The Effect of Contact Area On Wear in Relation To Fixed Bearing and Mobile Bearing Knee Replacements
The Effect of Contact Area On Wear in Relation To Fixed Bearing and Mobile Bearing Knee Replacements
2
Joint Replacement Institute, 2400 S. Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90007
Abstract: It is generally assumed that the wear rates in knee replacements are reduced as the
contact area is increased. Hence, fixed bearing or mobile bearing designs with large contact
areas throughout the full range of flexion wear less than partially conforming fixed-bearing
designs. This hypothesis was investigated in an experimental model, where flat-ended ultra
high molecular weight polyethylene pins of varying diameters were reciprocated and rotated
on polished metal plates under a constant load with serum lubrication. The pin diameters
ranged from 8 –23 mm, giving nominal contact pressures from 23.9 –2.8 MPa, covering the
range associated with a wide spectrum of total knees including mobile-bearings. For pin
diameters of 8 –12 mm, the mean wear rates were in the range of 5.0 –16.0 E-10 g/cycle. For
diameters of 17 and 23 mm, the mean wear rates were approximately 1.0 E-10 g/cycle. The
latter wear rates were significantly less than the former. Scanning electron microscopy
indicated milder wear processes with the larger diameters, while the smaller diameters
exhibited transverse ripples and cracks and detachment of thin layers from the surface. The
percentages of granules (mostly submicron), fibrils and flakes, and the sizes of these particle
types were similar among all pin diameters, except that, for the 23 mm pin diameter, the
percentage of fibrils increased and of flakes decreased. This work supports the hypothesis that
larger contact areas, up to the maximum area tested in our study, produce lower wear rates,
and suggests that there is no disadvantage regarding particle type or size associated with the
larger areas of contact. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 58: 282–290,
2001
Keywords: wear debris; polyethylene wear; knee simulators; mobile bearing knees; total
knee replacement
Figure 1. (Left) A fixed bearing contact of low conformity with an average contact pressure in the
region of 20 MPa. (Right) A mobile bearing contact with complete conformity at the upper and lower
surfaces with an average contact pressure in the region of 3 MPa. (Note that the study is applicable
to all types of condylar TKRs.)
cumferential scratching of the metal plate and considerable mobile bearing, suffer less wear and damage than those with
wear on the lower surface of the polyethylene bearing.2 There smaller contact areas. Even the laboratory studies differ in
was also delamination wear on the upper surface in some their findings on this subject. We, therefore, carried out a
samples. It is noted that, in this design, there was full con- laboratory study of wear as a function of contact area, to
formity in early flexion but only partial conformity in high determine whether a larger area metal-polyethylene contact
flexion. would produce a lower rate of gravimetric wear compared to
Concerning the wear particles themselves, the size distri- a small area contact under the same loading conditions. In
butions10 and tissue response have been compared for tissues addition, we asked whether the polishing mechanisms ex-
from periprosthetic tissue recovered at revision surgery of pected for a low-pressure interface would produce particles of
total hips and total knees.11 For hips, most of the particles a smaller size than for a high-pressure interface, where more
were submicron, and there were numerous plump macro- severe wear mechanisms might be expected.
phages containing these particles, with only occasional giant
cells. For the knees, most of the particles were in the 2–20
micron range, and these elicited a giant cell reaction with few MATERIALS AND METHODS
macrophages. When the particle sizes from different types of
total knee were measured, it was found that the less conform-
Design and Materials of the Test Components
ing the design, the higher was the surface damage, but the
larger the particle size.9 Mobile bearing implants actually had To maintain a constant area of contact, it was decided to use
a higher rate of production of particles than the fixed bearing cylindrical specimens of ultra high molecular weight poly-
designs. ethylene (UHMWPE) sliding on flat plates made from cobalt-
The earliest laboratory study of the effect of contact pres- chrome alloy. The diameter of the pins ranged from 8 –23
sure on wear rate, in the pressure range relevant to joint mm, producing average contact pressures from 23.9 –2.8 MPa
replacements, showed an exponential increase in wear rate under a load of 1200 N (Fig. 2). This configuration was
with pressure.12 A similar result was found in a later study intended to represent the contact area of one condyle of a total
using a different configuration of the test specimens.13 How- knee, ranging from a low conformity fixed bearing design, to
ever, the opposite effect, a decrease in wear factor with an a mobile bearing design with complete conformity, under a
increase in contact pressure, was found in a reciprocating total joint force of approximately 3 body weight. The pins
pin-on-plate study.14 were held in metal housings with half the diameter protrud-
It is evident that there is no consistent finding that total ing. A semi-circular lug at the bottom of the hole in the metal
knees with larger contact areas, whether fixed bearing or housing prevented the plastic pins from rotating. To evaluate
284 SATHASIVAM ET AL.
Figure 3. The contact pressures on the surfaces of two alternate pin shapes, determined by finite
element analysis. The plain cylindrical shape has a more uniform distribution.
