NovaGold Resources Inc.

NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Ambler Project
Arctic Deposit, Alaska

Prepared for:

NovaGold Resources Inc.

Suite 2300-200 Granville St.
Vancouver, B.C., V6C 1S4

Prepared by:

7175 W. Jefferson Ave., Suite 3000

Lakewood, CO 80235

Project Reference No:

168401

Effective Date: January 31, 2008

Report Date: February 12, 2008

Contributors: Qualified Persons:

Dorinda K. Bair, BSc Geology Dr. Neal Rigby, CEng, MIMMM, PhD
James Beck, P.E., CHMM Russ White, P. Geo
Alva Kuestermeyer, MS Mineral Economics, SME
Nick Michael BS Mining, MBA
NovaGold Resources Inc. i
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Table of Contents
SUMMARY (ITEM 3) .................................................................................................................... I
1 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE (ITEM 4)..................................... 1-1
1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report ................................................... 1-1
1.3 Qualifications of Consultant (SRK)..................................................................... 1-1
1.4 Reliance on Other Experts (Item 5) ..................................................................... 1-2
1.4.1 Sources of Information .......................................................................... 1-2
1.5 Effective Date ...................................................................................................... 1-2
2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (ITEM 6)........................................... 2-1
2.1 Property Location................................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Mineral Tenure..................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2.1 Agreements............................................................................................ 2-1
2.3 Environmental Liabilities..................................................................................... 2-2
2.4 Permits ................................................................................................................. 2-3
3 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND
PHYSIOGRAPHY (ITEM 7) ...................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Access to Property ............................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Climate................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.3 Physiography........................................................................................................ 3-1
3.4 Infrastructure........................................................................................................ 3-2
3.4.1 Camp Facilities and Airstrip.................................................................. 3-2
3.5 Support Labor ...................................................................................................... 3-2
4 HISTORY (ITEM 8)........................................................................................................ 4-1
4.1 Historical Testwork.............................................................................................. 4-2
4.1.1 1995 Testwork ....................................................................................... 4-3
4.1.2 Historical Exploration ........................................................................... 4-4
4.2 Historical Drilling ................................................................................................ 4-5
4.3 Historical Geophysics .......................................................................................... 4-5
4.4 Historical Resource Estimates ............................................................................. 4-5
5 GEOLOGIC SETTING (ITEM 9) ................................................................................... 5-1
5.1 Regional Geology ................................................................................................ 5-1
5.1.1 Terrane Descriptions ............................................................................. 5-1
5.1.2 Regional Tectonic Setting ..................................................................... 5-2
5.2 District/Property Geology.................................................................................... 5-2
5.2.1 General Description of the Stratigraphy of the District......................... 5-3
5.3 Deposit Geology .................................................................................................. 5-4
5.3.1 Local Lithology ..................................................................................... 5-4
5.3.2 Alteration............................................................................................... 5-5
5.4 Structure............................................................................................................... 5-5
6 DEPOSIT TYPE (ITEM 10)............................................................................................ 6-1
6.1 Exploration Target ............................................................................................... 6-2
7 MINERALIZATION (ITEM 11)..................................................................................... 7-1

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. ii
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

8 EXPLORATION (ITEM 12) ........................................................................................... 8-1

8.1 Drilling................................................................................................................. 8-1
8.2 Regional Mapping................................................................................................ 8-1
8.3 Regional Geochemistry........................................................................................ 8-1
8.4 Geophysics........................................................................................................... 8-1
8.5 Portable Infrared Mineral Analyzer (PIMA) Data............................................... 8-1
8.6 Oriented Core....................................................................................................... 8-2
9 DRILLING (ITEM 13) .................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1 Drill Program and Objectives .............................................................................. 9-1
9.2 Drill Results ......................................................................................................... 9-2
10 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH (ITEM 14)............................................... 10-1
11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY (ITEM 15).................... 11-1
11.1 Pre-1998 Assay Reruns...................................................................................... 11-1
11.2 Reliability of Results.......................................................................................... 11-2
12 DATA VERIFICATION (ITEM 16) ............................................................................. 12-1
12.1 Data Acquisition and Verification ..................................................................... 12-1
12.1.1 NovaGold Verification ........................................................................ 12-1
12.1.2 SRK Verification ................................................................................. 12-1
13 ADJACENT PROPERTIES (ITEM 17)........................................................................ 13-1
13.1 Sun Prospect....................................................................................................... 13-1
13.2 Smucker Prospect............................................................................................... 13-1
13.3 Bornite Property................................................................................................. 13-1
14 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING (ITEM 18) ........... 14-1
14.1 Metallurgical Testwork...................................................................................... 14-1
14.1.1 1998–1999 Testwork ........................................................................... 14-1
15 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE (ITEM 19) ........................................................ 15-1
15.1 Resource Estimation .......................................................................................... 15-1
15.1.1 Drillhole Database ............................................................................... 15-1
15.1.2 Univariate Statistics............................................................................. 15-1
15.1.3 Geology ............................................................................................... 15-2
15.1.4 Compositing ........................................................................................ 15-2
15.1.5 Specific Gravity................................................................................... 15-2
15.1.6 Variogram Analysis and Modeling ..................................................... 15-4
15.1.7 Resource Classification ....................................................................... 15-5
15.1.8 Mineral Resource Statement................................................................ 15-6
15.1.9 Resource Potential ............................................................................... 15-6
16 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES AND
PRODUCTION PROPERTIES (ITEM 25)............................................................................... 16-1
17 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION (ITEM 20)............................... 17-1
18 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS (ITEM 21) ............................................ 18-1
19 RECOMMENDATIONS (ITEM 22) ............................................................................ 19-1
20 REFERENCES (ITEM 23) ............................................................................................ 20-1
21 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................. 21-1
21.1 Mineral Resources & Reserves.......................................................................... 21-1

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. iii
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

21.2 Glossary ............................................................................................................. 21-2

21.3 Units of Measure and Abbreviations ................................................................. 21-3
22 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE (ITEM 24)..................................................................13

List of Tables
Table 1.3.1: Key Project Personnel............................................................................................. 1-2
Table 4.4.1: Historical Resource Estimate - 1990 ...................................................................... 4-5
Table 10.1: Selected Significant Intervals with True Thickness Estimates.............................. 10-2
Table 11.1.1: Pre-1998 Pulp Rerun Comparisons .................................................................... 11-1
Table 13.1.1: Historical Anaconda Resource Estimate 1977 .................................................... 13-1
Table 14.1.1.1: Summary of Metallurgical Test Programs....................................................... 14-1
Table 15.1.2.1: Drillhole Assay Statistics................................................................................. 15-1
Table 15.1.5.1: Historical Specific Gravity Data Statistics – Arctic Deposit: 1998–2004....... 15-3
Table 15.1.5.2: Specific Gravity Measurements Categorized by Rock Type........................... 15-4
Table 15.1.6.1: Estimation Parameters ..................................................................................... 15-5
Table 15.1.6.2: Gross Metal Value (GMV) Parameters ........................................................... 15-5
Table 15.1.8.1: Arctic Deposit Resources at $100GMV Cut-off ............................................. 15-6
Table 21.2.1: Definitions of Terms........................................................................................... 21-2
Table 21.3.1: Units of Measure and Abbreviations .................................................................. 21-4

List of Figures
Figure 2-1: Regional Location Map............................................................................................ 2-4
Figure 2-2: Claim Map 1............................................................................................................. 2-5
Figure 2-3: Claim Map 2............................................................................................................. 2-6
Figure 2-4: Prospect Location Map ............................................................................................ 2-7
Figure 3-1: Ambler Area Location Map ..................................................................................... 3-3
Figure 3-2: Project Location Map............................................................................................... 3-4
Figure 5-1: Terrain Map 1........................................................................................................... 5-7
Figure 5-2: Terrain Map 2........................................................................................................... 5-8
Figure 5-3: Tectonic Evolution................................................................................................... 5-9
Figure 5-4: Geologic Map of the Ambler Project..................................................................... 5-10
Figure 15-1: Drillhole Location Map (Grid, 10m Contour) ..................................................... 15-7

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. iv
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Figure 15-2: Typical Cross-Section Looking Northeast at XS600NE...................................... 15-8

Figure 15-3: Typical Cross-Section Looking Northwest at XS600NW ................................... 15-9
Figure 15-4: Grade-tonnage Curve for the Project ................................................................. 15-10

List of Appendices
Appendix A
Certificates of Authors
Appendix B
Ambler Project Claims
Appendix C
Drillhole Collars
Appendix D
Drillhole Assay Statistics
Appendix E
Variograms

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. I
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Summary (Item 3)
SRK Consulting (US), Inc. (SRK) was commissioned by NovaGold Resources Inc. (NovaGold)
to prepare an independent Technical Report on Resources (Technical Report) of the Ambler
Project (the Project) located in Alaska. This Technical Report has been prepared in general
accordance with the guidelines provided by the National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101)
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. This assessment is a preliminary resource
estimate of the contained resources at the Project.
Property Description and Location
The Project consists of the Arctic volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit located in the
southern Brooks Range of northwestern Alaska in the Northwest Arctic Borough. The Project is
geographically isolated with no roads accessing the site and no existing power generating
infrastructure in the region.
The Project is located in the Ambler District, in the southern Brooks Range of northwestern
Alaska at geographic coordinates N67.17º latitude and W156.38º longitude. Work is performed
at the site using Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) North American Datum (NAD) 1927
Zone 4. The center of the Project area is 263km east of the town of Kotzebue, 29km north of the
village of Kobuk, 260km west of the Dalton Highway and 480km northwest of Fairbanks. The
current size of the property is approximately 65km long x 8km wide and comprises a total of
36,750ha.
Ownership
Kennecott Exploration Company, Kennecott Arctic Company (collectively Kennecott) and
Alaska Gold Company are parties to a joint venture agreement on the Project effective March 23,
2004. In this agreement, NovaGold may earn up to 51% in the Project subject to the completion
by NovaGold of the following:
• Performance of certain environmental mitigation efforts within the Ambler District;
• Execution of exploration programs resulting in expenditures of at least US$5,000,000
over the first five years of the Project;
• Delivery to Kennecott by March 23, 2016 of a Pre-Feasibility Study with a positive rate
of return using a discount rate of 10%;
• Obtainment of an executed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with critical Alaskan
stakeholder groups; and
• Expenditures in total of US$20,000,000 prior to March 23, 2016 over a 12-year period.
As of August 2007, NovaGold had achieved the first two requirements of the Joint Venture
agreement. Exploration programs in excess of the minimum requirement have been completed,
and NovaGold has addressed identified environmental concerns associated with the former
Kennecott-operated Arctic camp, the Arctic airstrip and the Picnic Creek campsite.
NovaGold is manager of the project through to the completion of a final feasibility study, at
which time Kennecott has a one-time option to acquire an extra 2% interest in the project from
NovaGold and assume the management of construction and operation of the mine by making a
one-time payment to NovaGold equivalent to 4% of the project's net present value.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. II
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Geology and Mineralization

Rocks that form the Ambler schist belt consist of a lithologically diverse sequence of lower,
Paleozoic, possibly Devonian age, carbonate and siliciclastic strata with interlayered mafic lava
flows and sills. The clastic strata, derived from terrigenous continental and volcanic sources,
were deposited primarily by mass-gravity flow into the sub-wavebase environment of an
extending marginal basin.
NovaGold’s work shows that the Ambler sequence underwent two periods of intense, penetrative
deformation. Sustained upper greenschist-facies metamorphism with coincident formation of a
penetrative schistosity and isoclinal transposition of bedding marks the first deformation period.
Pervasive similar-style folds on all scales deform the transposed bedding and schistosity,
defining the second event. At least two later non-penetrative compressional events deform these
earlier fabrics. NovaGold’s observations of the structural and metamorphic history of the
Ambler District are consistent with current tectonic evolution models for the schist belt, based on
the work of others elsewhere in southern Brooks Range (Gottschalk and Oldow, 1988; Till et al.,
1988; Vogl et al., 2002).
The mineralization at the Project and within the Ambler District consists of Devonian age,
polymetallic (Zn-Cu-Pb-Ag) VMS occurrences. VMS deposits are formed by and associated
with sub-marine volcanic-related hydrothermal events. These events are related to spreading
centers such as fore arc, back arc or mid-ocean ridges. VMS deposits are often stratiform
accumulations of sulfide minerals that precipitate from hydrothermal fluids on or below the
seafloor. These deposits are found in association with volcanic, volcaniclastic and/or siliciclastic
rocks. They are classified by their depositional environment and associated proportions of mafic
and/or felsic igneous rocks to sedimentary rocks.
Mineralization occurs as stratiform semi-massive to massive sulfide beds. The sulfide beds
average 4m thick but vary from less than 1m to 18m thick. The bulk of the mineralization is
within four zones located between two thrust faults, the upper Warm Springs Thrust and the
Lower Thrust. A smaller fifth zone is located below the Lower Thrust. All of these zones are
within an area of roughly 1km2, with average zone length ranging from 600m to 850m and width
ranging from 350m to 700m. Depths of known mineralization extend to approximately 250m
below the surface. Host rocks are primarily graphitic chlorite schists and fine-grained quartz
sandstones.
Exploration
Exploration on the Project was intermittent between the discovery of Arctic in 1965 through to
1998. From 1998 until 2003, there was no work performed on the Project. NovaGold entered
into negotiations with Kennecott to explore its Ambler land position in mid 2003. Negotiations
were completed and a joint venture agreement signed on March 23, 2004. Since 2004,
NovaGold has been performing project level and regional mapping, drilling, geophysics and
geochemical surveys.
While efforts during 2004 and 2005 were directed at drilling and delineating the Project, work in
2006 was focused on exploration for new, nearby resources within the claim block. These
activities included mapping, drilling, regional geochemistry and geophysics at the COU, Sun,
Dead Creek and Red prospects. This work was undertaken to expand the resource potential and
to better understand the Project area. This exploration effort was focused both northwest and

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. III
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

southeast of the Project, along structure, and covering approximately 18km. Drilling targets are
chosen based on a combination of geophysics, geochemistry and mapping information.
Exploration activities at Arctic have been performed within industry standards using appropriate
models and techniques for a VMS target. SRK agrees with the techniques used at this project.
Conclusions
The Arctic deposit is a high-grade, volcanic massive sulfide deposit with excellent potential but
logistical challenges.
The following presents the interpretations and conclusions of this Technical Report:
• Geology;
o Geologic interpretations by NovaGold geologists show a complexly folded and
potentially faulted deposit. Based on the widely spaced data available, the current
resource model omits these complexities due to lack of correlatable data.
However, volumetrically this resource estimate should be representative based on
the available samples. The resource estimate has been completed based on
industry standards for this type of deposit with this level of sample spacing.
• Resource;
o The mineral resources have been classified using logic consistent with the CIM
definitions incorporated in NI 43-101. The mineralization of the Project satisfies
sufficient criteria to be classified into Indicated and Inferred resource categories,
and
o Further exploration is required to upgrade the resources thus far identified.
Recommendations
The findings of this Technical Report provide compelling arguments to advance the evaluation
of the Project to the pre-feasibility stage.
Additional activities in support of a pre-feasibility assessment include the following, together
with indicative costs:
• Environmental Assessment US$500,000
• Exploration and Drilling US$2,000,000
• Metallurgical Testwork US$400,000
• Pre-feasibility Report US$200,000
Given the amount of work performed on the project, additional activities are required to confirm
previous work and further define the development scheme.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 1-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

1 Introduction and Terms of Reference (Item 4)

1.1 Project Overview
SRK Consulting (US), Inc. (SRK) was commissioned by NovaGold Resources Inc. and Alaska
Gold Company (collectively NovaGold), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NovaGold Resources
Inc., to prepare an independent Technical Report on Resources (Technical Report) of the Ambler
Project (the Project) located in Alaska.
The Project is a volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit located in the southern Brooks
Range of northwestern Alaska in the Northwest Arctic Borough. The Project is geographically
isolated with no roads accessing the site and no existing power-generating infrastructure in the
region.
1.2 Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report
This Technical Report is intended for the use of NovaGold to further the evaluation of the
Project by providing an audit of the mineral resource estimates, a classification of resources in
accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM)
classification system and an evaluation of the property. This Technical Report includes the
potential mining of inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to
have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as
mineral reserves. Therefore, the term “mineable resource” is used in lieu of “reserves” to
describe mineable quantities in this report.
NovaGold may also use this Technical Report for any lawful purpose to which it is suited. This
Technical Report has been prepared in general accordance with the guidelines provided by the
National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
The metric (SI System) units of measure are used in this report unless otherwise noted.
Analytical results are reported as a percentage of chemical element or as parts per million (ppm).
A glossary of terms used in this report can be found in Section 21 of this report.
1.3 Qualifications of Consultant (SRK)
The SRK Group comprises over 750 staff offering expertise in a wide range of resource
engineering disciplines. The SRK Group’s independence is ensured by the fact that it holds no
equity in any project and that its ownership rests solely with its staff. This permits SRK to
provide its clients with conflict-free and objective recommendations on crucial judgment issues.
SRK has a demonstrated record of accomplishment in undertaking independent assessments of
mineral resources and mineral reserves, project evaluations and audits, technical reports and
independent evaluations to bankable standards on behalf of exploration and mining companies
and financial institutions worldwide. The SRK Group has also worked with a large number of
major international mining companies and their projects, providing mining industry consultancy
service inputs.
This report has been prepared based on a technical and economic review by a team of consultants
sourced principally from the SRK Group’s Denver, US office. These consultants are specialists
in the fields of geology, exploration, mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation and
classification, underground mining, mineral processing and mineral economics.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 1-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Neither SRK nor any of its employees and associates employed in the preparation of this report
has any beneficial interest in NovaGold. SRK will be paid a fee for this work in accordance with
normal professional consulting practice.
The individuals who have provided input to this Technical Report have extensive experience in
the mining industry and are members in good standing of appropriate professional institutions.
Russ White, P.Geo. visited the Project property on May 16, 2007 and is the independent
Qualified Person (QP) within the meaning of NI 43-101 for the preparation of the Section 15 of
this report. Dr. Neal Rigby, CEng, MIMMM, PhD is the independent QP for the preparation of the
overall report. Dr. Neal Rigby has not visited the Project site. The key project personnel
contributing to this report are listed in Table 1.3.1. The Certificate of Author of each QP is
provided in Appendix A.
Table 1.3.1: Key Project Personnel
Name Discipline
Dr. Neal Rigby, CEng, MIMMM, PhD QA/QC, QP
Russ White, P.Geo. Geology and Resources, QP
Dorinda K. Bair, BSc Geology Geology
James Beck P.E. CHMM Environmental
Alva Kuestermeyer, MS Mineral Economics, SME Metallurgy and Process
Nick Michael BS Mining, MBA Project Management

1.4 Reliance on Other Experts (Item 5)

SRK’s opinion contained herein is based on information provided to SRK by NovaGold
throughout the course of SRK’s investigations. The sources of information include data and
reports supplied by NovaGold personnel as well as documents in Section 20.
For the purposes of the estimation of mineral resources for this Technical Report, SRK has relied
on information and data compiled and provided by NovaGold.
The Qualified Persons preparing and supervising this Technical Report have not relied on a
report, opinion or statement of a legal or other expert, who is not a qualified person for
information concerning legal, environmental, political or other issues and factors relevant to this
Technical Report.
1.4.1 Sources of Information
The background studies and additional references for this Technical Report are listed in Section
20. SRK has reviewed the project data and, where appropriate, incorporated the results into this
Technical Report. SRK used its experience to determine if the information from previous reports
was suitable for inclusion in this Technical Report and adjusted information that required
amending. Revisions to previous data were based on research, recalculations and information
from other projects. The level of detail used was appropriate for this level of study.
1.5 Effective Date
The effective date of this report is January 31, 2008.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 2-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

2 Property Description and Location (Item 6)

2.1 Property Location
The Project is located in the Ambler District (Figure 2-1), in the southern Brooks Range of
northwestern Alaska at geographic coordinates N67.17º latitude and W156.38º longitude. Work
is performed at the site using Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) North American Datum
(NAD) 1927 Zone 4. The center of the Project area is 263km east of the town of Kotzebue,
29km north of the village of Kobuk, 260km west of the Dalton Highway and 480km northwest
of Fairbanks. The current size of the property is approximately 65km long x 8km wide and
comprises a total of 36,750ha.
2.2 Mineral Tenure
The Project land tenure consists of 1,230 contiguous claims, including 789 40-acre State claims,
347 160-acre State claims, 79 40-acre State select claims, 15 20-acre Federal claims, and 272
acres of Federal patented land. These claims are shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-3 and are listed in
Appendix B. These claims are listed and recorded in acres since this is the unit of land measure
in the United States of America. Twenty acres is equivalent to 8ha, 40 acres is equivalent to
16ha and 160 acres is equivalent to 65ha. The Federal patented claim corners at the Project were
located by U.S. Government Surveys (USGS). NovaGold has used some of these points along
with USGS benchmarks to survey drill collars in the district with an Ashtech ProMark2 Global
Positioning System (GPS) unit. A third-party survey of drill collars has not been performed on
the property. Rent for each claim is paid annually to the Alaska Department of Natural
Resources. The Project is located near the southern edge of the center of the claim block.
Mineralization is interpreted to extend west and east and potentially north of the project area and
is covered by claims in these directions.
In 1971, the United States Congress passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
which settled land and financial claims made by the Alaska Natives and provided for the
establishment of 13 regional corporations to administer those claims. These are known as the
Alaska Native Regional Corporations (ANCSA Corporations). One of these 13 regional
corporations is Northwest Alaskan Native Association (NANA) Regional Corporation. Lands
controlled by NANA bound the southern border of the claim block. In addition, the northern
property border is within 25km of National Park lands.
The Ambler District contains many mineralized prospects and two known significant deposits, in
addition to the Project. The first prospect, located west of the Project, is the Smucker deposit.
Smucker is owned by Teck Cominco Limited (Teck Cominco) and is currently in target
delineation. The second prospect, the Sun deposit, is owned by Andover Ventures Inc.
(Andover) and is in the process of resource definition. These two prospects are shown in Figure
2-4 where they are identified as Smucker and Sun. Figure 2-4 also shows the location of all the
known prospects in the Ambler District including Sunshine Creek, CS, Bud, Horse Creek, Cliff,
Dead Creek, Kogo, Red, BT and Tom Tom. The Ruby Creek deposit near Bornite located
southwest of the Project is held by NANA.
2.2.1 Agreements
Kennecott Exploration Company, Kennecott Arctic Company (collectively Kennecott) and
Alaska Gold Company are parties to a joint venture agreement on the Project effective March 23,

