0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Light Pollution

Uploaded by

Khaled Rabea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Light Pollution

Uploaded by

Khaled Rabea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Volume 7 Issue 2 March 2003

Table of Contents

Abstract Page 01

Introduction Page 01

Light Pollution Q & A


What is light pollution? Page 02

What is sky glow? Page 03

How is sky glow measured or calculated? Page 04

What is light trespass? Page 04

How is light trespass measured or calculated? Page 05

What is glare? Page 05

How is the issue of light pollution currently being addressed? Page 06

What are lighting environmental zones? Page 07

How can sky glow be reduced? Page 08

How is light trespass controlled? Page 09

How is glare controlled? Page 09

What are the IESNA cutoff classifications? Page 11

Are the IESNA cutoff classifications a good indicator of direct uplight? Page 11

What is the difference between full cutoff and fully shielded? Page 14

Resources Page 15

Sponsors and Credits Page 17

Glossary Page 18

Legal Notices Page 19

Abstract

Outdoor lighting has become a necessary integral part of society. Light pollution is a by-product of outdoor
lighting. Light pollution can be reduced by lighting only what is actually needed, when it is needed, and to the
appropriate level. This publication discusses the three elements of light pollution, which are sky glow, light
trespass, and glare, and gives examples and recommendations for minimizing or eliminating the undesirable
effects of each element when designing and using outdoor lighting.

Introduction

We light our outdoor nighttime environment to meet certain societal goals, such as increasing safety and
security, enhancing economic development, as well as highlighting historic areas or landmarks of cities or
towns. Our society has become a 24-hour society, and nighttime lighting has become a necessity to facilitate
using our roadways and downtown areas. Figure 1 is a composite image that depicts the light emitted from the
earth at night. The brighter areas in the figure are regions of higher population density and, thus, more outdoor
lighting.

Page 1 of 19 4/28/2003
Figure 1. The earth at night

Source: Image and data processing by the National Oceanic and


Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Geophysical Data
Center. Data collected by the U.S. Air Force Weather Agency under
the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, 1994-1995

Light pollution is a by-product of lighting at night, especially when we use inefficient luminaires and lamps and
when we light to excessive levels. We can minimize our impact on light pollution by lighting more efficiently.
When we choose efficient luminaires and lamps, fewer lamps may be required to meet the lighting objectives,
resulting in less wasted light emitted into areas where the light is not needed.

What is light pollution?

Light pollution is an unwanted consequence of outdoor lighting and includes such effects as sky glow, light
trespass, and glare. An illustration of both useful light and the components of light pollution are illustrated in
Figure 2. Sky glow is a brightening of the sky caused by both natural and human-made factors. The key factor
of sky glow that contributes to light pollution is outdoor lighting.

Figure 2. Example of useful light and light pollution from a typical


pole-mounted outdoor luminaire

Source: Adapted from Institution of Lighting Engineers

Light trespass is light being cast where it is not wanted or needed, such as light from a streetlight or a floodlight

Page 2 of 19 4/28/2003
that illuminates a neighbor’s bedroom at night making it difficult to sleep.

Glare can be thought of as objectionable brightness. It can be disabling or discomforting. There are several
kinds of glare, the worst of which is disability glare, because it causes a loss of visibility from stray light being
scattered within the eye. Discomfort glare is the sensation of annoyance or even pain induced by overly bright
sources. Think of driving along a dark road when an oncoming car with bright headlights suddenly appears. The
sudden bright light can be uncomfortable and make it difficult to see. Discomfort and even disability glare can
also be caused by streetlights, parking lot lights, floodlights, signs, sports field lighting, and decorative and
landscape lights.

What is sky glow?

Sky glow occurs from both natural and human-made sources. The natural component of sky glow has five
sources: sunlight reflected off the moon and earth, faint air glow in the upper atmosphere (a permanent, low-
grade aurora), sunlight reflected off interplanetary dust (zodiacal light), starlight scattered in the atmosphere,
and background light from faint, unresolved stars and nebulae (celestial objects or diffuse masses of interstellar
dust and gas that appear as hazy smudges of light). Natural sky glow is well quantified. In this publication,
further discussion of sky glow considers only human-made sources.

Electric lighting also increases night sky brightness and is the human-made source of sky glow. Light that is
either emitted directly upward by luminaires or reflected from the ground is scattered by dust and gas molecules
in the atmosphere, producing a luminous background. It has the effect of reducing one’s ability to view the
stars, as seen in Figure 3. Sky glow is highly variable depending on immediate weather conditions, quantity of
dust and gas in the atmosphere, amount of light directed skyward, and the direction from which it is viewed. In
poor weather conditions, more particles are present in the atmosphere to scatter the upward-bound light, so sky
glow becomes a very visible effect of wasted light and wasted energy.