EFFECT OF CONTACT AREA ON WEAR IN KNEE REPLACEMENTS 285
RESULTS
Figure 6. The surface height patterns of a 12 mm diameter pin and an
The finite element analysis (FEA) model was used to calcu- 8 mm diameter pin after the test, determined by soft-probe profilom-
late the pressure distribution on the end of the plastic pin for etry. The dark color represents a lower surface level. (Scale: mm.)
286 SATHASIVAM ET AL.
Figure 7. Weight loss plotted against number of cycles for all the pins
tested. The data is corrected for fluid uptake based on the nonworn
soak controls.
samples were run due to the scatter of the data for the initial
6 samples.
The mean wear rates for each diameter pin were calculated
(Fig. 8). ANOVA was carried out on the data (SPSS software,
Chicago, IL), and using the Bonferroni test, there were sig-
nificant differences between the wear rates of all pairs of pin
diameters at p ⬍ 0.05, except for the following pairs: 8 and
10 mm, 8 and 17 mm, 8 and 23 mm, and 17 and 23 mm.
Typical scanning electron micrographs at 2000 magnifi-
cation are shown in Figure 9. For the 17 and 23 mm diameter
pins, there were scratches 1–3 m wide and deep, local areas
of ripples at 2– 4 m spacing perpendicular to the main
sliding direction, and raised patches a few microns in size that
could indicate incipient flake generation. For the 12 mm
diameter pins, the ripples were more extensive, often had Figure 9. Scanning electron micrographs at 2000 ⫻ of typical areas
of the worn surfaces: (a)–(b) 17 mm dia; (c)–(d) 12 mm dia; (e)–(f) 8 mm
cracks in between them, were larger at 4 –10 m spacing, and
dia. Milder wear processes are evident for the larger diameters.
DISCUSSION
knee vary between the upper and lower bearing surfaces, distance combined with the rotation allowed for sufficient
and whether the lower surfaces allow only rotation or both replenishment of fluid in the contact region. As the diameter
sliding and rotation. It is clear that no simple test can increased to 12 mm, the fluid replenishment would be much
reproduce all conditions of all designs, but can neverthe- less, possibly promoting starved lubrication and even fluid
less give valuable indicators under a controlled set of degradation. This may have produced the worst combination
conditions. Ultimately, individual designs need to be of contact pressure and lubricating conditions, as evidenced
tested in an appropriate knee simulating machine, a more by the tendency for scratching of the metal plate. For the
extensive and costly procedure. larger diameter pins, however, the contact pressures would be
Explanations can be proposed for the relation between sufficiently low that fluid flow could still occur between the
wear rate and contact area in our test; namely, an increase in surface irregularities of the plastic and metal, because the
wear rate from 8 –12 mm diameter, and then a sharp decrease pressures would be insufficient to completely compress them.
in wear rate at 17 and 23 mm diameters. For the 8 mm It must be noted, however, that the constant load used in our
diameter, although the wear processes were severe, so long as tests would have imposed more severe conditions than phys-
there was no gross breakdown, such as delamination, the iological, where lubricant replenishment could occur during
wear rate was low. This may be because the 10 mm sliding swing phases of activity.
EFFECT OF CONTACT AREA ON WEAR IN KNEE REPLACEMENTS 289
The scratching of the metal plates per se is not easy to For the areas of contact associated with mobile bearing
explain. Such scratching of metal has been reported by others knees, represented by the 17 and 23 mm diameter pins, the
on both retrievals and test specimens.1–3,6,23 Possible expla- wear rates were significantly lower than for the areas repre-
nations are hard contaminants such as calcium oxide in the senting fixed bearing designs, even if the wear rates are
polyethylene, carbide particles released from the surface of doubled to account for the upper and lower bearing surfaces.