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 2-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

2004. In this agreement, NovaGold may earn up to 51% in the Project subject to the completion
by NovaGold of the following:
• Performance of certain environmental mitigation efforts within the Ambler District;
• Execution of exploration programs resulting in expenditures of at least US$5,000,000
over the first five years of the Project;
• Delivery to Kennecott by March 23, 2016 of a Pre-Feasibility Study with a positive rate
of return using a discount rate of 10%;
• Obtainment of an executed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with critical Alaskan
stakeholder groups; and
• Expenditures in total of US$20,000,000 prior to March 23, 2016 over a 12-year period.
As of August 2007, NovaGold had achieved the first two requirements of the joint venture
agreement. Exploration programs in excess of the minimum requirement have been completed,
and NovaGold has addressed identified environmental concerns associated with the former
Kennecott-operated Arctic camp, the Arctic airstrip and the Picnic Creek campsite.
To the extent that portions of the Project lands are situated on or proximal to lands owned by
Native Alaskan corporations or village groups and/or activities associated with possible mining
(e.g., transportation, etc.) which have the potential to effect these stakeholder groups lands or
subsistence areas, the Project proponent will be required to establish a MOU with these groups
that defines the components of the operation and how it will interact with interests of these
groups.
NovaGold is manager of the project through to the completion of a final feasibility study, at
which time Kennecott has a one-time option to acquire an extra 2% interest in the project from
NovaGold and assume the management of construction and operation of the mine by making a
one-time payment to NovaGold equivalent to 4% of the project's net present value.
2.3 Environmental Liabilities
To date, the Ambler District has been the subject of various early stage exploration programs.
However, there has been no actual mine development or production within the Project area
boundaries, and no evidence of mine workings or mill tailings is present on the property.
In conjunction with the fulfillment of one of the requirements of the aforementioned joint
venture agreement, NovaGold (in 2004) completed certain environmental mitigation programs to
include removal of materials and debris associated with historical exploration activities within
the Ambler District. The joint venture agreement indemnifies NovaGold with respect to any pre-
existing Kennecott or Bear Creek Mining Company (BCMC) environmental liabilities present
prior to execution of the agreement. In addition, there are no indications of any known
environmental impairment or enforcement actions associated with NovaGold’s activities to date.
As a result, NovaGold has not incurred any outstanding environmental liabilities in conjunction
with its entry into the joint venture agreement. Thus, further development of the Project would
not be burdened with any legacy of environmental issues. Prior to approximately 1987, BCMC
was the exploration subsidiary of Kennecott.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 2-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

2.4 Permits
Various permits are required during the exploration phase of the Project. The permit for
exploration on the property, the State of Alaska Annual Hardrock Exploration Permit, is initially
obtained and thereafter renewed annually through the Alaska Department of Natural Resources –
State Division of Mining, Land and Water (Alaska DNR). NovaGold holds a current exploration
permit in good standing with the Alaska DNR, and has done so each year since 2004. In
addition, since the property is situated within the Northwest Arctic Borough, a Title 9 permit is
required for transportation of personnel by air over Borough lands. NovaGold held this permit in
good standing during the 2004, 2005, and 2006 seasons and renewed this permit for the 2007
exploration season.
A number of statutory reporting and payments are required to maintain the claims in good
standing on an annual basis. Additional permits will be necessary to carry out environmental
baseline studies and detailed engineering studies as the Project moves closer to development.
The Project will require multiple permits from regulatory agencies and other entities at the
Federal, State and local (Borough) levels. Due to the preliminary stages of this Project, it is
difficult to assess what specific permitting requirements will ultimately apply to the Project.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
 50km

Arctic,
Kobuk, AK Regional Location Map
SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 2-1 Source: Alaska Gold Company Date: 07/24/07 Approved: DKB Figure: 2-1
 Ambler Project Claims

Smucker

Bornite
SUN

Arctic

Dahl Creek Camp

Kobuk
Shungnak

6 miles

Arctic, Claim Map 1

Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 2-2.doc Source: Alaska Gold Company Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 2-2
 Claim Boundary Map
Ambler Project
Arctic Deposit

Arctic,
Kobuk, AK Claim Map 2
SRK Job No.: 168401 Source: Alaska Gold Company
File Name: Figure 2-3 Date: 02/15/08 Approved: DKB Figure: 2-3
 Arctic, Prospect Location Map
Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 2-4.doc Source: Hitzman et al. Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 2-4
NovaGold Resources Inc. 3-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

3 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources,

Infrastructure and Physiography (Item 7)
3.1 Access to Property
There is no developed surface access to the Project area. Primary access is by air using both
fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. There are four well maintained, approximately 1,500m-long
gravel airstrips capable of accommodating charter aircraft. These airstrips are located 66km west
at Ambler, 46km southwest at Shungnak, 36km southwest at Kobuk and 32km southwest at Dahl
Creek (Figure 3-1). Smaller and lesser-maintained dirt airstrips include the 700m-long Bornite
airstrip 27km southwest of the Project and the 518m-long Arctic airstrip located 13km southwest
at the abandoned Shungnak River Camp in the Ambler Lowlands. From these points of fixed
wing access, helicopter use is required to access the Project site and transport personnel,
equipment and supplies. A one-lane dirt track (Figure 3-2) suitable for high-clearance vehicles
or construction equipment links the project site to the Shungnak River Camp and the Arctic
airstrip.
River access to Ambler, Shungnak and Kobuk by barge is occasionally possible via the Kobuk
River from Kotzebue Sound via Hotham Inlet (Figure 2-1). High water during seasonal runoff is
necessary for successful navigation of this route since the Kobuk River is commonly shallow and
impassible upstream of the village of Ambler.
The center of the Project area is 263km east of the town of Kotzebue, 36km northeast of the
village of Kobuk, 260km west of the Dalton Highway, and 480km northwest of Fairbanks. All
distances are direct by air. The current size of the property is approximately 65km long x 8km
wide and comprises a total of 36,750ha. The village of Kobuk, population 111 (2003) is located
36km away and is accessible by fixed wing aircraft.
3.2 Climate
The climate in the Ambler District is typical of a sub-arctic environment. The exploration season
for the Project is from late May until late September. Weather conditions change suddenly
during the field season and can vary significantly from year to year. During this time period
average high temperatures range from 4 to 18°C, while average lows range from -2 to 10°C.
Record high and low temperatures during these months are 29 and -17°C, respectively.
Extended sunlight in late May and early June accelerates melting of the winter snow pack on the
property. By late September or early October, poor weather prohibits safe helicopter travel to
the property. Heavy rains and snow are also possible in August. The winter months are long and
cold as the property is blanketed by snow and ice. During this time, snow cover allows for
increased access to the property by snow machine, track vehicle or by fixed wing aircraft.
Winter temperatures are routinely below -28°C and can exceed -51°C. Annual precipitation in
the region is 546.1mm with the most rainfall occurring from July through October and the most
snowfall occurring from December through April (Alaska Climate Summaries, 2007).
3.3 Physiography
The Project is located along the south side of the Brooks Range, one of the longest mountain
ranges in Alaska. The Brooks Range separates the Arctic region from the Alaskan interior
(Climate of Alaska, 2007). The Project is located on the east side of Subarctic Creek straddling a

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 3-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

970m ridge between Subarctic Creek and the Kogoluktuk River Valley. Subarctic Creek is a
tributary of the Shungnak River. The Project area is marked by steep and rugged terrain.
Elevations range from 30m above mean sea level (amsl) at Ambler, Alaska along the Kobuk
River to 1,180m amsl on the peak immediately north of the project area. The divide between the
Shungnak and Kogoluktuk Rivers in the Ambler Lowlands is just 220m amsl.
Nearby surface water includes Subarctic Creek, both the Shungnak and Kogoluktuk Rivers, the
Kobuk River, and numerous small lakes.
The Kobuk Valley marks the transition zone between boreal forest and arctic tundra. The area is
near the northern limit for trees. Spruce, birch and poplar can be found in better drained portions
of the valley, with lichen and moss covering the ground. Willow and alder thickets as well as
isolated cottonwoods follow drainages, and alpine tundra is found on the higher slopes and
ridges. Tussock tundra and low, heath-type vegetation covers most of the flat floor of the valley
(Kobuk Valley National Park, 2007).
Permafrost is a layer of soil at variable depths beneath the surface where the temperature has
been below freezing continuously from a few to several thousand years. Permafrost exists where
summer heating fails to penetrate to the base of the layer of frozen ground and occurs in most of
the northern third of Alaska as well as in discontinuous or isolated patches in the central portion
of the State (Climate of Alaska, 2007).
3.4 Infrastructure
Because of the remote location of the Project, infrastructure, specifically transport of material
and personnel to and from the Project and power, are the largest cost items. There is no
developed surface access to the Project area and no power infrastructure near the Project area.
3.4.1 Camp Facilities and Airstrip
Drilling and mapping programs are seasonal and have been supported out of the Bornite camp
and Arctic airstrip. The Bornite camp, a permanent facility, and the Arctic airstrip are both
located in the Ambler Lowlands and owned by NANA. NovaGold leases the facilities from
NANA.
3.5 Support Labor
The local workforce of the region could potentially be a substantial source of personnel. In
2006, NovaGold hired local residents from Kobuk, Shungnak and Ambler to work on the Ambler
exploration project. Employees were hired through NANA Management Services employee
leasing, a division of NANA management. NovaGold employed more than 15 local residents on
the Project, including one senior field coordinator, six geotechnicians, two cook’s assistants, two
core splitters and four driller helpers.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
Enlarged Location Map of Ambler District. Well-maintained 1,524m long gravel airstrips, indicated by black diamonds, are located at Ambler, Shungnak, Kobuk, and Dahl Creek. Several of the known mineral prospects in
the Ambler District are labeled by red pick and shovel marks.

Arctic,
Kobuk, AK Ambler Area Location Map
6 Miles
SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 3-1 Source: Alaska Gold Company Date: 07/24/07 Approved: DKB Figure: 3-1
 Dead Creek

Sub-Arctic Creek
Backdoor Creek

Arctic Ridge

Riley
Ridge
Arctic Deposit
Arctic
Shungnak River Creek
Valley
Caterpillar
Track

Kogoluktuk River
Valley

Arctic,
Kobuk, AK Project Location Map
SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 3-2 Source: Alaska Gold Company Date: 07/24/07 Approved: DKB Figure: 3-2
NovaGold Resources Inc. 4-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

4 History (Item 8)
Prospectors came up the Kobuk River into the Ambler Lowlands and parts of the Brooks Range
around 1900. Several small gold placer deposits in the Cosmos Hills were discovered and
worked intermittently. A second wave of prospectors returned to the region after World War II
looking for gold, uranium and copper. Copper mineralization was observed at Ruby Creek in
1905, but not much work occurred there until its rediscovery by Rhinehart Berg in the 1940s. By
1957, Berg exposed significant amounts of high-grade copper mineralization. At this time
BCMC, the exploration subsidiary of Kennecott, optioned Ruby Creek from Mr. Berg
(Kennecott, 1977, Hitzman et al., 1986). The project came to be known as Bornite. Kennecott
later began underground development at Bornite, but an attempt to mine the discovery was short
lived (Dodd et al., 2005).
The following is excerpted from the Alaska Gold Company’s Ambler Project (1816) 2004
Summary Report and has been standardized to this document.
BCMC conducted regional exploration of the Cosmos Hills and the southern Brooks Range
while drilling extensively at Ruby Creek. Stream silts sampling in 1963 revealed a 1,400ppm Cu
anomaly in Arctic Creek. This anomaly contributed to discoveries of massive sulfide at Arctic
and Dead Creeks in 1965 (Kennecott, 1977; Hitzman et al., 1986). In 1967, eight core holes
were drilled at Arctic Creek yielding impressive massive sulfide intercepts over a strike length of
460m. This successful program resulted in the continuation of drilling over the next several
seasons at the Project. In 1966 and 1967, BCMC drilled eight core holes at Dead Creek, also
intercepting massive sulfide. Structural complexities at Dead Creek hindered progress and
BCMC focused on the Arctic Creek area. BCMC intermittently conducted exploration programs
on the Project from August 1967 to 1998. Over that span, 92 holes were drilled at the Project,
including 14 large diameter metallurgical holes, totaling 17,572m. No drilling or additional
exploration on the Project was conducted between 1998 and 2004.
In addition to drilling on the Project, BCMC continued their exploration of other prospects in the
Ambler District. Competing companies, including Sunshine Mining Company, Anaconda,
Noranda, Teck Cominco, Resource Associates of Alaska (RAA), Watts, Griffis and McOuat Ltd.
(WGM), and Houston Oil and Minerals Company, entered into a claim staking war in the district
in the early 1970s. District exploration by Sunshine Mining Company and others resulted in two
substantial discoveries at the Sun Prospect located 60km east of the Project and the Smucker
Prospect located 40km west of the Project. District exploration continued until the early 1980s
on the four larger deposits (the Project, Ruby Creek, Smucker and Sun) as well as many lesser-
defined prospects within the district, including Sunshine Creek, CS, Bud, Horse Creek, Cliff,
Dead Creek, Kogo, Red, BT and Tom Tom. No production has occurred at the Project.
In 1993, Kennecott Minerals, the successor of BCMC, began to re-evaluate the Project. This
included a review of the deposit geology and the assembly of a computer database. A new
computer-generated block model was constructed in 1990 and an updated resource was estimated
from the block model. The result was an internal historical estimate of an inferred resource of
36.3Mt averaging 4.0% Cu, 5.5% Zn, 0.8% Pb, 54.9g/t-Ag and 0.7g/t-Au. Although believed by
NovaGold management to have been relevant and reliable, this historical resource estimate pre-
dates the development of NI 43-101 reporting guidelines, was not estimated in compliance with
NI 43-101 procedures and should not be relied on.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 4-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

4.1 Historical Testwork

The first three test campaigns performed on the Project ores were conducted at the Kennecott
Research Center between 1968 and 1976. The focus was on selective flotation to provide
separate copper, lead and zinc concentrates for conventional smelting.
The initial amenability testing was carried out in 1968 on individual samples and their
composites made from cores from eight diamond drillholes. Core drilled prior to 1998 was
drilled using NQ- and BQ-sized strings. An additional four samples were obtained from three
holes and tested in 1972. Laboratory scale bench tests included a conventional selective flotation
approach to produce three separate (copper, lead and zinc) concentrates. The major problems
encountered were:
• Difficult copper-lead separation, and
• Zinc deportment to the copper and the lead concentrates.
The highest-grade copper concentrate contained over 30% Cu, 2 to 3% Zn and less than 1% Pb,
but at a low copper recovery of less than 80%. The lead concentrate was low-grade 17 to 36%
Pb and assayed 5 to 25% Cu. The subsequent sphalerite flotation was generally efficient. The
zinc concentrate grade was 55% and the zinc recovery up to 70%, depending on how much zinc
floated in the preceding copper and lead flotation. Silver generally followed galena.
During 1975, large diameter cores from 14 drillholes were used for more detailed testing to
develop the concentrator flowsheet and process parameters. Two composites were prepared:
No.1 (Eastern zone) and No.2 (Western zone). Most of the test work was conducted on the
composite No.1, which represented 75% of the resources. The test program included
mineralogical examinations, bench scale testing of various process parameters for each selective
flotation step and locked cycle tests. Complete analyses were done on a number of concentrates
to identify potential impurities. Preliminary tests for bulk flotation of all sulfides were also
carried out.
Historical testing showed that a clear separation of various sulfide minerals is difficult because of
fine interlocking of mineral grains. It showed that the economically most important minerals,
chalcopyrite and sphalerite, could be recovered into selective copper and zinc concentrates with
commercial concentrate grades and good recoveries. Lead and precious metals easily reported to
the copper concentrate. The production of a selective high-grade lead concentrate was not
successful. Only a low-grade, silver-bearing lead concentrate (17 to 36% Pb) was obtained,
containing high amounts of iron, copper and zinc. Generally, the copper concentrate grade and
recovery depended on the amounts of lead and zinc prevented from floating during copper
flotation and cleaning. Production of two selective copper and zinc concentrates could be
confidently projected, although additional testing would be required to optimize the flow sheet
and all process parameters.
Testing indicated that the talc contained in the ore would have to be floated before selective
flotation of sulfide minerals. The losses of base and precious metals to the talc concentrate were
satisfactory and below 1% each.
Silver was mainly associated with galena. The highest silver recovery to copper concentrate was
achieved when lead was recovered as well. If galena was rejected from the copper concentrate,

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 4-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

20 to 40% of the silver, associated with tetrahedrite and tennantite, remained in the copper
concentrate.
Gold assaying was very sporadic during the three test campaigns and was not provided. It was
noted, however, that at least 70% of the gold reported to the copper concentrate, although not
enough testing was performed to predict gold recovery.
4.1.1 1995 Testwork
The 1976 conceptual study for the selection of the metallurgical process for the Project
established that the Kennecott Sulfite Process (KSP) could be developed as an economic hydro
metallurgical alternative to smelting. Bulk concentrate could be amenable for processing with
this novel technology.
Metallurgical testing was carried out at Hazen Research in 1995 to:
• Produce bulk concentrate for amenability testing;
• Determine technical viability of the key KSP process steps for processing of the Project
bulk concentrate; and
• Optimize flow sheet and parameters for selective flotation, especially to improve
selectivity among copper, lead, zinc and pyrite and obtain additional data on gold
recovery.
Samples used in the 1995 testwork were minus 10 mesh core rejects from the 1975 drilling, kept
in storage since the 1976 testing. A composite No.lA was prepared, similar in composition to the
1976 composite No.1 using the samples from the same holes. Investigations at Hazen Research
confirmed similar mineralogy for the 1976 and 1995 composites.
Initial selective flotation testing failed to reproduce the results obtained during the 1976 testing
under the same process conditions. The surface deterioration of the samples during the long
storage significantly affected the selectivity of the sulfide minerals and their separation into
specific concentrates, even if the total recoveries to all concentrates had not been reduced.
Further attempts to conduct testing to optimize selective flotation under those conditions were
abandoned.
Bulk flotation was not significantly affected by deterioration of samples during storage. The
bulk concentrate produced at Hazen Research contained 10.4% Cu, 2.2% Pb and 15.0% Zn and
recovered 94% Cu, 92% Pb, 97% Zn, 87% Au and 95% Ag. Only the recovery of lead was
slightly lower than obtained during earlier tests.
The testing of the key KSP process steps (roasting, leaching and copper reduction) did not
demonstrate a “fatal flaw” and confirmed the technical viability of the concept. However, a
more complex approach was indicated for zinc recovery from the bulk concentrate when
compared to the lower zinc grade of the copper concentrate considered in the 1976 study. In
addition, precious metals recoveries by cyanidation of the residue were disappointing and the
potential recovery of lead from bulk concentrate in the commercial product was not attempted.
Substantial development work is still required to define each KSP process step and determine its
design parameters, as well as to demonstrate the integrated process on a scale sufficient for a
meaningful evaluation. The same applies to the emerging chloride-based Intec Ltd. copper
process currently being developed for hydrometallurgical treatment of copper concentrates under

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 4-4
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

the Rio Tinto-Zinc Corporation participation in the sponsorship. Therefore, these

hydrometallurgical options for processing bulk concentrate were not considered for this
evaluation as alternatives to conventional smelting.
The optimization and further development of the flow sheet and process conditions for selective
flotation at Hazen Research in 1995 was prevented by surface deterioration of the available
samples. The test results from the 1968–1976 test work at the KRC were used for flow sheet
development in this evaluation.
The selected process is conventional selective flotation to produce separate copper and zinc
concentrates for shipment to existing smelters for treatment. Most of the lead and precious
metals would report to the copper concentrate.
4.1.2 Historical Exploration
Exploration on the Project has been intermittent since the discovery of Arctic in 1965. Arctic
was discovered during a routine follow up on a copper anomaly identified from a 1963 regional
geochemical survey performed by BCMC. In 1965, BCMC geologists discovered sulfide
minerals in an outcrop on Arctic Ridge while performing a follow-up investigation of a
1,400ppm Cu geochemical anomaly from sampling completed during a 1963 regional
exploration program. This regional exploration program covered the Cosmos Hills and much of
the southern Brook Range and included reconnaissance geological mapping and stream sediment
sampling.
Since 1965, the project has undergone many different periods of exploration activity under two
operators: Kennecott or its subsidiaries and NovaGold. Inaccessibility of the Ambler District,
along with depressed metals prices, caused interest in the district to wane, and significant
exploration in the Ambler District ended in 1985. Kennecott sold Bornite to NANA in 1986.
Lack of road or rail access to the area has hindered development within the Ambler District.
In 1993, Kennecott began a re-evaluation of the Arctic deposit. This included a review of the
deposit geology and the assembly of a computer database. A new computer-generated block
model was constructed in 1995 and an updated resource was calculated from the block model.
The resulting estimated inferred resource totaled 36.3Mt averaging 4.0% Cu, 5.5% Zn, 0.8% Pb,
54.9g/t Ag and 0.7g/t Au. Although believed by NovaGold management to have been relevant
and reliable, this historical resource estimate pre-dates the development of NI 43-101 reporting
guidelines, was not estimated in compliance with NI 43-101 procedures and should not be relied
on.
In September 1997, Kennecott located a total of 2,035 State mining claims covering most of the
known Ambler schist belt. More drilling was performed and, in 1998, an updated resource
estimate was completed using the 1995 model. Economic studies, based on the latest resource
estimate, failed to produce a positive net present value (NPV) and the project was suspended.
No additional exploration on the Project was conducted between 1998 and 2004.
Kennecott reduced its land position in the southern Brooks Range to 829 State of Alaska claims.
In addition to the State claims, Kennecott maintains 15 unpatented Federal mining claims
surrounding 18 private patented claims.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 4-5
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

