Final Alignment Report

Satellite Town Ring Road (STRR)

Bangalore West Side (NH 948A)

April 2018
Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

FINAL ALIGNMENT REPORT

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic

Project Name Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of
freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra
Pradesh, Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Document Name FINAL ALIGNMENT REPORT (STRR)

Document No. 4800182- GGN-DE-003(B) Issue No. 03

Prepared by Vivek/Swaraj

Reviewed By K Mohan

Team leader/Senior Highway Engineer

ISSUE LOG / SIGNATURE PAGE

Issue # Submission Date Remark Approved By

Name/Position Signature
Draft
Alignment K Mohan
01 10 Nov. 2017
Report Team Leader
submitted
Final
Alignment K Mohan
02 07/02/2018 Report is
being Team Leader
Submitted
Final
Alignment K Mohan
03 13/04/2018 Report is
being Team Leader
Submitted

Final Alignment Report i

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 GENERAL ................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Original STRR alignment ............................................................................................................. 2

1.1.1 Modifications proposed ..................................................................................................... 4

1.1.2 Value addition proposed .................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Connection to Hosur city.............................................................................................................. 5

1.3 Submission & Approvals from Government of Karnataka & Tamil Nadu .................................... 8
1.4 Satellite Towns Ring Road (STRR) Bangalore West Side ........................................................ 30

1.4.1 Road under progress in STRR ........................................................................................ 30

1.5 Declaration of STRR (west side) as NH .................................................................................... 31

1.6 Project road ............................................................................................................................... 31
1.7 Environment Studies .................................................................................................................. 35
1.8 Social Assessment .................................................................................................................... 36

List of Tables

Table 1: Modified proposed Original alignment of Karnataka ................................................................. 5

Table 2: Comparative Statement of Proposed Alignment ....................................................................... 6
Table 3: Major Cross road locations ..................................................................................................... 31
Table 4: Proposed Highway Design Standards .................................................................................... 32
Table 5: Tentative Land Uses along the Project ................................................................................... 37

List of Figures

Fig. 1: Original STRR Alignment as think of by Karnataka State Government ....................................... 3

Fig 2: STRR proposal connect Hosur city with four options ................................................................... 6
Fig 3: Concurrence obtained for alignment from Karnataka state .......................................................... 9
Fig 4: Concurrence obtained for alignment from Karnataka state ........................................................ 10
Fig 5: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu ........................................ 11

Final Alignment Report ii

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 6a: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu ...................................... 12
Fig 6b: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu ...................................... 13
Fig 7: Final Alignment ........................................................................................................................... 29
Fig. 8: Proposed Typical Cross Section of Road .................................................................................. 34
Fig 9: Alignment passes through Banneragatta National Park ............................................................. 35

List of Annexures

Annexure 1: MORTH Gazette notification no 6, dated 02/01/2018 ...................................................... 38

Annexure 2: Horizontal Alignment details ............................................................................................. 40

Final Alignment Report iii

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

ALIGNMENT REPORT

1.0 GENERAL
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH), Government of India has proposed
“Bharat Mala Pariyojana” an Umbrella scheme of road development project through National
Highways Authority of India (NHAI), National Highway and Industrial Development Corporation
(NHIDC) and state Public Works Departments (PWD) at an estimated cost of INR
5,35,000crores. This is the second largest highways construction project in the country after
NHDP, in that almost 50,000 km of roads targeted across the country. This project aim to
improve connectivity particularly on economic corridors, border areas and to remote areas with
an aim of rapid and safe movement of cargo to boost exports. International trade considered
as a key aspect in this scheme and northeastern states have given special focus. The project
cleared by the Union Cabinet on October 25, 2017.
The ambitious project expected to create nearly 100million man days of jobs during the
construction and subsequently to about 22million jobs of the increased economic activity across
the country. The construction will carried out through many means including debt funds,
budgetary allocation, private investment, toll operator transfer etc. The total length of around
34,800km considered in phase 1 including

 Economic corridors of around 9,000km,

 Inter-corridor and feeder routes of around 6,000km,
 National Corridors Efficiency Program of about 5,000 km roads
 Border and international connectivity roads of around 2,000 km,
 Coastal and port connectivity roads of around 2,000 km,
 Expressways of around 800 km
 NHDP roads of 10,000km
In pursuance of the above program, NHAI appointed M/s Louis Berger Consulting Private
Limited, New Delhi as Consultants to carry out the Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR
for development of Economic Corridors, Inner corridors, feeder Routes and Costal Roads to
improve the efficiency of fright movement in India - Lot 3/Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Goa &
Kerala, / Package 1. The project consists the following stretches of roads finalized as per final
Inception Report.
1. Aurad – Bidar section - KA SH 15
2. Mydukur – Badvel section – NH 67
3. Puttur - Janappanchatram section - AP SH 4421 & TN SH 51
4. Belagavi (Belgaum) – Sanquelim with a proper Connectivity to NH4A and NH 17
through existing SH – KA SH 54, KA SH 31, GA SH 4
5. Balance Portion of Satellite Ring Road of Bangalore (West Side) including connection
to Hosur town & Feasibility for widening the existing SH between Anekal to Sarjapur
for Passenger traffic bound to Attibele/ Sarjapur to ensure ring road connectivity for
Bangalore.
The Letter of Acceptance was communicated vide NHAI letter NHAI/Planning/
EC/2016/DPR/Lot 3/ Ap. Knt. Goa &KL/Package 1/98598 dated 21/04/2017. The contract
agreement signed on 11/5/2017 vide letter NHAI/planning/EC/2016/DPR/Lot 3/AP, Karnataka,
Goa &KL, / Package 1/99575 dated 11/05/2017 with immediate commencement date.

Final Alignment Report 1

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

The draft alignment report submitted vie dated 10/11/2017. Based on joint site visit and further
discussions held with RO/NHAI/Bangalore and PD/Bangalore some modifications made. The
current submission is Final Alignment Report for STRR Bangalore, the alignment declared
declared NH 948A.

1.1 Original STRR alignment

In order to ensure safe, smooth, efficient, and high speed transport corridor to Bangalore city,
it is impetus that the infrastructure of city and adjoining towns anticipated the development.
National Highways NH 648 (NH 207), NH 48 (NH 4), NH 275, NH 948, NH 209 & NH 75 (Hassan
road), and majority of State Highways SH 3, SH 85, & SH 35 pass through Bangalore city
comprising heavy commercial traffic movement. Most of these traffic are not intend to pass
through the Bangalore city. These traffic further aggravate the scenario in the city roads and
resulting huge traffic jams.

The Government of Karnataka took steps to improve and augment network within and
neighboring area of the city to match with its phase of development. Bangalore Metropolitan
Regional Development Authority (BMRDA) had planned the following network of roads
consisting the length of 367km to match these requirements.

 Satellite Towns Ring Road (STRR) – 204km

 Individual Town ring Roads (ITRR) – 163km

The total length of STRR (204km) is exclude the stretch passing within the ITRR except for
Neelmangala town. The STRR connects the important towns namely Dobbaspet,
Doddaballapura, Devanahalli, Sulibele, Hoskote, Sarjapura, Attibele, Anekal, Tattekere,
Kanakapura, Ramanagara and Magadi.

BMRDA assigned M/s SECON for the consultancy services to undertake the topographical &
Cadastral surveys, finalize the proposed alignment and to prepare the land acquisition report
in year 2006. Subsequently, the same agency was engaged to carry out the consultancy for
Techno –Economic Feasibility Report in 2007.The notification for land acquisition for STRR &
ITRR issued on 12/09/2007 and the project report approved by BMRDA on 10/06/2008. The
proposed STRR alignment has declared as State Highway (special) -2 as per the provisions of
Karnataka Highways Act 1964 and the SE, PWD, Bangalore circle nominated as ‘The Highway
Authority’. Land acquisition processes initiated vide notification NO4017-07-08 dated
19/10/2007.

The original corridor proposed with 90m right-of-way consists of divided 4lanes carriageways
with depressed median of 20.50m, with service roads (7m) on both sides. Provision of high
speed rail corridor of 15m on one side throughout also made. In addition to this utility corridor
of 5m and bus lay-bye of 4m also considered on both sides. The corridor of 90m also frozen by
the state government. Ring roads was also proposed to be developed individually for 8 major
towns namely Anekal, Kanakapura, Ramanagara, Magadi, Neelmangala, Doddaballapura,
Devanahalli & Hoskote to act as bypass for these towns. However, the project shelved due to
paucity of funds with the State government.

The original alignment as think of by Karnataka State government and obtained from
M/s SECON through NHAI enclosed in Fig 1.