Figure 3. Example of sky glow over a city

Source: Reprinted with permission from the Institution of Lighting


Engineers and the Society of Light and Lighting

Sky glow is of most concern to astronomers because it reduces their ability to view celestial objects. Sky glow
increases the brightness of the dark areas of the sky, which reduces the contrast of stars or other celestial
objects against the dark sky background. Astronomers typically like very dry clear dark nights for observing. A
typical suburban sky is 5 to 10 times brighter at the zenith than the natural sky (the zenith is the angle that
points directly upward, or 180°, from the observation point). In city centers, the zenith may be 25 or 50 times
brighter than the natural background.

Sky brightness is increasing, as recorded by professional and amateur astronomers. For example, at the Mars
Hill Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, sky brightness is reported to have increased by 0.5 magnitude from 1976
to 1988 (Lockwood et al. 1990). An increase in brightness at this level means that certain stars may blend into

Page 3 of 19 4/28/2003
the background, making them indistinguishable. Upgren (1991) performed naked eye observations of bright
stars over the interval from 1977–1991. Upgren’s data show an increase in light pollution and possibly air
pollution in the area around Middletown, Connecticut.

How is sky glow measured or calculated?

With the growing awareness of light pollution, lighting professionals only recently began measuring sky glow in
an attempt to quantify its relationship to electric lighting. This is a very challenging task, because many factors
play a role in sky glow. One must not only consider the lighting, but also the angular distribution of the light
emitted from the luminaire, the light reflected from the ground and its angular distribution, as well as
atmospheric effects of humidity and the interaction of light with aerosols (particles in the atmosphere that may
be caused by manufactured pollutants, fire, volcanic eruptions, etc.), all of which can change from moment to
moment.

When observing the night sky, professional astronomers often measure the dark portion of the sky with their
astronomical equipment to have a background value they can use to compare their star signal against.
Professional astronomers use an instrument called a photoelectric photometer to make these measurements.
Typically such measurements are made at the zenith . Other methods to measure sky brightness are discussed
in the CIE technical report, Guidelines for Minimizing Sky Glow (CIE 1997).

Many amateur and professional astronomers have recorded sky brightness measurements to monitor the
increase in sky brightness (Lockwood et al. 1990; Upgren 1991). From these data, a number of metrics or
calculation methods have been developed to estimate sky glow (Garstang 1986, 1989, 1991; Walker 1977).
One very simple approach used by casual observers, for example, is to estimate sky glow by looking for the Big
Dipper constellation and then counting how many stars are visible to the naked eye. However, none of the
metrics directly relate electric lighting emissions to sky glow. For example, both Garstang (1986) and Walker
(1977) developed relationships using population multiplied by a given number of lumens per person to include
lighting in their calculations. However, the distribution of the light sources, the number of light sources,
wattage, and the amount of reflected light are all excluded from the calculation. Without the ability to model this
lighting information, it is difficult to determine how to minimize sky glow while minimizing the impact on the use
of light at night.

What is light trespass?

Light trespass occurs when spill light is cast where it is not wanted. Light trespass is somewhat subjective
because it is difficult to define when, where, and how much light is unwanted. An example of light trespass is
when spill light from a streetlight or floodlight enters a window and illuminates an indoor area. Figures 4 and 5
depict examples of light trespass. The light trespass shown in Figure 4 would be significantly reduced if a shield
were placed on the luminaire. In Figure 5, the floodlight on the hotel casts light on the home across the street.
Proper aiming of the floodlight and shielding would significantly reduce the light trespass shown in this example.

Page 4 of 19 4/28/2003
Figure 4. Example of light trespass

Source: David Fern ández-Barba, Dep. d'Astronomia i Meteorologia,


Universitat de Barcelona, SPAIN

Figure 5. Example of light trespass from a floodlight


installed by a hotel that casts light onto a house across
the street

How is light trespass measured or calculated?

The Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) specifies light trespass limits for light entering windows in terms of
environmental zones (ILE 2000). (See “What are lighting environmental zones?”) It is difficult to measure light
trespass because the occurrences are so different. Illuminance on a vertical plane (for example vertical
illuminance at the window, as depicted in Figure 4) may be appropriate in some cases. Horizontal illuminance
might be appropriate in other cases (for example, horizontal illuminance on a bed). An illuminance level of 1 lux
(0.1 footcandle) might be acceptable to some and completely objectionable to another. For reference, 0.3 lux
(0.03 footcandle) is typical of the illuminance that results from moonlight.