4.2 Historical Drilling

Between 1967 to July 1985, 86 holes were drilled (including 14 large diameter metallurgical test
holes) totaling 16,080m. In 1998, Kennecott drilled six core holes totaling 1,492m in the Arctic
deposit to test for extensions of the known resource, and to test for grade and thickness
continuity. Drilling for all BCMC/Kennecott campaigns in the Arctic deposit area (1966–1998)
totals 92 core holes for a combined 17,572m.
No drilling was performed on the project between 1998 and 2003. NovaGold took control of the
Project in 2004. The 2004–2006 drill programs conducted by NovaGold are described in Section
9, Drilling.
4.3 Historical Geophysics
In 1998, an airborne geophysical survey of the entire claim block generated numerous
electromagnetic anomalies. Additional geophysical surveys have been performed by NovaGold
and will be discussed in Section 8, Exploration.
4.4 Historical Resource Estimates
A resource estimate was performed on Arctic by Kennecott based on 70 holes. This resource
estimate was performed in 1990 and is summarized in Table 4.4.1. This estimate is considered
to be that of an inferred resource. Although believed by NovaGold management to be relevant
and reliable, this historical resource estimate pre-dates the development of NI 43-101 reporting
guidelines, was not estimated in compliance with NI 43-101 procedures and should not be relied
on (Randolf, 1990).
Table 4.4.1: Historical Resource Estimate - 1990
Classification Tonnes (kt) Cu% Zn% Pb% Ag_ppm Au_ppm
Inferred 36,300 4.0 5.5 0.8 54.9 0.7

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

5 Geologic Setting (Item 9)

5.1 Regional Geology
The Ambler District occurs within an east–west trending zone of Devonian to Jurassic age
submarine volcanic and sedimentary rocks (Hitzman et al., 1986). VMS deposits and prospects
are hosted in the Middle Devonian to Early Mississippian age Ambler Sequence, a group of
metamorphosed bimodal volcanic rocks with interbedded tuffaceous, graphitic and calcareous
volcanoclastic metasediments. The Ambler Sequence occurs in the upper part of the Anirak
Schist, the thickest member of the Coldfoot subterrane (Moore et al., 1994). VMS
mineralization can be found along the entire 110km strike length of the district. Hitzman notes
that the 1,980m-thick Devonian age section of the Cosmos Hills, which includes the 915m-thick
Bornite Carbonate Sequence, is equivalent in age to the Anirak Schist and was mineralized
during the Ambler mineralizing event.
The Ambler District is characterized by a series of east–west trending belts of rocks of increasing
metamorphic grade northward across the strike of the units. The structure of the district is
isoclinally folded in the northern area and thrust faulted in the southern half (Schmidt, 1983).
The Devonian to Mississippian age Angayucham basalt and the Triassic to Jurassic age mafic
volcanic rocks are in low-angle thrust contact with various units of the Coldfoot subterrane along
the northern edge of the Ambler Lowlands.
5.1.1 Terrane Descriptions
The terminology of terranes in southern Brooks Range evolved during the 1980s because of the
region’s complex juxtaposition of rocks of various composition, age and metamorphic grade.
Hitzman et al. (1986) divided the Ambler District into the Ambler and Angayucham terranes.
Slightly more recent work (Till et al., 1988; Silberling et al., 1992; Moore et al., 1994) includes
the rocks of the previously defined Ambler terrane as part of the regionally extensive Schist belt
or Coldfoot subterrane along the southern flank of the Arctic Alaska terrane (Figure 5-1) (Moore
et al., 1994), which is the usage in this report. In general, the southern Brooks Range is
composed of east–west trending structurally bound allochthons of variable metasedimentary and
volcanogenic Paleozoic age rocks.
The Angayucham terrane, which lies along southern margin of the Brooks Range, is locally
preserved as a klippen within the eastern Cosmos Hills and is composed of weakly
metamorphosed to unmetamorphosed massive-to-pillowed basalt rocks with minor radiolarian
cherts, marble lenses and isolated ultramafic rocks (Figure 5-2). This package of Devonian to
Late Triassic age (Plafker and others, 1977) mafic and ultramafic rocks is interpreted to represent
portions of an obducted and structurally dismembered ophiolite that formed in an ocean basin
south of the present day Brooks Range (Hitzman et al., 1986; Gottschalk and Oldow, 1988).
Locally, the Angayucham terrane overlies the Schist belt to the north along a poorly exposed
south-dipping structure.
Gottschalk and Oldow (1988) describe the schist belt as a composite of structurally bound
packages composed of dominantly greenschist facies tectonite rocks, including pelitic to semi-
pelitic quartz-mica schist with associated mafic schists, metagabbro and marbles. Locally, the
schist belt includes the middle Devonian age Bornite carbonate sequence, the lower Paleozoic
age Anirak pelitic, variably siliceous and graphic schists, and the mineralized Devonian age
Ambler sequence consisting of volcanogenic and siliciclastic rocks variably associated with

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

marbles, calc-schists, metabasites and mafic schists (Figure 5-2) (Hitzman et al., 1982; Hitzman
et al., 1986). The lithologic assemblage of the schist belt is consistent with an extensional,
epicontinental tectonic origin.
Structurally overlaying the schist belt to the north is the Central belt. The Central belt is in
unconformable contact with the schist belt along a north-dipping low-angle structure (Till et al.,
1988). The Central belt consists of lower Paleozoic age metaclastic and carbonate rocks, and
Proterozoic age schists (Dillon et al., 1980). Both the Central belt and Schist belt are intruded by
meta-to-peraluminous orthogneisses, which locally yield a slightly discordant U-Pb-TIMS zircon
crystallization age of middle to late Devonian (Dillon et al., 1980; Dillon et al., 1987). This
igneous protolith age is supported by Devonian orthogniess ages obtained along the Dalton
Highway, 161km to the east of the Ambler District (Aleinikoff et al., 1993).
5.1.2 Regional Tectonic Setting
Rocks exposed along the southern Brooks Range consist of structurally bound, and possibly far
traveled, imbricate allochthons that have experienced an intense and complex history of
deformation and metamorphism. Shortening in the fold and thrust belt has been estimated to
exceed 500km (Oldow et al., 1987) based on balanced cross sections across the central Brooks
Range. In general, the metamorphic grade and tectonism in the Brooks Range increases to the
south and is greatest in the schist belt. The tectonic character and metamorphic grade decreases
south of the schist belt in the overlaying Angayucham terrane.
In the late Jurassic to early Cretaceous age, the Schist belt experienced penetrative thrust-related
deformation accompanied by recrystallization under high-pressure and low-temperature
metamorphic conditions (Till et al., 1988). These north-directed compressional tectonics were
likely related to crustal thickening caused by obduction of the Angayucham ophiolitic section
over a south-facing passive margin. Thermobarometry of schists from the structurally deepest
section of the northern schist belt yield relict metamorphic temperatures of 475 ± 35°C and
pressures from 7.6 to 9.8kbar (Gottschalk and Oldow, 1988). Metamorphism in the schist belt
grades from lowest greenschist facies in the southern Cosmos Hills to upper greenschist, locally
overprinting blueschist mineral assembles in the northern belt (Hitzman et al., 1986).
Compressional tectonics, which typically place older rocks on younger, do not adequately
explain the relationship of young, low-metamorphic-grade over older and higher-grade
metamorphic rocks observed in the southern Brooks Range hinterland. Mull (1982) interpreted
the schist belt as a late antiformal uplift of the basement to the fold and thrust belt. More recent
models propose that the uplift of the structurally deep schist belt occurred along duplexed, north-
directed, thin-skinned thrust faults, followed by post compressional south-dipping low angle
normal faults along the south flank of the schist belt, accommodating for an over-steepened
imbricate thrust stack (Figure 5-3) (Gottschalk and Oldow, 1988; Moore et al., 1994). Rapid
cooling and exhumation of the schist belt began at the end of the early Cretaceous age at 105 to
103Ma, based on Ar40/Ar39 cooling ages of hornblende and white mica near Mt Igikpak, and
lasted only a few million years (Vogl et al., 2002). Additional post extension compressive events
during the Paleocene age further complicate the southern Brooks Range (Mull, 1985).
5.2 District/Property Geology
Rocks that form the Ambler schist belt consist of a lithologically diverse sequence of lower
Paleozoic possibly Devonian age carbonate and siliciclastic strata with interlayered mafic lava

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

flows and sills. The clastic strata, derived from terrigenous continental and volcanic sources,
were deposited primarily by mass-gravity flow into the sub-wavebase environment of an
extending marginal basin.
NovaGold’s work shows that the Ambler sequence underwent two periods of intense, penetrative
deformation. Sustained upper greenschist-facies metamorphism with coincident formation of a
penetrative schistosity and isoclinal transposition of bedding marks the first deformation period.
Pervasive similar-style folds on all scales deform the transposed bedding and schistosity,
defining the second event. At least two later non-penetrative compressional events deform these
earlier fabrics. NovaGold’s observations of the structural and metamorphic history of the
Ambler District are consistent with current tectonic evolution models for the schist belt, based on
the work of others elsewhere in southern Brooks Range (Gottschalk and Oldow, 1988; Till et al.,
1988; Vogl et al., 2002).
5.2.1 General Description of the Stratigraphy of the District
The local base of the Ambler section consists of variably metamorphosed carbonates historically
referred to as the Gnurgle Gneiss. NovaGold interprets these strata as calc-turbidites, perhaps
deposited in a sub-wavebase environment adjacent to a carbonate bank. Calcareous schists
overlie the Gnurgle Gneiss and host sporadically distributed mafic sills and pillowed lavas.
These fine-grained clastic strata indicate a progressively quieter depositional environment up
section, and the presence of pillowed lavas indicates a rifting, basinal environment. The
overlying Arctic-sulfide host section consists mostly of fine-grained carbonaceous siliciclastics
and indicates further isolation from a terrigenous source terrain. The section above the Arctic
host contains voluminous reworked silicic volcanic strata with the Button Schist at its base. The
paucity of volcanically derived strata below the Arctic host section and abundance above
indicates that the basin and surrounding hinterlands underwent major tectonic reorganization
during deposition of the Arctic section. Greywacke sands that NovaGold interpret as channeled
high-energy turbidites occur throughout the section but concentrate high in the local stratigraphy.
Several rock units show substantial change in thickness and distribution between the Arctic
Ridge, geographically above the Arctic deposit, and the Riley Ridge to the west. This
distribution shows patterns that may have resulted from structural controls imposed on the basin
during initial deposition:
• The Gnurgle Gneiss is thickest in exposures along the northern extension of Arctic Ridge
and appears to thin to the west;
• Mafic lavas and sills thicken from east to west. They show thick occurrences in upper
Subarctic Creek and to the west, but are sparsely distributed to the east;
• The quartzite section within and above the Arctic sulfide does not occur in abundance
east of Arctic Ridge; it is thicker and occurs voluminously to the west;
• Button Schist thickens dramatically to the west from exposures on Arctic Ridge;
exposures to the east are virtually nonexistent; and
• Greywacke sands do not exist east of Subarctic Creek but occur in abundance as massive,
channeled accumulations to the west, centered on Riley Ridge.
These data are interpreted by NovaGold to define a generally north–northwest-trending
depocenter through the central Ambler District. Diamictite occurrences described below in

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-4
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

concert with these formational changes suggest that the depocenter had a fault-controlled eastern
margin. The basin deepened to the west; the Riley Ridge section deposited along a high-energy
axis, and the Center of the Universe (COU) section lies distally from a depositional energy point
of view. This original basin architecture appears to have controlled mineralization of the sulfide
systems at Arctic and Dead Creeks, concentrating fluid flow along the extensional structures in
the eastern basin margin. Deposit and district geology is shown in Figure 5-4.
5.3 Deposit Geology
Russell (1995) and Schmidt (1983) describe three mineralized horizons that comprise the
Project: the Main Sulfide Horizon, the Upper South Horizon and the Warm Springs Horizon.
The Main Sulfide Horizon was further subdivided into three zones: the southeast zone, the
central zone and the northwest zone. Previous deposit modeling was grade-based resulting in
numerous individual “ore zones” representing relatively thin sulfide horizons.
Work from the 2004 campaign suggests that mineralization at the Project can be explained using
two locally folded and refolded mineralized horizons. The primary exception is in the area of
Warm Springs and east of Warm Springs where mineralization occurs stratigraphically higher
than anticipated using this model. Thrust faulting may have an effect on ore horizon geometry in
this area.
5.3.1 Local Lithology
Five lithologic groups and/or types described by URSA Engineering (1998) and Russell (1995)
and found within the Project area include:
• Metarhyolite: Includes the Button Schist, which is described as a porphyroblastic quartz
feldspar porphyry. It also includes a variety of less porphyroblastic felsic schists
considered to be metamorphosed rhyolitic volcaniclastic and tuffaceous rocks. Members
of this group occur both stratigraphically above and below the main mineralized sequence
at the Project. These units have been interpreted as separate metavolcanics, though
similarities occur between the basal Button Schist and the uppermost units described by
Schmidt (1983);
• Quartz Mica Schist: Locally contains varying proportions of carbonate, chlorite, graphite
and feldspar. Protolith for these rocks may have been tuffaceous sediments,
volcaniclastics and dirty carbonates;
• Talc Schist: Highly talc chlorite altered products of metavolcanic or graphitic schist units
with talc in excess of 30%. Original texture often destroyed by alteration;
• Graphitic Schist: Dark grey to black, fissile, well-foliated quartz-banded schist found
throughout the deposit; and
• Base-Metal, Sulfide-Bearing Schist: This is the ore-bearing lithology at the Project.
These contain highly-altered schists containing varying amounts of talc, chlorite, barite,
quartz, muscovite, carbonate and massive, relatively non-schistose zones.
Studies in 2004 suggest the base-metal, sulfide-bearing schist is more a product of alteration than
primary lithology and, as a result, should be included in the quartz mica schist group.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-5
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

5.3.2 Alteration
Schmidt (1988) defined three main zones of hydrothermal alteration occurring at the Project as:
• A main chloritic zone occurring within the footwall of the deposit consisting of phengite
and magnesium-chlorite;
• A mixed alteration zone occurring below and lateral to sulfide mineralization consisting of
phengite and phlogopite along with talc, calcite, dolomite and quartz; and
• A pyritic zone overlying the sulfide mineralization.
Portable Infrared Mineral Analyzer (PIMA) data collected from all 2004 and 2005 drillholes and
select pre-2004 holes indicate talc and magnesium chlorite to be the dominant alteration products
associated with the sulfide-bearing horizons. Talc alteration grades outward to mixed talc-
magnesium chlorite with minor phlogopite, into zones of dominantly magnesium chlorite, then
into mixed magnesium chlorite-phengite with outer phengite-albite zones of alteration.
Thickness of alteration zones vary with stratigraphic interpretation, but tens of meters for the
outer zones is likely, as seen in phengite-albite exposures on the east side of Arctic Ridge.
5.4 Structure
Earlier studies (Russell 1977, 1995; Schmidt, 1983) concluded the mineralization at the Project
was part of a normal stratigraphic sequence striking northeast and dipping 10º to 35º southwest.
Structural interpretation concluded that the limits of the upper limb have been fairly well defined
by existing drilling, but mineralization in the lower limbs remain open at depth.
Russell (1995) includes the following discussion on the structural setting surrounding the Arctic
deposit area. “The structural geology of the Ambler District and the Arctic deposit is discussed
in some detail by Hitzman et al. (1986) and Schmidt (1983, 1986). The present east–west trend
of the structural grain in the Ambler District is due to the Jurassic to Cretaceous age Brooks
Range Orogeny. The first deformational episode widely affecting the Ambler Sequence was an
intense, tight to isoclinal, Jurassic(?) age event, which produced the Arctic Synform, an
overturned syncline whose horizontal N70ºW axis lies a short distance north of the Arctic
deposit. The parallel Kalurivik Arch, a relatively broad antiform, is the result of a Middle
Cretaceous structural event that produced more open folds (Schmidt, 1983). Between these two
major structural events were several more localized episodes. Any or all of these structural
events could have had a major impact on the Devonian-age Arctic deposit.” This would suggest
the possibility of a more complex setting at the Project than earlier proposed.
Subsequent reinterpretation by Kennecott in 1998 and 1999 suggests the entire sequence at
Arctic may indeed be overturned. Proffett (1999) reviewed the Arctic geology and suggested a
folded model, indicating potential for continued mineralization at depth associated with the
overturned limb of a large recumbent fold, and proposed the mineralized sequence at the Project
was part of an anticline opening to the east and closing to the west. Proffett’s interpretation is
that this was an F2 fold superimposed on a broad north-trending F1 fabric.
Lindberg (2004) supports a folded model similar to Proffett, though he feels the main fold at the
Project is northwest closing and southeast opening. Lindberg named this feature the Arctic
Antiform, and interpreted this structure to be an F1 fold.
Intrafolial folding occurs throughout the property as documented in several previous reports,
including Russell (1995). Folding is commonly observed in outcrop and drill core, both within

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 5-6
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

lithologic units and massive sulfide zones. Lindberg believes the majority of folding within the
mineralized horizons occurs in the central part of the deposit within a southwest plunging
“cascade zone.” The increased thicknesses of mineralized intervals in this part of the property
can in part be explained by the multiple folding of two main ore horizons as opposed to
numerous individual mineralized beds as shown in the 1995 geologic model. The cascade zone
appears to be confined to the upper sulfide limbs of the Arctic antiform. An isopach map of the
base of the lower limb sulfide bed shows little to no disruption, indicating a sheet-like
morphology (Dodd et al., 2004). This is in contrast to an isopach map of the top of the upper
limb sulfide bed, which shows a more disrupted surface plane and some indication of possible
thrusting to the South (Dodd et al., 2004).
Drillholes south and east of the Arctic deposit failed to intersect the lower Button Schist where
anticipated. Results of 2006 mapping at Arctic suggest that an F2 fold event may fold the lower
Button Schist back to the north under the deposit in this area (Otto, B.R., 2006). Some deep
drilling in the deposit is necessary to test this concept.
Low-angle thrust faults extending into this area from the south may be responsible for some
displacement observed at the Arctic deposit. Fault zones were observed in this area, but
conclusions are mixed with limited drill data.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
 Arctic Terrane Map 1
Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401 Source: Mull et al. (1987) and

File Name: Figure 5-1.doc Moore et al. (1994) Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 5-1
 Known sulfide occurrences are indicated by small squares, and large occurrences are labeled

Arctic Terrane Maps 2

Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 5-2.doc Source: Hitzman et al. (1982) Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 5-2
 A schematic sketch of the tectonic evolution of the schist belt, as proposed by Gottschalk and Oldow (1988). Ks = Lower Cretaceous
metasedimentary rocks of the Koyukuk basin. MzPzv = Paleozoic and Mesozoic mafic rocks interlayered with metasediments
(Angayucham terrain). lmPz-Tr = Lower Paleozoic to Triassic metasediments rocks, possibly derived from the Arctic Alaskan
continental margin. PzPm = Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian epicontinental metasediments and volcanogenic rocks of the schist
belt. pCb = Precambrian continental basement. A) Stratigraphic relationships post obduction and imbrication of the Angayucham
terrain. B) Inception of thin-skinned thrusting of the schist belt rocks. C) Post or syn-thrust extensional unroofing of the schist belt.

Arctic Tectonic Evolution

Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 5-3.doc Source: Gottchalk and Oldow Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 5-3
 Arctic, Geological Map of the Arctic
Kobuk, Alaska Project
SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 5-4.doc Source: Alaska Gold Company Date: 07-24-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 5-4
NovaGold Resources Inc. 6-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

6 Deposit Type (Item 10)

The mineralization at the Project and within the Ambler District consists of Devonian age,
polymetallic (Zn-Cu-Pb-Ag) VMS occurrences. VMS deposits are formed by and associated
with sub-marine volcanic-related hydrothermal events. These events are related to spreading
centers such as fore arc, back arc or mid-ocean ridges. VMS deposits are often stratiform
accumulations of sulfide minerals that precipitate from hydrothermal fluids on or below the
seafloor. These deposits are found in association with volcanic, volcaniclastic and/or siliciclastic
rocks. They are classified by their depositional environment and associated proportions of mafic
and/or felsic igneous rocks to sedimentary rocks. There are five general classifications based on
rock type and depositional environment:
• Mafic rock dominated often with ophiolite sequences, often called Cyprus type;
• Bimodal-mafic type with up to 25% felsic volcanic rocks;
• Mafic-siliciclastic type with approximately equal parts mafic and siliclastic rocks, which
can have minor felsic rocks and are often called Beshi type;
• Felsic-siliclastic type with abundant felsic rocks, less than 10% mafic rocks and shale
rich; and
• Bimodal-felsic type where felsic rocks are more abundant than mafic rocks with minor
sedimentary rocks, also termed Kuroko type.
Prior to any subsequent deformation and/or metamorphism, these deposits are often bowl- or
mound-shaped with stockworks and stringers of sulfide minerals found near vent zones. These
types of deposit exhibit an idealized zoning pattern as follows:
• Pyrite and chalcopyrite near vents;
• A halo around the vents consisting of chalcopyrite, sphalerite and pyrite;
• A more distal zone of sphalerite and galena and metals such as manganese; and
• Increasing manganese with oxides such as hematite and chert.
Alteration halos associated with VMS deposits often contain sericite, ankerite, chlorite, hematite
and magnetite close to the VMS with weak sericite, carbonate, zeolite, prehnite and chert more
distal. These alteration assemblages and relationships are dependent on degree of post
deposition deformation and metamorphism. A modern analog of this type of deposit is found
around fumeroles or black smokers in association with rift zones.
In the Ambler District, VMS mineralization occurs along the western schist belt over a strike
length of approximately 100km. These deposits are hosted by a volcanogenic sequence
consisting of volcaniclastic, siliciclastic and calcareous metasedimentary rocks interlayered with
mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks. Sulfide occurs above the mafic metavolcanic rocks but
below the Button schist, which has been interpreted as a volcaniclastic rock. The presence of the
mafic and felsic metavolcanic units is used as evidence to suggest formation in a rift-related
environment, possibly proximal to a continental margin. A sulfide-smoker occurrence has been
identified near Dead Creek northwest of the Project and suggests local hydrothermal venting
during deposition. However, the lack of stockworks and stringer-type mineralization suggests
that the Project is not a near-vent type VMS. Although this is a stratiform VMS, drill cores from

