REVIEW The Arguments For and The Meaning of Quality
The article explores the concept of quality in education but finds that it lacks a clear definition. It discusses various perspectives on quality, including improvement, excellence, and fitness for purpose. While many features of quality are mentioned, such as standards, accreditation, and professionalism of teachers, the article questions if these truly represent quality. It argues that simply taking improvement as the definition of quality leaves open questions. Overall, the article analyzes arguments around the meaning of quality in different educational contexts but concludes there is no single agreed-upon concept.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views2 pages
REVIEW The Arguments For and The Meaning of Quality
The article explores the concept of quality in education but finds that it lacks a clear definition. It discusses various perspectives on quality, including improvement, excellence, and fitness for purpose. While many features of quality are mentioned, such as standards, accreditation, and professionalism of teachers, the article questions if these truly represent quality. It argues that simply taking improvement as the definition of quality leaves open questions. Overall, the article analyzes arguments around the meaning of quality in different educational contexts but concludes there is no single agreed-upon concept.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
You are on page 1/ 2
The Arguments For And The Meaning Of interpretation in the context of education,
Quality associating it to the lessons, results,
Helen Thomas___________________ resources,etc but Thomas contemplates some questions which imply that it does not ELT Journal, 2003, Volume 57/3____ exist a clear concept of quality. Only some Oxford University Press___________ features are mentioned but not a clear idea. So, Thomas argues “to take improvement as a definition for quality leaves many According to the title of the Thomas’ article unanswered questions” (p. 235). “The Arguments For And The Meaning Of Quality”, the concept of this term used The subtible 2 is “Economic Arguments” in frequently in different contexts would have a which Thomas explains the way how several greater clarity for potential readers. The associations play a role in quality of English article affirms the exploration for several language teaching in different countries, at elements related to this topic in order to the same time she questions the reasons for “seek a rationale and meaning for quality for doing it, mentioning the interest for assuring all practitioners” (p. 234). their business and generate income. We can see the article is contextualized in private Before addressing the issue of how the institution of ELT in Britain. quality is clearly defined and all aspects that it influences, I will describe the organization The subtitle 3 is “Political Arguments” and of the article, and present the mean ideas of it mentions the reasons to create “agreed the content. quality standards”, other concept that is fundamental to know. Thomas says how this The article is divided in eight subtitles, element could help students to avoid accompanied by the respective introduction “cowboy” language schools and to choose and conclusion. The introduction presents excellent institutions to learn English. At the how the concept of quality is used in same time, it considers how some bodies of different situations of the daily life. It sets accreditation could facilitate to some some examples of this. Moreover, Thomas countries to achieve friends for a political connects the concept to the educational aim. In this point, Thomas asks the question context, exactly the English Language “…are the agreed standards?” which it is not Teaching (ELT). answered clearly. The first subtitle is related to the definition The subtible 4 is about the The State sector”. of quality in education. A term that is So, it explains the use of term quality in the necessary to know for doing an effective state education, how the national curriculum reading of the article. Thomas mentions the could be a tool for controlling the autonomy struggle for the variety of definitions, among of institutions by means of OFSTED. The them: excellence, improvement and fitness goverment try to assure the higher for purpose. She emphasises the education, and use the term quality for improvement which is an aceptable providing this accountability. To this point we can see several features of quality, but of the quality” (p. 239). Thomas emphasizes not a clear concept of what it means in the an idea that I consider fundamental for ELT. quality, that is “We must look at the how, the what, and the what for: quality is process The subtitle 5 is “Quality Goals”. Thomas and product, and the relevance of the goes back to the term “standards”, asking product (p. 240). “What are these standards?” and she explains how they are the basis for Despite of the interesting reading and the all accreditation of institutions. She does not aspects about quality that are explained in going into details about the definition but the article, there are some points that I she gives a simple idea about the standards consider could have been explained better in are. order to facilitate to readers the comprehension of the topic. It is clear that The subtitle 6 about the “time frame” the article uses a technical language belong affirms how the process for accreditation is to the educational field. That is the case of developed in a defined period. Documents, some terms like “quality, standards and visits, and the outcomes are evaluated in a accreditation” whose definitions are specific dates. Thomas remarks the stress important in order to understand all ideas caused by these visits and how they can be expressed by Thomas. If the article is read managed by the institutions, which are for a person that is starting his work in the proficient at covering their weaknesses. educational field maybe she or he will not Thomas makes us think if the accreditation find clear concepts to know. However, I do visits really get to the quality of what is not deny the excellent work done by Thomas going on. This is a good point to analyze: in this publication. the development of the assessment process in order to certify quality. It is clear for me that the definitions of quality and standard are complex, and we The subtitle 7 called “Professionalism” can only take in account some aspects of this exalts the role of the teachers and lectures in order to have an idea about they are. So, who want to improve their work with Thomas makes a good work showing all students. Thomas, from her experience, arguments related to quality, and although mentions an important benefits of the we do not have one concept of these terms quality, that is to provoque a positive we could enjoy an excellent reading. impact. The reviewer________________________ The subtitle 8 is “Fitness of purpose”, one of the aspects to define quality in the Katerine Gómez is a student of Foreign educational field. Thomas says how the Languages, and teacher of primary school in “department decides what it is going to teach Institución Educativa Técnica Comercial de and how” and at the same time, she argues Ponedera, where she has analized different in a accurate way “the relevance or aspects and strategies to achieve the quality appropriateness of what we teach is also part in the teaching and learning process.