0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Sl. No FGD System Component Capital Cost Incremental Auxiliary Consumption Shut Down Period

The document discusses the costs associated with installing flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems and other pollution control equipment at thermal power plants in India to comply with new emission standards. It provides details of the estimated capital and operational costs for different system components at two power plants - Sipat STPS and an unnamed plant. The capital costs for installing an FGD system, chimney liner, de-NOx system and other components are provided. It also lists the estimated incremental auxiliary power consumption and required shutdown periods for installing the equipment. The total estimated capital cost for Sipat STPS is 0.78 crore/MW with an incremental auxiliary consumption of 1.7%.

Uploaded by

Xplore Engg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Sl. No FGD System Component Capital Cost Incremental Auxiliary Consumption Shut Down Period

The document discusses the costs associated with installing flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems and other pollution control equipment at thermal power plants in India to comply with new emission standards. It provides details of the estimated capital and operational costs for different system components at two power plants - Sipat STPS and an unnamed plant. The capital costs for installing an FGD system, chimney liner, de-NOx system and other components are provided. It also lists the estimated incremental auxiliary power consumption and required shutdown periods for installing the equipment. The total estimated capital cost for Sipat STPS is 0.78 crore/MW with an incremental auxiliary consumption of 1.7%.

Uploaded by

Xplore Engg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sl.

FGD System Capital Cost# Incremental Shut Down


No Component Auxiliary Period
Consumption
9 Other O&M 10% of equipment
cost: for cost
manpower and
maintenance of
addition
equipment
Total `0.86 crore/ MW 2.0%

Sipat STPS
S No FGD System Capital Cost# Incremental Shut Down
Component Auxiliary Period
Consumption
1 FGD system `0.5 crore/MW 1.5% 180 days per
Unit
2 Chimney liner `18 crore/Unit
3 Reagent cost `2.75 lakh/ MW/
annum
4 De-Nox System 0.25 crore/MW 0.2% 90 days per Unit
(Combustion
Modification
and Installation
of SNCR)
5 Reagent cost `2.0 lakh/ MW/
annum
6 Other O&M 10% of equipment
cost- for cost
manpower and
maintenance of
addition
equipment
7 ESP Presently no The shutdown
modification period not
proposed, envisaged in
however, will case of schemes
approach not being done
Commission as presently.
and when However,
implemented. appropriate shut
8 Mercury Presently no down period
emission modification may also be
proposed, allowed, as and
however, will when such
approach schemes are
Commission as implemented.
and when
implemented.
Total `0.78 crore/ MW 1.7%
# This is estimated capital cost and same may change upon finalisation of technology supplier and lenders.

Order in Petition No. 98/MP/2017 Page 10 of 47


40. Further, MoP has issued directions under section 107 of the 2003 Act to

facilitate the smooth implementation of the revised emission norms under the

MOEFCC Notification for thermal power plants in the larger public interest. Section

107 of the 2003 Act provides as under:

“107 (1) In discharge its functions, the Central Commission shall be guided by such
directions as matter of policy involving public interest as the Central Government
may give to in writing.”

41. Therefore, the Commission is required to be guided by the policy directions

issued by the Central Government under section 107 of the 2003 Act in discharge

of its functions.

42. Para 5.4 of the Directions issued by MoP under Section 107 of the 2003 Act

provides as under:

“5.4 For the TPPs that are under the purview of the Central Commission, the
Commission shall develop appropriate regulatory mechanism to address the impact
on tariff, and certainty in cost recovery on account of additional capital and
operational cost, under concluded long term and medium term PPAs for this
purpose.”

43. MoP in its directions under section 107 of the 2003 Act has recognised that

the MOEFCC Notification requiring compliance of Environment (Protection)

Amendment Rules, 2015 dated 7th December, 2015 is of the nature of Change in

law event with two exceptions namely, where Power Purchase Agreements of such

TPPs whose tariff is determined under section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003 having

bid deadline on or after 7th December, 2015; or where such requirement of

pollutions control system was mandated under the environment clearance of the

plant or envisaged otherwise before the notification of amendment rules.

44. In our view, the MOEFCC Notification dated 7.12.2015 requiring the thermal

generating stations to implement the revised environmental norms amounts to

Order in Petition No. 98/MP/2017 Page 44 of 47

You might also like