whole process run by setting proper inputs
and outputs ( see my recommendation).
□ The company handbook refers to evaluation process and reward system. In
addition, there is a complete evaluation policy and grievance procedures
(HR Policy & Procedure Manual) on how we set it up.
□ Appraisals are done once a year instead of three times. We do not monitor
these reviews on quarterly bases. This results in loss of control and
tracking. Moreover, the superior may tend to blame the subordinate of not
achieving certain goal during a year with zero follow up. In my view, high
communication between management and employee is the key element of
success.
My manager and I do set together and review some targets (not objectives).
We look at the environment of work and make flexible planning. My
manager tends to review the targets with almost every half month.
The key work area is the main subject of evaluation. It tends to reduce the
bias and subjectivity to some extent.
There are two types of appraisals that involve self assessment which are
360 degree and open window. They allow transparency and they are “the
only way to give a complete picture of the performance of the employee
and to avoid a criticize-defend scenario”. (Margerison, 1976)
The managers do not set down with me on quarterly bases and there is no
way of having clear objectives for assessment. Thus, we lake planning
objectives for the year and review on quarterly basis to stretch and aline.
The training needs are not linked with training and development process
and not aligned with business needs.
The appraiser may not realize all aspects of job abilities, attitude,
originality of thoughts, and perception in one session.
Most of head of departments use their own offices and surprise staff on the
appraisal time.
Though, some do the performance against targets; they may fail to measure
the extent to which previously set targets have been achieved. (Source:
IDS, 1992)
The idea behind the 360 degree appraisal is to get the maximum feedback
from others to improve performance. In many incidents, this process has
scratched the dignity of the senior staff rather than opening their minds.
This type appraisal is now closed!
The objectives are set “top-down” basis in which employees are not involved in
setting and refining the objectives including me. Only top management sets the
objectives and the middle management to execute them. In fact, the employees are
not involved in such influential process.
The Appraisals are delivered and some times are not delivered at all in my
company. They are produced by HR department and delivered to line mangers to
do assessment to staff using three techniques: single window, open window and ,
360 degree. In which, all are delivered in bosses rooms (internally)
The appraisal form dictates the way and the marks. There is a scale of 1-4 in
which 1 is poor and 4 is excellent. There is no ranking system such as 10:80:10. To
overall staff in a department. The final appraisal does not command promotion or
increment. Instead, it keeps track records of staff!
What recommendations would you suggest to make this process more
effective?
The company established terms and conditions of employment that grants many
rights to staff such as:
On the other hand, the company reserves the right to regulate and discipline staff
in case of breaching the terms and conditions. Some codes of practice and
procedures are related to ;
The company follows plenty of procedures from the guidelines can be find on The
advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), the code of practice
entitled Disciplinary and grievance procedures 2000.
Absence management:
Return to work interview, as been introduced on 13th September, 2009. In its initial
stage. The proposal is to try it first in head quarter and to start with HR
Department.
There are many reasons of absences in which the annual leave comes in the top
followed by sick leave, and then unauthorized absence. It is to metion that the
company is facing difficulties in managing all types of absences even annual leave
which has to be planned on yearly basis but no one follows. It all depends on the
circumstances.
Reward management:
Staff tend to relate and appreciate the financial reward system especially the
junior staff. Whereas, senior staff appreciate the non-financial rewards much more.
Examples of non-financial rewards in the company are;
• Access to medical care (Muscat Private Hospital).
• Schooling and communication facility.
• Car park access.
• Recognition.
Financial rewards are becoming less as the company is gowing through financial
losses. Sometimes, the company adopt both financial and non-finanical reward at
the same time ex; employee of the month (recognition in the board and pay of
OMR 50).
The reward system is defined in the company policy but not practiced properly.
Many Head of Departments forget to use the reward system on monthly basis.
Other departments have over 800 employees and 12 rewards per year are not
enough to them.
Pay per performance system is not implemented in the company and the merit is
ceased until further notice.
• I have learned the development module and the four stages of Directing,
Coaching, Supporting, and delegating. It was very interesting to go through
each one and most importantly when to delegate some one. Sometimes
people who are delegated do some mistakes we need then to go one step
back and support instead of directing. Situational management; si all about
how to manage people in relations to development.