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 6-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

the 2004 and 2005 drilling programs within the deposit exhibit characteristics and textures
common to replacement-style mineralization, and it is interpreted that at least some of this
mineralization may have formed as diagenetic replacements.
At the Project, sulfides occur as semi-massive (10 to 30% sulfide) to massive (>30% sulfide)
layers, typically dominated by pyrite with substantial disseminated sphalerite and chalcopyrite
and trace amounts of galena. This sulfide accumulation at the Project is thought to be correlative
to those seen at the Dead Creek and Sun deposits. The VMS deposits in the Ambler District are
unusually sheet-like compared with other VMS deposits worldwide. This is likely a result of
attenuation and folding of the section caused by high-pressure deformation during the late
Jurassic to early Cretaceous age Brooks Range orogeny. This structural attenuation as well as
metamorphic recrystallization makes it difficult to interpret the genesis of this deposit. However,
the sulfide formation is not consistent with a specific type of VMS and may be a hybrid style of
mineralization that formed in a magmatically active marginal rift basin.
There is also an occurrence of epithermal discordant vein and fracture hosted base metal (Pb-Zn-
Cu) mineralization identified at the Red prospect in the Kogoluktuk Valley, east of the Project.
This occurrence also contains substantial fluorite veins suggesting high temperature
hydrothermal activity. Although not yet fully understood, the genesis of this occurrence is
considered to be related to the regional system that formed the VMS deposits in the Ambler
District.
Knowledge of the position and genetic relationship within the VMS system is important to
targeting the richest zones. The information collected from mapping, sampling and geophysics
at the Project and regional levels within the Ambler District is being used to define the position
of Arctic relative to an ancient spreading center.
6.1 Exploration Target
While efforts during 2004 and 2005 were directed at drilling and delineating the Project, work in
2006 was focused on exploration for new, nearby resources within the claim block. These
activities included mapping, drilling, regional geochemistry and geophysics at the COU, Sun,
Dead Creek and Red prospects. This work was undertaken to expand the resource potential and
to better understand the Project area. This exploration effort is focused both northwest and
southeast of the Project, along structure, and covering approximately 18km. Drilling targets are
chosen based on a combination of geophysics, geochemistry and mapping information.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 7-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

7 Mineralization (Item 11)

Mineralization occurs as stratiform semi-massive to massive sulfide beds. The sulfide beds
average 4m thick but vary from less than 1m to 18m thick. The bulk of the mineralization is
within four zones located between two thrust faults, the upper Warm Springs Thrust and the
Lower Thrust. A smaller fifth zone is located below the Lower Thrust. All of these zones are
within an area of roughly 1km2, with average zone length ranging from 600m x 850m and width
ranging from 350m to 700m. Depths of known mineralization extend to approximately 250m
below the surface. Host rocks are primarily graphitic chlorite schists and fine-grained quartz
sandstones.
Marginal to the main deposit, mineralization is locally present as discontinuous thin, “wispy”
sulfide bands. No stockworks or stringers in association with the mineralization have been
observed. These features are common in near-vent VMS deposits. Much of the core from the
2004 and 2005 programs within the deposit exhibits characteristics and textures common to
replacement-style mineralization.
Mineralization is predominately coarse-grained sulfides consisting mainly of chalcopyrite,
sphalerite, galena, pyrite and pyrrhotite, and may or may not include tetrahedrite. Tetrahedrite-
tennantite, electrum and enargite are also present in minor amounts. Pyrite is commonly
associated with the massive sulfide horizons, and pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite are present in lesser
amounts. Gangue minerals associated with the mineralized horizons include quartz, barite, white
mica, black chlorite, calcite, dolomite and cymrite, while talc is common in the footwall.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 8-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

8 Exploration (Item 12)

Exploration on the Project was intermittent between the discovery of Arctic in 1965 through to
1998. From 1998 until 2003, there was no work performed on the Project. NovaGold entered
into negotiations with Kennecott to explore its Ambler land position in mid 2003. Negotiations
were completed and a joint venture agreement signed on March 23, 2004. Since 2004,
NovaGold has been performing project level and regional mapping, drilling, geophysics and
geochemical surveys.
8.1 Drilling
The 2004 drilling focused on the Project area and was principally designed to verify the grade
and continuity of the mineralized intercepts encountered in the previous drill campaigns. Eleven
holes totaling 2,996m were drilled in potential extensions of mineralization and on an adjacent
geophysical anomaly. During 2005, approximately 3,030m of core drilling was completed, and
in the 2006 field season an additional 3,010m of drilling in 12 drill holes was completed. The
2006 program focused on regional extensions and included drilling at the Dead Creek, Sun, COU
and Red prospects. The drilling was carried out by Boart Longyear, a contract diamond driller.
8.2 Regional Mapping
Regional mapping completed during the 2005 field season extended across Riley Ridge to
Limestone Creek, with a limited amount of work completed on Dead Creek Ridge by Doyle
Albers. From this work came recognition of the importance of the large airborne
electromagnetic low resistivity anomaly west of Riley Ridge.
Local and regional mapping performed during the 2005–2006 mapping program enabled Paul
Lindberg, contracted to NovaGold, to complete a model of an unfolded view of the Project
geology. These results provide a good platform on which to build subsequent models of original
zoning patterns, changing thicknesses and other laterally variable characteristics of the deposit.
8.3 Regional Geochemistry
A total of 2,106 stream silt and soil samples were collected during the 2004 mapping program as
part of an effort to develop a regional geochemistry model for future district exploration. This
program was carried out by NovaGold personnel and the model is still being developed.
8.4 Geophysics
During 2005, two Time Domain ElectroMagnetic (TDEM) induction ground surveys were
performed at the Project and COU. COU is within the claim block and is a significant anomaly
of similar size and tenor a few kilometers to the northwest of Arctic. The 2006 exploration
program was focused on a more regional basis to extend existing mineralization and to identify
new mineralized targets within the claim block, and included 13 TDEM surveys performed to
enhance previous work performed by Kennecott in 1998. Data evaluation is ongoing.
8.5 Portable Infrared Mineral Analyzer (PIMA) Data
PIMA data were collected by NovaGold personnel from all 2004 drillholes as well as select pre-
1998 drillholes. The data collection supplemented previous data collected from the 1998
Kennecott program. Data were collected on a sample interval basis for the 2004 core with a
reading approximately every 0.5m. Readings on the pre-1998 core were taken on both sample

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 8-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

intervals as well as drill run intervals where no assay sample was taken. Alteration mineral type
and relative intensity was interpreted from the spectra and entered into the database. Evaluation
of these data is ongoing.
8.6 Oriented Core
Oriented data were collected from select angle drillholes. The clay impression method was used
to orient the core with data capture done using a circular protractor for beta values and a standard
protractor for alpha values. The majority of oriented measurements were of foliation with a
northwest strike and a southwest dip, similar to those observed on the surface.
Exploration activities at Arctic have been performed within industry standards using appropriate
models and techniques for a VMS target. SRK agrees with the techniques used at this project.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 9-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

9 Drilling (Item 13)

9.1 Drill Program and Objectives
The 2004 drilling focused on the Project area and was principally designed to verify the grade
and continuity of the mineralized intercepts encountered in the previous drill campaigns.
Alternate geologic models for the Project were investigated through surface mapping, drill core
re-logging and re-interpretation of previous drill results. Eleven holes totaling 2,996m were
drilled. Significant mineralized intervals were encountered in eight of the eleven holes drilled in
the program. The twin and infill drilling confirmed previously drilled intervals of base-metal
mineralization.
Drilling in 2005 again focused on extending and confirming mineralization, particularly in the
lower limb of the Arctic antiform at the Project. Approximately 3,030m of core drilling was
completed and, although good mineralization was encountered in several holes, structural
discontinuities appear to limit expansion of mineralization to the south and east. Results suggest
that the model remains open to the northeast and that the faulted off-root zone has yet to be
identified. Drill spacing for all programs is dependent on the steep, rugged terrain for locating
drill rigs; however, it varies from 90 to 120m. Sections have been drawn at 61m intervals.
During the 2006 field season, an additional 3,010m of drilling in 12 drillholes was completed.
This drill program was focused on a more regional basis to extend existing mineralization and to
identify new mineralized targets within the claim block.
The drill programs used a single skid-mounted LF-70 core drill, drilling HQ core with Boart
Longyear as the drill contractor. The drill was skidded to the various drill pads using a D-8
bulldozer located on site. The D-8 was also used in road and site preparation. Fuel, supplies and
personnel were transported by helicopter.
Field collar surveys were done with an Ashtech GPS survey system using post-processing
software to obtain survey coordinates. The Riley Vertical Angle Bench Mark was used as the
base for all surveys in 2004. Final surveys are listed in the Ambler survey files. The majority of
pre-2004 drill collars were also surveyed as part of data verification.
Downhole surveys were collected using a reflex camera. Individual survey readings were
collected at the site; data was collected at 50m intervals from the bottom of the hole. Data were
initially captured on paper and subsequently entered into an electronic spreadsheet. All data
were incorporated into a single Access database.
All NovaGold drill core was logged, photographed and sawn, with half sent to the lab for
analysis and half stored near the property. Core logging was done using metric measurements.
Lithology and visual alteration features were captured on observed interval breaks.
Mineralization data, including total sulfide (recorded as percent), sulfide type (recorded as a
relative amount), gangue and vein mineralogy were collected for each sample interval with an
average interval of approximately 2m. Structure data were collected as point data. Geotechnical
data [core recovery, rock quality designation (RQD)] were collected along drill run intervals.
Using the 2004 logging procedure as a guide, data from the earlier campaigns were taken from
those drill logs and entered into the database, with a focus on mineralization information.
The overall objectives of the three drill programs were:

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 9-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

• Verification of mineralized intercepts from previous drill campaigns (twin holes);

• Continuity of ore grade intercepts in the central part of the resource area (infill holes);
• Exploring possible extensions of ore zones; and
• Recording data electronically and building a 3-D model of the deposit.
9.2 Drill Results
Significant mineralized intervals were encountered in eight of the eleven holes drilled in 2004.
Twin and infill drilling confirmed previously drilled intervals of high-grade base-metal
mineralization. The results of the 2004 drilling program show a high degree of variability in
thickness and grade within areas of the deposit.
Drillholes designed to test extension of the ore deposit failed to extend significant ore grade
mineralization. Some holes encountered locally anomalous or sub-ore grade material, possibly
representing distal mineralization. An abrupt decrease in grade occurred in AR04-81 below a
fault zone, suggesting that the mineralized zones may be offset or folded south of the known
deposit. AR04-87 was abandoned due to an inability to penetrate a major fault zone, and was
subsequently re-drilled as AR04-88. This hole ended at 387.6m in altered quartz muscovite
schist, short of the targeted Button Schist.
For 2005, the highest priority objectives included:
• Determining the limits of the deposit to the south and east of the known mineralization by
drilling sufficiently deep holes to test extension of the lower, overturned limb of the
deposit; and
• Gathering information useful for a new resource calculation and scoping study scheduled
for 2006.
In April 2005, NovaGold made plans to drill 3,000m on the south and east fringe of the deposit
through the projected elevation of the lower sulfide limb, completing a downhole TDEM
geophysical survey and extending the geologic mapping from the Project area northwest toward
Dead Creek. Work completed toward extending the lower sulfide limb included nine holes
totaling 3,030m. Of these, two failed to achieve their targeted depth.
Frontier Geosciences, Inc. was contracted to complete downhole probing of selected holes at the
Project. They also completed a large loop TDEM survey over the Project area. Because
mapping indicated permissive stratigraphy coincident with the airborne anomaly west of Riley
Ridge, Frontier completed an additional TDEM loop survey over the anomaly core.
NovaGold geologists completed geochemical sampling of all NovaGold core and spot sampling
of much of the historical BCMC/Kennecott Minerals Arctic core. This work is ongoing and will
allow NovaGold to build a reasonably comprehensive lithogeochemical model of the Arctic
deposit.
The 2006 drilling program completed 3,010m in 12 holes. This program was performed to test
mineralization extensions and geophysical anomalies outside the immediate Project area, but
within the claim block. These holes were drilled at the Dead Creek, Sun, COU and Red
prospects.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 9-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

At Dead Creek, the holes were located based on a combination of geophysics and geology. Each
hole penetrated the targeted stratigraphy, and showed that the sulfide system diminishes to the
north and east but remains open to the south and west. One of the Back-Door Creek holes
penetrated an 8m zone that contained several 2 to 7cm-thick pyrrhotite bands, but with only a
trace of chalcopyrite. This zone correlates stratigraphically with a mineralized interval in a
nearby historical hole, suggesting metallic mineral zonation from pyrite and base-metal sulfide to
pyrrhotite.
Drilling in the Sunshine Creek area tested the western extent of mineralization observed in
historical drill holes, which is interpreted to be two sulfide-bearing horizons that lie sub-parallel
to the stratigraphy, above a carbonate package. NovaGold interprets the two mineralized
horizons as limbs of an F2 anticline. Drill intercepts from 2006 that correlate with these two
horizons had significantly lower grade and were thinner than historical intercepts. Preliminary
results indicate that the sulfide horizon becomes dominated by pyrrhotite to the west. NovaGold
currently interprets this compositional change to represent a more distal portion of the
mineralized system.
Drilling at COU was performed to investigate an electromagnetic anomaly and consisted of one
hole. The source of this anomaly was a thick sequence of graphitic black schist that contained
abundant continuous pyrrhotite bands. Downhole a few hundred meters it was recognized that
the hole was still in the hanging wall to the stratigraphic package that hosts the Project. This
resulted in extending the hole. The hole was stopped slightly above its target because of safety
considerations. This hole has proven vital to NovaGold’s understanding of the regional F2 folds
and to the stratigraphic stacking order in this area.
NovaGold drilled four holes into the Red prospect, located in the lowlands of the Kogoluktuk
Valley, about 5km east of the Project. These holes tested an electromagnetic anomaly and
intersected a sulfide vein system hosted by siltstone believed to underlie the Gnurgle Gneiss.
The veins have a quartz-calcite-fluorite gangue, and their margins commonly contain
concentrations of secondary brown biotite, suggesting an affinity to relatively high-temperature
potassic alteration. The F1 structural fabric deforms the veins, suggesting that they are relatively
old. The vein style of mineralization makes this occurrence unique in the district.
An ongoing effort to gather and compile data for a new resource model for the Project includes
re-logging of historical drill core, detailed logging of individual ore intersections at 1:50 scale
and work with hole-to-hole correlations.
Drilling at Arctic has been performed within industry standards using appropriate methods and
techniques for a VMS target. SRK agrees with the techniques used at this project.
Multiple drillhole intersections have resulted in a reasonably accurate knowledge of the
orientation of the mineralization. Mineralization follows enclosing stratigraphic layering and is
further defined, except where tightly folded, by bedding parallel to bedding subparallel foliation.
Most holes intersect the mineral zone nearly perpendicular to foliation and to the mineralization,
so the intersections represent near true thickness. Exceptions are where mineralized zones wrap
around tight fold hinges, but these instances are rare.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 10-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

10 Sampling Method and Approach (Item 14)

The sampling protocol for all the NovaGold drill programs at the Arctic deposit from 2004–2007
is the same. Core logging geologists mark the sample intervals, which range from 1 to 3m in
length. Varying rock types, lithologic contacts and mineralized zones influence sample interval
selection. Sample boundaries are placed at lithologic contacts. Each hole was sampled in its
entirety, even in areas that encountered significant intervals of unmineralized core. Sample
intervals of 2 to 3m are most common in weakly to unmineralized core, and sample intervals of 1
to 2m are more common in mineralized zones or areas of varying lithology. Sample intervals
used are well within the width of the average mineralized zone in the resource area. This
sampling approach is considered sound and appropriate for this style of mineralization and
alteration. Core recovery was good to excellent, resulting in quality samples with little to no
bias. There are no known drilling and/or recovery factors that could materially impact accuracy.
ALS Chemex in Vancouver, B.C. was used for all analyses conducted by NovaGold.
Core drilling within the resource area was specifically targeted for geologic control and to best
define zones of mineralization for the resulting resource estimate. Drilling outside of the
resource area was focused to explore for additional mineralization and to gain a better
understanding of the geologic controls to mineralization.
After logging, the core was digitally photographed and cut in half using diamond core saws.
Specific attention to core orientation was maintained during core sawing to ensure the best
representative sampling. One-half of the core was returned to the core box for storage on site
and the other half was bagged and labeled for sample processing and analysis.
Sampling of drill core prior to 2004 by Kennecott and BCMC focused primarily on the
mineralized zones. During the 1998 campaign, Kennecott did sample some broad zones of
alteration and weak mineralization, but much of the unaltered and unmineralized rock remains
unsampled. ALS Chemex was also used for analyses conducted by Kennecott.
Earlier BCMC sampling was even more restricted to mineralized zones of core. Intervals of
visible sulfide mineralization were selected for sampling and analyses were conducted by Union
Assay Office Inc. of Salt Lake City, Utah. Numerous intervals of weak to moderate
mineralization remain unsampled in the historical drill core. NovaGold conducted some limited
sampling of this historical drill core to gain a better understanding of trace element distribution
around the Arctic deposit. During the relogging of much of this historical core, 1m intervals
were selected over each 10m of unmineralized core. These 1m intervals were sawn in half, with
one-half returned to the box and the other half placed in a bag, labeled and sent to the laboratory
for analysis. This type of sampling was used to determine trace element distribution about the
deposit; none of the mineralized zones were sampled in this way.
With the lack of outcrop in a folded metamorphic terrane, it is necessary to have a good
understanding of the geologic model to predict positioning of the drill to get a sample of true
thickness in the mineralized zone. NovaGold has been diligently relogging core and mapping
the project to gain this understanding. The use of oriented core is very important to this
interpretation. SRK has confidence that the samples collected at the Project are representative of
the geometry of the mineralized zone.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 10-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Table 10.1: Selected Significant Intervals with True Thickness Estimates

Assayed True
Hole ID From To Length (m) Cu_% Au_ppm Ag_ppm Pb_% Zn_% Thickness (m)
AR-72 183.18 198.73 15.55 2.368 0.774 49.80 0.92 4.77 14.09
AR-72 137.92 154.69 16.77 5.832 2.036 66.24 2.21 7.87 15.76
AR-60 194.46 205.80 11.34 4.043 0.620 81.90 0.94 6.20 10.95
AR-51 39.47 46.48 7.01 3.84 8.806 54.06 1.92 7.38 6.67
AR-44 184.65 210.49 25.84 1.833 0.845 43.85 0.63 3.47 24.71
AR-44 132.83 148.44 15.61 2.476 0.720 47.27 0.54 5.02 15.27
AR-40 75.47 83.33 7.86 6.203 3.164 74.04 0.94 6.57 7.48
AR-39 148.13 156.58 8.45 5.741 8.735 198.94 1.53 5.90 7.32
AR-34C 166.12 182.61 16.49 4.288 0.514 53.58 0.57 5.72 14.95
AR-26 28.04 51.21 23.17 4.543 0.192 53.11 1.17 4.40 14.89
AR-22 278.59 292.61 14.02 5.751 0.608 69.81 0.75 4.14 13.71
AR-16B 154.47 172.12 17.65 3.717 0.967 58.84 1.11 8.51 17.05
AR-14B 166.66 173.77 7.11 4.895 1.988 106.95 2.00 11.29 7.00
AR-14B 148.01 160.72 12.71 4.233 0.772 56.17 1.28 7.12 12.66
AR-14A 148.35 159.53 11.18 3.723 1.084 41.43 1.19 6.20 10.51
AR-14 146.79 161.39 14.60 4.416 0.725 62.60 1.73 7.19 14.10
AR-12 204.83 215.59 10.76 6.629 1.180 98.69 0.93 6.26 10.52
AR-12 158.92 175.41 16.49 4.367 0.150 23.60 0.30 2.08 16.49
AR-11B 146.30 158.83 12.53 4.954 0.724 65.20 1.12 8.02 12.10
AR-11A 148.22 154.84 6.62 7.874 1.481 98.62 1.34 10.92 6.22
AR-11 170.08 189.37 19.29 2.623 0.539 49.70 0.55 2.48 19.00
AR-07 125.27 135.48 10.21 3.804 0.757 79.85 1.36 7.53 10.21
AR04-87 98.81 106.17 7.36 9.651 0.730 108.21 1.64 10.35 5.20
AR04-86 218.67 231.12 12.45 3.759 0.910 52.36 0.58 6.01 11.70
AR04-83 262.64 279.00 16.36 3.514 1.139 109.30 1.08 8.09 15.37
AR04-83 174.34 190.62 16.28 4.023 0.162 27.49 0.55 2.86 14.75
AR04-79 136.18 163.75 27.57 5.288 2.342 75.61 1.24 7.49 24.99
AR04-78 231.00 247.00 16.00 3.073 1.256 59.55 0.72 4.81 13.11
AR04-78 211.02 223.00 11.98 3.581 0.927 60.18 1.27 6.05 10.86

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 11-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security

(Item 15)
The core from the NovaGold programs was sawn in half, with half sent to labs in Fairbanks, AK
for sample preparation and the other half returned to the core box for storage. Samples were
crushed to 70% <2mm and a nominal 250g split was sent to Vancouver, B.C. for analysis by
ALS Chemex. There the splits were pulverized to 85% <75um. Initial gold analysis was done
by fire assay atomic absorption (FA-AA) on a nominal 30g split of the pulp. Samples returning
over limit gold values (>10ppm) were rerun using fire assay techniques. Initial results for all
other elements (27) were done via four acid digestion ICP analysis on a nominal 25g split of the
pulp. Samples with over limit values for copper (>10,000ppm), lead (>10,000ppm), zinc
(>10,000ppm) or silver (>100ppm) were rerun using atomic absorption (AA) techniques.
Gold values for duplicate samples (both blind and laboratory) from 2004 and for those samples
re-assayed from earlier programs locally showed high variability, indicating a possible nugget
effect. As a result, a series of samples was selected for mass spectrometer analysis (MSA)
analysis. Results are pending.
A Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program was instituted for the 2004 drill
program. Samples were broken into 20 sample batches that included three QA/QC samples. The
QA/QC samples included one duplicate, one blank and one standard. Duplicate samples were
prepared at the prep facility by taking a second split from the entire prepped sample. A local
limestone source was used as the blank material. A series of samples taken from the source area
and assayed confirm that the limestone is a suitable blank material. The standard material was
obtained from WCM Minerals of Burnaby, B.C. A base-metal standard was selected that best
represented the grade of the Arctic ore. Samples were either in the custody of NovaGold
personnel or the assay labs at all times.
11.1 Pre-1998 Assay Reruns
A search was made through Kennecott’s Reno, NV warehouse for sample pulps from pre-1998
drill campaigns. A total of 290 pulps was located, mainly from the earliest drill programs, and
sent to ALS Chemex Labs in Vancouver, B.C. for analysis. The samples were analyzed for gold
by FA-AA as well as 27 additional elements by ICP analysis (see analytical description).
Samples were arranged in batches of approximately 20, each with inserted QA/QC samples.
A comparison of the average base and precious metal assay results for the 2004 assays versus
those from previous drill campaigns is listed below (Table 11.1.1).
Table 11.1.1: Pre-1998 Pulp Rerun Comparisons
Element # Sample Pairs Ave: Original Assays Ave: Re-assays 2004 % Diff.: 2004 vs. Orig.
Copper 272 2.91% 2.65% -10.10
Lead 134 1.09% 1.30% +16.40
Zinc 199 5.00% 4.80% -4.11
Silver 212 54.15ppm 55.05ppm +1.63
Gold 119 0.802ppm 0.767ppm -4.65

Of the 290 total pulps, 11 contained insufficient volume for any analysis. The variable number
of sample pairs is the result of either insufficient sample size for analysis of select elements in

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 11-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

2004 (mainly over limits) or because some elements were not selected for assay in earlier
campaigns.
Zinc, silver and gold analyses all compared favorably. While lead showed the largest variability,
the average grades are relatively low, thereby having little effect on the tonnage value. Copper
values also had high variability and averaged 10% lower than the original values.