In a recent study, Boyce et al. (2001) suggest that light trespass be measured in a relative manner, at property
boundaries, to take into account both light coming into the property as well as light inside the property. When
designing the lighting for a site, imagine a vertical plane at the boundary between the site property and an
adjacent property. Measure the illuminance on the vertical plane at the property boundary, directed toward the
lighting design site, 180° away from the adjacent property. Then rotate 180° away from the lighting design site,
and measure the illuminance on the vertical plane, directed toward the adjacent property. Calculate the ratio of
the illuminance on the plane pointing toward the lighting design site to the illuminance on the plane pointing
toward the adjacent property. If the ratio of the measured illuminances is less than unity (one), this implies that

Page 5 of 19 4/28/2003
the design site receives more light from the adjacent property than the design site delivers to the adjacent
property. If the ratio is greater than unity, then the design site delivers more light to the adjacent property than
the adjacent property delivers to the site. The larger the ratio, the more likely light trespass complaints are to
occur.

What is glare?

Glare is a visual sensation caused by excessive and uncontrolled brightness. It can be disabling or simply
uncomfortable. It is subjective, and sensitivity to glare can vary widely. Older people are usually more sensitive
to glare due to the aging characteristics of the eye. Disability glare is the reduction in visibility caused by
intense light sources in the field of view, while discomfort glare is the sensation of annoyance or even pain
induced by overly bright sources (Rea 2000). Compare the glare from the streetlight shown in Figure 6 to the
glare from the luminaires shown in Figure 7. Reducing glare is an effective way to improve the lighting.

Figure 6. Example of lighting that can result in disability


and discomfort glare

Figure 7. Example of how reduced glare improves the


lighting

Source: Lumec

Page 6 of 19 4/28/2003
How is the issue of light pollution currently being addressed?

A number of educational, research, and developmental efforts addressing light pollution are underway, including
work to design lighting equipment that produces less light pollution; but the main efforts currently involve
education and legislation.

In response to the demand to reduce light pollution, research and development efforts have focused on
advancements in technology to design luminaires to efficiently direct light where it is needed. Luminaire
manufacturers have concentrated on providing highly efficient luminaires with given beam distributions while
meeting the cutoff classifications set forth by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)
to reduce glare as well as wasted light. Advancements in lamp technologies have resulted in producing high
efficiency light sources that reduce light pollution and have the added benefit of saving energy.

In an effort to increase public awareness on the topic of quality outdoor lighting, the number of state, local, and
regional lighting ordinances is growing. Many states have adopted legislation controlling outdoor lighting, more
states have pending outdoor lighting bills in front of their legislators. Numerous adopted and pending local
ordinances pertain to the lighting of cities, towns, and counties. Figure 8 shows which states have adopted or
pending statewide legislation.

Legislation typically includes requirements for full cutoff luminaires, minimum light levels, lumen or wattage
limitations, light source type limitations, controlled operating periods, curfews, and the elimination of certain
kinds of lighting. (Curfews for outdoor lighting are generally defined by local planning authorities based on
anticipated use of the area and, thus, a need for lighting. During pre-curfew times, the need for lighting is
warranted, so lighting levels are generally higher than during post-curfew times.) In addition to preserving dark
skies, legislation is being justified on the basis of minimizing wasted energy and money, reducing unwanted
light on adjoining properties (such as light in bedroom windows), reducing glare, and preserving animal
breeding and migration habitats.

Figure 8. Adopted and pending legislation governing


light pollution in the United States, as of January 2003

Luminaires are designed to have lighting distributions that are appropriate for specific applications. Virtually any
luminaire can generate sky glow, light trespass, and glare if installed improperly or in the wrong application.
These problems can be avoided by selecting luminaires that have the appropriate distribution for the application
and installing them correctly to limit spill light and uplight.

Page 7 of 19 4/28/2003
What are lighting environmental zones?

Although the goal may be to eliminate light pollution, in some locations light pollution cannot be avoided
altogether. The environmental consequences of the pollution, however, need not be equally detrimental across
all locations. The Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) has outlined four environmental zones to
establish a basis for outdoor lighting regulations (CIE 1997). The environmental zone rating can be used to help
ensure that the lighting goals of an environment are appropriately defined and met, but not exceeded. The
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) has adopted the concept of environmental zones
(described in Table 1) and recommends their use in developing new outdoor lighting (IESNA 1999). In some
states legislation is being considered that would restrict outdoor lighting by environmental zone. For example,
California has drafted environmental legislation that includes the designation of outdoor lighting zones (CEC
2002). Application of environmental zones is first envisioned for the protection of natural park preserves and
astronomical observatories. Environmental zones promise to reduce overall light pollution by helping to limit, or
in some cases eliminate, light wastage.

