Free Modules 55 PDF
Free Modules 55 PDF
1
That is we can define free module as follows:
Definition Let F be an R-module. If F has a
nonempty basis X, then F is a free R-module on
the set X.
2
Thus Z is free as Z-module and Zn is free as Zn-
module. Also Q is a free Q-module.
3
4
6. Consider Q as a Z-module. Let p/q, r/t Q be
two distinct elements. Then
(q r) (p/q ) + (−p t) (r/t) = 0. Hence { p/q , r/t } is
not linearly independent. Hence the only linearly
independent subsets of Q are singletons. Thus if Q
admits a basis, then Q = < p/q >, which is a
contradiction as Q is not cyclic as an Abelian group
under addition. Hence Q as a Z-module is not free.
5
6
7
8
9
11
Remark: Note that the basis is not unique since the
sets {(1,0), (0,1)} and {(1,1),(1,0)} are two
different bases for R2 . One can ask about the
cardinality of the different bases for a free module.
In the case of free abelian groups (Z-modules) we
know that any two bases of a free Z-module have
the same cardinality. Unfortunately, this is not true
for free modules over arbitrary rings with identity
as we will see in the example below. First note that
11
12
However, the following result is satisfied
Theorem. Let R be a ring with identity and F a free
R-module with an infinite basis X . Then every
basis of F is infinite and has the same cardinality as
X.
Proof. If Y is another basis of F, then we claim that
Y is infinite. Suppose on the contrary that Y were
finite. Since Y generates F and every element of Y
is a linear combination of a finite number of
elements of X, it follows that there is a finite
subset{ x1, … , xm }of X, which generates F. Since
X is infinite, there exists x X - { x1, … , xm }.
Then for some ri R, x = r1 x1, … , rm xm, which
contradicts the linear independence of X.
Therefore, Y is infinite.
( complete the proof, see Hungerford Theorem 2.6.
page 184 ).
13