ALS Chemex has attained ISO 9001:2000 registration. In addition, the ALS Chemex
Vancouver laboratory is accredited to ISO 17025 by Standards Council of Canada for a number
of specific test procedures including fire assay Au by AA, ICP and gravimetric finish, multi-
element ICP and AA assays for Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn.

11.2 Reliability of Results

The apparently poor reproducibility of historical assay values is likely a sign of a highly variable
deposit, and not an assaying issue. While sample assays are suitable for this Technical Report,
further analysis and comparisons are recommended for prefeasibility.
The QA/QC data appear to be reasonable for a program of this scope; a few discrepancies exist
which are normal. No formal assessment of the QA-QC data from the 2004-2005 data has been
made. This should also be done before prefeasibility, and any significant problems addressed by
re-assaying samples which had issues.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 12-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

12 Data Verification (Item 16)

12.1 Data Acquisition and Verification
12.1.1 NovaGold Verification
NovaGold performed a review of existing Ambler data at the Kennecott offices in Salt Lake
City, Utah with a focus on data relating to the Arctic deposit. Numerous reports and studies
were scanned. All available assay certificates as well as the current database were copied and/or
scanned.
All pre-2004 drill assay values in the database provided by Kennecott were compared to assay
values from the original assay certificates. Local discrepancies, mainly associated with precious
metal results, were identified and corrected.
12.1.2 SRK Verification
SRK was supplied with paper and scanned electronic certificates for the pre-2004 programs.
Assay certificates for 472 samples out of 1,854 of these samples were unavailable for review.
SRK checked 10% of pre-2004 assay certificates against the database. Only minor typographical
discrepancies were found and corrected. All of the highest 5% grades of all five elements were
checked where available.
SRK also received electronic certificates as text files in comma-separated values (CSV) format
for 2,612 assays (88% of the NovaGold Arctic samples) from the 2004–2005 drilling/sampling
program, which also included numerous samples selected from previously drilled core. All of
these assays were verified successfully with the provided database.
QA/QC data were also made available for the 2005 sampling program, consisting of 166
duplicate samples, 282 standards and 293 blanks. These samples were well within acceptable
limits.
Although a few of the paper certificates were unavailable, the available certificates provided
reasonable assurance that the database is accurate.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 13-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

13 Adjacent Properties (Item 17)

There are three properties adjacent to Arctic: Sun, Smucker and Ruby Creek (Bornite). Sulfide
systems similar in character to Arctic occur at the exploration properties of Sun and Smucker
(Figure 2-4), held by Andover and Teck Cominco, respectively. Copper mineralization at
Bornite, held by NANA, occurs with hydrothermal dolomitization of the Bornite carbonate
sequence (Hitzman et al., 1986). The information for Sun, Smucker and Bornite, and the
comparisons with Arctic, is in no way indicative that a mineral deposit of similar size or grade
does occur or will be found at the Project. The qualified persons have been unable to verify the
information on adjacent properties contained herein.
13.1 Sun Prospect
The Sun prospect is also referred to as the Hot prospect. It is described as a copper, zinc, lead
and silver deposit and is east of Arctic in the same terrane and lithologic sequence. The deposit
is currently in reserve development and is being assessed as a potential open pit and underground
mine site. Andover owns 100% of the property but former owner Hastings Base Metals
Corporation retains a 1.5% net smelter return (NSR) on production. A resource estimate was
performed on Sun by Anaconda based on surface drilling programs. The resource estimate,
summarized in Table 13.1.1, was performed in 1977, has been publicly disclosed and is
considered to be inferred resources. This historical resource estimate pre-dates the development
of NI 43-101 reporting guidelines, was not estimated in compliance with NI 43-101 procedures
and should not be relied on (Metals Economics Group, 2007).
Table 13.1.1: Historical Anaconda Resource Estimate 1977
Classification Tonnes (kt) Cu% Zn% Pb% Ag_ppm
Inferred 18,407 1.912 4.466 1.182 81.106

13.2 Smucker Prospect

This prospect is located west of Arctic in the same terrane and lithologic sequence and is
described as a copper, zinc, silver and lead prospect currently in target outline. Targeting is for a
potential underground mine, but there are no published resource and reserve estimates for this
project (Metals Economics Group, 2007).
13.3 Bornite Property
The Bornite property is also called Ruby Creek or Cosmos Creek. The property is currently held
by NANA and has underground workings. It is described as being on care and maintenance and
in target outline (Metals Economics Group, 2007). This property is a copper and cobalt deposit
with both Mississippi Valley and Olympic Dam type deposit affinities. It is hosted by a tabular
hydrothermal breccia in dolomite and limestone (Williams, 2000). Ore mineralization includes
chalcopyrite, bornite, chalcocite, tennantite and galena with pyrite, pyrrhotite and dickite as
gangue minerals (Metals Economics Group, 2007). The site currently has a flooded shaft and an
unknown amount of underground workings. A resource was estimated by Hitzman (1986),
which listed the Ruby Creek deposit as 90Mt at 1.2% copper. This historical resource estimate
pre-dates the development of NI 43-101 reporting guidelines, was not estimated in compliance
with NI 43-101 procedures and should not be relied on. Hitzman is a highly respected geologist

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 13-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

and the existence of a historical resource estimate in the region is encouraging in terms of
regional prospectivity.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 14-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

14 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

(Item 18)
The Arctic deposit is a VMS deposit in talc schists. The principal minerals containing metals of
interest are chalcopyrite (Cu), tetrahedrite (Cu, Ag), galena (Pb, Ag) and sphalerite (Zn). The
present study considers production of concentrates for shipment to an existing off-site
conventional smelter. Metallurgical testing and the selection process are summarized in this
section.
14.1 Metallurgical Testwork
14.1.1 1998–1999 Testwork
A metallurgical testwork program was performed for Kennecott by Lakefield Research
(Lakefield) in 1998, with a report issued in January 1999. In previous work completed in the
1970s, high levels of lead and zinc were found to report to the copper concentrate, which would
at best incur significant smelter penalties, and at worst would not be acceptable to a copper
smelter. The objective of the Lakefield test program, therefore, was to define a metallurgical
flow sheet that would produce three marketable concentrates: lead/precious metals, copper and
zinc.
Two composites were prepared from five drillholes for the metallurgical test program and are
thought to be representative of various ore characteristics of the deposit. The first composite,
which was defined as the Upper Zone, showed much better metallurgy than the Lower Zone.
The Lower Zone samples contained significant quantities of easily floating talc. Table 14.1.1.1
summarizes the results from the metallurgical test program.
Table 14.1.1.1: Summary of Metallurgical Test Programs
Assays Distribution, %
Ore Type Product Wt % %Cu %Pb %Zn Au, g/t Ag, g/t Cu Pb Zn Au Ag
Low Talc Pb 2nd Cl Conc 2.22 6.5 58.8 3.43 38.9 1,703 2.7 68.1 1.1 48.7 47.3
CuPb 2nd Cl
Conc 19.2 26.1 8.77 2.71 5.67 281 94.7 87.6 7.2 61.3 67.4
Zn 2nd Cl Conc 9.91 0.44 0.36 59.1 0.65 14.7 0.8 1.9 81.1 3.6 1.8
Head Grade
(Calc) 100.0 5.28 1.92 7.21 1.78 80.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
High Talc Pb 2nd Cl Conc 1.05 8.01 35.3 3.36 34.7 1,670 3.6 30.3 0.6 41.1 30.9
CuPb 2nd Cl
Conc 11.60 18.3 7.27 2.98 4.76 345 88.4 66.9 5.8 66.6 70.5
Zn 2nd Cl Conc 8.97 0.62 0.65 53.4 0.56 25.9 2.4 4.3 81.0 5.9 4.1
Head Grade
(Calc) 100.0 2.40 1.26 5.87 0.82 56.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
High Talc Pb 3rd Cl Conc 0.80 11.9 47.9 3.51 70.7 2,589 4.0 31.7 0.5 56.4 38.9
CuPb 2nd Cl
With Talc Conc 13.4 16.3 7.41 5.34 5.99 339 90.1 81.7 12.1 79.6 85.0
Head Grade
Prefloat (1) (Calc) 100.0 2.41 1.21 5.93 1.01 53.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
(1)
No zinc concentrate was produced in this test.

Conclusions from the test program are summarized below:

• The copper and lead recoveries and concentrate grades for the Lower Ore Zone,
containing high talc, did not yield satisfactory results;

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 14-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

• Copper and zinc concentrates grading 26% Cu and 59% Zn, respectively, in the Upper
Zone should be readily marketable;
• The lead concentrate grades for both ore zones were less than 50% Pb, relatively low by
world standards;
• The lead recoveries for both ore zones were also low at 68.1% for the low talc and only
31.7% for the high talc with the talc pre-float;
• A talc pre-float appears to be more effective for the Lower Zone material than talc
depression, confirming the earlier work at the KRC;
• Primary grinds were generally finer than in previous work (P80 of 74µm versus 120µm);
and
• Gold and silver recoveries were generally lower than the projections in the 1996 study
but more in line with the actual testwork data from the 1970’s.
The data obtained from the Lakefield tests, as expressed in the points above, provided a
significant improvement from previous testwork campaigns in the ability to separate payable
metals into saleable concentrates.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

15 Mineral Resource Estimate (Item 19)

15.1 Resource Estimation
SRK used Maptek’s Vulcan software to create the geologic and block models and estimate
grade. The resource estimate includes all data produced through 2005; no additional data has
been generated since 2005, thus the effective date of this report is January 31, 2008.
15.1.1 Drillhole Database
The drillhole database consists of 119 core holes, 96 of which intercepted significant
mineralization. Of the 25,000m drilled, 4,808 intervals were sampled representing 9,128m of
sampled drilling. Sample lengths vary from 0.1 to 12m, and average about 1.9m. Each interval
contains assays for copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver, as well as codes for lithology and
mineralized zone. Drillhole collars for the holes used in this estimate are listed in Appendix C,
and their locations are shown in Figure 15-1.
A separate database table includes specific gravity (SG) measurements for 404 samples taken
from 47 drillholes.
Downhole surveys were recorded in 50 to 150ft intervals for the majority of the drillholes. A
standard “typical deviation” had been applied to 40 holes, which were unsurveyed. Due to the
assumed regional structural fabric, this practice is reasonable, although the actual hole deviations
may vary greatly depending on structures encountered, lithologic contacts, drilling rigs and
drilling conditions. For a Technical Report, the sample locations are sufficient. SRK
recommends that a detailed study of downhole surveys be performed to verify that a general
artificial survey is appropriate for all parts of the deposit. In future, all holes require downhole
surveys.
Zone codes were assigned to the drillhole database to match the modeled massive sulfide units as
described below in Section 15.1.2. These were chosen based upon a combination of logged
lithology and assayed grades and were coded based on the geometric relationship to the
interpreted geology.
15.1.2 Univariate Statistics
Univariate statistics were calculated on all mineralized intercepts as shown in Appendix D.
Based on breaks in the populations as observed in the probability plots, caps were determined for
each element. These caps and their effects are listed in Table 15.1.2.1 and broken out by
massive sulfide and host (non-massive sulfide) categories.
Table 15.1.2.1: Drillhole Assay Statistics
Cu (%) Zn (%) Pb (%) Au (ppm) Ag (ppm)
Category Length Uncut Cap 15 Uncut Cap 18 Uncut Cap 4 Uncut Cap 7 Uncut Cap 190
Host 19,703.45 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.09 1.09
Sulfide 1,077.11 3.77 3.76 6.05 6.04 0.94 0.93 0.83 0.75 56.86 55.81
Total 20,780.56 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 3.98 3.93
Number Capped 4 8 9 3 5

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

15.1.3 Geology
Based upon cross sectional interpretations supplied by NovaGold, five “zones” representing
massive sulfide lenses were modeled. Two of these represent the upper and lower limbs of a
basic recumbent fold structure hinged to the northwest and dipping to the southwest roughly 20°,
and two others are splayed horizons sandwiched between the main limbs. The fifth zone is a
single limb northwest and below the other zones across a fault referred to as the “Lower Thrust”.
Previously existing Vulcan models supplied the basic geometries for this model but were not
suitable for capturing data in an appropriate manner for estimation. These zones were modeled
to fit this geometry using grid models of elevation and vertical thickness. The grid interpolation
method used chosen intercepts as data points with both elevation and vertical thickness. These
attributes were interpolated into 5m x 5m grid cells that were then manipulated to provide a top
and bottom surface for each lens. An advantage of this method is that it does a very good job of
respecting the locations of the original intercepts while maintaining a reasonable/logical
geometry. Due to the sparse data that this is based upon, it has been assumed that more drilling
data and further refinement of the model will occur before final mine planning is done. These
zones are coded as follows, and illustrated in Figures 15-2 and 15-3.
1 = Main upper limb.
2 = Intermediate upper lens.
3 = Intermediate lower lens.
4 = Main lower limb.
11 = Lower thrust extension.
Intervals of massive sulfide that could not be clearly correlated to this general interpretation were
assigned a code of 5 or 6 so they could be easily identified in future attempts at correlation.
Although the cross sectional interpretation clearly shows several faults cutting across the sulfide
bodies, the sparsity of data supporting isolated blocks of sulfides led to the use of a simpler
interpretation to reflect supportable volume estimates of sulfides. As more drilling information
is gained these models should be revised.
These lenses were in general not extrapolated more than 50m beyond the edge of mineralized
intercepts. In some areas the distance between intercepts internal to the mineralization exceeded
50m.
15.1.4 Compositing
Composites were created in 1m downhole intervals, broken at changes in zone codes. This
length was used as a compromise to capture short intervals that were typically sampled on
massive sulfides, while still allowing high- and low-grade intervals to exist within the narrow
lenses. Unsampled and unlogged intervals were counted as having zero grades for all metals.
15.1.5 Specific Gravity
Previous resource estimations for the Project used an average SG of 3.48 for mineralized
material. There is no documentation explaining how this number was derived. In 1998,
Kennecott had SG analyses done on 38 core samples of which 22 were from mineralized zones
and 16 from other lithologies. Analyses were split between Chemex Laboratories and Golder
and Associates. Mineralized samples were defined for SG measurements as massive sulfide

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

(>50% total sulfides) or semi-massive sulfide (<50% total sulfides). Lithologic samples were
also collected, some of which contain up to 10% sulfides. The mineralized samples showed a
large difference from the previous estimated density number used.
The following year, in 1999, Kennecott selected 231 samples from the pre-1998 drill campaigns
for SG analysis. The samples were shipped to Anchorage but were not forwarded to a lab for
analysis.
Due to the large discrepancy between previous SG measurements, a more extensive field SG
program was implemented. In 2004, the 231 samples from the pre-1998 drill campaigns were
collected from Kennecott’s Anchorage warehouse and sent to Chemex Laboratories for bulk
density analysis. In addition to these 231 samples, 33 samples from the 2004 program were
included, mainly to check field procedures.
Field SG measurements were collected using an Ohaus triple beam balance. Select core samples
were first dried and then a weight-in-air value was obtained followed by a weight-in-water, with
the sample suspended by a wire into a water-filled bucket. The density was calculated using the
following formula:
Weight in air
(Weight in air – Weight in water)
A total of 127 usable field SG measurements was obtained.
The 2004 lab program produced significantly lower SG results for mineralized samples
compared to the earlier programs. The average of the field results were within 1% of the lab
results, confirming the accuracy of the field procedures. In comparison to the earlier programs,
the 2004 SG measurements were 7.4% lower for massive sulfide samples and 14.5% lower for
semi-massive sulfide samples. The average of the lithology samples was similar in all programs.
Table 15.1.5.1 shows the results obtained for these three programs.
Table 15.1.5.1: Historical Specific Gravity Data Statistics – Arctic Deposit: 1998–2004
MS (>50% sulfide) No. of SMS (<50% sulfide) No. of Lithologies No. of
Program Average g/cm3 Samples Average g/cm3 Samples Avg g/cm3 Samples
1998 Lab (Chemex, Golder) 4.37 15 4.02 7 2.84 16
2004 Field 4.40 35 3.84 19 2.83 73
2004 Lab (Chemex) 4.06 121 3.36 77 2.85 66
All Programs 4.16 171 3.49 103 2.84 155

The difference between the 2004 lab results and those from previous studies may be the result of
selection bias in the earlier programs as well as mineralogy within individual samples. With the
exception of the lithology samples, the averages from the earlier programs were obtained using
fewer samples. Samples from the pre-1998 drill campaigns were from NQ- and BQ-sized core,
while samples from the 1998 and 2004 drilling programs were collected from HQ-sized core. In
addition, the length of sample taken from the pre-1998 averaged 7.27cm, whereas samples of
2004 core averaged 9.05cm. As a result, sample size may also be a factor in the SG variation
from program to program. With more data, a better correlation between total estimated sulfide
and SG may be defined. This could then be used in future resource estimations.
For the purpose of this resource estimate, the non-rejected SG measurements were categorized
by rock type and vary from 2.62 to 4.87 with an average of 4.4 for massive sulfide (MS). The

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-4
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

MS zones modeled are actually composed of a mixture of MS and semi-massive sulfide (SMS),
and the combination of these samples have an average SG of 4.2 (Table 15.1.5.2). Actual values
within each zone were used to interpolate SG into the block model using inverse distance
squared, but where SG sample density was too sparse, a default value of 4.2 was used in the
mineralized zones. A default of 2.9, the average SG of non-rejected quartz mica schist samples,
was used for all host rock.
Table 15.1.5.2: Specific Gravity Measurements Categorized by Rock Type
Rock Category Count Average Max Min
MS+SMS 77 4.2 4.87 2.84
Non-MS/SMS 93 2.9 4.26 2.62

15.1.6 Variogram Analysis and Modeling

Due to the wide spacing of data and the complex geometry of the sulfide lenses, a thorough
directional variogram study is impractical. General directional variograms were generated for
each element and, due to the drill spacing and orientation, the best variograms are in the
orientation of azimuth 150, plunge 30 (as shown in Appendix E). Ranges of 40 to 50m are
observed in all elements but gold, which has a range of 25m.
The block model was defined with an orientation of 49° to parallel the trend of the dominant
recumbent fold. Blocks are 5m x 5m in the X and Y dimensions, and variable to within the
closest 0.2m in the Z dimension in order to fit the volume of the narrow flat MS zones, as
defined by the wireframe solid models.
Due to the convoluted, but narrow geometry of the sulfide zones, the estimation used a spherical
search restricted within the zones. Multiple passes were used—50m, 100m and 150m—to fill as
many blocks as possible with the zones. The first search pass used a minimum of two samples,
with no more than three from any one drillhole. Subsequent search passes omitted these
restrictions. All elements were estimated simultaneously using the same parameters. Although
gold had a shorter range than the other elements, it is not a significant economic contributor to
this model, so using a slightly longer range was not viewed as an issue.
Because some isolated MS intercepts were not easily correlated to the modeled zones, they
remain outside of these zones. To associate a limited volume to these intercepts, a very narrow
“pancake” search of 40m x 40m x 5m was used outside of the modeled zones (also referred to as
zone 0). Two different generalized orientations were used to match the two dominant fabrics
observed outside of the modeled zones. An “upper/South” limb orientation strikes 85°, dipping
22° to the South, and a lower/North limb orientation strikes 356°, dipping 32° West. Although
these orientations may not always exactly match the local fabric, they allow these uncorrelated
samples to represent a reasonable tonnage of inferred resource. All estimation parameters are
defined in Table 15.1.6.1.
After the metal grades were estimated, a simplified Gross Metal Value (GMV) was calculated
based on metal prices applied to each individual grade. The GMV is equal to the sum of each
grade multiplied by the value of the metal unit as shown in Table 15.1.6.2.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-5
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Using a range of GMV cutoffs verses indicated and inferred resources and grade in percent
copper equivalents, SRK developed a preliminary grade-tonnage curve (Figure 15-4). A $100
GMV cutoff was selected using this grade-tonnage curve.
In addition, underground mining methods have been used as a basis for modeling this deposit.
An open pit option was not considered because of the following reasons:
• Preliminary geotechnical analysis indicated that attainable pit wall angles would have to
be relatively shallow, necessitating high stripping ratios; and
• The potential acid rock generation issues associated with the massive sulfide mineralogy
exposed in an open pit and waste piles adding potential mitigation costs and permitting
requirements.
Table 15.1.6.1: Estimation Parameters
Samp.
Block Selection Selec. Estim. Samp. Lims. DH Limit Ellipse Variogram
Description Type Test Area Zone Zone Flag Min Max Use Mx/Hole Radii** Rotation Range Nug. SillDif.
MS Pass 1 OK * * 1 2 15 y 3 50 0 50 0.1 0.9
MS Pass 2 OK flag<1 * * 2 1 15 y 3 100 0 75 0.1 0.9
MS Pass 3 OK flag<1 * * 3 1 15 n - 150 0 75 0.1 0.9
Outside OK topo>0 Low 0 5, 6, 0 4 2 6 n - 40x5 x140, y-12, z-18 40x5 0.1 0.9
Zones
OK topo>0 Hi 0 5, 6, 0 4 2 6 n - 40x5 x320, y25, z-20 40x5 0.1 0.9
SG ID2 topo>0 * * 1 6 n - 400x200 0 - - -
* For blocks in all modeled zones (1,2,3,4,11) each block used only samples from the same zone.
** Spherical search, or disk shaped search.
All elements estimated with identical parameters (Cu, Zn, Ag, Pb, Au).

