Internal Kaizen For OEE Improvement - Flextronics PDF
Internal Kaizen For OEE Improvement - Flextronics PDF
OEE Improvement
on time
80% Incomplete
informed in
70% Short manpower to advance Offline setup setup not
60% Data Material coming
50% Inaccurate OEE solve the issues
issue ready
40% Material missing or short
30% OEE Tgt Data Lack of Skilled to
20% Wrong Target wrong material in kit
10% Dec' Jan' Feb' Augu OEE
handle issue on OEE 60%
Mar Apr May June July Sep Oct Nov Dec CPH/UPH m/c
07 08 08 st
LU Tgt First Article takes
OEE Tgt 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 60% 60% 60% Non-level Loading program NOT
OEE 47.2% 50.1% 50.6% 50.5% 46.2% 50.8% 53.0% 52% 56.00 54.8% LU too long
Change-Over takes Optimized Reduced Speed
LU Tgt 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Lack of
long time feeder problem due to Machine
LU 32% 32% 26% 32.4% 25.2% 35.2% 37.7% 39% 36.10 38.7% Employee
Awareness to Lineconditions
NOT
Monthly Too many WIP parts fall out
the OEE Balanced
waiting for Top Lack of training Blocked or Starved
Problem Zero spare part
and B/E within the line
Grasp inventory for
Environme level 1
The Machiner
Method nt y
Target Sheet Progress Situation
Downtime breakdown
Date: 10/27/2008 Customer/Model :ALL
Team Title : OEE improvement Line/Area/ Module :ALL line
Show a breakdown of the subject matter Q1'09 Q2'09
Unit Of
and identify area that is being focused.
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Start Date: Date:
CTQs Measur Target Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 % Improved Status
Week 1 Week 2
ement
Description Average
OEE(FCM II) % 57% 65.0% 57% 57%
OEE (NXT) % 61% 70.0% 61% 61% No schedule downtime 29.48% 43.4% 27.4% 22.8% 24.8% 35.6% 22.9%
OEE(Pace) % 50% 55.0% 50% 50%
OEE (NEC) % 44% 55.0% 44% 44%
Planned downtime 4.75% 2.7% 3.5% 4.5% 4.0% 5.4% 8.4%
OEE (HMLV) % 38% 50.0% 38% 38% Equipment downtime 5.08% 5.0% 4.9% 5.9% 5.3% 3.9% 5.5%
dow ntim e Min 5。08% 3% 5.08% 5.08%
Materila downtime 0.43% 1.0% 0.9% 0.1% 0。2% 0.4% 0.2%
Production/process D/T 0.20% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0。2% 0.3% 0.3%
On-line setup, C/O D/T 2.10% 1.2% 1.3% 1.4% 2.9% 2.7% 3.1%
Qulity related 0.37% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2%
0-70% 71%-90% 91%-100% Above 100% Actual production time 57.42% 46.0% 61.0% 64.5% 62.1% 51.5% 59.4%
4. Check 3. Do
GBE-KPO-4-001-00 Kaizen Template (Operations) Rev. 06 3
Source :Internal Kaizen
Shenzhen Fu Yong
Independent Study on Kaizen Needs Oct. 2008
[email protected]
5. feeder mainteance
Objectives
1. Improve OEE from current 55% to 60%
2. Reduce Machine related downtime 5.08% to 3%
3. Improve MV2F ECPH
Goals
Unit Of
Start
CTQs Measur Target % Improved Status
ement
OEE(FCM II) % 57% 65.0% 89.0%
OEE (NXT) % 61% 70.0% 102.1%
OEE(Pace-MV2F) % 50% 55.0% 120.3%
OEE (NEC-CP6) % 44% 55.0% 73.4%
OEE (Pace-CM602) % 85.0% 106.2%
Note : Pls ensure that all G&O identified in this page is captured under the target sheet.