Final Alignment Report 2

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig. 1: Original STRR Alignment as think of by Karnataka State Government

Final Alignment Report 3

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

However, the earlier proposed alignment by the Karnataka state government passes through
some of built up stretches, tanks including religious structures, burial grounds etc. Also during
the course of time, some new activities also come up. Therefore, it was indispensable to further
study the alignment and update, considering the current scenario along the original proposed
alignment. Accordingly, modifications are propose to ensure minimal social Impact and to serve
the alignment to wider spectrum of inhabitants in that region. The details given below.

1.1.1 Modifications proposed

1. The original alignment passes through the Dobbaspet town connecting NH 4 on
Bangalore side. This extended further on Doddaballapura side towards NH 207 to
ensure avoidance of Dobbaspet town local traffic.
2. The original alignment (in the cross point of Hassan road) passes through thickly built
up area in Gudermaranahalli from km 14.000 to km 22.000 This stretch consists of
residential, school and religious structures.
3. The earlier alignment passes through thickly built up area from km 22.000 to km 25.600
in Harthi/Renganahalli.
4. The original alignment passes through Savanadurga Forest area from km 34.700 to km
41.700. This forest also has wildlife.
5. The original alignment pass through Siddadevarabetta Forest area from km 43.000 to
km 46.700
6. The original alignment passes through Ramadevarabetta forest area from km 57.700 to
km 58.300 near NH 275 crossing in Ramanagara.

1.1.2 Value addition proposed

Further the alignment made value additions by connecting some cross roads and considering
the current and future proposals in that location as per below details.
1. The starting point of the STRR extended to connect NH 207 (near km 131.200) with a
bypass provision in Dobbaspet town on Pune side to ensure uninterrupted traffic flow,
contrary to the earlier proposed location pass through the mid of built up area in
Dobbaspet. It is relevant to mention that the through traffic contribute from Pune
direction, on NH 4 is significant.
2. There is Multi Model Logistic Park (MMLP) and proposed KIADB coming up near
Dobbaspet on SH 3 spread at about 250acres of land. The Feasibility study also done
for the proposed MMLP project. Therefore, connection to this park is eminent and
provision made accordingly to these logistic park & KIADB with proposed STRR.
3. NHAI is currently developing bypasses to Kankapura and Ramanagara towns under
different programs to ease traffic congestion on NH 209 and NH 275 respectively. Thus,
in order to ensure seamless traffic flow through these proposed bypasses, it is
necessary to integrate with proposed STRR at these locations.
4. Hosur is an automobile industry town located in the vicinity of about 7km away from
Karnataka state border. This city generates huge amount of through traffic and
currently experiencing massive traffic congestion. It observed that the proposed STRR
would further deteriorate the Hosur traffic. Therefore, consideration of STRR taking
along this town necessitated.

Final Alignment Report 4

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

The modification proposed to original alignment of Karnataka state portion tabulated as below.

Table 1: Modified proposed Original alignment of Karnataka

STRR Original Modified STRR Re-

alignment (km) Alignment (km) Alignment
S. as received Side w.r.t
Reason for change
No Original
STRR
Alignment
Length Length
From To From To
(km) (km)
To provide Bypass to
Dobaspette town and to connect
1 0.00 6.50 6.50 0.00 17.50 17.50 Right
NH 207 and Proposed MMLP in
Dobaspette
2 6.50 14.00 7.50 17.50 25.00 7.50 No change in original alignment
3 14.00 22.00 8.00 25.00 33.40 8.40 Left To avoid Temple and Pond
4 22.00 25.60 3.60 33.40 37.00 3.60 Left To avoid Builtup area
5 25.60 34.70 9.10 37.00 46.00 9.00 No change in original alignment
6 34.70 41.70 7.00 46.00 52.70 6.70 Right To avoid Savandurga forest.
7 41.70 43.00 1.30 52.70 54.00 1.30 No change in original alignment
To avoid Siddadevarabetta
8 43.00 46.70 3.70 54.00 58.00 4.00 Left
Reserve Forest.
9 46.70 51.00 4.30 58.00 62.20 4.20 No change in original alignment
To avoid Siddadevarabetta
10 51.00 68.00 17.00 62.20 80.80 18.60 Left
Vulture Sanctuary (Ramanagara)
11 68.00 74.00 6.00 80.80 86.75 5.95 No change in original alignment
To avoid Reserve forest and Hill
12 74.00 99.00 25.00 86.75 106.00 19.25 Left
cutting (Kanakpura)
13 99.00 115.00 16.00 106.00 121.85 15.85 No change in original alignment
Due to inclusion of Ring Road of
Hosur town, Automobile Hub of
14 115.00 End - 121.85 179.63 57.78
Tamil Nadu and Connecting with
proposed KITCO alignment

1.2 Connection to Hosur city

It was also envisage connecting the Hosur city with the proposed STRR alignment as per the
meeting held with CGM/NHAI in Bangalore during the Inception study. The city is located in the
proximity of only 7km from Karnataka state border. The Industrial town of Hosur is also an
automobile hub of Tamil Nadu. Thus, this proposal will enable to disburse the traffic toward
further south in a methodical manner. It also further enables a connectivity for Hosur to the
proposed Bangalore - Chennai Expressway.
The proposed alignment also discussed with District Commissioner, Krishnagiri and with
various stake holders, district level officers, and NHAI. Four options proposed and all options
discussed with its merits and demerits. The details given in Fig 2.

Final Alignment Report 5

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 2: STRR proposal connect Hosur city with four options

The comparative statements of all options of proposed Hosur bypass alignment are as below

Table 2: Comparative Statement of Proposed Alignment

Option - 1 Option - 2 Option - 3 Option - 4

No Description
(ABHCDIEF) (ABGCDIEF) (ABHCDJEF) (ABGCDJEF)
1 Starting 139.000 139.000 139.000 139.000
2 Ending 190.000 190.000 190.000 190.000
After Hosur airport After Hosur Before Hosur
Before Hosur
Route & airport & airport &
airport & away from
3 Alignment away from Close to Close to
Kelavarapalli
side Kelavarapalli Kelavarapalli Kelavarapalli
reservoir area
reservoir area reservoir area reservoir area
Length of
4 60 59 63
Bypass (km) 59
Length of
existing
5 alignment/
nil nil nil nil
bypassed
(km)
Built-up
6 nil
stretch (km) nil nil nil
7 Terrain Plain Plain Plain Plain
8 Speed 100 km/h 100 km/h 100 km/h 100 km/h
Geometry is good, Geometry is good, Geometry is Geometry is
9 Geometries
supports 100 supports 100 km/h good, supports good, supports

Final Alignment Report 6

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Option - 1 Option - 2 Option - 3 Option - 4

No Description
(ABHCDIEF) (ABGCDIEF) (ABHCDJEF) (ABGCDJEF)
km/h speed. Good speed. Good sight 100 km/h 100 km/h speed.
sight distance with distance with speed. Good Good sight
curves widely curves widely sight distance distance with
spaced. spaced. with curves curves widely
widely spaced. spaced.
Intersection
10 7 7 7
developments 7
Existing Land
use pattern
Agricultural Land Agricultural Land Agricultural Agricultural Land
11 through
and barren land and barren land Land and and barren land
proposed
barren land
alignment
12 Major Bridge 2 2 2 2
13 Minor Bridge 3 3 2 2
Approximate
14 120 120 130
Culverts (no) 120
15 ROB 1 1 1 1
16 Interchange 7 7 7 7
17 VUP nil nil nil nil
18 PUP nil nil nil nil
Proposed
19 90 90 90
ROW 90
20 Existing ROW 0 0 0 0
No of affected
21 nil
Settlements nil nil nil
Agasa Agasa
Timanahalli, Timanahalli,
Agasa Timanahalli,
Patnagere Patnagere Agasa
Singasandra,
Gollahalli, Muttur, Gollahalli, Timanahalli,
KomaranapalliPoo
Mattakur, Muttur, Singasandra,
nahalli, Achettipalli,
Agraharam, Mattakur, Komaranapalli,
Kothur,
Alignment Achettipalli, Agraharam, Poonahalli,
Peranadapalli,
passes Kothur, Achettipalli, Achettipalli,
22 Attur,
through Peranadapalli, Kothur, Kothur,
Pathamuthalli,
villages Attur, Peranadapalli, Peranadapalli,
Avalapalli,
Pathamuthalli, Nandi Nandimaglam,
Eluvapalli, Nallur,
Avalapalli, maglam, Baglur, Kaganur
Chikhanathpuram,
Eluvapalli, Nallur, Baglur, Sarjapur.
Kothapalli,
Chikhanathpuram, Kaganur
Sarjapur
Kothapalli, Sarjapura.
Sarjapur
23 Social Impact Not significant Not significant Not significant Not significant
Environmental
24 Not significant Not significant Not significant Not significant
Impact

Final Alignment Report 7

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

The merits and demerits for the Hosur alignment inclusion in STRR are as follow.