• Good objectives need to be both quantity and quality (input and output).
And most importantly, agreed among the team instead of individual.
Do you encounter any barriers or difficulties and how did you overcome
them?
Performance management topic involves legality and financial aspects. I was very
careful in making my recommendations. It is always difficult to impose suggestion
to Top Management.
2 days sick leave policy took me weeks to come up with. This is a real scenario
that is faced by the company in which I have come up with this suggestion in the
hope it will be accepted.
Have you addressed the key issues identified in points 2 and 5 above?
Summaries here all that you have learnt wiliest completing this Module and
this Assignment
Practical ideas are always the way for improvement. The current performance
management in my organization requires lots of improvement. We shall start with
objectives then everything else will be fine.
In the module, I have discovered that at my workplace we have done good job in
performance management but still not enough. There is always room for
improvement. The assignment enforced me to start the quarterly based review in
HR and my section with immediate effect.
However, if we do not set together and form our objectives all other steps of the
process will collapse.
Further reading is the key to the right mindset and broadens the concept of
performance management. I have read many books and articles regarding
performance management and the much I read the more ignorance I discover.
How will this change the way that you work? What would you do differently
in the future in your role?
I have already suggested the 2 days sickness first draft policy to control the
unauthorized sick leaves. I have also worked on new sick leave system that
involves decimal points such as 1.5 day sick leave. This is applicable for cabin
crew who works on hourly basis (11 pm to 6 am flight) rather than full days. I
found support from the management to check if it is technically and legally
possible.
I may not have power to change the performance appraisal, but I can start making
quarterly review to my staff.
7
References
1. Armstrong, M. and Baron,D. (1998) Performance management: the new realities.
London: Institute of Personal Development (IPD) (now CIPD).
2. Locke, E. and Ltham , G. (1984). Goal Setting. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Beardwell, I. Holden, L. , and Clayldon, T. (2004). Human Resource Management: A
contemporary approach, 4th (edn), Harlow:FT/Prentice Hall.
4. Company- HR Policy & Procedure Manual and Performance Appraisal Form.
5. IDS (1992) “PRP grows as tax relief doubles”, IDS Study 520, December.
6. Margerison, C. (1976), “A constructive approach to appraisal”, Personnel Management,
July pp. 30-33.
7. Roberts, I. ( 2001) “Reward and performance management”, in Beardwell I, and Holden,
L. (eds) Human Resource Management, 3ed (edn), Harlow: FT/Prentice Hall.
8. The advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), the code of practice entitled
Disciplinary and grievance procedures 2000.
9. Omani Labor Law (2003) Sultanate of Oman- Ministry of Manpower.
10. Torrington, D. and Hall, L. (1998) Human Resource Management. 4th ed. Hemel
Hempstead: Prentice Hall Europe.
Appendix A: Recommendation
Function to be
Improved Weaknesses Recommendation
1 Strategic/Top Down Problem: Currently Solution: This is top down process and it has to be
Hierarchy the objectives are set communicated correctly in 4 simple steps as follows:
individually and not
shared with 1. CEO to encourage this step and meet with GMs
employees. in workshop to review past year performance and
set the forthcoming objectives.
4 Remuneration Problem: Reward Solution: To activate the system of pay per performance
& Benefits system is currently by following the below:
absent and there is no
pay per performance 1. HR Remuneration and Benefit section to make a
system. circular informing all departments that new
system of PPP is effective and they need to do
assessment forms and evaluation to all staff.
NO P1: YES
P10: ADMIN.C TO INFORM P2: ADMIN.C
CALL STAFF SUPERIO GIVES 2 DAYS TO
(DAY1) R STAFF TO GET P5
NO YES
P3: GO
TO P4: STAFF
CLINIC OBTAIN LEAVE
YES
P9: HR PROCEEDS CERTIFICATE
DISCIPLINARY
P11: STAFF
ACTION -
RESPONDE
UNAUTHORIZED
D (DAY 1)
ABSENCE.
P14: IF NO
RESPONSE HR TO
ISSUE WARNING
(DAY 4)