the metal, particles in the lubricant, or even extraneous debris This would suggest that the wear rates of mobile bearing
from the wear test machine. knees are much less than that of fixed bearing knees. How-
The scanning electron microscopy data showed that the ever, the relative amounts of sliding in fixed vs. mobile
wear processes for the three smaller diameters appeared to be bearing knees needs to be considered. Evidence from knee
similar, predicting granules, fibrils, and flakes. Generation of simulator testing suggests that, in fact, the sliding and rotation
flakes is probably dependent on sufficient contact pressure to in a mobile bearing knee can be less than that of a fixed-
produce high shear stresses over sufficient areas of plastic bearing knee.27 This has also been borne out in fluoroscopy
surface, at least several microns in size. However, for the studies of patients ascending a step,28,29 where there was less
larger diameters, the individual contact patches were evi- motion than reported for a range of fixed-bearing designs.30
dently smaller in area, favoring the generation of granules Knee simulator testing showed that the wear in fixed-bearing
and fibrils from small ripples. The tendency for smaller sized designs was much greater than for the LCS Rotating Plat-
particles is consistent also. form.5 Bell et al.,6 however, showed similar wear rates in the
The size of the particles in our study can be compared with MBK Mobile Bearing design and the Insall–Burstein II de-
that found from in vivo sources. Schmalzreid et al.11 found sign, mainly due to the higher wear on the lower plastic
that most of the particles in the tissue around fixed-bearing surface compared with the upper plastic surface interfacing
total knees were in the size range of 2–20 microns, with with the femoral condyles. This may have been due to both
particles less than 1 micron being less common. In contrast, translation and rotation occurring at the lower bearing sur-
most of the particles in tissue around total hips was less than face, a facility intended to provide improved knee kinematics
1 micron in size. Hirakawa et al.9 studied the particles around and a greater freedom of position. Collier et al.2 found that
three types of total knee, with low-medium conformity, me- the lower bearing surfaces on mobile bearing knees were
dium-high conformity, and mobile bearing knees. The tissue usually scratched, which could account for accelerated wear
was obtained at revision for loosening. The mobile bearing on these surfaces, especially considering the accelerated wear
knees (LCS Rotating Platform) had a larger number of par- that could be produced even for modest scratching.31 The
ticles per month at implantation time greater than 10 months, wear rates of retrieved Oxford knees, a completely conform-
compared with the other two groups. The fixed-bearing de- ing unicompartmental design, was very small in 1–13 year
sign of low-medium conformity had a higher percentage of follow-up.8 The average wear depth was 0.036 mm per year
larger particles than the other two groups. Beaule et al.24 with a maximum of 0.08 mm. However, when the cases with
measured the mean granule diameter, fibril length, and flake bone-plastic impingement were discounted, this figure was
diameter of particles around medium-high conformity fixed- reduced to 0.01 mm per year. In light of the above, caution
bearing knees at 0.39, 3.37, and 1.14 microns. This can be must be given to directly extrapolating the results of simple
compared with our data, averaging all pin diameters, of 0.42, tests to specific designs of mobile bearing (or fixed bearing)
3.92, and 2.39 microns. The percentages of the different knees. For example, factors such as the actual area of contact,
particle sizes in our study agreed more with the data of which can be very large on the lower bearing surface, and the
Schmalzreid et al.11 and Hirakawa et al.9 than with Beaule et flatness of the polished tibial plate may be important factors.
al.,24 but that might to some extent reflect the degree of In summary, considering all the above evidence, it appears
conformity of the different knee designs studied. that the wear rates of total knees with large contact areas,
Our data as a whole supports the use of large contact areas such as mobile bearing knees, can be much less than that of
in total knees, in order to reduce the volumetric wear rate. fixed-bearing designs, for the same plastic material. How-
However, paradoxically, for fixed bearing designs, it ap- ever, each specific design would need to be tested individu-
peared that an 8 mm diameter contact area with a pressure of ally in a suitable simulating machine in order to account for
23.9 MPa would be better than a larger area, for example 12 the design, kinematics, manufacturing, and materials factors
mm diameter. However, for the small area, the severe wear that come into play.
processes and the likelihood of delamination with some types The authors acknowledge the collaboration of Dr. Gordon Blunn
of polyethylene would suggest caution. Nevertheless, with and Dr. Carol Bell at the Centre of Biomedical Engineering, UK.
molded polyethylene, such contact areas in a low conformity SEM analysis was provided by AEA Technology, Didcot, Oxford-
modular knee have indeed produced low wear without del- shire, UK. The tibial trays were provided by Zimmer, Swindon, UK.
This project was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences
amination in long-term follow-up.23 The absence of severe Research Council (EPSRC), UK.
wear at 8 –12 year follow-up has also been noted for the M-G
unicompartmental knee, and for the AGC knee, also made REFERENCES
from molded polyethylene.2,25 Molded polyethylene has been 1. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, Lidgren L, Lilley P, Ryd L,
found to be much less susceptible to oxidation, which may Engelbrecht E, Walker PS. Wear in retrieved condylar knee
explain the lack of delamination.26 arthroplasties. J Arthropl 1997;12:281–290.
290 SATHASIVAM ET AL.
2. Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, Surprenant VA, Jensen weight polyethylene tibial inserts. A Finite element study. At-
RE. Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from lanta: Proc AAOS Conf; 1996.
uncemented tibial knee components. Clin Orthop 1991;273: 19. Plante–Bordeneuve P, Freeman MAR. Tibial high-density poly-
232–242. ethylene wear in conforming tibiofemoral prostheses. J Bone
3. Landy MM, Walker PS. Wear of ultra high molecular weight Joint Surg B 1993;75:630 – 636.
polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prostheses. J 20. Polyzoides AJ, Dendrinos GK, Tsakonas H. The Rotaglide total
Arthropl 1988;3S:S73–S85. knee arthroplasty. J Arthropl 1996;11:453– 459.