Merits

 Enabling new spatial distribution of business/ housing in Hosur city

 Improved road geometry will ensure enhanced traffic safety and reduction in road
accident rate.
 Major cross roads intersections will provisioned with free flow interchanges and will
catalyzed development of Industrial sited located near to this places
 Will remove through truck traffic from city’s main artery
 More local traffic may get encouraged to use a route previously avoided due to heavy
truck traffic
 Proactive planning by local authorities will further catalyze industrial development
 Will benefits the town in revenues, real estate, and job opportunities

Demerit

 The overall alignment length will increase and result higher land acquisition and
construction costs.
Based on facts presented, the district administration recommended and approved Option 4
(ABGCDJEF) for consideration.
1.3 Submission & Approvals from Government of Karnataka & Tamil Nadu

Karnataka

The original alignment validated with current developments in that region and the updated
alignment discussed with NHAI. Accordingly, this updated STRR alignment submitted to NHAI
vide our reference 4800182-GGN-OC-019 dated 05/10/2017 for Concurrences from
Government of Karnataka. NHAI submitted to Government of Karnataka to seek consent to the
modifications proposed in STRR vide letter NHAI/12012/Lot 3/Package 1/I/2017/PIU-BNG
(EXP)/530 dated 09/10/2017.
The government of Karnataka vide its letter PWD/518/CNH2017 dated 27/10/2017 conveyed
the concurrences. NHAI vide letter NHAI/Planning/EC/2016/DPR/Lot 3/AP-KT-Goa &
Kerala/Pkg 1/1087-28 dated 17/11/2017 agreed to the further modification proposed.
The approval letters obtained from the government of Karnataka and the approved alignment
are given in Fig 3 & Fig 4.
Tamil Nadu

The concurrences for Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu obtained vide letter 14787/HV1/2017-2
dated 24/01/2018. The approval letters obtained from government of Tamil Nadu with approved
alignments given in Fig 5 & Fig 6.

Final Alignment Report 8

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 3: Concurrence obtained for alignment from Karnataka state

Final Alignment Report 9

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 4: Concurrence obtained for alignment from Karnataka state

Final Alignment Report 10

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 5: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu

Final Alignment Report 11

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 6a: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu

Final Alignment Report 12

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 6b: Concurrence obtained for alignment of Hosur portion of Tamil Nadu

Final Alignment Report 13

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

1.4 Modifications in Original STRR

The approved alignment also gone through some further slight modifications so to amalgamate
the proposal with adjoining alignments and the details are as below.

1. Inclusion of Multi Model Logistic Park (MMLP) & proposed KIADB in Dobbaspet:
change km 0.000 to km 17.500 (original km 0.000 to km 6.500)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications in Dobbaspet are given
below.

S. Option 2
Description Option-1 Option-3 Option-4
No. (Original STRR)
Length of
1 17.5 6.5 19.6 17.54
Alignment (km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good, Geometry is Geometry is Geometry is
5 Geometries
supports 100 good, supports good, supports good, supports

Final Alignment Report 14

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

S. Option 2
Description Option-1 Option-3 Option-4
No. (Original STRR)
kmph speed. 100 kmph speed. 100 kmph speed. 100 kmph
Good sight Good sight Good sight speed. Good
distance with distance with distance with sight distance
curves widely curves widely curves widely with curves
spaced. spaced. spaced. widely spaced.
Existing Land use
Agricultural
pattern through Agricultural Industrial Land / Agricultural Land /
6 Land /
proposed Land/Barren Land Agricultural Land Forest Land
Residential
alignment
Proposed ROW
7 75 75 75 75
(m)
Total Additional
8 land required in 131.25 48.75 147 131.55
Hec.
No of affected
9 Structures 0 20 5 20
(tentative)
10 ROB 1 0 1 1
11 Bridge 0 0 0 0
12 Interchange 1 0 0 0
The proposed
No significant No significant alignment will No significant
Environmental environmental environmental passes through environmental
13
Impact impact is impact is Nijagal and impact is
envisaged envisaged Kengal Reserve envisaged
Forest
Tentative cost
15 941.05 320.89 994.576 1029.5624
(INR in crores)

1. No
structure/establish
ment is affected
Better road
2. Connectivity
16 Merits geometry could
given to proposed
be achieved
MMLP in
Dabaspete
3. Comparatively
shorter alignment
1. Larger
alignment length
1. Alignment 1.Poor
2. Passes through
passes through alignment
Forest land & thus
built-up location Geometry
forest clearence
at Dabaspete 2.Passing
need to be
2. Passes through Built-
obtained before
through the up stretch
17 Demerits implimentation of
proposed MMLP 3.Land cost will
project
Industrial location be more as the
3. Passes through
in Dabaspete alignement
the aggregate
3.Not connecting passing
quarry area
Dabaspete as a through buit-up
4. Passes through
whole region
abutting CISF
land
Not Not Not
18 Recommendation Recommended
Recommended Recommended Recommended

Final Alignment Report 15

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

2. Design chainage km 25.000 to km 33.400 (Original km 14.000 to km 22.000)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications in Dobbaspet are given
below

S. Option-2 ( original
Description Option-1 Option-3
No. STRR)
Length of
1 8.4 8 7.6
Alignment (km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good, Geometry is good, Geometry is good,
supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph
5 Geometries speed. Good sight speed. Good sight speed. Good sight
distance with curves distance with curves distance with curves
widely spaced. widely spaced. widely spaced.
Existing Land
use pattern
6 Agricultural Land Agricultural Land Agricultural Land
through proposed
alignment
Proposed ROW
7 75 75 75
(m)

Final Alignment Report 16

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

S. Option-2 ( original
Description Option-1 Option-3
No. STRR)
Total Additional
8 land required in 63 60 57
Hec.
No of affected
9 Structures 0 20 20
(tentative)
10 ROB 1 1 1
11 Bridge 0 0 0
12 Interchange 1 1 1
No significant No significant No significant
Environmental
13 environmental impact environmental environmental impact is
Impact
is envisaged impact is envisaged envisaged

Tentative civil
15 cost (INR in 478.854 506.98 485.856
crores)

1. No
structure/establishment
is affected
16 Merits
2.Less construction
cost
3.Better alignment
geometry

1. Alignment passes
1. Passes through through many existing
large number of roads, resulting
structures including provision grade
religious structure, separators
17 Demerits
resulting higher land 2. Combined
& social cost interchange of ROB
2. Passes through and NH crossing is
the mid of a pond required, for that under
construction ROB to be
demolished

18 Recommendation Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended

Final Alignment Report 17

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

3 Avoiding thick built up area in Rangenahalli

Chainage km 33.400 to km 37.000 (original km 22.000 to km 25.600)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications are given below

Option-2 ( original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR )
Length of
1 3.6 3.6 5.7
Alignment (km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good, Geometry is good, Geometry is good,
supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph
5 Geometries speed. Good sight speed. Good sight speed. Good sight
distance with curves distance with curves distance with curves
widely spaced. widely spaced. widely spaced.
Existing Land
use pattern Agricultural Land /
6 Agricultural Land Agricultural Land
through proposed Forest Land
alignment

Final Alignment Report 18

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Option-2 ( original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR )
Proposed ROW
7 75 75 75
(m)
Total Additional
8 land required in 27 27 42.75
Hec.
No of affected
9 Structures 0 30 5
(tentative)
10 ROB 0 0 0
11 Bridge 0 0 0
12 Interchange 0 0 0
No significant No significant No significant
Environmental
13 environmental environmental impact environmental
Impact
impact is envisaged is envisaged impact is envisaged
Tentative civil
15 cost (INR in 169.866 172.866 269.4545
crores)
1. Shorter alignment
length
16 Merits
2. No built-up land is
involved

1. More than 30
1. Passes through
establishments would
pond
17 Demerits get affected
2.Higher construction
2.Comparatively poor
cost
alignment geometry

18 Recommendation Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended

Final Alignment Report 19

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

4 Avoiding Savanadurga forest Area

Chainage km 46.000 to km 52.700 (Original km 34.700 to km 41.700)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications are given below

Option-2 ( original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR)
Length of
1 6.7 7 8.8
Alignment (km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good,
Geometry is good, Geometry is good,
supports 100 kmph
supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph
speed. Good sight
5 Geometries speed. Good sight speed. Good sight
distance with
distance with curves distance with curves
curves widely
widely spaced. widely spaced.
spaced.