Table 15.1.6.2: Gross Metal Value (GMV) Parameters

Metal/Unit Price (US$) Price Unit Conversion Value of Metal/Unit (US$)
Cu% 2.25 lb 22.0462 49.60
Au (gpt) 525 oz 0.032151 16.88
Ag (gpt) 9.50 oz 0.032151 0.31
Pb% 0.55 lb 22.0462 12.13
Zn% 1.05 lb 22.0462 23.15

15.1.7 Resource Classification

The mineral resources have been classified according to the CIM Standards on Mineral
Resources and Reserves: Definitions and Guidelines” (November 2005) as described in the
Glossary (Section 21).
Resources in the MS zones, which were estimated by the first (50m) search, were classified as
indicated. This is roughly based on a distance that is twice the variogram range and within one
cross section distance inside a modeled shape, which is based on correlated intervals. All blocks
outside of the MS zones, and all other estimated blocks too distant from the samples for the first
pass, were classified as inferred. No resources were classified as measured. Inferred resources
have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined
legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of inferred resources will ever
be upgraded to a higher category.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 15-6
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

15.1.8 Mineral Resource Statement

The resources for the Project are derived from the Vulcan block model using SG values
estimated from measurements as described in Section 15.1.5. The resources are summarized in
Table 15.1.8.1 at $100 GMV cut-off.
Table 15.1.8.1: Arctic Deposit Resources at $100GMV Cut-off
Resource Grade Contained Metal
Cu Zn Pb Ag Au Cu Zn Pb Ag Au
Zone (kt) (%) (%) (%) (gpt) (gpt) (Mlb) (Mlb) (Mlb) (koz) (koz)
Indicated
Zone 1 5,294 4.56% 6.45% 1.05% 62.8 0.956 533 752 122 10,684 163
Zone 2 2,982 4.36% 5.82% 0.80% 45.8 0.521 287 383 53 4,387 50
Zone 3 1,957 3.66% 6.00% 0.93% 51.2 0.522 158 259 40 3,220 33
Zone 4 6,092 3.82% 6.00% 0.98% 68.7 1.008 513 805 131 13,451 197
Zone 11 517 4.16% 3.32% 0.34% 32.9 0.254 47 38 4 546 4
Total Indicated 16,841 4.14% 6.03% 0.94% 59.6 0.826 1,538 2,237 350 32,289 447
Total Inferred
Zone 0 1,162 2.21% 2.27% 0.69% 4.2 0.333 57 58 18 156 12
Zone 1 3,163 3.92% 5.75% 0.93% 55.0 0.760 273 401 65 5,596 77
Zone 2 1,559 4.06% 5.60% 0.74% 43.4 0.433 139 193 25 2,176 22
Zone 3 1,307 3.83% 5.13% 0.63% 48.1 0.438 110 148 18 2,021 18
Zone 4 4,382 3.34% 5.03% 0.84% 58.4 0.891 323 486 81 8,224 126
Zone 11 370 4.27% 3.32% 0.36% 33.8 0.293 35 27 3 402 3
Inferred 11,944 3.56% 4.99% 0.80% 48.4 0.674 937 1,313 210 18,575 259
Notes:
* gpt=ppm
(1) The effective date of this mineral resource estimate is January 31, 2008.
(2) Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. It
cannot be assumed that all or any part of inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
(3) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(4) This mineral resource estimate assumes metal prices of US$2.25/lb Cu, US$525/oz Au, US$9.50/oz Ag, US$0.55/lb Pb and US$1.05/lb Zn.

15.1.9 Resource Potential

There are many intercepts in the vicinity of the modeled zones that have not been correlated with
this model. Infill drilling will undoubtedly increase the knowledge of how these intercepts fit the
picture, and may potentially lead to an increase in the resources quantum.
In preparing the Technical Report presented herein, SRK has applied modifying factors based on
testwork undertaken to date and/or general industry accepted practice for a project of this nature.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
 500m

Arctic Drillhole Location Map

Kobuk, AK (Grid, 10m Contour)
SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 15-1 Date: 07-25-07 Approved: DKB Figure: 15-1
 Arctic, Typical Cross-section
Kobuk, AK Looking Northeast at
SRK Job No.: 168401
XS600NE
File Name: Figure 15-2.doc Date: 07/24/07 Approved: DKB Figure: 15-2
 Arctic, Typical Cross-section
Kobuk, AK Looking Northwest at
SRK Job No.: 168401
XS600NW
File Name: Figure 15-3.doc Date: 07/24/07 Approved: DKB Figure: 15-3
 37,500 12.00%

35,000
11.00%
32,500
10.00%
30,000
9.00%
27,500

25,000 8.00%

Grade (Cu-Equivalent %)
22,500
Resource (I&I) (kt)

7.00%
20,000
6.00%
17,500
5.00%
15,000

12,500 4.00%

10,000
3.00%
7,500 Resources (I&I)
Grade (Cu-Equivalent %) 2.00%
5,000
1.00%
2,500

0 0.00%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Gross Metal Cut-off ($/tonne)

Arctic, Grade-tonnage Curve

Kobuk, AK

SRK Job No.: 168401

File Name: Figure 15-4.doc Date: 02-12-08 Approved: DKB Figure: 15-4
NovaGold Resources Inc. 16-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

16 Additional Requirements for Development

Properties and Production Properties (Item 25)
SRK and other consultants have undertaken internal conceptual plans of various aspects of
potential development options for the Project. These are at an early stage and are considered too
preliminary for public disclosure.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 17-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

17 Other Relevant Data and Information (Item 20)

There is no further information or data to the Project that has not been included in this Technical
Report.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 18-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

18 Interpretation and Conclusions (Item 21)

The Arctic deposit is a high-grade, volcanic massive sulfide deposit with excellent potential but
logistical challenges.
The following presents the interpretations and conclusions of this Technical Report:
• Geology;
o Geologic interpretations by NovaGold geologists show a complexly folded and
potentially faulted deposit. Based on the widely spaced data available, the
currently modeled resource model omits these complexities due to lack of
correlatable data. However, volumetrically this resource should be representative
based on the available samples. The resource has been completed based on
industry standards for this type of deposit with this level of sample spacing.
• Resource;
o The mineral resources have been classified using logic consistent with the CIM
definitions incorporated in NI 43-101. The mineralization of the Project satisfies
sufficient criteria to be classified into Indicated and Inferred resource categories,
o Further exploration is required to upgrade the resources thus far identified, and
o Resource estimation is based on underground mining methods.
• Environmental and Permitting;
o Development of the Project will be subject to extensive environmental baseline
analyses, impact assessment and evaluation, and associated permitting
requirements reflective of the cumulative impacts associated with full project
build-out, and the sensitive environment in which it is to be constructed.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 19-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

19 Recommendations (Item 22)

The findings of this Technical Report provide compelling arguments to advance the evaluation
of the Project to the pre-feasibility stage.
Additional activities in support of a pre-feasibility assessment include the following, together
with indicative costs:
• Environmental Assessment US$500,000
• Exploration and Drilling US$2,000,000
• Metallurgical Testwork US$400,000
• Pre-feasibility Report US$200,000
Given the amount of work performed on the project, additional activities are required to confirm
previous work and further define the development scheme. A revised economic analysis should
be carried out.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 20-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

20 References (Item 23)

Aleinikoff, J. N., Moore, T. E., Walter, M., and Nokleberg, W. J. (1993), U-Pb ages of zircon,
monazite, and sphene from Devonian Metagranites and Metafelsites, Central Brooks
Range, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, v. B 2068, p. 59-70
Bearing Marine Lines (2007), Personal Communication with Company Representative
Dillon, J. T., Pessel, G. H., Chen, J. H., and Veach, N. C. (1980), Middle Paleozoicmagmatism
and Orogenesis in the Brooks Range, Alaska: Geology, v. 8, p. 338-343
Dillon, J. T., Tilton, G. R., Decker, J., and Kelley, M. J. (1987), Resource Implications of
Magmatic and Metamorphic Ages for Devonian Igneous Rocks in the Brooks Range, in
Tailleur, I. L., and Weimer, P., Alaskan North Slope Geology, Pacific Section, Society of
Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, p. 713-723
Dodd, S. P., Lindberg, P. A., Albers, D. F., Robinson, J. D., Prevost, R. (2004) Ambler Project,
2004 Summary Report, Unpublished Internal Report, Alaska Gold Company
Gottschalk, R. R., and Oldow, J. S. (1988), Low-angle Normal Faults in the South-central
Brooks Range Fold and Thrust Belt, Alaska, Geology, 16, p. 395-399
Hitzman, M. W. (1982) Geology of the Ruby Creek Copper Deposit, Southwestern Brooks
Range, Alaska: Economic Geology v. 81, p. 1644-1674
Hitzman, M. W., Smith, T. E., and Proffett, J. M. (1982), Bedrock Geology of the Ambler
District, Southwestern Brooks Range, Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and
Geophysical Surveys Geologic Report 75, scale 1:250,000
Hitzman, M. W., Proffett, J. M., Schmidt, J. M., and Smith, T. E. (1986) Geology and
Mineralization of the Ambler District, Northwestern Alaska: Economic Geology v. 81, p.
1592-1618
Kennecott Research Center (September 1968) Amenability Testing of Diamond Drill Core
Samples from Arctic, Alaska Project, TR 68-20
Kennecott Research Center (August 1972) Amenability Testing of Samples from Bear Creek
Mining Company’s Arctic Deposit, TR 72-12
Kennecott Research Center (September 1976) Recovery of Mineral Values Arctic Prospect, RTR
76-22
Kennecott (1977) Annual Report Arctic Deposit: Unpublished in-house report
Kennecott (1998) Arctic Deposit and Ambler District Field Report: Unpublished in-house report
Kennecott Research Center (January 1997) Process Selection for Arctic Deposit, Technical
Report RTR 77-4
Kobuk Valley National Park (2007) at National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program
website, http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/units/arcn/park_detail.cfm?parkid=4
Lakefield Research Limited (January 7, 1999) An Investigation of the Recovery of Lead, Zinc &
Precious Metals from Samples of the Arctic Project Ore submitted by Kennecott
Minerals, Progress Report No.1

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 20-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Lindberg, P. A. (2004) Structural Geology of the Arctic Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag Sulfide Deposit: Alaska
Gold Company Unpublished Report
Michaelson, S. D. (March 11, 1970) Memo to H. L. Bauer
Moore, T. E., Wallace, W. K., Bird, K. J., Karl, S. M., Mull, C. G., and Dillon, J. T. (1994)
Geology of Northern Alaska, in Plafker, G., and Berg, H. C., eds., The Geology of
Alaska: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, The Geology of North
America, v. G1, p. 49-140
Mull, C. G. (1982) Tectonic Evolution and Structural Style of the Brooks Range, Alaska; an
Illustrated Summary, in Geologic Studies of the Cordilleran Thrust Belt, Rocky Mt.
Assoc. Geol., Denver, CO, United States (USA), p. 1-45
Mull, C. G. (1985) Cretaceous Tectonics, Depositional Cycles, and the Nanushuk Group, Brooks
Range and Arctic Slope, Alaska, U.S. Geol. Soc. Bull., 1614, p. 7-36
Nauman, C. R. (December 29, 1994) Memo Arctic: Status of Development of Ore Processing
Oldow, J. S., Seidensticker, C. M., Phelps, J. C., Julian, F. E., Gottschalk, R. R., Boler, K. W.,
Handschy, J. W., and Ave Lallemant, H. G. (1987) Balanced Cross Sections Through the
Central Brooks Range and North Slope, Arctic Alaska, AAPG, p. 19, 8 plates
Otto, B. R. (2006) Personal Communication
Proffett, J. M. (1999) Summary of Conclusions on Geology of the Arctic Deposit, AK: Kennecott
Minerals Company Unpublished Report
Randolph, M. P. (August 29, 1990) to T. J. Stephenson: Arctic Deposit, Internal Kennecott
Memo
Robertson Geoconsultants Inc. (December 1998) Initial Assessment of Geochemical and
Hydrological Conditions at Kennecott’s Arctic Project
Russell, R. H. (1977) (1976) Annual Report, Arctic Deposit: Bear Creek Mining Company
Unpublished Report
Russell, R. H. (1995) Arctic Project 1995 Evaluation Report, Geologic Report: Kennecott
Corporation Unpublished Report
Sawyer, Roger J. (January 15, 1999) Memo to J. Earnshaw, Kennecott Minerals, Arctic-
Metallurgy Projections
Schmidt, J. M. (1983) Geology and Geochemistry of the Arctic Prospect, Ambler District,
Alaska: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University
Schmidt, J. M. (1986) Stratigraphic Setting and Mineralogy of the Arctic Volcanogenic Massive
Sulfide Prospect, Ambler District, Alaska: Economic Geology v. 81. p. 1619-1643
Schmidt, J. M. (1988) Mineral and Whole Rock Compositions of Seawater-Dominated
Hydrothermal Alteration at the Arctic Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Prospect, Alaska:
Economic Geology v.83, p. 822-842
Till, A. B., Schmidt, J. M., and Nelson, S. W. (1988), Thrust Involvement of Metamorphic Rocks,
Southwestern Brooks Range, Alaska: Geology, v. 16, p. 930-933

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 20-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

URSA Engineering (1998) Arctic Project Rock Mass Characterization, Prepared for: Kennecott
Minerals, Co., Unpublished Report, p. 49
Vogl, J. J., Calvert, A. J., Gans, P. B. (2002) Mechanisms and Timing of Exhumation of
Collision-Related Metamorphic Rocks, Southern Brooks Range, Alaska: Insights from Ar
(40)/ Ar (39) Thermochronology, Tectonics, v 21, No 3, p. 1-18
Williams, A. (2000) Opportunities in the NANA Region, in: Mining Alaska National Interest
Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA)-Twenty Years Later-Abstracts, Alaska Miners
Association 2000 Annual Convention, p. 25
www.kobuk.valley.national-park.com/info.htm#env (2007), Kobuk Valley National Park
www.meg.com (2007), Metals Economics Group Report on Sun Prospect
www.meg.com (2007), Metals Economics Group Report on Smucker Prospect
www.meg.com (2007), Metals Economics Group Report on Bornite Property
www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/ALASKA.htm (2007), Climate of Alaska
www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmak.html (2007), Alaska Climate Summaries
Zieg, G. A., et al. (2005) Ambler Project 2005 Progress Report, Unpublished Internal Report,
Alaska Gold Company

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 21-1
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

21 Glossary
21.1 Mineral Resources & Reserves
Mineral Resources
The mineral resources and mineral reserves have been classified according to the “CIM
Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves: Definitions and Guidelines” (November 2005).
Accordingly, the Resources have been classified as Measured, Indicated or Inferred, the
Reserves have been classified as Proven, and Probable based on the Measured and Indicated
Resources as defined below.
A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized
organic material in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or
quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade,
geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or
interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.
An ”Inferred Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade
or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and
reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on
limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such
as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drillholes.
An ”Indicated Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or
quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence
sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support
mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on
detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques
from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drillholes that are spaced closely
enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.
A ”Measured Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or
quality, densities, shape, physical characteristics are so well established that they can be
estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and
economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of
the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing
information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches,
pits, workings and drillholes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade
continuity.
Mineral Reserves
A Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral
Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This Study must include
adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors
that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A Mineral
Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material
is mined.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 21-2
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

A “Probable Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some
circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility
Study. This Study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical,
economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic
extraction can be justified.
A “Proven Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource
demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This Study must include adequate
information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that
demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified.
21.2 Glossary
Table 21.2.1: Definitions of Terms
Term Definition
Assay The chemical analysis of mineral samples to determine the metal content.
BQ Size Letter name specifying the dimensions of bits, core barrels, and drill rods in the B-size
and Q-group wireline diamond drilling system having a core diameter of 36.5mm and
a hole diameter of 60mm.
Capital Expenditure All other expenditures not classified as operating assets.
Cementitious Of or relating to a chemical precipitate, especially of carbonates, having the
characteristics of cement.
Composite Combining more than one sample result to give an average result over a larger
distance.
Concentrate A metal-rich product resulting from a mineral enrichment process such as gravity
concentration or flotation, in which most of the desired mineral has been separated
from the waste material in the ore.
Crushing Initial process of reducing ore particle size to render it more amenable for further
processing.
Cut-off Grade (CoG) The grade of mineralized rock, which determines as to whether or not it is economic to
recover its gold content by further concentration.
Dilution Waste, which is unavoidably mined with ore.
Dip Angle of inclination of a geological feature/rock from the horizontal.
Fault The surface of a fracture along which movement has occurred.
Footwall The underlying side of an ore body or stope.
Gangue Non-valuable components of the ore.
Gross Metal Value An estimate value per ton for each resource block, which considers only contained
(GMV) metal values at specified metal prices without consideration of recoveries or
processing costs.
Grade The measure of concentration of gold within mineralized rock.
Hangingwall The overlying side of an ore body or slope.
Haulage A horizontal underground excavation which is used to transport mined ore.
HQ Size A letter name specifying the dimensions of bits, core barrels, and drill rods in the H-
size and Q-group wireline diamond drilling system having a core diameter of 63.5 mm
and a hole diameter of 96 mm.
Igneous crystalline rock formed by the solidification of magma.
Kriging An interpolation method of assigning values from samples to blocks that minimizes
the estimation error.
Level Horizontal tunnel the primary purpose is the transportation of personnel and materials.
Lithological Geological description pertaining to different rock types.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 21-3
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Table 21.2.1: Definitions of Terms (Continued)

Term Definition
Material Properties Mine properties.
Milling A general term used to describe the process in which the ore is crushed and ground
and subjected to physical or chemical treatment to extract the valuable metals to a
concentrate or finished product.
Mineral/Mining Lease A lease area of which mineral rights are held.
Mining Assets The Material Properties and Significant Exploration Properties.
NQ Size A letter name specifying the dimensions of bits, core barrels, and drill rods in the N-
size and Q-group wireline diamond drilling system having a core diameter of
47.6mm and a hole diameter of 75.7mm.
Net Smelter Return An estimate value per ton for each resource block, which considers metal values,
(NSR) recoveries and processing costs.
Ongoing Capital Capital estimates of a routine nature which is necessary for sustaining operations.
Operating Costs Sum of cost of mining, beneficiation, and administration gives the operating cost of
the mine.
Ore Reserve See Mineral Reserve.
Pillar Rock left behind to help support the excavations in an underground mine.
Room Underground void created by mining where the ore is close to horizaontal or at a low
angle..
Sedimentary Pertaining to rocks formed by the accumulation of sediments, formed by the erosion
of other rocks.
Shaft An opening cut downwards from the surface for transporting personnel, equipment,
supplies, ore and waste.
Sill A thin, tabular, horizontal to sub-horizontal body of igneous rock formed by the
injection of magma into planar zones of weakness.
Smelting A high temperature pyrometallurgical operation conducted in a furnace, in which the
valuable metal is collected to a molten matte or doré phase and separated from the
gangue components that accumulate in a less dense molten slag phase.
Specific Gravity (SG) The weight of a substance compared with the weight of an equal volume of pure
water at 4ºC.
Stratigraphy The study of stratified rocks in terms of time and space.
Stope Underground void created by mining.
Strike Direction of line formed by the intersection of strata surfaces with the horizontal
plane, always perpendicular to the dip direction.
Sulfide A sulfur bearing mineral.
Tailings Finely ground waste rock from which valuable minerals or metals have been
extracted.
Thickening The process of concentrating solid particles in suspension.
Total Expenditure All expenditures including those of an operating and capital nature.
Variogram A statistical representation of the characteristics (usually grade)
Zone Modeled 3D shape representing correlateable intercepts of massive sulfide material
in shallowly dipping lenses.

These are general definitions commonly used in mining.

21.3 Units of Measure and Abbreviations
The metric system is used throughout this report with the exception of gold and silver quantities,
which are reported in troy ounces, or unless otherwise stated. All currency is in US dollars.
Abbreviations used in this report are shown in Table 21.3.1.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
NovaGold Resources Inc. 21-4
Ambler Project NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources

Table 21.3.1: Units of Measure and Abbreviations

Abbreviation Unit or Term
AA Atomic Absorption
amsl above mean sea level
ºC degrees centigrade
cm centimeter
CoG cut-off grade
CSV comma-separated values
FA-AA Fire Assay-Atomic Absorption
g gram
gpt grams per metric ton
GMV Gross Metal Value
GPS Global Positioning System
ha hectare (10,000m2)
ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
km kilometer (1,000m)
KSP Kennecott Sulfite Process
L liter
m meter
m2 square meter
m3 cubic meter
mm millimeter
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MS Massive Sulfide
MSA mass spectrometer analysis
Mt million metric tonnes
NAD North American Datum
NI 43-101 National Instrument 43-101
NPV Net Present Value
NSR net smelter return
oz troy ounce (31,1035g)
PIMA Portable Infrared Mineral Analyzer
ppm parts per million
QA/QC quality assurance/quality control
QP Qualified Person
RC rotary circulation (drilling)
RQD rock quality designation
SG Specific Gravity
SMS Semi-massive Sulfide
t metric ton, or tonne
TDEM Time Domain ElectroMagnetic
USGS United States Geological Survey
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
VMS Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide

These are general abbreviations and units of measured commonly used in mining.

SRK Consulting (US), Inc. February 12, 2008

Ambler Project.NI 43-101 Resource Report.168401.KG.009.doc
 Appendix A
Certificates of Authors
 SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.
7175 West Jefferson Avenue, Suite 3000
Lakewood, Colorado
USA 80235
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.srk.com
Tel: 303.985.1333
Fax: 303.985.9947

CERTIFICATE of AUTHOR

I, Neal Rigby, CEng. do hereby certify that:

1. I am a Principal of:

SRK Consulting (US), Inc.

7175 W. Jefferson Ave, Suite 3000
Lakewood, CO, USA, 80235

2. I graduated with a 1st Class Honors BSc Degree in Mining Engineering in 1974 and a PhD in
Mining Engineering in 1977 both from the University of Wales, UK.