Table 1. Description of the lighting environmental zones, as


adapted by IESNA

Zone
Description
rating

Areas with intrinsically dark landscapes


National parks or residential areas with strict limits on
E1
light trespass
Roads usually unlit

Areas of low ambient brightness


E2
Outer urban or rural residential areas

Areas of medium ambient brightness


E3
Urban residential areas

Areas of high ambient brightness


E4 Urban areas, residential and commercial with high
levels of night time activity

Source: IESNA 1999

The IESNA gives recommendations for pre-curfew and post-curfew light levels to limit light trespass (IESNA
1999). Pre-curfew is from dusk until 11:00 p.m. local time, when the area being illuminated is more likely to be
in use. Post-curfew is from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. local time. Recommended lighting levels are higher during
pre -curfew time (IESNA 1999). The Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) provides guidelines on obtrusive light
limits for sky glow, light trespass, and glare in exterior lighting installations (ILE 2000).

How can sky glow be reduced?

While it is difficult to accurately model sky glow, at this point it is presumed that the most important factors
are light output and lamp spectral characteristics, light distribution from the luminaire, reflected light from the
ground, and aerosol particle distribution in the atmosphere. If the quantity of light going into the sky is reduced,
then sky glow is reduced. Thus, current practice is to reduce sky glow by 1) using full cutoff luminaires to
minimize the amount of light emitted upward directly from the luminaire; 2) reducing light levels; 3) turning off
unneeded lights; 4) limiting lighted hours of outdoor sales areas, parking areas, and signs around important
observing sights; 5) limiting lighting installations; and 6) mandating low-pressure sodium light sources, which
allows astronomers to filter the line spectra from telescopic images. For reducing sky glow, the Institution of
Lighting Engineers (ILE) has suggested limits on the amount of luminaire-emitted light that goes directly into
the sky. The ILE’s limits are specified by environmental zone, as shown in Table 2.

Page 8 of 19 4/28/2003
Table 2. Limits on sky glow for different environmental
zones

Environmental zone Sky glow ULR* (max %)

E1 0.0

E2 2.5

E3 5.0

E4 15.0

* ULR is the Upward Light Ratio of the installation and is the


maximum permitted percentage of luminaire flux for the total
installation that goes directly into the sky.

How is light trespass controlled?

Light trespass may be controlled or minimized by following the general suggestions provided by the
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA 1999):

l Consider the surrounding area during the lighting design, and select luminaires, locations, and orientations
that minimize spill light onto adjacent properties.
l Select luminaires that control the intensity (candela) distribution.
l Use well -shielded luminaires.
l Keep floodlight aiming angles low so that the entire beam falls within the intended lighted area.

The Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) has suggested limits on light trespass in terms of the amount of light
that is cast on the surface of a window for different environmental zones (see Table 3).

Table 3. Limits on light trespass for different environmental


zones

Light into windows, vertical


Environmental illuminance (lux)
zone
Before curfew After curfew

E1 2 1*

E2 5 1

E3 10 2

E4 25 5

Source: ILE 2000


* Acceptable from public road lighting installations only

How is glare controlled?

The cutoff classifications of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) were developed to
control glare. The IESNA full cutoff, cutoff, and semicutoff designations limit the intensity values in the glare
zone. (See “What are the IESNA cutoff classifications?”) The Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) has
suggested limits for glare for the different environmental zones, as shown in Table 4. In the table, the source
intensity applies to each source in the potentially obtrusive direction, outside of the area being lit.

Page 9 of 19 4/28/2003
Table 4. Limits on glare for different environmental zones

Source intensity (kilocandela)


Environmental
zone
Before curfew After curfew

E1 0 0.0

E2 20 0.5

E3 30 1.0

E4 30 2.5

Source: ILE 2000

Glare and light trespass are of special concern when installing floodlights. The Commission Internationale de
l’Eclairage (CIE) provides design guidelines on the siting and aiming of floodlights (CIE in press). One objective
when the lighting is installed is to ensure that, to the extent practicable, direct view of the bright parts of the
floodlights is prevented from positions of importance at eye-height on neighboring properties. Where possible,
shielding should be considered. To determine the mounting height of luminaires, the CIE suggests the following
considerations:

l Higher mounting heights can often be more effective in controlling spill light, because floodlights with a
more controlled light distribution (i.e., narrower beam) may be used, and the floodlights may be aimed in
a more downward direction, making it easier to confine the light to the design area.
l Lower mounting heights increase the spill light beyond the property boundaries. To illuminate the space
satisfactorily, it is often necessary to use floodlights with a broader beam and to aim the floodlights in
directions closer to the horizontal than would occur when using higher mounting heights.
l Lower mounting heights make bright parts of the floodlights more visible from positions outside the
property boundary, which can increase glare.