No of Shingijutsu
Team Members Name Job Title Department
No Workshop attended
1 SJ Ma Leader ME 5
2 Guo Qing Li Co-leader ME 3
3 James Peng Co-leader ME 4
4 Road Lu Co-leader ME 1
5 Fu Guangyuan Engieer ME 1
6 Zhou zhongqiang Co-leader ME 4
7 Tx lee Co-leader ME 6
8 Liu Liming Engieer ME 5
9 HuangJinghua Engieer ME 2
10 Clifford Zheng Engieer ME 3
11 Sun Susan Engieer ME 2
12
13
No of Shingijutsu
External Team Members Name Job Title Department
No Workshop attended
1
2
3
GBE-KPO-4-001-00 Kaizen Template (Operations) Rev. 06 6
Source :Internal Kaizen
Target Sheet Shenzhen Fu Yong
Oct. 2008
[email protected]
Notes :
• Use this Target Sheet if project is not tracking ETE
• Please ensure all the G&O’s identified in Page 5 is captured.
• Site lean leader is responsible in reviewing this and ensuring that a follow thru is done till the closure.
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Hard Soft
Savings Savings
SMT Metrics (USD/ (USD/
Production Sankyo Study machine (UOM) Before After % Improved month) month) Do right thing at
demand process time one by first time.
increased, and one and try to Programmer
LBR 81.25% 92.50% 13%
Customer: one line cannot improve line LBR should deliver
meet customer and increase line well balanced
Sankyo requirement productivity UPH 120 140 17% program to SMT
Tools Used
Lean
25
30 24 20 20
20 20 18
18 16
16
Second
20 Second
15
C/T C/T
10 10
5
0 0
S/P MV1 MV2 IC Placer S/P MV1 MV2 IC Placer
Station Station
100 80
75
57 59 48 49 50
second
60
50 second
C/T 40 C/T
0 20
0
0
S/P MV2 MV2 MPAV2 S/P MV2 MV2 MPAV2
stations stations
150 150
100 110
85 90 85 90
second
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Hard Soft
Metrics Savings Savings
Before After % Improved
SMT (UOM) (USD/ (USD/
operation month) month)
Do right thing in first
Use MPS to LBR 96% 98% 2% time. Programmer
Low ECPH
optimize the should deliver well
Customer: and LBR balanced program to
program
SMT
ECPH 39.44% 50% 10%
pace
Tools Used
Lean UPH 44 60 16
Six Sigma
80
70
60
40 75 50
Time(s)
57 59
20 30 48 49 50
0 10
MV2F(1) MV2F(2) MPAV2B MV2F(1) MV2F(2) MPAV2B
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Hard Soft
Saving Saving
Metrics
SMT Before After % Improved s s
(UOM)
Operation:li (USD/ (USD/
ne22-1 month) month) Do right thing in first
Use MPS to time. Programmer
Low ECPH LBR 90.39% 96.07% 5%
optimize the should deliver well
and LBR balanced program to
program
Customer: SMT
ECPH 33.67% 50.08% 16%
PACE
Tools Used
Lean UPH 44 60 16
Six Sigma
80 60
60 50 After Kaizen
40
40 75 30 51
69 48 48
57
20 20
10
0 MV2F(1) MV2F(2) MPAV2B
MV2F(1) MV2F(2) MPAV2B Time(s) 48 48 51
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
SMT Original Use supporting Metrics Before After % Improved $ Hard $ Soft standard
Operation: supporting pin block to replace solder procedue to
paste
14-1 can not satisfy supporting pin to define supporting
printing
with demand support PCB better quality 98% 99.96% 2% block using in
Customer: of
solder paste
quality,which station
take
Thomson production
Tools Used print issue
Lean
Six Sigma
Before Kaizen After Kaizen
Method for
Operations: Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Metrics Before After % Improved $ Hard $ Soft
SMT
standard
Operation
procedue to
solder paste make a careep quality define careep
Customer: misprinting table to attach table using in
cause plasitic on board to solder paste
potencial protect PCB from station when pilot
All quality issue cleaning
Tools Used run
Lean
Six Sigma
Before Kaizen After Kaizen
Design special
stickup tools to
finish film cover
Tape is
difficult to
cover PCB
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Two persons to Make use of trolly to Metrics Before After % Improved $ Hard $ Soft Training all
SMT remove PIP from help remove PIP of FCM technicians to
Operation M/C for repair –
Waste manpower Manpower operate PIP
repair trolly
Customer:
PACE&
THM
Tools Used
Lean
Six Sigma
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Water&oil Add a filter to make Metrics Before After % Improved $ Hard $ Soft
SMT
was found in machine get dry air Maintenance
Operation
compress filter periodically
air,which D/T
Customer:
brought a lot
PACE& of down time
THM up
Tools Used
Lean
Six Sigma
Setup a filter
to make
compress air
dry
Method for
Operations: Problem Action Taken Results
Sustaining
Some Only use one soft Metrics Before After % Improved $ Hard $ Soft
Changeover support pins support pin ,it Fuji all NXT line
need move in needn't move when Yokoten the line.