Final Alignment Report 20

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Option-2 ( original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR)
Existing Land
use pattern Mostly Barren Barren Land / Forest Barren Land / Forest
6
through proposed Land Land Land
alignment
Proposed ROW
7 75 75 75
(m)
Total Additional
8 land required in 50.25 52.5 66
Hec.
No of affected
9 Structures 0 0 0
(tentative)
10 ROB 0 0 0
11 Bridge 0 0 0
12 Interchange 0 0 0
The proposed The proposed
No significant alignment passes alignment passes
Environmental environmental through Savanadurga through Savanadurga
13
Impact impact is Reserve Forest. Thus Reserve Forest. Thus
envisaged Reserve forest Reserve forest
clearances required. clearances required.
Tentative civil
15 cost (INR in 316.1395 330.295 415.228
crores)
1. Away from forest
land, resulting
ease in
16 Merits
construction
2.Better alignment
geometry
The proposed The proposed
alignment passes alignment passes
through Savanadurga through Savanadurga
Reserve Forest. Thus Reserve Forest. Thus
17 Demerits
Reserve forest Reserve forest
clearances required. clearances required.
This will delay the This will delay the
project implementation project implementation

18 Recommendation Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended

Final Alignment Report 21

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

5. Siddadevarabetta Forest Area

Chainage km 54.000 to km 58.000 (Original km 43.000 to km 46.700)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications are given below

S. No. Description Option-1 Option-2 ( original STRR)

Length of Alignment
1 4 3.7
(km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good, supports
Geometry is good, supports 100
100 kmph speed. Good sight
5 Geometries kmph speed. Good sight distance
distance with curves widely
with curves widely spaced.
spaced.
Existing Land use
6 pattern through Mostly Barren Land Barren Land / Forest Land
proposed alignment
7 Proposed ROW (m) 75 75
Total Additional land
8 30 27.75
required in Hec.

Final Alignment Report 22

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

S. No. Description Option-1 Option-2 ( original STRR)

No of affected
9 Structures 0 0
(tentative)
10 ROB 0 0
11 Bridge 0 0
12 Interchange 0 0
The proposed alignment passes
Environmental No significant environmental through Siddadevarabetta
13
Impact impact is envisaged Reserve Forest. Thus Reserve
forest clearances required.
Tentative civil cost
15 188.74 174.5845
(INR in crores)
Away from forest land,
16 Merits resulting ease in
construction

The proposed alignment passes

through Siddadevarabetta
17 Demerits
Reserve Forest. Thus Reserve
forest clearances required.

18 Recommendation Recommended Not Recommended

Final Alignment Report 23

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

6. Ramanagara vulture Sanctuary area

Chainage km 62.200 to km 80.800 (Original km 51.000 to km 68.000)

Alignment options

Comparative statement

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications are given below

Option-2 (original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR)
Length of
1 18.6 17 25.05
Alignment (km)
2 Built-up stretch Nil Nil Nil
3 Terrain Plain Plain Plain
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is good,
supports 100 Geometry is good, Geometry is good,
kmph speed. supports 100 kmph supports 100 kmph
5 Geometries Good sight speed. Good sight speed. Good sight
distance with distance with curves distance with curves
curves widely widely spaced. widely spaced.
spaced.
Existing Land
Agricultural Land /
use pattern Agricultural Agricultural Land/Barren
6 Forest
through proposed Land/Barren Land Land/Forest Land
Land/Residential
alignment
Proposed ROW
7 75 75 75
(m)
Total Additional
8 land required in 139.5 127.5 187.875
Hec.

Final Alignment Report 24

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Option-2 (original
S. No. Description Option-1 Option-3
STRR)
No of affected
9 Structures 0 0 10
(tentative)
10 ROB 1 1 1
11 Bridge 1 1 1
12 Interchange 1 1 2
The proposed alignment
No significant The alignment is
pass through close
Environmental environmental passing through the
13 proximity of
Impact impact is Ramadevarabetta
Doddamannugudde
envisaged Reserve forest
Reserve Forest
Tentative civil
15 cost (INR in 992.641 917.145 1347.98425
crores)

1.Not demolishing
any major
structure
16 Merits
2.No forest land is
involved, resulting
ease of
construction

1. Larger alignment
length
2. The proposed
alignment pass through
close proximity of
The alignment is
Doddamannugudde
passing through the
Reserve Forest.
17 Demerits mid of
3. the existing railway line
Ramadevarabetta
and the National highway
Vulture Sanctuary
are in close proximity
(250m) therefore vertical
geometry not suitable for
ROB & interchange
provision in NH 275

18 Recommendation Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended

Final Alignment Report 25

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

7. Kanakapura
Chainage km 86.750 to km 106.000 (Original km 74.000 to km 99.000)

Alignment options

The comparative statements of all four options of proposed modifications are given
below:

S. Alt 1
Description Original STRR Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4
No. (Modified)
Length of
1 Alignment 25 24.65 21.10 19.61 19.25
(km)
Built-up
2 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
stretch
3 Terrain Plain/rolling Plain/rolling Plain/rolling Plain/rolling Plain/rolling
4 Speed 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
Geometry is Geometry is
good, supports good, supports
Geometry is Geometry is Geometry is
100 kmph 100 kmph
good, supports good, supports good, supports
5 Geometries speed. Good speed. Good
100 kmph 100 kmph 100 kmph
sight distance sight distance
speed. speed. speed.
with curves with curves
widely spaced. widely spaced.
Existing
Land use
pattern Barren/Agricult Barren/Agricult Barren/Agricult Barren/Agricult Barren/Agricult
6
through ural Land ural Land ural Land ural Land ural Land
proposed
alignment

Final Alignment Report 26

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

S. Alt 1
Description Original STRR Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4
No. (Modified)
Proposed
7 75 75 75 75 75
ROW (m)
Total
Additional
8 land 172.5 176.25 148.125 141.75 138.75
required in
Hec.
No of
affected
9 75 20 5 5 5
Structures
(tentative)
10 ROB 0 0 0 0 0
Major
11 1 1 1 1 1
Bridge
12 Interchange 1 1 1 1 1
Pass through
No significant No significant No significant No significant
reserve forest
Environment environmental environmental environmental environmental
13 land and
al Impact impact is impact is impact is impact is
heavily built up
envisaged envisaged envisaged envisaged
area.
Tentative
civil cost
15 1416.13 1390.54 1202.25 1150.86 1074.49
(INR in
crores)
Good
Length is horizontal
Length is
shorter as geometry. The
shorter as
compare to length will be
Improved compare to
proposed, shorter
geometry as proposed &
original and compared to
compare to original, Avoid
Alt-1, Avoid originally
original, Avoid acquisition in
16 Merits - acquisition in proposed
acquisition in built-up and
built-up and alignment.
built-up and reserve forest
reserve forest Very less
reserve forest area. No
area. No structures will
area significant
significant be affected. No
environmental
environmental significant
impact
impact environmental
impact
Passes The proposed Comparatively Comparatively Some amount
through large flyover will be poor horizontal poor horizontal cutting is
number of combined for geometry. geometry. expected due
structures both existing Large amount Large amount to rolling
including NH 209 and its of cutting of cutting terrain.
religious newly involved. Pass involved. Pass
structure, proposed through close through close
resulting bypass to reserve to reserve
17 Demerits higher land & resulting more forest area. forest area.
social cost. length. There is major There is major
water pipe (2 water pipe (2
The existing no) line run no) line run
NH and parallel to NH parallel to NH
proposed 209. 209.
Kankapura Interchange Interchange
bypass are at length will be length will be
the distance of more as they more as they

Final Alignment Report 27

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

S. Alt 1
Description Original STRR Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4
No. (Modified)
about 800m. are at close are at close
This envisage proximity to proximity to
a combined road. The road. The
structure. interchange interchange
Higher proposal may proposal may
construction encroach the encroach the
cost. existing water existing water
body body
Not Not Not Not
18 Recommended
Recommended Recommended Recommended Recommended

End point of Tamil Nadu/Karnataka

The end of STRR will need integration with the alignment under finalization for 4 lanes of
Sarjapur, Karnataka/Tamil Nadu border near Bagalur town. In order to provide efficient
connectivity it envisaged during the joint site visit with PD/NHAI/Bangalore during 8 to 10
January 2018 that bypass the Bagalur town is also vital. Thus, the alignment extended to cover
Bagalur town and joining the alignment in Kalakunde. This section dealt with M/s Kerala
Industrial and Technical Consultancy Organization Ltd (KITCO). Accordingly, the proposal
modified after discussed with RO/NHAI/Bangalore. The alignment also slightly modified in few
locations in Karnataka portion. The Modifications also further discussed with CGM/NHAI on
31/1/2018 and agreed upon.