Figures 9 and 10 show how a higher mounting height compares to a lower mounting height for providing a given
amount of light.

Figure 9. Floodlight at a higher mounting height with narrow


beam angle, resulting in less spill light

Page 10 of 19 4/28/2003
Figure 10. Floodlight at a lower mounting height with wider beam
angle, resulting in more spill light

What are the IESNA cutoff classifications?

The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) defines several outdoor luminaire cutoff
classifications , each with different photometric criteria. For these classifications, two relevant zones are
defined with respect to the nadir of a luminaire (the nadir is defined as the angle that points directly downward,
or 0°, from the luminaire). One zone applies to angles at or above 80° above nadir, and the second zone covers
all angles at or above 90° above nadir, or above the horizontal plane of the luminaire (see Figure 11). Light
emitted in the 80° to 90° zone is more likely to contribute to glare, and light emitted above the horizontal is
more likely to contribute to sky glow. The four IESNA classifications are defined as follows (IESNA 2000):

l Full cutoff—The luminous intensity (in candelas) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir is zero, and
the luminous intensity (in candelas) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir does not numerically
exceed 10% of the luminous flux (in lumens) of the lamp or lamps in the luminaire.
l Cutoff—The luminous intensity (in candelas) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir does not numerically
exceed 2.5% of the luminous flux (in lumens) of the lamp or lamps in the luminaire, and the luminous
intensity (in candelas) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir does not numerically exceed 10% of
the luminous flux (in lumens) of the lamp or lamps in the luminaire.
l Semicutoff—The luminous intensity (in candelas) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir does not
numerically exceed 5% of the luminous flux (in lumens) of the lamp or lamps in the luminaire, and the
luminous intensity (in candelas) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir does not numerically
exceed 20% of the luminous flux (in lumens) of the lamp or lamps in the luminaire.
l Noncutoff —There is no candela limitation in the zone above maximum candela.

Figure 11. Angles referenced by the


IESNA cutoff classifications

Source: Adapted from Bullough 2002


© IESNA, used with permission

Page 11 of 19 4/28/2003
Are the IESNA cutoff classifications a good indicator of direct uplight?

Except for the full cutoff designation, the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) cutoff
classifications are not a good indicator of direct uplight, because glare control was the original reason they
were developed. A luminaire that has the IESNA full cutoff classification does not have any light going directly
upward from the luminaire and will not, if mounted correctly, emit light directly into the sky. The direct uplight
from a cutoff luminaire can vary from 0% to 16% of the total luminaire light output, and the uplight from a
semicutoff luminaire can vary from 0% to 31% of the total luminaire light output.

However, careful consideration of these classification definitions can be very important when evaluating outdoor
luminaires for their potential to cause light trespass or glare. Please read the following sentence carefully:

The definitions are given in terms of luminous intensity (in candelas), but the values are made in
reference to luminous flux of the light source (in lumens).

Casually skimming these definitions could lead to the assumption that for a cutoff luminaire, no more than 10%
of the lamp luminous flux is emitted between 80° and 90° from nadir, or that no more than 2.5% of the lamp
luminous flux is emitted above 90° from nadir. In fact, neither of these assumptions is correct. The following is
a technical discussion of these discrepancies.

Bullough states the following:

Consider the hypothetical luminous intensity distribution [shown in Figure 12] for a luminaire
equipped with a 1000-lumen lamp. The luminous intensity at any angle between and including 80°
and 90° from nadir is 100 candelas, which is 10% of the numerical value of the lamp lumens. The
luminous intensity 90° from nadir and at any angle above is 25 candelas, which is 2.5% of the
numerical value of the lamp lumens. [The distribution of the remaining 73% of lamp lumens at
angles below 80° from nadir does not affect the cutoff classification of the luminaire and, thus, is not
shown in Figure 12.] This hypothetical luminaire can be classified as a cutoff luminaire.
Interestingly, a luminaire with this distribution would emit 11% of the lamp lumens between 80°
and 90° from nadir, and nearly 16% of the lamp lumens above 90° from nadir. (Bullough 2002, reprinted
with permission from IESNA)

Figure 12. Hypothetical luminous intensity distribution


at 80°–180° for a cutoff luminaire containing a 1000-
lumen lamp (units are in candelas)

Source: Bullough 2002, © IESNA, used with permission

Page 12 of 19 4/28/2003
The quantity of lumens emitted above 90° from nadir is calculated by multiplying the maximum allowable
intensity value, 25 candelas, by the solid angle over which they are emitted, 2p steradians , totaling 157
lumens or 16% of the 1000 lumens emitted by the lamp. For the percentage of lamp lumens in the glare zone,
the solid angle from 80° to 90° is approximately 1 steradian. Multiplying the solid angle, 1 steradian, by the
maximum allowable intensity value, 100 candelas, the total allowable lumens in the glare zone is 109 lumens or
11% of the 1000 lumens emitted by the lamp.