4. Wright TM, Rimnac CM, Faris PM, Bansal M. Analysis of 21. Estupinan JA, Bartel DL, Wright TM. Residual stresses in
surface damage in retrieved carbon-fibre reinforced and plain ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene loaded cyclically by a
polyethylene tibial components from posterior stabilized total rigid moving indenter in nonconforming geometries. J Orthop
knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg A 1988;70:1312–1319. Res 1998;16:80 – 85.
5. Pappas MJ, Makris G, Buechel FF. Wear in knee prosthetic 22. Wimmer MA, Andriacchi TP, Natarajan RN, Loos J, Karlhuber
knee joints. Washington DC: Proc AAOS Conf; 1992.
M, Petermann J, Schneider E, Rosenberg AG. Astriated pattern
6. Bell CJ, Walker PS, Sathasivam S, Campbell PA, Blunn GW.
of wear in ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene compo-
Differences in wear between fixed bearing and mobile bearing
knees. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1999;24:962. nents of miller-galante total knee arthroplasty. J Arthropl 1998;
7. Menchetti PPM, Walker PS. Mechanical evaluation of mobile 13:8 –16.
bearing knees. Am J Knee Surg 1997;10:73– 82. 23. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Lilley PA, Engelbrecht E, Ryd L, Lidgren
8. Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW. Wear L, Hardinge K, Neider E, Walker PS. Polyethylene wear in
of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee ar- unicondylar knee prostheses: 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA and
throplasty. J Bone Joint Surg B 1998;80:976 –982. St. Georg tibial components compared. Acta Orthop Scand
9. Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Borden LS. 1992;63:247–255.
Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 24. Beaule PE, Campbell PA, Walker PS, Schmalzreid TP, Blunn
different designs. Clin Orthop 1996;331:151–158. GW, Bell C, Dorey FJ, Amstutz HC. Characterization of poly-
10. Landry ME, Blanchard CR, Mabrey JD, Wang X, Agrawal CM. ethylene wear particles retrieved from total knee replacements
Morphology of in vivo generated ultra high molecular weight worn in vivo and in a knee simulator. Orlando: Trans Orthop
polyethylene wear particles as a function of contact conditions Res Soc; 2000.
and material parameters. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 25. Ritter MA, Worland R, Saliski J, Helphenstine JV, Edmondson
1999;48:61– 69. KL, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Flat-on-flat, noncon-
11. Schmalzreid TP, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH. Polyeth- strained, compression molded polyethylene total knee replace-
ylene wear debris and tissue reactions in knee as compared to ment. Clin Orthop 1995;321:79 – 85.
hip replacement prostheses. J Appl Biomater 1994;5:185–190. 26. Furman BD, Awad JN, Chastain KE, Li S. Material and per-
12. Rostoker W, Galante JO. Contact pressure dependence on wear formance differences between retrieved machine and moulded
rates of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Biomed I-B type total knee arthroplasties. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1997;
Mater Res 1979;13:957–964. 22:643.
13. Rose RM, Goldfarb HV, Ellis E, Crugnola AM. On the pressure 27. Des Jardins JD, Walker PS, Haider H, Perry J. A comparison
dependence of wear of UHMWPE. Wear 1983;92:99 –111. between the uni-axial and dynamic walking cycle laxities of
14. Barbour PSM, Barton DC, Fisher J. The influence of contact
multiple TKR designs. Trans Euro Orthop Res Soc 1999;32.
stress on the wear of UHMWPE for total replacement hip
28. Des Jardins JD, Walker PS, Haider H, Perry J. The use of a
prostheses. Wear 1995;181–183:250 –257.
15. Campbell PA, Ma S, Schmalzreid T, Amstutz HC. Tissue di- force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the me-
gestion for wear debris particle isolation. J Biomed Mater Res chanical performance of total knee replacement designs. J Bio-
1994;28:523–526. mech, to appear.
16. Campbell PA, Ma S, Yeom B, McKellop H, Schmalzreid TP, 29. Walker PS. Consequences regarding wear of providing rotation
Amstutz HC. Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UH- in TKR. J Bone Joint Surg B 1999;81SII:126.
MWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J Biomed 30. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo
Mater Res 1995;29:127–131. kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin
17. Szivek JA, Cutignola L, Volz RG. Tibiofemoral contact stress Orthop 1996;331:107–117.
and stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J 31. Hailey JL, Ingham E, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J.
Arthropl 1995;10:480 – 491. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris gener-
18. Morra EA, Postak PD, Greenwald AS. Effects of plateau ge- ated in vivo and in laboratory tests; the influence of counterface
ometry on delamination wear failures in ultra high molecular roughness. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1996;210H1:3–10.