3. I am a member Institute of Materials, Mining and Metallurgy.

4. I have worked as a mining engineer for a total of 33 years since my graduation from
university.

5. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI
43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional
association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the
requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

6. I am responsible for the overall preparation of all sections of the Technical Report titled
NovaGold Resources Inc., NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources, Ambler Project, Arctic
Deposit, AK, and dated February 12, 2008 (the “Technical Report”) relating to the Ambler
Project. I have not visited the Ambler Project property.

7. I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

Group Offices in: North American Offices:

Australia Denver 303.985.1333
North America Elko 775.753.4151
Southern Africa Reno 775.828.6800
South America Tucson 520-544-3688
United Kingdom Toronto 416.601.1445
Vancouver 604.681.4196
Yellowknife 867-699-2430
SRK Consulting (US), Inc. Page 2 of 2

8. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.4 of National Instrument
43-101.

9. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has
been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form.

10. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory
authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic
publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the
Technical Report.

11. As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the
Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be
disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Dated this 12th Day of February, 2008.

(signed)
Neal Rigby, CEng., MIMMM, PhD

Certificate of Author.168401.NR.doc
 SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.
7175 West Jefferson Avenue, Suite 3000
Lakewood, Colorado
USA 80235
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.srk.com
Tel: 303.985.1333
Fax: 303.985.9947

CERTIFICATE of AUTHOR

I, Russell White, P.Geo do hereby certify that:

1. I am a Associate Geologist of:

SRK Consulting (US), Inc.

7175 W. Jefferson Ave, Suite 3000
Lakewood, CO, USA, 80235

2. I graduated with a degree in Bachelor of Science from the University of Northern Arizona in
1983. In addition, I have obtained a minor degree in Computer Science also at Northern
Arizona University in 1984.

3. I am a Registered Geologist (number 2293) with the State of Washington.

4. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 23 years since my graduation from university.

5. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI
43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional
association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the
requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

6. I am responsible for the preparation of Section 15 of the Technical Report titled NovaGold
Resources Inc., NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources, Ambler Project, Arctic Deposit,
AK, and dated February 12, 2008 (the “Technical Report”) relating to the Ambler Project. I
visited the Ambler Project property on May 16, 2007.

7. I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

Group Offices in: North American Offices:

Australia Denver 303.985.1333
North America Elko 775.753.4151
Southern Africa Reno 775.828.6800
South America Tucson 520-544-3688
United Kingdom Toronto 416.601.1445
Vancouver 604.681.4196
Yellowknife 867-699-2430
SRK Consulting (US), Inc. Page 2 of 2

8. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.4 of National Instrument
43-101.

9. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has
been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form.

10. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory
authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic
publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the
Technical Report.

11. As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the
Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be
disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Dated this 12th Day of February, 2008.

(signed)
Russell E. White, P.Geo

(sealed)

Certificate of Author.168401.RW.doc
 Appendix B
Ambler Project Claims
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
ARCTIC 5 FF-054378 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 35 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 6 FF-054379 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 35 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 8 FF-054381 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 35 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 12 FF-054382 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 14 FF-054383 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 16 FF-054384 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 18 FF-054385 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 20 FF-054386 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 21 FF-054387 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 22 FF-054388 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 33 FF-054392 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 35 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 300 FF-054418 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 301 FF-054419 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 400 FF-054425 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
ARCTIC 401 FF-054426 20 9/6/1965 21N 11E 34 Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic 40A 540543 40 8/29/1990 21N 11E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic 496A 540544 40 8/29/1990 21N 11E 34 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic 1001 540545 40 8/29/1990 21N 11E 34 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic 1002 540546 40 9/1/1990 21N 11E 34 SE & SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic 1005 540549 40 9/1/1990 21N 11E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Arctic #3 546162 40 9/1/1990 21N 11E 35 SW & NW Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 24 546144 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 SW & SE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 25 546145 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 SW & SE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 26 546146 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 NW & NE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 34 546147 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 35 546148 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 SE & NE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 36 546149 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 44 546150 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 SW 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 45 546151 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 &16 SW & NW;SE &Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 46 546152 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 NW 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 54 546153 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 55 546154 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 SW & NW Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 56 546155 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 64 546156 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 SW & SE Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 65 546157 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 SW & SE; NW &Kateel River Kotzebue
SC 66 546158 40 Jun-95 21N 10E 15 NW & NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-165 590853 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-166 590854 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-167 590855 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-168 590856 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-169 590857 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-170 590858 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-171 590859 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-172 590860 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-165 590874 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-166 590875 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-167 590876 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-168 590877 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-169 590878 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-170 590879 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-171 590880 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-172 590881 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-165 590895 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-166 590896 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-167 590897 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-168 590898 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-169 590899 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-170 590900 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-171 590901 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-172 590902 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-165 590916 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-166 590917 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-167 590918 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-168 590919 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-169 590920 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-170 590921 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-171 590922 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-172 590923 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-165 590940 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 67-166 590941 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-167 590942 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-168 590943 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-169 590944 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-170 590945 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-171 590946 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-172 590947 40 Sep-97 21N 9E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-186 590998 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-187 590999 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-188 591000 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-189 591001 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-190 591002 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-191 591003 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-192 591004 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-193 591005 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-194 591006 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-195 591007 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-176 591008 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-177 591009 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-178 591010 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-179 591011 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-180 591012 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-181 591013 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-182 591014 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-183 591015 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-184 591016 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-185 591017 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-186 591018 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-187 591019 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-188 591020 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-189 591021 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-190 591022 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-191 591023 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-192 591024 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-193 591025 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-194 591026 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-195 591027 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-176 591028 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-177 591029 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-178 591030 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-179 591031 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-180 591032 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-181 591033 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-182 591034 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-183 591035 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-184 591036 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-185 591037 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-186 591038 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-187 591039 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-188 591040 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-189 591041 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-190 591042 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-191 591043 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-192 591044 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-193 591045 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-194 591046 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-176 591047 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-177 591048 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-178 591049 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-179 591050 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-180 591051 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-181 591052 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-182 591053 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-183 591054 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-184 591055 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-185 591056 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-186 591057 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-187 591058 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-188 591059 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-189 591060 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-190 591061 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-191 591062 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 59-192 591063 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-193 591064 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-176 591065 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-177 591066 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-178 591067 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-179 591068 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-180 591069 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-181 591070 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-182 591071 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-183 591072 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-184 591073 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-185 591074 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-186 591075 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-187 591076 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-188 591077 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-189 591078 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-190 591079 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-191 591080 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-192 591081 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-193 591082 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-176 591083 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-177 591084 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-178 591085 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-179 591086 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-180 591087 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-181 591088 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-182 591089 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-183 591090 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-184 591091 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-185 591092 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-186 591093 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-187 591094 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-188 591095 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-189 591096 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-190 591097 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-191 591098 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-192 591099 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-193 591100 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-176 591101 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-177 591102 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-178 591103 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-179 591104 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-180 591105 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-181 591106 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-182 591107 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-187 591108 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-188 591109 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-189 591110 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-190 591111 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-191 591112 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-192 591113 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-193 591114 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-173 591115 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-174 591116 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-175 591117 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-176 591118 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-177 591119 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-178 591120 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-179 591121 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-180 591122 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-181 591123 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-182 591124 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-187 591125 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-188 591126 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-189 591127 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-190 591128 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-191 591129 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-192 591130 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-193 591131 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-173 591132 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-174 591133 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-175 591134 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 64-176 591135 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-177 591136 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-178 591137 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-179 591138 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-180 591139 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-181 591140 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-182 591141 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-183 591142 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-184 591143 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-185 591144 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-186 591145 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-187 591146 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-188 591147 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-189 591148 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-190 591149 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-191 591150 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-192 591151 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-193 591152 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-173 591153 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-174 591154 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-175 591155 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-176 591156 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-177 591157 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-178 591158 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-179 591159 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-180 591160 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-181 591161 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-182 591162 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-183 591163 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-184 591164 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-185 591165 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-186 591166 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-187 591167 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-188 591168 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-189 591169 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-190 591170 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-191 591171 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-192 591172 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-193 591173 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-173 591174 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-174 591175 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-175 591176 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-176 591177 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-177 591178 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-178 591179 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-179 591180 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-180 591181 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-181 591182 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-182 591183 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-183 591184 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-184 591185 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-185 591186 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-186 591187 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-187 591188 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-188 591189 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-189 591190 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-190 591191 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-191 591192 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-192 591193 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-193 591194 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-173 591195 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-174 591196 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-175 591197 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-176 591198 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-177 591199 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-178 591200 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-179 591201 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-180 591202 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-181 591203 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-182 591204 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-183 591205 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-184 591206 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 67-185 591207 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-186 591208 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-187 591209 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-188 591210 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-189 591211 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-190 591212 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-191 591213 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-192 591214 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-193 591215 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-194 591216 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-195 591217 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-196 591218 40 Sep-97 21N 10E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-206 591219 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-207 591220 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-208 591221 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-209 591222 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-210 591223 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-214 591224 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-215 591225 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-216 591226 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-217 591227 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-218 591228 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-219 591229 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-220 591230 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-206 591231 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-207 591232 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-208 591233 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-209 591234 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-210 591235 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-211 591236 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-213 591237 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-214 591238 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-215 591239 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-216 591240 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-217 591241 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-218 591242 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-219 591243 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-220 591244 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-206 591245 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-207 591246 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-208 591247 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-209 591248 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-210 591249 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-211 591250 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-212 591251 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-213 591252 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-214 591253 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-215 591254 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-216 591255 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-217 591256 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-218 591257 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-219 591258 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-220 591259 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-206 591260 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-207 591261 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-208 591262 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-209 591263 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-210 591264 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-211 591265 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-212 591266 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-213 591267 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-214 591268 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-215 591269 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-216 591270 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-217 591271 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-218 591272 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-219 591273 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-220 591274 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-206 591275 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-207 591276 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-208 591277 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-209 591278 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 53-210 591279 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-211 591280 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-212 591281 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-213 591282 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-214 591283 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-215 591284 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-216 591285 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-217 591286 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-218 591287 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-219 591288 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-220 591289 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-206 591290 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-207 591291 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-208 591292 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-209 591293 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-210 591294 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-211 591295 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-212 591296 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-213 591297 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-214 591298 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-215 591299 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-216 591300 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-217 591301 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-218 591302 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-219 591303 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-220 591304 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-206 591305 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-207 591306 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-208 591307 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-209 591308 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-210 591309 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-211 591310 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-212 591311 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-213 591312 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-214 591313 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-215 591314 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-216 591315 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-217 591316 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-218 591317 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-219 591318 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-220 591319 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-206 591320 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-207 591321 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-208 591322 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-209 591323 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-210 591324 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-211 591325 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-212 591326 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-213 591327 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-214 591328 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-215 591329 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-216 591330 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-217 591331 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-218 591332 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-219 591333 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-220 591334 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-206 591335 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-207 591336 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-208 591337 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-209 591338 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-210 591339 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-211 591340 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-212 591341 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-213 591342 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-214 591343 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-215 591344 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-216 591345 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-217 591346 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-218 591347 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-219 591348 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 57-220 591349 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-206 591350 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 58-207 591351 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-208 591352 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-209 591353 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-210 591354 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-211 591355 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-212 591356 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-213 591357 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-214 591358 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-215 591359 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-216 591360 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-217 591361 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-218 591362 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-219 591363 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 58-220 591364 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-202 591365 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-203 591366 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-204 591367 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-205 591368 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-206 591369 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-207 591370 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-208 591371 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-209 591372 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-210 591373 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-211 591374 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-212 591375 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-213 591376 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-214 591377 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-215 591378 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-216 591379 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-217 591380 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 59-218 591381 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-202 591382 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-203 591383 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-204 591384 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-205 591385 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-206 591386 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-207 591387 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-208 591388 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-209 591389 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-210 591390 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-211 591391 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-212 591392 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-213 591393 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-214 591394 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-215 591395 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-216 591396 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-217 591397 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 60-218 591398 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-202 591399 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-203 591400 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-204 591401 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-205 591402 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-206 591403 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-207 591404 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-208 591405 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-209 591406 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-210 591407 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-211 591408 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-212 591409 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-213 591410 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-214 591411 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-215 591412 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-216 591413 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-217 591414 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 61-218 591415 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-202 591416 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-203 591417 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-204 591418 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-205 591419 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-206 591420 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-207 591421 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-208 591422 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 62-209 591423 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-210 591424 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-211 591425 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-212 591426 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-213 591427 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-214 591428 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-215 591429 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-216 591430 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-217 591431 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 62-218 591432 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-202 591433 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-203 591434 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-204 591435 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-205 591436 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-206 591437 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-207 591438 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-208 591439 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-209 591440 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-210 591441 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-211 591442 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 63-212 591443 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-202 591444 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-203 591445 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-204 591446 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-205 591447 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-206 591448 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-207 591449 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-208 591450 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-209 591451 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-210 591452 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-211 591453 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 64-212 591454 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-202 591455 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-203 591456 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-204 591457 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-205 591458 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-206 591459 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-207 591460 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-208 591461 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-209 591462 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-210 591463 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-211 591464 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 65-212 591465 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-202 591466 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-203 591467 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-204 591468 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-205 591469 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-206 591470 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-207 591471 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-208 591472 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-209 591473 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-210 591474 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-211 591475 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 66-212 591476 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-197 591477 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-198 591478 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-199 591479 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-200 591480 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-201 591481 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-202 591482 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-203 591483 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-204 591484 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-205 591485 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-206 591486 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-207 591487 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-208 591488 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-209 591489 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-210 591490 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-211 591491 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 67-212 591492 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 68-208 591493 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 68-209 591494 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 68-210 591495 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 68-211 591496 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 68-212 591497 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 69-208 591498 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 69-209 591499 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 69-210 591500 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 69-211 591501 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 3 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 69-212 591502 40 Sep-97 21N 11E 3 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-221 591503 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-222 591504 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-223 591505 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-224 591506 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-225 591507 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-226 591508 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-227 591509 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-228 591510 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-229 591511 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 49-230 591512 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-221 591513 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-222 591514 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-223 591515 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-224 591516 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-225 591517 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-226 591518 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-227 591519 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-228 591520 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-229 591521 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 50-230 591522 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-221 591523 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-222 591524 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-223 591525 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-224 591526 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-225 591527 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-226 591528 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-227 591529 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-228 591530 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-229 591531 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 51-230 591532 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-221 591533 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-222 591534 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-223 591535 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-224 591536 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-225 591537 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-226 591538 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-227 591539 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-228 591540 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-229 591541 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 52-230 591542 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-221 591543 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-222 591544 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-223 591545 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 53-224 591546 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-221 591547 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-222 591548 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-223 591549 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 54-224 591550 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-221 591551 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-222 591552 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-223 591553 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 55-224 591554 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-221 591555 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-222 591556 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-223 591557 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 56-224 591558 40 Sep-97 21N 12E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 37-226 591575 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 37-227 591576 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 37-228 591577 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 37-229 591578 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 37-230 591579 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 38-226 591590 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 38-227 591591 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 38-228 591592 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 38-229 591593 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 38-230 591594 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 39-226 591605 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 39-227 591606 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 39-228 591607 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 39-229 591608 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 39-230 591609 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 40-226 591620 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 40-227 591621 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 40-228 591622 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 40-229 591623 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 40-230 591624 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-225 591635 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-226 591636 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-227 591637 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-228 591638 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-229 591639 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 41-230 591640 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-223 591648 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-224 591649 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-225 591650 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-226 591651 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-227 591652 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-228 591653 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-229 591654 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 42-230 591655 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-221 591661 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-222 591662 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-223 591663 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-224 591664 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-225 591665 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-226 591666 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-227 591667 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-228 591668 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-229 591669 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 43-230 591670 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-219 591676 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-220 591677 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-221 591678 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-222 591679 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-223 591680 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-224 591681 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-225 591682 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-226 591683 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-227 591684 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-228 591685 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-229 591686 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 44-230 591687 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-217 591693 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-218 591694 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-219 591695 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-220 591696 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-221 591697 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-222 591698 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-223 591699 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-224 591700 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-225 591701 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-226 591702 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-227 591703 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-228 591704 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-229 591705 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 45-230 591706 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-217 591712 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-218 591713 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-219 591714 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-220 591715 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-221 591716 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-222 591717 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-223 591718 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-224 591719 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-225 591720 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-226 591721 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
AM 46-227 591722 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-228 591723 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-229 591724 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 46-230 591725 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-217 591731 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-218 591732 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-219 591733 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-220 591734 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-221 591735 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-222 591736 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-223 591737 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-224 591738 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-225 591739 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-226 591740 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-227 591741 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-228 591742 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-229 591743 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 47-230 591744 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-217 591745 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-218 591746 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-219 591747 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-220 591748 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-221 591749 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-222 591750 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-223 591751 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-224 591752 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-225 591753 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-226 591754 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-227 591755 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-228 591756 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-229 591757 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
AM 48-230 591758 40 Sep-97 20N 12E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 1 634110 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 2 634111 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 3 634112 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 4 634113 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 5 634114 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 6 634115 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 7 634116 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 8 634117 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 9 634118 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 10 634119 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 11 634120 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 12 634121 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 13 634122 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 14 634123 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 15 634124 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 16 634125 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 17 634126 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 18 634127 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 19 634128 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 20 634129 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 21 634130 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 22 634131 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 23 634132 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 24 634133 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 25 634134 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 26 634135 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 27 634136 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 28 634137 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 29 634138 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 30 634139 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 31 634140 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 32 634141 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 33 634142 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 34 634143 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 35 634144 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 36 634145 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 37 634146 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 38 634147 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 39 634148 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 40 634149 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
EDC 41 634150 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 42 634151 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 43 634152 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 44 634153 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 45 634154 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 46 634155 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 47 634156 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 48 634157 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 49 634158 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 50 634159 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 51 634160 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 52 634161 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 53 634162 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 54 634163 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 55 634164 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 56 634165 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 57 634166 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 58 634167 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 59 634168 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 60 634169 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 61 634170 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 62 634171 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 63 634172 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 64 634173 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 65 634174 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 66 634175 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 67 634176 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 68 634177 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 69 634178 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 70 634179 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 71 634180 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 72 634181 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 73 634182 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 74 634183 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 75 634184 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 76 634185 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 77 634186 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 78 634187 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 79 634188 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 80 634189 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 81 634190 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 82 634191 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 83 634192 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 84 634193 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 85 634194 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 86 634195 40 Apr-00 21N 10E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 87 634196 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 88 634197 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 89 634198 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 90 634199 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 91 634200 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 92 634201 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 93 634202 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 94 634203 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
EDC 95 634204 40 Apr-00 21N 11E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 1 651152 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 2 651153 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 3 651154 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 4 651155 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 5 651156 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 6 651157 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 7 651158 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 8 651159 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 9 651160 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 10 651161 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 11 651162 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 12 651163 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 13 651164 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 14 651165 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 15 651166 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 16 651167 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 17 651168 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
ZED 18 651169 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 19 651170 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 20 651171 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 21 651172 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 22 651173 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 23 651174 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 14 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 24 651175 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 14 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 25 651176 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 13 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 26 651177 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 27 651178 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 28 651179 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 29 651180 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 30 651181 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 31 651182 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 32 651183 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 33 651184 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 34 651185 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 15 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 35 651186 160 Sep-05 20N 12E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 36 651187 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 37 651188 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 38 651189 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 39 651190 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 40 651191 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 41 651192 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 42 651193 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 43 651194 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 44 651195 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 45 651196 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 46 651197 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 47 651198 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 48 651199 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 49 651200 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 50 651201 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 51 651202 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 52 651203 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 53 651204 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 54 651205 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 55 651206 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 56 651207 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 57 651208 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 58 651209 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 59 651210 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 60 651211 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 61 651212 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 62 651213 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 22 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 63 651214 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 23 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 64 651215 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 23 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 65 651216 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 24 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 66 651217 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 67 651218 160 Sep-05 20N 15E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 68 651219 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 69 651220 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 70 651221 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 71 651222 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 72 651223 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 73 651224 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 74 651225 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 75 651226 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 76 651227 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 77 651228 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 78 651229 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 79 651230 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 22 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 80 651231 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 23 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 81 651232 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 23 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 82 651233 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 24 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 83 651234 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 24 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 84 651235 160 Sep-05 20N 15E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 85 651236 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 86 651237 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 87 651238 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 88 651239 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 89 651240 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
ZED 90 651241 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 91 651242 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 92 651243 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 93 651244 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 94 651245 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 95 651246 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 96 651247 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 97 651248 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 98 651249 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 99 651250 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 100 651251 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 101 651252 160 Sep-05 20N 15E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 102 651253 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 103 651254 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 104 651255 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 105 651256 160 Sep-05 20N 13E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 106 651257 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 107 651258 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 108 651259 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 29 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 109 651260 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 29 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 110 651261 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 111 651262 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 112 651263 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 113 651264 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 114 651265 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 115 651266 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 116 651267 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 117 651268 160 Sep-05 20N 14E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 118 651269 160 Sep-05 20N 15E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 119 566637 160 Sep-06 20N 12E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 120 566638 160 Sep-06 20N 12E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 121 566639 160 Sep-06 20N 13E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 122 566640 160 Sep-06 20N 13E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 123 566641 160 Sep-06 20N 13E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 124 566642 160 Sep-06 20N 13E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
ZED 125 566643 160 Sep-06 20N 13E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 1 651270 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 2 651271 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 3 651272 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 4 651273 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 5 651274 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 6 651275 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 7 651276 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 8 651277 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 9 651278 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 10 651279 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 11 651280 40 Sep-05 21N 11E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 20 651289 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 21 651290 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 22 651291 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 23 651292 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 24 651293 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 29 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 25 651294 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 27 651296 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
PAL 28 651297 160 Sep-05 21N 11E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 01 650291 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 02 650292 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 03 650293 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 04 650294 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 05 650295 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 06 650296 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 07 650297 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 08 650298 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 18 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 09 650299 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 18 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 10 650300 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 17 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 11 650301 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 17 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 12 650302 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 16 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 13 650303 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 16 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 14 650304 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 15 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 15 650305 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 19 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 16 650306 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 19 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 17 650307 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 20 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
HOSS 18 650308 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 20 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 19 650309 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 21 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 20 650310 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 21 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 21 650311 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 22 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 22 650312 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 19 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 23 650313 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 19 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 24 650314 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 20 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 25 650315 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 20 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 26 650316 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 21 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 27 650317 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 21 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 28 650318 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 22 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 29 650319 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 30 650320 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 31 650321 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 32 650322 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 29 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 33 650323 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 34 650324 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
HOSS 35 650325 160 7/13/2005 22N 10E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 1 651299 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 28 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 2 651300 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 28 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 3 651301 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 27 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 4 651302 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 27 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 5 651303 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 26 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 6 651304 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 26 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 7 651305 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 25 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 8 651306 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 25 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 9 651307 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 30 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 10 651308 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 30 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 11 651309 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 29 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 12 651310 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 13 651311 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 14 651312 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 15 651313 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 27 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 16 651314 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 26 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 17 651315 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 26 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 18 651316 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 25 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 19 651317 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 25 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 20 651318 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 21 651319 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 22 651320 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 29 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 23 651321 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 29 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 24 651322 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 25 651323 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 26 651324 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 27 651325 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 28 651326 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 29 651327 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 30 651328 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 31 651329 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 32 651330 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 33 651331 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 34 651332 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 35 651333 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 36 651334 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 37 651335 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 38 651336 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 39 651337 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 34 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 40 651338 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 35 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 41 651339 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 35 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 42 651340 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 36 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 43 651341 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 36 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 44 651342 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 31 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 45 651343 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 31 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 46 651344 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 32 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 47 651345 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 32 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 48 651346 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 33 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 49 651347 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 33 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 50 651348 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 34 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 51 651349 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 30 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 52 651350 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 30 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 53 651351 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 29 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 54 651352 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 29 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
GAP 55 651353 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 28 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 56 651354 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 28 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 57 651355 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 27 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 58 651356 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 34 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 59 651357 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 60 651358 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 61 651359 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 62 651360 160 Sep-05 22N 8E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 63 651361 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 64 651362 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 65 651363 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 66 651364 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 67 651365 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 68 651366 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 69 651367 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 70 651368 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 34 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 71 651369 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 35 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 72 651370 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 35 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 73 651371 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 36 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 74 651372 160 Sep-05 22N 9E 36 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 75 651373 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 31 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 76 651374 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 31 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 77 651375 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 32 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 78 651376 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 32 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 79 651377 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 33 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 80 651378 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 33 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 81 651379 160 Sep-05 22N 10E 34 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 82 651380 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 3 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 83 651381 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 2 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 84 651382 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 2 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 85 651383 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 1 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 86 651384 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 1 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 87 651385 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 88 651386 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 89 651387 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 2 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 90 651388 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 2 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 91 651389 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 1 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 92 651390 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 1 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 93 651391 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 6 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 94 651392 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 6 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 95 651393 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 96 651394 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 97 651395 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 98 651396 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 99 651397 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 100 651398 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 2 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 101 651399 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 2 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 102 651400 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 1 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 103 651401 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 1 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 104 651402 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 105 651403 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 106 651404 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 107 651405 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 108 651406 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 109 651407 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 110 651408 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 111 651409 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 3 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 112 651410 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 2 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 113 651411 160 Sep-05 21N 10E 2 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 114 651412 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 115 651413 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 116 651414 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 117 651415 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 118 651416 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 119 651417 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 120 651418 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 121 651419 40 Sep-05 21N 9E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 122 651420 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 123 651421 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 124 651422 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 125 651423 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 126 651424 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
GAP 127 651425 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 128 651426 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 129 651427 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 130 651428 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 131 651429 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 132 651430 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 133 651431 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 134 651432 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 135 651433 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 136 651434 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 137 651435 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 138 651436 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 139 651437 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 140 651438 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 141 651439 40 Sep-05 21N 10E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 142 651440 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 5 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 143 651441 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 5 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 144 651442 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 4 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 145 651443 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 4 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 146 651444 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 3 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 147 651445 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 3 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 148 651446 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 3 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 149 651447 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 2 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 150 651448 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 2 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 151 651449 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 1 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 152 651450 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 1 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 153 651451 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 6 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 154 651452 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 6 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 155 651453 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 5 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 156 651454 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 5 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 157 651455 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 4 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 158 651456 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 4 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 159 651457 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 3 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 160 651458 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 3 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 161 651459 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 162 651460 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 11 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 163 651461 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 11 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 164 651462 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 12 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 165 651463 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 12 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 166 651464 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 7 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 167 651465 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 7 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 168 651466 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 8 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 169 651467 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 8 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 170 651468 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 9 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 171 651469 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 9 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 172 651470 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 10 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 173 651471 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 10 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 174 651472 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 175 651473 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 176 651474 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 177 651475 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 12 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 178 651476 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 12 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 179 651477 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 7 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 180 651478 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 7 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 181 651479 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 8 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 182 651480 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 8 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 183 651481 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 9 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 184 651482 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 9 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 185 651483 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 10 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 186 651484 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 10 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 187 651485 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 188 651486 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 189 651487 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 190 651488 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 191 651489 160 Sep-05 21N 8E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 192 651490 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 18 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 193 651491 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 18 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 194 651492 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 17 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 195 651493 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 17 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 196 651494 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 16 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 197 651495 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 16 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
GAP 198 651496 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 15 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
Claim Name File Number (ADL #/ BLM#) Size (Arces) Location Date Township Range Sec. 1/4 Sec. Meridian On File
GAP 199 651497 160 Sep-05 21N 9E 15 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 1 655648 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 11 SW Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 2 655649 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 11 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 3 655650 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 14 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 4 655651 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 14 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 5 655652 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 13 NW Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 6 655653 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 13 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 7 655654 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 13 SE Kateel River Kotzebue
KG 8 655655 160 Sep-06 21N 11E 24 NE Kateel River Kotzebue
 Appendix C
Drillhole Collars
Hole ID Program Type Area UTM East UTM North Elevation Azimuth Dip Depth
AR-01 1966 BCMC Core Arctic 613643.31 7453181.73 918.21 49.0 -90.0 32.00
AR-02 BCMC Core Arctic 613582.16 7453270.84 944.36 49.0 -90.0 93.88
AR-03 BCMC Core Arctic 613573.56 7453365.16 927.63 88.7 -90.0 182.88
AR-04 BCMC Core Arctic 613631.98 7453125.00 944.94 49.0 -90.0 86.87
AR-05 BCMC Core Arctic 613556.86 7453316.86 947.75 49.0 -90.0 127.10
AR-06 BCMC Core Arctic 613632.95 7453036.21 980.97 49.0 -90.0 86.87
AR-07 BCMC Core Arctic 613455.04 7453138.11 944.42 49.0 -90.0 142.04
AR-08 BCMC Core Arctic 613692.14 7452975.08 981.06 49.0 -90.0 53.95
AR-09 BCMC Core Arctic 612843.16 7453228.85 736.98 49.0 -90.0 204.22
AR-10 BCMC Core Arctic 613467.36 7453026.47 933.21 49.0 -90.0 209.40
AR-11 BCMC Core Arctic 613337.50 7453140.58 906.81 49.0 -90.0 207.26
AR-11A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613349.09 7453124.22 906.66 49.0 -90.0 200.56
AR-11B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613344.76 7453128.78 906.38 49.0 -90.0 199.61
AR-12 BCMC Core Arctic 613355.28 7452937.65 876.27 49.0 -90.0 221.28
AR-12A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613354.33 7452942.68 876.67 49.0 -90.0 215.80
AR-13 BCMC Core Arctic 613209.77 7453257.06 872.55 49.0 -90.0 236.83
AR-14 BCMC Core Arctic 613226.18 7453011.90 847.40 99.7 -90.0 526.08
AR-14A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613216.77 7453023.58 846.86 49.0 -90.0 174.04
AR-14B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613226.12 7453007.44 847.22 49.0 -90.0 177.09
AR-15 BCMC Core Arctic 612820.25 7452710.71 704.61 49.0 -90.0 225.55
AR-16 BCMC Core Arctic 613111.17 7452886.94 790.83 49.0 -90.0 205.44
AR-16A 1975 BCNC Core Arctic 613100.00 7452900.00 791.00 0.0 -90.0 122.53
AR-16B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613110.27 7452881.42 790.93 49.0 -90.0 176.17
AR-16C 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613096.58 7452904.81 791.63 49.0 -90.0 181.48
AR-17 BCMC Core Arctic 613218.69 7453133.36 865.57 49.0 -90.0 166.73
AR-18 BCMC Core Arctic 613606.09 7452924.13 975.60 49.0 -90.0 102.41
AR-19 BCMC Core Arctic 613352.58 7452860.31 869.35 49.0 -90.0 222.50
AR-20 BCMC Core Arctic 612986.85 7452753.97 733.90 49.0 -90.0 212.75
AR-21 BCMC Core Arctic 612981.32 7452992.23 767.88 49.0 -90.0 153.01
AR-22 BCMC Core Arctic 613242.15 7452652.54 824.03 49.0 -90.0 307.24
AR-23 BCMC Core Arctic 612991.97 7452598.34 758.01 49.0 -90.0 317.91
AR-24 BCMC Core Arctic 612867.03 7452861.29 717.01 49.0 -90.0 143.56
AR-25 BCMC Core Arctic 612735.79 7452871.60 689.70 49.0 -90.0 118.87
AR-26 BCMC Core Arctic 613679.95 7452707.31 871.55 49.0 -90.0 73.76
AR-27 BCMC Core Arctic 613202.72 7452467.43 845.79 49.0 -90.0 484.02
AR-28 BCMC Core Arctic 613728.24 7452583.04 833.41 49.0 -90.0 153.92
AR-29 BCMC Core Arctic 612694.57 7452688.05 696.32 173.2 -90.0 217.93
AR-30 BCMC Core Arctic 613363.81 7452636.33 896.84 74.7 -90.0 272.80
AR-31 BCMC Core Arctic 612823.28 7452558.76 777.54 23.2 -90.0 340.46
AR-32 BCMC Core Arctic 613466.91 7452929.78 925.37 49.6 -90.0 256.64
AR-33 BCMC Core Arctic 612167.71 7452753.46 588.36 64.6 -90.0 406.60
AR-34 BCMC Core Arctic 613238.31 7452845.82 823.94 47.6 -90.0 256.64
AR-34A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613234.16 7452852.49 824.20 49.0 -90.0 229.58
AR-34B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613232.18 7452857.98 823.94 49.0 -90.0 221.59
AR-34C 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613231.26 7452863.85 824.21 49.0 -90.0 218.24
AR-35 BCMC Core Arctic 613454.50 7452791.89 913.97 49.0 -90.0 300.53
AR-36 BCMC Core Arctic 613727.05 7452805.21 896.60 64.6 -90.0 288.95
Hole ID Program Type Area UTM East UTM North Elevation Azimuth Dip Depth
AR-37 BCMC Core Arctic 613381.45 7452488.94 912.05 35.6 -90.0 397.76
AR-38 BCMC Core Arctic 613536.88 7452732.49 955.46 44.6 -90.0 213.36
AR-39 BCMC Core Arctic 613450.42 7453276.37 977.01 39.6 -90.0 282.24
AR-40 BCMC Core Arctic 613603.41 7452918.68 976.18 83.6 -90.0 293.83
AR-41 BCMC Core Arctic 613643.31 7453181.73 918.21 84.6 -90.0 285.29
AR-42 BCMC Core Arctic 613339.19 7453236.90 926.84 55.6 -90.0 242.32
AR-43 BCMC Core Arctic 613548.57 7453098.16 976.12 92.6 -90.0 301.75
AR-44 BCMC Core Arctic 613381.29 7453073.54 906.02 78.6 -90.0 257.25
AR-45 BCMC Core Arctic 613455.88 7453457.47 964.14 25.6 -90.0 206.04
AR-46 BCMC Core Arctic 613088.19 7453122.49 827.17 4.6 -90.0 142.04
AR-46A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613089.77 7453117.78 827.20 49.0 -90.0 103.33
AR-46B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613086.19 7453125.51 827.29 49.0 -90.0 107.59
AR-47 BCMC Core Arctic 613399.00 7453365.69 964.94 56.6 -90.0 180.44
AR-48 BCMC Core Arctic 613064.38 7453272.34 813.76 49.0 -90.0 78.03
AR-48A 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613063.92 7453274.79 814.03 49.0 -90.0 43.89
AR-48B 1975 BCMC Core Arctic 613063.82 7453278.71 813.91 49.0 -90.0 46.02
AR-49 BCMC Core Arctic 613151.88 7452791.78 789.40 53.6 -90.0 254.81
AR-50 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 613111.93 7453345.79 830.52 81.5 -90.0 49.68
AR-51 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 613043.65 7453206.12 806.04 45.5 -90.0 102.11
AR-52 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 612983.17 7453123.47 790.29 27.5 -90.0 76.20
AR-53 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 613208.57 7453358.10 867.19 49.5 -90.0 84.12
AR-54 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 612990.06 7453219.83 789.22 75.5 -90.0 44.44
AR-55 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 612972.43 7453294.20 780.59 71.5 -90.0 35.30
AR-56 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 613017.43 7453355.50 787.91 41.5 -90.0 45.72
AR-57 1976 BCMC Core Arctic 612931.11 7453192.85 766.79 31.5 -90.0 39.62
AR-58 1977 BCMC Core Arctic 612994.15 7452864.89 752.85 37.5 -90.0 192.94
AR-59 1977 BCMC Core Arctic 612819.71 7452944.29 720.82 29.5 -90.0 100.89
AR-60 1979 BCMC Core Arctic 613267.15 7452931.28 843.79 87.4 -90.0 230.12
AR-61 1979 BCMC Core Arctic 612827.00 7452825.54 695.97 25.4 -90.0 140.82
AR-62 1977 BCMC Core Arctic 613107.54 7453001.93 814.27 30.4 -90.0 202.69
AR-63 1981 BCMC Core Arctic 613818.50 7452022.06 551.25 24.3 -90.0 457.81
AR-64 1982 BCMC Core Arctic 613458.75 7453329.39 985.39 44.2 -90.0 256.03
AR-65 1982 BCMC Core Arctic 613270.81 7452514.80 856.70 37.2 -90.0 94.49
AR-66 1982 BCMC Core Arctic 613706.35 7452984.73 976.34 82.2 -86.0 45.72
AR-67 1982 BCMC Core Arctic 613073.56 7452508.01 803.00 4.2 -90.0 97.54
AR-68 1983 BCMC Core Arctic 613660.81 7452504.22 885.44 0.0 -90.0 153.01
AR-69 1984 BCMC Core Arctic 613200.71 7453405.97 865.63 49.0 -90.0 48.46
AR-70 1984 BCMC Core Arctic 612533.16 7452691.80 662.94 49.0 -90.0 204.22
AR-71 1986 BCMC Core Arctic 612424.33 7452684.57 624.48 0.0 -90.0 184.40
AR-72 1998 Core Arctic 613319.89 7453038.75 878.94 0.0 -90.0 263.35
AR-73 1998 Core Arctic 613248.65 7452746.37 820.68 0.0 -90.0 301.75
AR-74 1998 Core Arctic 613291.56 7452883.10 846.69 0.0 -90.0 263.65
AR-75 1998 Core Arctic 613174.16 7452944.89 821.62 0.0 -90.0 242.93
AR-76 1998 Core Arctic 611773.01 7452502.28 593.84 80.0 -45.0 192.18
AR-77 1998 Core Arctic 611772.01 7452502.23 593.90 80.0 -70.0 258.78
AR04-0078 2004 Core Arctic 613302.22 7452802.65 842.32 0.0 -90.0 284.37
AR04-0079 2004 Core Arctic 613265.55 7452930.27 843.93 0.0 -90.0 226.61
Hole ID Program Type Area UTM East UTM North Elevation Azimuth Dip Depth
AR04-0080 2004 Core Arctic 613203.03 7453401.70 863.78 0.0 -90.0 49.68
AR04-0081 2004 Core Arctic 613455.06 7452796.27 913.58 160.0 -55.0 270.35
AR04-0082 2004 Core Arctic 613454.69 7452796.74 913.57 0.0 -90.0 153.31
AR04-0083 2004 Core Arctic 613452.99 7452798.41 913.59 340.0 -65.0 340.46
AR04-0084 2004 Core Arctic 612288.03 7453746.90 684.33 20.0 -70.0 434.64
AR04-0085 2004 Core Arctic 613107.22 7452624.43 778.46 30.0 -75.0 322.17
AR04-0086 2004 Core Arctic 613315.86 7452870.86 855.20 0.0 -90.0 261.51
AR04-0087 2004 Core Arctic 613592.84 7452895.88 975.54 160.0 -65.0 265.32
AR04-0088 2004 Core Arctic 613590.58 7452895.36 975.54 195.0 -65.0 387.55
AR05-0089 2005 Core Arctic 613129.00 7452561.00 799.00 0.0 -90.0 373.98
AR05-0090 2005 Core Arctic 613241.00 7452575.00 830.50 0.0 -90.0 416.66
AR05-0091 2005 Core Arctic 613361.13 7452589.57 913.58 0.0 -90.0 465.43
AR05-0092 2005 Core Arctic 613456.54 7452796.62 913.50 0.0 -90.0 167.03
AR05-0093 2005 Core Arctic 613455.63 7452794.60 913.50 0.0 -90.0 369.72
AR05-0094 2005 Core Arctic 613605.68 7452910.56 980.00 0.0 -90.0 444.39
AR05-0095 2005 Core Arctic 613466.88 7452929.78 930.00 39.9 -69.5 321.86
AR05-0096 2005 Core Arctic 612320.00 7452905.00 600.00 0.0 -90.0 154.83
AR05-0097 2005 Core Arctic 613457.20 7453139.70 930.00 0.0 -90.0 316.38
EC-01 1976 Anaconda Core Arctic 613351.72 7453844.07 959.26 0.0 -90.0 148.74
EC-02 1977 Anaconda Core Arctic 613200.60 7453850.82 893.98 0.0 -90.0 340.16
EC-03 1976 Anaconda Core Arctic 613469.69 7453831.95 1004.40 0.0 -90.0 178.00
EC-04 1979 Anaconda Core Arctic 612259.67 7453749.00 701.89 0.0 -90.0 214.58
EC-05 1980 Anaconda Core Arctic 612356.05 7453893.46 694.21 45.0 -55.0 182.88
EC-06 1981 Anaconda Core Arctic 612397.15 7453947.73 691.50 45.0 -58.0 174.04
EC-07 1982 Anaconda Core Arctic 612595.60 7453910.91 655.56 0.0 -90.0 182.88
 Appendix D
Drillhole Assay Statistics
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
250