Bullough further explains:

Conversely, consider another hypothetical luminous intensity distribution [shown in Figure 13], also
for a luminaire equipped with a 1000-lumen lamp. The luminous intensity at one angle between 80°
and 90° from nadir is 125 candelas, exceeding 10% (100 candelas) of the numerical value of the
lamp lumens. The luminous intensity at one angle above 90° from nadir is 40 candelas, exceeding
2.5% (25 candelas) of the numerical value of the lamp lumens. Such a luminaire would emit only
3% of the lamp lumens between 80° and 90 ° from nadir, and about 1% of the lamp lumens above
90° from nadir. [As in the example above, the distribution of the remaining 96% of lamp lumens at
angles below 80° from nadir does not impact the luminaire's cutoff classification and, thus, is not
shown in Figure 13.] Because of its luminous intensity values, this luminaire cannot be classified as
a cutoff luminaire even though it emits significantly less light upward than the [previously shown]
hypothetical luminaire [Figure 12]. Indeed, even if this same luminaire were fully shielded so that it
emitted no light above 90°, it could not be considered a full cutoff or even a cutoff luminaire,
because of its higher-than permitted intensity at one angle between 80° and 90 °. (Bullough 2002,
reprinted with permission from IESNA)

Figure 13. Hypothetical luminous intensity distribution at


80°–180° for a luminaire containing a 1000-lumen lamp
failing to meet the cutoff classification (units are in
candelas)

Source: Bullough 2002, © IESNA, used with permission

Certainly, these luminous intensity distribution examples represent extreme cases. They do, however, serve to
emphasize the caution that is required when interpreting the various cutoff classifications. If, for example, one
is concerned about minimizing direct uplight from a luminaire, it is not necessarily true that a cutoff luminaire
will emit a smaller proportion of its luminous flux upward than a semicutoff (or even a noncutoff) luminaire,
even if the luminaires are equipped with the same lamp. A full cutoff luminaire, on the other hand, will never
emit direct uplight.

The best way to estimate the luminous flux emitted directly upward by a particular luminaire is to consult a
zonal luminous flux summary prepared by the luminaire's manufacturer.

Page 13 of 19 4/28/2003
Continuing with the logic above and generalizing for each cutoff classification, ranges of lumen percentage are
shown in Table 5 in terms of uplight and lumens in the glare zone. The direct uplight of a luminaire that has the
IESNA semicutoff classification theoretically can vary from 0% to 31% of the total lamp lumens and the lumens
in the glare zone can vary from 0% to 22%.

Table 5. Allowable range of the lumens being emitted up and in


the glare zone

Range of
Range of
Luminaire allowable lumens
allowable lumens
classification emitted between
emitted upward
80° and 90°

Full cutoff 0 0 - 11%

Cutoff 0 - 16% 0 - 11%

Semicutoff 0 - 31% 0 - 22%

What is the difference between full cutoff and fully shielded?

The term full cutoff has and is being used to describe luminaires that have no direct uplight (no light emitted
above horizontal). However, in addition to that limitation, the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
(IESNA) definition also requires luminaires to comply with the glare requirement limiting intensity of light from
the luminaire in the region between 80° and 90°.

The term full cutoff is often substituted for the term fully shielded. The terms are not equivalent. Fully shielded
luminaires emit no direct uplight, but have no limitation on the intensity in the region between 80° and 90 °.
Luminaires that fall under the IESNA full cutoff, cutoff, semicutoff, and noncutoff definitions, may also
qualify as fully shielded. It may be obvious that a luminaire that is characterized as an IESNA full cutoff
luminaire is fully shielded, but not as obvious when luminaires with other IESNA classifications may also qualify.
Consider a semicutoff luminaire containing a 1000 lumen lamp that has no direct uplight but a candela value of
150 between 80° and 90 °. This luminaire is considered to be fully shielded. However, if it were mistakenly
labeled a full cutoff luminaire, this can become quite confusing. In 2002, the IESNA chartered a new committee
to address the inconsistencies and confusion.

