Automated Material Handling System
Automated Material Handling System
ABSTRACT
Flexible manufacturing is a process which permits production systems to perform under high
customized production needs. The goals of manufacturing system like minimum inventories, improved
quality, enhanced technical performance and reduction of cost can be achieved by implementing the
FMS. Material handling system plays a very important role in flexible manufacturing system. Material
handling system consumes a significant amount of cost and time in any manufacturing process.
Selection of best material handling system is very important task. The basic requirement in the design
of any material handling system is to identify the factors which affect the material handling. So, here
the researchers have identified the core attributes of material handling system through exhaustive
literature survey. Further, these attributes are sub grouped into different categories and their importance
in the context of material handling system design is discussed.
1. INTRODUCTION
In this age of globalization, manufacturing industries are changing rapidly to counter the vital threats
of inflation in market needs and corporate lifestyle. Hence, in current circumstances, industries which
are responding quickly to market fluctuations with more competitiveness will have good capabilities in
producing products with high quality and low cost to satisfy the consumer needs. Now the factors which
are important to the manufacturer are flexibility, quality, efficient delivery and customer satisfaction
rather than the cost. Hence, to attain these factors manufacturing industries are adopting latest
techniques like automation, robotics and other innovative concepts such as just-in-time (JIT),
Production planning and control (PPC), enterprise resource planning (ERP). Flexible manufacturing
system is also one of the techniques which are predominantly used by these industries to achieve their
goals.
Flexible manufacturing is a technique which permits production systems to perform under high
customized production needs. The problems such as minimum inventories and market-response time to
strike into customer needs, response and satisfaction to adjust as per the trends in the market. In order
to compete in market by reducing the cost and improving the quality of products and services will be
compulsory to various companies to move over to flexible manufacturing systems. FMS is used as a
feasible way to overcome the market issues while making reliable and good quality and cost effective
products to fulfill the customer needs.
Flexible manufacturing system includes the concepts and skills in an automated production system like
flexible automation, group technology, computer numerical control machine tools and automated
material handling and storage. Flexible manufacturing system is collection of different tools and
techniques. The components of flexible manufacturing system are discussed in the following
paragraphs.
Monorails, hoists, and cranes such as bridge, gantry, tower and stacker.
Automated guided vehicle systems such as unit load carriers, towing vehicles, pallet trucks,
fork trucks and assembly line.
Automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) such as unit and multi load carriers, person-
on-board, deep lane, and storage carousel systems.
Automated guided vehicle systems
An AGVS is a driverless vehicle, powered by battery with programming capabilities for destination,
path selection and positioning. The AGVS is highly flexible, intelligent, and versatile material handling
systems used to transport materials from different loading locations to different unloading locations all
over the facility.
The components of an AGVS
1. The vehicle- It is used to move the material within the system without a human operator.
2. The guide path- It guides the vehicle to move along the path.
3. The control unit- It monitors and directs system operations including feedback on moves, inventory,
and vehicle status.
4. The computer interface- It interfaces with other computers and systems such as the mainframe host
computer, the automated storage and retrieval system and the flexible manufacturing system.
2. Human Labour: Human labour is mainly used to transport and handle the materials from one place
to another. It is very suitable in developing countries like India where human workforce is easily and
cheaply available.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
There has been lot of work done on selection of material handling equipments in flexible manufacturing
system.
Basnet (1994) reviewed the literature concerning the operations of FMS. Flexible manufacturing
systems (FMS) are distinguished by the use of computer control in place of the hard automation usually
found in transfer lines. The high investment required for a FMS and the potential of FMS as a strategic
competitive tool make it attractive to engage in research in this area.
Chan et al. (1999) developed MHESA (material handling equipment selection advisor) which is an
intelligent system to select the material handling system. This designed system can automate the
material handling selection process and artificial intelligence can also be used.
Raj et al. (2007) proposed a new concept called humanized flexible manufacturing system (HFMS). In
this system human labour is utilized in place of automated material handling system in FMS.
Kumar and Raj (2016) stated that material handling equipment plays an important role in the design
and development of flexible manufacturing systems. In this paper an attempt has been made to select
the most appropriate material handling equipment for the design and development of FMS. They
proposed model on the basis of material handling attributes and sub attributes which are critical for
material handling equipment selection.
Kant et al. (2017) presented a method for selection of material handling equipment (MHE) for flexible
manufacturing system. In the first phase, the system considers major issues, rate of transfer, average
time to transfer, flexibility etc., which is essential for the system. In second phase, the system selects
the most feasible MHE types for every MH operation in a given application depends upon these major
issues using fuzzy logic controller.
2.1 Gaps in Literature Review
Although a lot of work has been performed on material handling system in flexible manufacturing
system but there is very little literature available which provides the details about the core attributes of
material handling system so that automated material handling system with human labour in FMS
environment can be compared based on them. So, in this research paper various attributes material
handling systems are identified and divided into different categories.
5 Others
Safety Kulak(2005),
Accuracy Beamon (1998)
Repeatability
Reliability
Supervision
associated inputs. Productivity is further classified into three categories: material handling productivity,
labour productivity and energy productivity. Material handling productivity refers to how well the
material is transported in a particular material handling system. Utilization of labour efficiently in the
material handling system is the measure of labour productivity. Energy productivity can be defined as
the utilization of energy to the per unit material transported.
Material handling flexibility is the ability to transport different work pieces between various processing
centers over multiple paths economically and effectively (Hutchinson, 1991; Sethi and Sethi, 1990;
Coyle et al. 1992). Routing flexibility is defined as ability to process a given set of part types using
multiple routes economically and effectively (Upton, 1995; Gerwin, 1993; Sethi and Sethi, 1990).
