WT - 2016 PDF
WT - 2016 PDF
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
A.1 Rupees
Sale price of combo (inclusive of sales tax) 260.00
Variable cost of combo:
Cost of ingredients [(36 × 40%) + (48 × 60%)] +18 + 12 73.20
Commission to riders (260 × 200,000 ÷ 5,000,000) 10.40
Sales tax (260 × 0.73 ÷ 5) 37.96
121.56
Contribution margin of combo 138.44
Less: Contribution forgone due to introduction of combos (W-1) 61.92
Adjusted contribution margin 76.52
WORKINGS
W-1 : Contribution Foregone
Per unit CM Reduction % in Reduction in
(Rs.) CM CM (Rs.)
A B A×B
Chicken Burger [150–63.90(W-3)] 86.10 16% 13.78
Beef Burger [170–79.62(W-3)] 90.38 24% 21.69
Fries [80–32.88(W-3)] 47.12 28% 13.19
Cold drinks [60–23.16(W-3)] 36.84 36% 13.26
61.92
Sales value in Rs. (W-4) (A) 1,320,000 1,122,000 880,000 1,108,800 1,069,200
----------------------------- Rupees -----------------------------
Cost of ingredients (Units×PU cost) 316,800 316,800 264,000 249,480 213,840
Commission to riders
(200,000÷5,000,000) × A Sales value 52,800 44,880 35,200 44,352 42,768
Sales tax (0.73÷ 5 × sales value) Sales value 192,720 163,812 128,480 161,885 156,103
Total variable costs (B) 562,320 525,492 427,680 455,717 412,711
Page 1 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
BT
Ratio Weighted ratio Allocation of total
No. of units sold
sales (Rs.)
A B=A×SP C=5.5m×B÷∑ B D=C÷SP
Chicken burger 4 600 1,320,000 8,800
Beef Burger 3 510 1,122,000 6,600
Club sandwich 2 400 880,000 4,400
Fries [(4+3+2)×70%] 6.3 504 1,108,800 13,860
Cold drink [(4+3+2)×90%] 8.1 486 1,069,200 17,820
23.4 2,500 5,500,000
Engineering
Units produced 30,000 60,000
Batch size 3,000 4,000
Number of batches 10 15
Allocation of engineering overheads – Rs. (D) 158,200 237,300 (W-2) 395,500
– Rs. (A+B+C+D) 688,423 1,421,577 2,110,000
W-2: Computation of cost driver rate:
Department
Total
Material Quality
Production Engineering (Given)
management control
-------------------------------------------Rupees----------------------------------------
Machine set-up costs - - - 160,000 160,000
IT department’s overheads
(120,000 × 30%, 15%, 15%, 40%) 36,000 18,000 18,000 48,000 120,000
Machine operating expenses 500,000 - - - 500,000
Production control 200,000 - - - 200,000
Material management - 140,000 - - 140,000
Quality control - - 240,000 - 240,000
Other expenses (750,000 ÷ 4) 187,500 187,500 187,500 187,500 750,000
Department wise overheads 923,500 345,500 445,500 395,500 2,110,000
Page 2 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
Page 3 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
Packing cost
Per unit packing cost J 15.00 40.00 50.00 100.00
Average RM Inventory – Rs. in million (@ Rs. 160 PU) 20.00 83.81 63.81
(After discount of 3%)
Page 5 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
A.5 PM-2
PM-1 PM-2 PM 3
(After BMR)
Data
Prod capacity per annum – in tons A 230 270 310 400
Normal loss % B 5% 8% 6% 4%
Labour hours required per ton C 30 50 45 20
Variable OH - in % of DL D 60% 50% 50% 40%
Machine WDV – Rs. E 35,000,000 30,000,000 55,000,000 80,000,000
Machine useful life (years) F 10 8 12 20
Determination of CM per ton --------------------- Rupees ---------------------
Sale price 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Less: Variable cost per ton
Raw material [17,480 ÷ (1 – B)] (18,400) (19,000) (18,596) (18,208)
Labour (120 × C) (3,600) (6,000) (5,400) (2,400)
Variable overheads (Labour × D) (2,160) (3,000) (2,700) (960)
Contribution margin per ton 25,840 22,000 23,304 28,432
Total contribution margin (CM per ton × A) 5,943,200 5,940,000 7,224,240 11,372,800
Less: Depreciation (E × F) (3,500,000) (3,750,000) (4,583,333) (3,600,000)
Profit from each plant 2,443,200 2,190,000 2,640,907 7,772,800
* Depreciation is worked out after deducting 10% salvage value from cost.
Profit from
Profit before Financing
PM-2 Net profit
Options available to AIL PM-1 PM-2 PM-3 fin. cost cost (W-1)
(after BMR)
------------------------------------------- Rs. in million -------------------------------------------
I Continue with existing
plant without
replacement and BMR 2,443,200 2,190,000 - - 4,633,200 - 4,633,200
II Replace PM-1 with new
machine and no BMR
(400 ton from PM-3 and 650,000 7,772,800
200 ton from PM-2) - - 8,422,800 6,950,000 1,472,800
III Replace PM-2 with new
machine (400 machine
from PM-3 and 200 ton
from PM-1) 1,668,000 - - 7,772,800 9,440,800 7,100,000 2,340,800
IV Replace PM-1 with new
machine and spend on
BMR (400 ton from PM-
3 and 200 ton from PM-
2(after BMR)) - - 77,467 7,772,800 7,850,267 9,450,000 (1,599,733)
V Only go for BMR 2,443,200 - 2,640,907 - 5,084,107 2,500,000 2,584,107
Conclusion
Continue with existing option is feasible as it results in highest net profit.
Page 6 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
Objective Function
Maximize Z: 9000x +5500y
From equation 1
At x = 0 then (0 , 3,450)
At y = 2,000 then (1,160 , 2,000)
From equation 2
At x = 0 then (0 , 3,000)
At y = 2,000 then (1,250 , 2,000)
Revised constraints
15x + 12y = 46,400 ------------------------ Equation 5
8x + 10y = 30,000 -------------------------- Equation 2
From equation 5
At x = 0 then (0 , 3,867)
At y = 2,000 then (1,493 , 2,000)
x = 1925.926 y = 1459.259
Page 7 of 8
Management Accounting
Suggested Answer
Final Examination (Transitional Scheme) – Winter 2016
As the quantity of y is 1,459 which is less than 2,000 ∴ the production plan is not possible and
the company has to revert to the production plan of producing minimum 2,000 quantities of
product y i.e.
(The End)
Page 8 of 8