There is also a confusing assumption that a luminaire with a flat lens qualifies as a full cutoff luminaire. While
this may be true sometimes, it is not always the case. Depending on the structure of the luminaire, reflections
off the housing may result in some amount of direct uplight from the luminaire. Consider the hypothetical
luminaire in Figure 14. Reflections from below the lens may result in some direct uplight from the luminaire. The
IESNA full cutoff classification also has a limitation on light in the glare zone between 80° and 90 °. A flat lens on
a luminaire does not guarantee that this requirement is met.

Page 14 of 19 4/28/2003
Figure 14. Example of a flat lens luminaire
that may have some uplight reflected from
the mechanical structures below the lens

Resources

References

Boyce, P.R., C.M. Hunter, and S.L. V ásconez. 2001. An Evaluation of Three Types of Gas Station
Canopy Lighting. Troy, New York: Lighting Research Center. Accessed 27 February 2003 at
http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/Projects/canopy.pdf

Bullough, J.D. 2002. Interpreting outdoor luminaire cutoff classification. Lighting Design +
Application 32(7):44 –46.

California Energy Commission (CEC). 2002. “Section 10-114 – Determination of outdoor lighting
zones and administrative rules for use.” In 2005 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings. Draft Report P400-03-001D2. Accessed 13 March 2003 at
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005_standards/documents/2002-11-18_workshop/DRAFT-2_2002-11-
18.pdf

Commission Internationale de l ’Eclairage (CIE). In press. Guide on the limitation of the effects of
obtrusive light from outdoor lighting installations, Report TC5.12. Vienna: Commission
Internationale de l’Eclairage.

Commission Internationale de l ’Eclairage (CIE). 1997. Guidelines for Minimizing Sky Glow. Vienna:
Commission Internationale de l ’Eclairage.

Garstang, R. 1986. Model for artificial night-sky illumination. Publications of the Astronomical
Society of the Pacific 98:364-375.

Garstang, R. 1989. Night-sky brightness at observatories and sites. Publications of the Astronomical
Society of the Pacific 101:306-329.

Garstang, R. 1991. Dust and light pollution. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
103:1109-1116.

Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). 2000. American National Standard
Practice for Roadway Lighting, ANSI/IESNA RP-8-00. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of
North America.

Page 15 of 19 4/28/2003
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). 1999. Recommended Practice for
Outdoor and Environmental Lighting, IESNA RP-33-99. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society
of North America.

Lockwood, G.W., R.D. Floyd, and D.T. Thompson. 1990. Sky glow and outdoor lighting trends since
1976 at the Lowell Observatory. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 102:481-91.

Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE). 2000. Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Light Pollution.
Warwickshire, UK: the Institution of Lighting Engineers.

Rea, M.S., ed. 2000. IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application, 9th edition. New York:
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

Upgren, A.R. 1991. Night-sky brightness from the visibility of stars near the horizon. Publications of
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 103:1292-1295.

Walker, M. 1977. The effects of urban lighting on the brightness of the night sky. Publications of the
Astronomical Society of the Pacific 89:405-409.

Page 16 of 19 4/28/2003
For more information

Many other resources provide information about light pollution. The following is not intended to be a complete
list of additional resources; numerous regional and international organizations disseminate information about
this topic.

l Commission Internationale de l ’Eclairage (CIE): Technical reports 146:2002/147:2002 CIE Collection on


Glare 2002. Accessed on 31 March 2003 at http://www.cie.co.at/cie/framepublications.html
l International Dark-Sky Association (IDA): http://www.darksky.org
l Lighting Research Center (LRC): http://www.lrc.rpi.edu
l Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE): http:// www.ile.org.uk
l National Electrical Manufacturing Association (NEMA): Statement of Principles on Outdoor Lighting Codes
of the Luminaire Section of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Accessed on 11 March 2003
at http://www.nema.org/index_nema.cfm/563/?pos=2&type=standard&pageid=6EC0CFDE-EA6A-48E8-
A3CA2C05333EA600&node=534

Sponsors

California Energy Commission


Iowa Energy Center
Lighting Research Center
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Wisconsin Focus on Energy

Credits
Lighting Answers - Light Pollution
Volume 7 Issue 2 March 2003

Author: Michele W. McColgan


Program Director: Conan O'Rourke
Editor: Virginia B. Harrison
Designer/Graphics Developers: James Gross
Julie Bailey
Technical Developers: Rick Hadley
Joann Coffey

Acknowledgments

NLPIP thanks Terry McGowan of Lighting Ideas, Inc., for providing technical review of this publication. Lighting
Research Center personnel who provided technical contributions include Conan O’Rourke, John Bullough, Dr.
John Van Derlofske, Dr. Peter Boyce, and Russ Leslie.