Final updated alignment incorporating all modifications given Fig 7. The final alignment
drawings on google images given in separate volume.

Final Alignment Report 28

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig 7: Final Alignment

Final Alignment Report 29

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

1.5 Satellite Towns Ring Road (STRR) Bangalore West Side

Bangalore town is thickly populated and In order to ensure safe, smooth, efficient, and high
speed transport corridor to this city, it is impetus that the infrastructure of city and adjoining
towns anticipated the development. National Highways NH 648 (NH 207), NH 48 (NH 4), NH
275, NH 948, NH 209 & NH 75 (Hassan road), and majority of State Highways SH 3, SH 85, &
SH 35 pass through Bangalore city comprising heavy commercial traffic movement. Most of
these traffic pass through the Bangalore city and resulting huge traffic jams. Also, the NICE ring
road currently has only four lanes configuration with very congested traffic level. Further, the
toll rates are also exorbitant in comparison to NHAI toll rates due to private operator (about 4
times and without return passage).

The STRR will function as an alternative and there is huge potential for the traffic to get divert
the proposed STRR facility. Provision of STTR will ensure high speed connectivity primarily to
Bangalore International airport and to the proposed Bangalore – Chennai Expressway.

Therefore, reviving the STRR project with considering current development in the region
including development of STRR west side is absolute necessary on priority basis and it is
propose to consider a 6lanes carriageway configuration throughout as minimum requirement.

1.5.1 Road under progress in STRR

Dobbaspet to Hoskote (80.20km)

The stretch of NH 207 from Dobbaspet to Hoskote (length 80.20km) on east side of STRR has
taken up for implementation to 4lanes divided carriageway configuration with 45m land width
by NHAI. However, the civil work currently held up due to contract complications. NHAI is
currently reviving this project with 60m right of way and 6lanes project facilities.

Hoskote to Sarjapur/Bagalur

The portion from Hoskote to Sarjapur/Bagalur (length about 25km) is currently under detailed
project report stage by KITCO consultants in NHAI. The alignment is already finalize by NHAI
to this portion. This alignment will be integrate with our current study to complete the ring for
entire STRR alignment.

Bangalore – Chennai Expressway

The Bangalore - Chennai Expressway is a proposed greenfield expressway between the cities
of Bangalore (Karnataka) and Chennai (Tamil Nadu). This project formulated under NHDP
Phase IV program and currently consider under Bharatmala Scheme. This high speed travel
corridor will run parallel to existing NH 4 and will be develop with total access control facility.
The proposed expressway starts from Hoskote (the junction of NH 4 & NH 207) and ends in
Sriperumbudur (just 40km away from Chennai) in Tamil Nadu. The total length of this proposed
facility will be 262.3km. The expressway passes through Bangalore Rural & Kolar districts in
Karnataka state (about 75.6km), Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh (88.31km), and Vellore,
Kanchipuram, Tiruvallur districts of Tamil Nadu (98.33km). The proposed configuration will be
4lanes carriageway with 5 major interchanges with fully access control facilities.

Final Alignment Report 30

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

1.6 Declaration of STRR (west side) as NH

The proposed STRR declared as National highway with a serial number 462 and new National
highway number 948A as per MORTH Gazette notification no 6, dated 02/01/2018. The copy
of Gazette enclosed in Annexure 1.
1.7 Project road
The project road currently intends to connect Dobbaspet, Magadi, Ramanagara, Kankapura,
Anekal, Hosur & Sarjapur. The proposed road passes through Bangalore Rural, Bangalore
Urban, and Ramanagara districts in Karnataka state and Hosur town in Krishnagiri district of
Tamil Nadu state. The total length of this alignment will be about 190km. Start point co-ordinate
of STRR -750104.8329/1465840.4410 (near Dobbaspet). End point coordinates of STRR
merging with KITCO alignment at Tamil Nadu/Karnataka Border – 83614.6946/1424665.8098
(near Sampangere).
Terrain

The project road stretch is passing through Plain and rolling terrain
Land use

The land use by the side of this road predominantly barren and agriculture
Project proposals
The proposal envisages a six lanes divided carriageway configuration with raised median as
per the latest circular issued. All provisions of structure will be consider as per IRC SP 87-2013
Manual. The design speed for the proposed road shall be 100km/h as terrain is plain/rolling.
Proposed ROW

A 75m corridor will propose for the entire alignment as intimated by NHAI except in
interchange locations additional width as per requirement will proposed.

Road Configuration

Six lanes divided carriageway configuration with raised median will proposed as per 6lanes
manual. The structures will proposed for 8lanes configuration. The proposed project road will
be consider for fully access controlled facilities as per NHAI guidelines. All major cross roads
will be provide with grade separated structures to ensure uninterrupted free flow through traffic
and to provide safety to local traffic. As far possible the minor cross roads will elevated and the
main carriageway will kept on ground level to ensure safe geometry standards. Service roads
will envisage as per requirement for segregation of local traffic needs.
The proposed alignment crisscrosses the existing SH 3 at many locations. All endeavor will
made not to disturb any existing network and try restoring the existing SH 3 where it affected
due to proposed STRR proposals.
The details of some of major cross roads given below.

Table 3: Major Cross road locations

Tentative
S No Cross road
location (km)
1 0.000 (Kar) NH 648 (old NH 207)
2 6.8 SH 3
3 8.6 NH 48 (old NH 4)

Final Alignment Report 31

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Tentative
S No Cross road
location (km)
4 30.1 NH 75 (old NH 48)
5 44.2 SH 85
6 70.0 NH 275 (Ramanagara)
7 95.4 NH 948 (old NH 209)
8 131.7 SH 35
9 139.5 17B
10 144.550 17A
11 151.800 SH 85
12 155.600 SH 17
13 160.900 NH 44 (old NH 7)

Horizontal Geometry
The tentative horizontal geometry for the proposed road worked out and the details are given
in Annexure 2. It is evident from the table that the entire corridor is cater for 100km per hour
design speed.
Proposed Design Standards
The geometry design standard as per IRC: SP: 87- 2013 adopted. The details are given below.

Table 4: Proposed Highway Design Standards

No. Description Unit Plain & Rolling

100 (Ruling)
1 Design Speed Km/h
80 (Minimum)
2 ROW Width m 60 (Minimum)
Pavement Width: Per Lane m 3.5
3 Two Lanes m 7
Three Lanes m 10.5
4 Cross Slope % - 2.5
Gradient:
5 Ruling % 2.5
Limiting 3.3
7% (If radius of curve is less than
desirable minimum)
6 Maximum Super-elevation %
5% (If radius of curve is more than
desirable minimum)
Approac
Open Built-up Approaches
Shoulder width hes to
Area area to Bridges
7 G.S.S.
Paved m 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5
Earthen m 2.0 - - 2.0
Shoulder’s cross slope
8
Paved % - 2.5
Unpaved % -3

Final Alignment Report 32

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

No. Description Unit Plain & Rolling

Horizontal Curvature:
m 400
9 Desirable minimum
Absolute minimum m 250
Absolute
Sight Distance for various Desirable
Minimum
speeds Minimum (I.S.D)
10 (S.S.D)
100 km/h 180 m 360 m
80 km/h 130 m 260 m

Ramp Design:

Ramp width m 3.75/5.5/7.0

11 Ramp Design speed Km/h 65
Radius of curvature m 150 (Minimum)
Super elevation maximum % 7
Stopping sight distance m 90
Minimum Length of
Horizontal Curves:
For deflection angle=5° m 150
12 For deflection angle=4° m 180
For deflection angle=3° m 210
For deflection angle=2° m 240
For deflection angle=1° m 270
For deflection angle<1° m 0 (Not Required)

Minimum Length Between

13 280 (10 sec travel time as per 100 kmph
same side Curves: m
design speed)
Vertical clearance at
14 m 5.5/3.5/3.0 (min)
VUP/LVUP/PUP
Vertical Curve, values for “K”, where K= L/(G1-G2), in m:
Design speed (km/h) Minimum (S.S.D) Desirable (I.S.D)
15 65 18.4 33.8
80 32.6 60
100 73.6 135
Minimum Length of vertical curves:
Maximum
Maximum grade change(percent) not length of a
Design speed (km/h)
requiring vertical curve vertical
16
curve(m)
65 0.8 40
80 0.6 50
100 0.5 60

Final Alignment Report 33

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under
Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Fig. 8: Proposed Typical Cross Section of Road

Final Alignment Report 34

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

1.8 Environment Studies

Environmental expert carried out reconnaissance survey of the project road. Important
environmental components along the corridor of impact zone of Banneragatta National Park
identified. The alignment corridor is passing through this wildlife Sanctuary between km 116 to
km 129. The alignment is pass through Buffer as well as core zones in this wildlife park. Though
3 options studied to avoid this location either partly or to maximum extent, no alignment option
could found feasible due to its terrain condition as it unable to cater the high speed traffic
corridor. So a joint meeting and site visit with PCCF/DFO and PIU/PD/NHAI held on 12/9/2017
& 19/9/2017 and it concluded that the original suggested option found feasible technically for
consideration. The portion of alignment passes through Banneragatta National Park given in
Fig 9.