Number of samples: 551

Samples off graph: 0
Average: 64.307443
Minimum: 1.132000
Maximum: 660.367981
200
Variance: 2312.689776
Geo mean: 50.498513
Q1: 33.039250
Median: 54.974998
Q3: 85.578501

150
counts

100

50

0
0 200 400 600 800

ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:AG
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
600

Number of samples: 551

Samples off graph: 0
Average: 0.864131
Minimum: 0.000000
Maximum: 32.362000
Variance: 2.926524
Q1: 0.270000
Median: 0.598000
Q3: 1.032000
400
counts

200

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:AU
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
125

Number of samples: 551

Samples off graph: 0
Average: 4.286510
Minimum: 0.175000
Maximum: 19.600000
100
Variance: 8.819017
Geo mean: 3.413303
Q1: 2.121000
Median: 3.563000
Q3: 5.680000

75
counts

50

25

0
0 5 10 15 20

ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:CU
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
200

Number of samples: 551

Samples off graph: 0
Average: 1.114492
Minimum: 0.000000
Maximum: 6.530000
Variance: 1.027017
150 Q1: 0.339000
Median: 0.900000
Q3: 1.565250
counts

100

50

0
0 2 4 6 8

ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:PB
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
80

Number of samples: 551

Samples off graph: 0
Average: 6.836677
Minimum: 0.000000
Maximum: 22.299999
Variance: 20.026783
60 Q1: 3.020000
Median: 6.294000
Q3: 9.646750
counts

40

20

0
0 5 10 15 20 25

ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:ZN
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
1000

100
ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:AG

10

1
0.001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.99 0.999

Probability
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
100

10
ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:AU

0.1

0.01

0.001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.99 0.999

Probability
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
100

10
ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:CU

0.001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.99 0.999

Probability
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
10

1
ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:PB

0.1

0.01

0.001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.99 0.999

Probability
 Raw Assay Data
mshg
100

10
ambgeo128.drl:ASSAY:ZN

0.1

0.01

0.001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.99 0.999

Probability
Appendix E
Variograms
 gamma

0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500

0
7291602
1489
Ag
1004
1048
963
1000

20
899 1129
991670
637
SEMI

486
400

40
533
618617
508439
451

60
601

range
672
708882753
az= 150

80
1278 1146
1108
1084 1006

100
pl= 30

120
 gamma

0.5
1.5

0.0
1.0
2.0

0
7291602
1489
Au
1048 1004
963
1000

20
899
1129
991
670 637
SEMI

400 486

40
533618
617 508
451 439

60
range
672
708 882
az= 150

1278

80
1108

100
pl= 30

120
 gamma

0
8

0
729 1602
1489
Cu
10041048
963
1000

20
899 1129
991
670637
SEMI

486 400

40
618 533
617 508

60
601

range
753672
708
882
az= 150

1278

80
1108 1146
1084 1006

100
pl= 30

120
 gamma

0.0
1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
7291602

Pb
1489
10041048
9631000

20
8991129
991
670
486 637
SEMI

400

40
533
618
617
508
439451

60
233 601

range
672
753
882 708
1278
az= 150

80
1146
1108
1084
1006

100
pl= 30

120
 gamma

5
15
25

0
10
20
30

0
729 1602
1489
Zn
10041048
963

20
899 1000
1129
991
670
637
SEMI

486400

40
618533
617
508

60
451233439
601

range
753 672
708
882
az= 150

1278

80
11081146
1084
1006

100
pl= 30

120
22 Date and Signature Page (Item 24)
The undersigned have duly executed the NovaGold Resources Inc., NI 43-101 Technical Report
on Resources, Ambler Project, Arctic Deposit, AK with an effective date of January 31, 2008.

Dated this 12th Day of February, 2008.

Per:

(signed)
Dr. Neal Rigby, CEng, MIMMM, PhD
Qualified Person

Per:

(signed)
Russ White, P.Geo.
Qualified Person