Expansion Flexibility is the capability of building a system, and expanding it as needed, easily and
modularly. This is not possible with all the material handling system. This flexibility can be measured
according to how large the material handling system can expand in FMS. Process Flexibility may be
defined as the ability to produce a given set of part types, each possibly using different material, in
several ways. Buzacott (1982) calls this `job flexibility', which `relates to the mix of jobs which the
system can process.' Gerwin (1982) calls this `mix flexibility'. Operation Flexibility is the ability to
interchange the ordering of several operations for each part type.
Cost in material handling system is combination of variable and fixed costs. Variable costs are generally
the operating costs of the material handling system. Variable costs include the cost of power, lubricants
and maintenance. The variable costs may also include the routing or travel expenses, which are
proportional to the distance travelled. Other Costs is associated with salary and other expanses provided
to human labour and cost associated with sudden failures and breakages. Fixed costs include such costs
as the construction and purchase of equipment and hardware.
The handling time per job is comprised of the time directly associated with material handling. This time
includes: (1) the time the job spends in queues waiting for the material handling vehicle, (2) the total
travel time, and (3) the total loading and unloading times, and (4) total vehicle blocking times. The total
handling time per job includes the time from when a job enters the system until it leaves the system
(Gaskins and Tanchoco 1987).
Material handling system set up should be flexible for the new products. So the system should be
designed in such a way that variety of products can be handled through that system. Material handling
system must be capable of transporting and handling a large volume of products with a good speed.
Kim and Tanchhoco (1993) have defined the P/T ratio as the ratio of the average processing time per
operation divided by the average transport time per transfer.
Safety is a measure concern in the industries. Material handling system should ensure the safety of
human labour as well as machines. Accuracy is the quality or state of being precise. Repeatability is the
measure of providing the similar output for same input over a long period. Reliability is defined as the
probability that an item will perform a required function, under stated conditions, for a stated period of
time (Smith 1993). A reliability measure, then, is a metric for quantifying this probability. Material
handling system has the capabilities to supervise itself and quickly respond to errors.
4. CONCLUSION
This paper discussed about the flexible manufacturing system and its components. Material handling
methods used in flexible manufacturing system is also explained. The core attributes for design of
material handling system in flexible manufacturing system are identified in this paper. These material
handling system attributes are sub grouped under a broad topic and discussed in the context of material
handling system design in flexible manufacturing system. This research can be further extended to select
and design the material handling system suitable for a particular industry by the applications of various
MCDM techniques like AHP and ANP based on these attributes.
REFERENCES
1. Basnet C., & Mize, J. H. (1994), “Scheduling and control of flexible manufacturing systems: a
critical review”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol.7 no.6, pp.
340-355.
2. Nagar, B., & Raj, T. (2012), “ An AHP-based approach for the selection of HFMS: an Indian
perspective”, International Journal of Operational Research, vol.13, no.3, pp.338-358.
3. Kumar S. & Raj T. (2016), “Selection of material handling equipment for flexible
manufacturing system using FAHP”, International Journal of Recent advances in Mechanical
Engineering, vol.5 no.1, pp. 25-45.
4. Chan, F. T. S. (2002), “Design of material handling equipment selection system: an integration
of expert system with analytic hierarchy process approach”, Integrated Manufacturing
Systems, vol.13, no.1, pp. 58-68.
5. Devise, O., & Pierreval, H. (2000), “Indicators for measuring performances of morphology and
material handling systems in flexible manufacturing systems”, International Journal of
Production Economics, vol.64 no.1-3, pp.209-218.
6. Son, Y. K., & Park, C. S. (1987), “Economic measure of productivity, quality and flexibility in
advanced manufacturing systems”, Journal of Manufacturing systems, vol. 6, no.3, pp.193-207.
7. Beamon, B. M. (1998), “Performance, reliability, and performability of material handling
systems”, International Journal of Production Research, vol.36 no.2, pp.377-393.
8. Peters, B. A., Malmborg, C., Petrina, G., Pratt, D., & Taylor, D. (1998), “An introduction to
material handling equipment selection”, College-Industry Council on Material Handling
Education (CICMHE).
9. Bouh, M. A., & Riopel, D. (2015, October), “Material handling equipment selection: New
classifications of equipments and attributes”, In Industrial Engineering and Systems
Management (IESM), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 461-468).
10. Sinriech, D., & Tanchoco, J. M. A. (1995), “An introduction to the segmented flow approach
for discrete material flow systems. International Journal of Production Research”, vol.33 no.12,
pp. 3381-3410.
11. Mahadevan, B., & Narendran, T. T. (1992), “Determination of unit load sizes in an AGV-based
material handling system for an FMS”. International Journal of Production Research, vol.30
no.4, pp. 909-922.
12. Beamon, B. M. (1998), “Performance, reliability, and performability of material handling
systems”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp.377-393.
13. Sethi, A. K., & Sethi, S. P. (1990), “ Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. International journal
of flexible manufacturing systems”, vol. 2, no.4, pp. 289-328.
14. Gerwin, D. (1993), “Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective”, Management
science, vol.39 no.4, pp.395-410.
15. Gaskins, R. J., & Tanchoco, J. M. (1987), “Flow path design for automated guided vehicle
systems. International Journal of Production Research,” vol. 25, no.5, pp.667-676.
16. Kant, R. and Sharma (2017), “Selection model for material handling equipment’s used in
flexible manufacturing system”, International journal of research in engineering and innovation
(IJREI), vol. 1, issue 2, pp.33-39.