Fig 9: Alignment passes through Banneragatta National Park

The environment study will identify trees, forests, National park and its core and buffer zones,
public utilities, community resources, cultural sites, high pollution zones, accident prone
zones/area etc. On the basis of back ground, information screening exercise will be conduct
subsequently. The data collected will be compile to develop environmental scenario and
sensitive component within that. Full road length and corridor of impact will put under screening
to identify hot spot zones. On the basis of this environment impact assessment and
Environmental, management plan will be frame.

Final Alignment Report 35

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

The following mitigation measures will be consider in subsequent project stages

 Adequate drainage facilities along the road

 Provision of service roads
 Appropriate noise barriers at sensitive locations
 Development of strip plantation on both sides and median shrubs
 Regular monitoring of ambient air quality, noise level and water quality
during construction.
 Grade separation/ interchanges at major intersections.
 Elevated arrangement for through traffic with barricade.

1.9 Social Assessment

The social assessment presents to determine the magnitude of actual potential impact due to
this new road development. The idea of social study is to minimize the social impact with best
possible engineering solutions at the optimal point. The social screening survey will be carry
out to assess the negative impact and to suggest the mitigation measures

 To avoid / minimize the adverse impact on nearby communities and natural

environment,

 People and properties falling on direct path of road development,

 People indirectly affected by the way of disruption of livelihood, breakage in community

linkages

 Impact on land acquisition and resettlement, on indigenous people (SC &ST) and on
human safety etc.
In order to minimize or avoid the adverse impact, all necessary modifications will made in design
stage. However, in case of unavoidable negative impacts, these will be mitigate through
suggested appropriate measures needs to be adopt during construction and operational stages.
To ensure that the project affected persons are duly compensated a Resettlement Action Plan
(RAP) would be drawn up as an integral part of project design proposal to ensure that highway
improvement are socially sound, sustainable and contribute to the development of social goals.
The prime objective of this RAP is to ensure and provide a policy framework to ensure that the
affected and displaced persons are aptly resettled and rehabilitated (to improve their livelihood
and standard of living or at least to restore them in real terms).
Land use

The terrain along this alignment is predominantly mix of plain and rolling. The land use pattern
along this project road comprises of agricultural, built up, barren, industrial, and forest.
However, the main land use pattern is agricultural and barren. The tentative land uses along
the project are as below.

Final Alignment Report 36

Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder
Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana - Lot 3/ Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, GOA & Kerala /Package 1

Table 5: Tentative Land Uses along the Project

S. No Land use pattern % of land use

1 Agriculture 82
2 Barren 5
3 Built up 3
4 Industrial 3
5 Forest 7

Based on the findings during the initial assessment study some measures have noted for
consideration that will reduce the detrimental effects of project appreciably.

 Alternative alignments such as realignment are attempt in the original STRR in order
to find a suitable alignment that would have minimum adverse impact on social aspects
and minimum land acquisition.

 The alignment avoids schools, places of worships, public utilities and other common
resources.

 It will be ensure that the likely affected common properties used by local people will
suitably rehabilitated before the start of civil construction work and budgetary provision
for the same will be made in the project estimates.

Approximate Land requirement

The STRR alignment passes through following districts and talukas in Karnataka and Tamil
Nadu states.

No state District Talukas

Neelmangala
1 Bangalore Rural
Magadi
Karnataka
2 Bangalore Urban Anekal
3 Ramanagara Ramanagara
Hosur
4 Tamil Nadu Krishnagiri
Denkanikottai

It is propose to acquire a strip of land of 75m corridor for the proposed STRR so to
accommodate the 6lanes carriageway configuration and other amenities as per six lanes
Manual and standards.

The Draft 3a for Karnataka portion submitted on 4800182-GGN-OC-026A dated 02/12/2017

and Draft 3a for Tamil Nadu portion submitted vide reference 4800182-GGN-OC-034 dated
29/12/2017. The updated draft 3a considering Bagalur portion resubmitted on vide reference
4800182-GGN-OC-047 dated 19/01/2018.

Final Alignment Report 37

Annexures
jftLVªh laö Mhö ,yö&33004@99 REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99

vlk/kj.k
EXTRAORDINARY
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
la- 06] ubZ fnYyh] eaxyokj] tuojh 2] 2018@ikS"k 12] 1939
No. 06] NEW DELHI, TUESDAY, JANUARY 2, 2018/PAUSHA 12, 1939

सड़क परवहन और राजमाग मं ालय

अिधसूचना
नई
दली, 01 जनवरी, 2018

का.आ. 06(
06(अ).
अ).—के ीय सरकार, रा ीय राजमाग अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 48) क धारा 2 क
उप-धारा (2) !ारा "द#त शि&तय' का "योग करते )ए, िन+निलिखत तािलका के -त+भ (2) और (3) म/ िविन1द2ट "#येक

राजमाग को रा24ीय राजमाग घोिषत करती है ।

राजमाग:, िजह/ अब इस अिधसूचना !ारा रा24ीय राजमाग घोिषत
कया जाना है, को तािलका के -त+भ (1), (2)
और (3) म/ यथा-िन1द2ट Bमश: नई Bम संFयाG, नई रा24ीय राजमाग संFयाG तथा रा24ीय राजमाग: के िववरण के साथ

उ&त अिधिनयम क अनुसूची म/ अंत:-थािपत
कया गया समझा जाएगा ।

तािलका
B. सं. नई रा24ीय रा24ीय राजमाग: का िववरण
राजमाग संFया

(1) (2) (3)

461 744ए तिमलनाडु राOय म/ आलमपQी के िनकट रारा-744 के साथ अपने जं&शन से "ांरभ होकर
वदागरई, नेद+
ू मादुरई, ईिलयारपाथी, ईR&कलाईवेलूर, क'ड़ागई, मनलूर, कुनाथूर,
परयानकुलम, थमराईपQी, ईरािनयम, उसीलामपQी, कुलामंगलम, कलवेलीपQी,
टाटामपQी को जोड़ने वाला और वाड़ीपQी के िनकट रारा-44 के साथ अपने जं&शन पर
समाUत होने वाला राजमाग (मदुरई Vरं ग रोड) ।

462 948ए कनाटक राOय म/ दोबासपेटे (मने) के िनकट रारा-648 और रारा-48 के अपने जं&शन से
"ांरभ होकर नीजागल, क/गल, गुडम
े रानाहली, हरथी, मेलाहली, )लीकेरे गुWर
ू , रायसंदरा,
बनवासी, थोकासंदरा से तिमलनाडु राOय म/ अचेि#तपली, अलूर को जोड़ने वाला कनाटक
राOय म/ सरजापुर के िनकट रारा-648 के साथ अपने जं&शन पर समाUत होने वाला
राजमाग (बXगलुY Vरं ग रोड)।

[फा. सं. एनएच-14012/27/2014-पीएंडएम (पाट-8)]

राजेश गुUता, उप सिचव

22 GI/2018 (1)
2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पाद टपणी : रा ीय राजमाग अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 48) और इसक अनुसूची, भारत के राजपZ,
दनां
कत
4 अ"ैल, 2011 को "कािशत अिधसूचना संFया का.आ. 689(अ) ,
दनां
कत 4 अ"ैल, 2011 !ारा
"ित-थािपत
कया गया था और इसम/ िपछली बार संशोधन अिधसूचना संFया 3708
दनां
कत
05.12.2017 !ारा
कया गया था।

MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS

NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 06(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 2 of the National
Highways Act, 1956 (48 of 1956), the Central Government hereby declares each of the highways specified in
columns (2) and (3) of the Table below to be a national highway.
The said highways, now declared to be national highways, shall be deemed to be specified in the
Schedule to the said Act with the new serial numbers, the new national highways numbers and the description
of the national highways thereof, as indicated in columns (1), (2) and (3) respectively, of the said Table.
TABLE
Serial New National Description of National Highways
No. Highway No.
(1) (2) (3)
461 744A The highway starting from its junction with NH-744 near Alampatti connecting
Vadagarai, Nedummadurai, Eliyarpathi, Erukkilaivellur, Kondagai, Manalur,
Kunnathur, Parayankulam, Thamaraipatti, Iraniyam, Usilampatti, Kulamangalam,
Kalvellipatti, Tatampatti and terminating at its junction with NH-44 near
Vadipatti in the State of Tamil Nadu (Madurai Ring Road)
462 948A The highway starting from its junction of NH 648 & NH-48 near Dobaspete
(Manne), Nijagal, Kengal, Gudemaranahalli, Harthi, Melahalli, Hulikeregunnur,
Rayasandra, Banavasi, Thokasandra in the State of Karnataka connecting
Achettipalli, Alur in the State of Tamil Nadu and terminating at its junction with
NH-648 near Sarjapur in the State of Karnataka (Bengaluru Ring Road)
[F. No. NH-14012/27/2014-P&M (Pt-8)]
RAJESH GUPTA, Dy. Secy.
Foot Note : The Schedule to the National Highways Act, 1956 (48 of 1956) was substituted vide
notification number S.O. 689(E), dated 4th April, 2011 publised in the Gazette of India, dated
the 4th April, 2011 and subsequently amended vide notification No. 3708, dated 05.12. 2017.

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
 Horizontal Curve Details
Max. restricted Superelevation 5.0%
Transition Start Chainage of End Chainage of Design
Sl. No. Easting, X Northing, Y Radius HIP Chainage Δ Lc e
Length, Ls Transition Curve Curve Transition Speed, V
1 749817.874 1465637.810 500.000 95.000 25.226 120.226 553.518 648.518 336.872 100 1.056584 433.292 5.00%
2 746423.057 1466930.419 3500.000 0.000 2446.087 5296.78 3871.434 100 0.814484 2850.693 NR
3 744672.988 1466098.371 2000.000 0.000 5397.42 6046.479 5721.95 100 0.32453 649.059 NR
4 742975.635 1465894.953 2000.000 0.000 6261.161 8374.567 7317.864 100 1.056703 2113.406 NR
5 741634.620 1462676.758 2000.000 0.000 9818.959 11467.953 10643.456 100 0.824497 1648.994 NR
6 742493.933 1460756.852 600.000 80.000 12364.875 12444.875 12922.738 13002.738 12683.807 100 0.929772 477.863 5.00%
7 741456.747 1458769.984 800.000 65.000 14279.236 14344.236 15332.154 15397.154 14838.195 100 1.316148 987.918 5.00%
8 742941.853 1457322.813 650.000 80.000 16576.873 16656.873 17010.604 17090.604 16833.739 100 0.667278 353.731 5.00%
9 743381.309 1454458.956 700.000 70.000 19626.287 19696.287 19757.732 19827.732 19727.01 100 0.187779 61.445 5.00%
10 743367.612 1453889.392 750.000 70.000 20125.451 20195.451 20397 20467 20296.226 100 0.362066 201.549 5.00%
11 743805.387 1452553.089 800.000 70.000 21579.996 21649.996 21753.774 21823.774 21701.885 100 0.217223 103.778 5.00%
12 744012.587 1450719.049 1000.000 80.000 23269.515 23349.515 23740.838 23820.838 23545.177 100 0.471323 391.323 4.44%
13 744452.741 1450035.105 1000.000 60.000 24161.074 24221.074 24489.705 24549.705 24355.39 100 0.328631 268.631 4.44%
14 744917.228 1449652.479 650.000 80.000 24743.46 24823.46 25085.991 25165.991 24954.726 100 0.52697 262.531 5.00%
15 745264.454 1448830.041 650.000 80.000 25652.462 25732.462 25957.231 26037.231 25844.847 100 0.468874 224.769 5.00%
16 745923.850 1448223.914 650.000 80.000 26531.922 26611.922 26864.26 26944.26 26738.091 100 0.511288 252.338 5.00%
17 746288.837 1447208.980 3000.000 0.000 27472.434 28155.162 27813.798 100 0.227576 682.728 NR
18 747228.370 1445670.946 600.000 90.000 29179.869 29269.869 29896.891 29986.891 29583.38 100 1.195037 627.022 5.00%
19 745140.889 1442768.417 1200.000 40.000 33033.643 33073.643 33181.288 33221.288 33127.466 100 0.123038 107.645 3.70%
20 744373.440 1441949.703 2000.000 0.000 33669.25 34798.942 34234.096 100 0.564846 1129.692 NR
21 744004.321 1440022.519 1850.000 0.000 35552.388 36763.962 36158.175 100 0.654905 1211.574 NR
22 743332.060 1439408.223 650.000 80.000 36789.949 36869.949 37214.709 37294.709 37042.329 100 0.653476 344.760 5.00%
23 743131.962 1438381.885 650.000 90.000 37872.283 37962.283 38203.956 38293.956 38083.12 100 0.510267 241.673 5.00%
24 743369.906 1437606.168 650.000 80.000 38721.58 38801.58 38984.098 39064.098 38892.839 100 0.403873 182.518 5.00%
25 743140.818 1434618.981 650.000 80.000 41577.119 41657.119 42102.188 42182.188 41879.654 100 0.807798 445.069 5.00%
26 743849.013 1433756.014 650.000 80.000 42533.322 42613.322 43292.137 43372.137 42952.73 100 1.167407 678.815 5.00%
27 743543.081 1433053.656 1000.000 50.000 43623.076 43673.076 43695.965 43745.965 43684.521 100 0.072889 22.889 4.44%
28 743437.882 1432788.035 1500.000 35.000 43857.757 43892.757 44047.549 44082.549 43970.153 100 0.126529 154.792 2.96%
29 742990.634 1431918.113 650.000 80.000 44552.102 44632.102 45221.215 45301.215 44926.659 100 1.029404 589.113 5.00%
30 743378.245 1431231.312 800.000 60.000 45471.027 45531.027 45852.463 45912.463 45691.745 100 0.476795 321.436 5.00%
31 744112.465 1430752.123 1250.000 40.000 46085.375 46125.375 46973.285 47013.285 46549.33 100 0.710328 847.910 3.56%
32 744764.692 1428655.960 3000.000 0.000 48472.603 48981.424 48727.014 100 0.169607 508.821 NR
33 745284.136 1427637.715 1000.000 50.000 49663.752 49713.752 50022.825 50072.825 49868.289 100 0.359073 309.073 4.44%
34 746912.338 1426123.512 1500.000 35.000 51414.087 51449.087 52661.469 52696.469 52055.278 100 0.831589 1212.382 2.96%
35 746915.056 1424589.131 1500.000 40.000 53370.289 53410.289 53697.587 53737.587 53553.938 100 0.218198 287.298 2.96%
36 747168.961 1423449.676 1000.000 80.000 54451.386 54531.386 54906.278 54986.278 54718.832 100 0.454892 374.892 4.44%
37 747885.530 1422486.573 700.000 90.000 55452.906 55542.906 56230.828 56320.828 55886.867 100 1.111318 687.922 5.00%
38 747192.790 1420931.769 800.000 90.000 57245.636 57335.636 57771.427 57861.427 57553.532 100 0.657239 435.791 5.00%
39 747501.723 1419455.025 1500.000 60.000 58924.912 58984.912 59129.055 59189.055 59056.984 100 0.136095 144.143 2.96%
40 747845.956 1418489.152 1000.000 100.000 59884.768 59984.768 60179.491 60279.491 60082.13 100 0.294723 194.723 4.44%
41 747914.224 1417492.450 1000.000 100.000 60894.232 60994.232 61167.454 61267.454 61080.843 100 0.273222 173.222 4.44%
42 748138.459 1416817.159 2000.000 0.000 61626.882 61956.929 61791.906 100 0.165023 330.047 NR
43 749431.291 1414416.902 2000.000 0.000 63726.881 65233.256 64480.069 100 0.753188 1506.375 NR
44 752964.762 1413174.193 500.000 90.000 67519.82 67609.82 68469.284 68559.284 68039.552 100 1.898928 859.464 5.00%
45 752009.286 1411806.338 650.000 80.000 69259.851 69339.851 69762.688 69842.688 69551.27 100 0.773594 422.837 5.00%