Page 17 of 19 4/28/2003
Glossary

Candela The Systeme International d'Unities (SI) of luminous intensity. One candela is one lumen per
steradian. Formerly, candle.

Cutoff angle The angle of light distribution from a luminaire, measured upward from nadir, between the vertical
axis and the first line at which the bare source (lamp) is not visible.

Cutoff classification The classification system of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) that
describes the light distribution of an outdoor luminaire. Cutoff classifications define the luminous
intensity limits in two illumination zones that occur within the range of 80° to 180 ° above nadir.

Cutoff luminaire IESNA classification that describes a luminaire having a light distribution in which the candela per
1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 25 (2.5%) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir,
and 100 (10%) at or above a vertical angle of 80 ° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles
around the luminaire.

Direct uplight Light emitted upward by a luminaire.

Disability glare A type of glare that causes a loss of visibility from stray light being scattered within the eye.

Discomfort glare The sensation of annoyance or even pain induced by overly bright sources.

Fixture A complete lighting unit consisting of lamp or lamps and the parts designed to distribute the light,
position and protect the lamp(s), and connect the lamp(s) to the power supply. (Also referred to as
luminaire.)

Footcandle (fc) A measure of illuminance in lumens per square foot. One footcandle equals 10.76 lux, although for
convenience 10 lux commonly is used as the equivalent.

Full cutoff luminaire IESNA classification that describes a luminaire having a light distribution in which zero candela
intensity occurs at or above an angle of 90° above nadir. Additionally, the candela per 1000 lamp
lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10%) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir. This
applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire.

Fully shielded luminaire A luminaire that emits no direct uplight, but which has no limitation on the intensity in the region
between 80 ° and 90°.

Glare The sensation produced by luminances within the visual field that are sufficiently greater than the
luminance to which the eyes are adapted, which causes annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual
performance and visibility.

Illuminance The amount of light (luminous flux) incident on a surface area. Illuminance is measured in
footcandles (lumens/square foot) or lux (lumens/square meter). One footcandle equals 10.76 lux,
although for convenience 10 lux commonly is used as the equivalent.

Light trespass A undesirable condition in which spill light is cast where it is not wanted.

Lumen (lm) A unit measurement of the rate at which a lamp produces light. A lamp's light output rating
expresses the total amount of light emitted in all directions per unit time. Ratings of initial light
output provided by manufacturers express the total light output after 100 hours of operation.

Luminous Flux The rate of flow of light, measured in lumens. The overall light output of a lamp

Luminous intensity The luminous flux on a small surface centered on and normal to the direction divided by the solid
angle (in steradians) that the surface subtends at the source. Luminous intensity can be expressed
in candelas or in lumens per steradian.

Page 18 of 19 4/28/2003
Lux (lx) A measure of illuminance in lumens per square meter. One lux equals 0.093 footcandle.

Nadir In the lighting discipline, nadir is the angle pointing directly downward from the luminaire, or 0 °.
Nadir is opposite the zenith.

Noncutoff luminaire IESNA classification that describes a luminaire light distribution in which there is no candela
limitation in the zone above maximum candela. (See also cutoff classification and cutoff angle.)

Semicutoff luminaire IESNA classification that describes a luminaire light distribution in which the candela per 1000 lamp
lumens does not numerically exceed 50 (5%) at or above an angle of 90 ° above nadir, and 200
(20%) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the
luminaire.

Sky glow Brightening of the sky caused by outdoor lighting and natural atmospheric and celestial factors.

Spill light Light that falls outside of the area intended to be lighted.

Steradian (sr) A unit of measure equal to the solid angle subtended at the center of a sphere by an area on the
surface of the sphere equal to the square of the sphere radius.

Uplight Light directed upward at greater than 90° above nadir. The source of uplight can be from a
combination of direct uplight and reflected light.

Zenith In the lighting discipline, zenith is the angle pointing directly upward from the luminaire, or 180°.
Zenith is opposite nadir. In astronomical usage, zenith is the highest point in the sky, directly above
the observation point.

Legal Notices

Lighting Answers is a serial publication that complements the National Lighting Product
Information Program's (NLPIP's) other serial, Specifier Reports. Each issue of Lighting Answers presents
information in one of three formats: educational information about a specific topic of concern to lighting
professionals, a summary of available information about a particular technology in an educational format with
no testing, and information about a new or special technology on which NLPIP has performed some limited
testing.

It is against the law to inaccurately present information extracted from Lighting Answers for product publicity
purposes. Information in these reports may not be reproduced without permission of Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute.

Technical Support
©1995 -2003 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 USA - All Rights Reserved

Page 19 of 19 4/28/2003

You might also like