smt machine each changeover. D/T
Customer:
when each
changeover.
ALU Yield
Tools Used
Lean
Six Sigma
Before Kaizen After Kaizen
Time
Action Item Who Due Date % Completed Remarks
Planned Closed
Line22-1 SMT balance Liu Liming Oct28 Oct27 Oct28 UPH increased 16 pcs
Line10-1 SMT program optimization Hu Yushan Oct28 Oct27 Oct28 UPH increase 6 pcs
Pallet Change Unit of NXT modification Lee TX/Fu Oct31 Oct27 Oct31 NXT changeover
Soft supporting pin introduction Lee Tx/Fu Oct31 Oct27 Oct31 NXT changeover
Line22-1 SMT machine c/t balance Liu Liming Oct29 Oct28 Oct29 UPH increased 16 pcs
1 Make use of 5why to solve issue Help to find out root cause of down-time
Program optimization is the base of
2 Program optimization will improve LBR
production.
3 Team work is the way to success BrainStorm
Items proposed for Yokoten Who Due Date Time % Complete Remarks
Get dry air by setup valve to keep water away from SMT machine James Peng 2008/11/15
Note:
• Please include follow up action items that needs to be continued after the workshop. 25% Complete 75% Complete
• Site lean leader is responsible in following thru the actions identified in the kaizen log.
• Site lean leader will select the items identified here for yokoten and will be transferred to the
yokoten tracking. 50% Complete 100% Complete
5 WHY CONCEPT
THOMSON FCM DOWNTIME ANALYSE
Defect THOMSON FCM VACUUM ALARM
total
Line name 17 18 20 21 23 24
time rate
Condition Machine PIP running that vacuum alarm
真空报警 10 20 10 0 30 100 170 35.4%
Date
Occurred
1 Step. 取料不良 30 0 0 0 20 10 60 12.5%
飞达不良 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 2.1%
Area Line 23-1
更换线 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 4.2%
Responsible
Huang Jh
调整偏位 30 20 0 20 110 20 200 41.7%
Division
其它 5 10 0 0 5 0 20 4.2%
Find The Cause (5 WHY)
1 WHY 2 WHY 3 WHY 4 WHY 5 WHY
per line down time analysis chart
Because of some
Because valve 4.2%
Because valve is conpression air Because tube
Why FCM valve running
unstable,Why uncleanly,Why compression air
vacuum alarm. defect,Why have
valve is unstable. compression air have water.
the defect.
uncleanly.
真空报警
35.4%
取料不良
更换线
Counter
Machine filter have not water. 调整偏位
Measure
其它
Enforcement 4.2% 12.5%
Limit
Need buy spare part and do monthly maintain. 2.1%
HUB
Conveyor
Daily
Shipment
Plan
C/P
Suppliers
IC/P
Conveyor
WIP
R/O AOI ICT FT Packing
Conveyor