Annexure -2
46 752241.096 1409585.800 650.000 90.000 71357.865 71447.865 72057.219 72147.219 71752.542 100 1.07593 609.354 5.00%
47 750659.199 1408433.669 2000.000 0.000 73197.18 74155.528 73676.354 100 0.479174 958.348 NR
48 749961.361 1407060.565 1000.000 50.000 74888.433 74938.433 75463.741 75513.741 75201.087 100 0.575308 525.308 4.44%
49 750274.572 1404037.511 650.000 90.000 77949.989 78039.989 78418.346 78508.346 78229.168 100 0.72055 378.357 5.00%
50 751063.186 1403281.933 2000.000 0.000 79166.063 79465.767 79315.915 100 0.149852 299.704 NR
51 752893.204 1402023.896 750.000 70.000 81379.001 81449.001 81623.142 81693.142 81536.072 100 0.325522 174.141 5.00%
52 753784.701 1400840.393 650.000 100.000 82888.314 82988.314 83046.923 83146.923 83017.619 100 0.244014 58.609 5.00%

40
Max. restricted Superelevation 5.0%
Transition Start Chainage of End Chainage of Design
Sl. No. Easting, X Northing, Y Radius HIP Chainage Δ Lc e
Length, Ls Transition Curve Curve Transition Speed, V
53 754078.968 1400164.094 1000.000 50.000 83647.126 83697.126 83813.305 83863.305 83755.216 100 0.166179 116.179 4.44%
54 754689.562 1399230.721 650.000 90.000 84593.816 84683.816 85048.206 85138.206 84866.011 100 0.699062 364.390 5.00%
55 755808.565 1398863.651 1000.000 0.000 85859.5 86215.009 86037.255 100 0.355509 355.509 4.44%
56 757077.887 1397879.082 2000.000 0.000 87471.37 87811.346 87641.358 100 0.169988 339.976 NR
57 757488.385 1397430.488 2000.000 0.000 88215.531 88282.492 88249.012 100 0.03348 66.961 NR
58 758786.973 1396103.449 2000.000 0.000 89175.912 90916.621 90046.267 100 0.870355 1740.709 NR
59 760836.145 1396255.613 5000.000 0.000 91963.858 92119.391 92041.625 100 0.031107 155.533 NR
60 762910.332 1396344.888 2000.000 0.000 93959.962 94274.836 94117.399 100 0.157437 314.874 NR
61 764242.282 1396615.513 2000.000 0.000 95293.277 95658.184 95475.731 100 0.182453 364.907 NR
62 766376.879 1396653.934 5000.000 0.000 97275.271 97944.059 97609.665 100 0.133758 668.788 NR
63 769210.790 1397087.326 5000.000 0.000 99686.75 101252.38 100469.565 100 0.313126 1565.630 NR
64 772684.423 1396521.865 5000.000 0.000 103111.9 104835.745 103973.823 100 0.344769 1723.845 NR
65 774056.052 1396776.278 2000.000 0.000 105234.161 105485.918 105360.04 100 0.125879 251.757 NR
66 774965.788 1396837.668 850.000 65.000 105993.299 106058.299 106476.645 106541.645 106267.472 100 0.568642 418.346 5.00%
67 776299.358 1397796.599 1500.000 35.000 107499.164 107534.164 108262.906 108297.906 107898.535 100 0.509162 728.742 2.96%
68 777043.785 1399377.357 1500.000 35.000 109302.365 109337.365 109931.731 109966.731 109634.548 100 0.419578 594.366 2.96%
69 777844.317 1400092.658 800.000 90.000 110451.791 110541.791 110862.552 110952.552 110702.172 100 0.513451 320.761 5.00%
70 778070.518 1400682.551 800.000 90.000 111188.498 111278.498 111385.286 111475.286 111331.892 100 0.245985 106.788 5.00%
71 778507.113 1401346.502 2000.000 0.000 112007.45 112245.364 112126.407 100 0.118957 237.914 NR
72 778924.577 1402153.240 650.000 80.000 112850.035 112930.035 113137.799 113217.799 113033.917 100 0.442713 207.764 5.00%
73 779777.632 1402835.110 650.000 85.000 113943.905 114028.905 114220.611 114305.611 114124.758 100 0.425702 191.706 5.00%
74 780520.723 1404234.387 1500.000 100.000 115517.949 115617.949 115799.239 115899.239 115708.594 100 0.187526 181.290 2.96%
75 780804.115 1405129.011 800.000 80.000 116513.872 116593.872 116700.038 116780.038 116646.955 100 0.232707 106.166 5.00%
76 781524.479 1406364.047 2000.000 0.000 117994.011 118159.347 118076.679 100 0.082668 165.336 NR
77 782060.678 1407404.880 450.000 115.000 118919.24 119034.24 119434.918 119549.918 119234.579 100 1.145952 400.678 5.00%
78 783041.313 1407432.966 650.000 80.000 119845.355 119925.355 120449.15 120529.15 120187.253 100 0.928914 523.795 5.00%
79 783692.233 1408196.526 850.000 90.000 120696.425 120786.425 121516.581 121606.581 121151.503 100 0.964889 730.156 5.00%
80 784862.508 1408149.298 3000.000 0.000 122119.697 122477.582 122298.64 100 0.119295 357.885 NR
81 787800.494 1408325.829 2500.000 0.000 123831.583 126399.419 125115.501 100 1.027134 2567.836 NR
82 790296.287 1404706.357 4000.000 0.000 128684.443 130073.101 129378.772 100 0.347164 1388.658 NR
83 793499.543 1402419.736 5000.000 0.000 131736.628 134780.507 133258.568 100 0.608776 3043.879 NR
84 794624.043 1399311.199 1200.000 67.000 135874.595 135941.595 137012.428 137079.428 136477.012 100 0.948195 1070.833 3.70%
85 798283.200 1398252.764 1500.000 55.000 139517.933 139572.933 140841.454 140896.454 140207.194 100 0.882347 1268.521 2.96%
86 799385.625 1398971.605 800.000 90.000 141087.314 141177.314 141760.961 141850.961 141469.138 100 0.842059 583.647 5.00%
87 800790.478 1398646.865 3000.000 0.000 142558.75 143233.889 142896.32 100 0.225046 675.139 NR
88 803021.053 1398612.954 2000.000 0.000 144851.857 145396.198 145124.028 100 0.272171 544.341 NR
89 804753.174 1398117.089 800.000 65.000 146501.503 146566.503 147239.361 147304.361 146902.932 100 0.922323 672.858 5.00%
90 807476.420 1400104.230 1850.000 0.000 149743.364 150738.023 150240.694 100 0.537654 994.659 NR
91 809345.391 1400286.652 3000.000 0.000 151167.048 152987.383 152077.216 100 0.606778 1820.335 NR
92 813294.280 1403640.360 3000.000 0.000 156762.599 157688.11 157225.355 100 0.308504 925.511 NR
93 814413.110 1405432.010 600.000 0.000 159108.841 159539.547 159324.194 100 0.717843 430.706 5.00%
94 814282.316 1406244.416 2000.000 0.000 159779.117 160487.99 160133.554 100 0.354436 708.873 NR
95 814650.674 1408111.284 2000.000 0.000 161752.195 162309.485 162030.84 100 0.278645 557.290 NR
96 815605.589 1409975.185 2500.000 0.000 162958.952 165138.277 164048.615 100 0.87173 2179.325 NR
97 813929.483 1413958.702 2000.000 0.000 167195.48 169207.198 168201.339 100 1.005859 2011.718 NR
98 815594.587 1416353.397 2500.000 0.000 169695.526 172137.23 170916.378 100 0.976682 2441.704 NR
99 814498.917 1419212.299 400.000 115.000 173728.122 173843.122 173899.312 174014.312 173871.217 100 0.427975 56.190 5.00%
100 814507.756 1419626.858 1000.000 80.000 174081.9 174161.9 174409.177 174489.177 174285.539 100 0.327277 247.277 4.44%

Annexure -2
101 814270.960 1420557.255 1000.000 80.000 174882.32 174962.32 175513.558 175593.558 175237.939 100 0.631238 551.238 4.44%
102 814606.225 1421497.444 1000.000 80.000 175978.55 176058.55 176396.401 176476.401 176227.476 100 0.417851 337.851 4.44%
103 814570.370 1422291.998 5000.000 0.000 176950.223 177092.414 177021.319 100 0.028438 142.191 NR
104 814534.451 1423147.511 1000.000 80.000 177494.969 177574.969 178162.952 178242.952 177868.961 100 0.667983 587.983 4.44%
105 814121.069 1423670.800 1000.000 80.000 178370.371 178450.371 178603.651 178683.651 178527.011 100 0.23328 153.280 4.44%
106 813726.706 1424454.928 2000.000 0.000 179326.52 179482.676 179404.598 100 0.078078 156.156 NR

41