Chap2 Fan Design
Chap2 Fan Design
1
Where nb is the number of the blades and r is the hub/tip ratio. The static
pressure produced is proportional to the number of blades nb times the blade
width L. This means that a certain design can be modified by, for instance, dou-
bling the number of blades and reducing the blade width to one-half without any
appreciable change in the fundamental design and in the resulting performance
of the unit, at least as far as air volume and static pressure are concerned. Tur-
bulence and noise are mostly produced by the leading and trailing edges of the
blades and not their surface. Therefore, fewer and wider blades will result in a
better fan efficiency and a lower noise level. On the other hand, if the number
of blades becomes too small and the blade width, therefore, too large, the fan
hub becomes too wide axially and thus heavy, bulky, expensive, and hard to
balance. In general, as a compromise between efficiency and cost, five to twelve
blades are good practical solutions.
2πR πR(1 − R)
Xp = = (3)
nb 3r
Xc , which is the chord length of the blade, is the distance between the
leading and trailing edges at the same radius. Xp and Xc have been graphically
illustrated in the figure 2. From an aerodynamic standpoint, the chord length
should increase from hub to tip. From a structural standpoint, the reverse is
preferred. As a compromise, however, it is suggested to use an almost constant
chord over the entire blade length. The blade spacing increases from hub to
tip. A pitch-chord ratio of 4:1 or higher can provide good efficiencies, however,
it is common to use a pitch-chord ratio near unity, which in turn is often used
as the mean effective radius Rm . Rm is that radius, which divides the flow into
two equal parts. Thus, assuming a uniform axial velocity, the mean radius, in
terms of tip and hub radii Rt and Rh is:
2 (Rt2 + Rh2 )
Rm = (4)
2
2
Figure 2: Chord and pitch lengths of an axial flow fan
have certain advantages, such as a significantly lower noise level and a higher
maximum pressure.
3
Figure 3: Blade angle or twist of an axial flow fan
2.1.1 Changes in sound power and sound pressure level with changes
in the fan speed and size
Size2 7 Speed2 5
P W Lα10log( ) + 10log( )
Size1 Speed1
Size2 3.5 Speed2 2.5
SP Lα20log( ) + 20log( )
Size1 Speed1
The above expressions are useful in determining the change in noise level,
which accompanies a change in fan size or speed, provided that other design
features, i.e., shroud etc are not changed.
2.1.2 Changes in sound power and sound pressure level with changes
in the fan size and back pressure
Size2 2 P ressure2 2.5
P W Lα10log( ) + 10log( )
Size1 P ressure1
Size2 3.5 P ressure2 1.25
SP Lα20log( ) + 20log( )
Size1 P ressure1
4
Figure 4: Fan speed versus air flow
2.1.3 Changes in sound power and sound pressure level with changes
in the fan capacity and back pressure
Capacity2 P ressure2 2
P W Lα10log( ) + 10log( )
Capacity1 P ressure1
Capacity2 0.5 P ressure2
SP Lα20log( ) + 20log( )
Capacity1 P ressure1
All the changes made to a fan for noise control can be expressed in terms of
their effect on the size, pressure, capacity, or speed of the fan.
5
2.2.2 Tip Clearance
The spacing between the tip of the fan blade and a shroud or venturi surrounding
it, is an important factor in the airflow delivered by an axial flow fan. The
primary benefit of small tip clearances is improved flow at a given rpm and a
by-product is some reduction in noise due to reduced turbulence near the blade
tips. The recommended design criterion was found to be:
F an Diameter
T ip Clearance = (7)
100
The reduction from a tip clearance of 3% to 1% can be expected to yield
about a 10% improvement in flow. This additional flow can then allow slowing
of the fan in terms of rpm. A perfect fit is common in plastic molded fans that
integrate the venturi or shroud in the molding process. For fans used in our
study, the tip clearance comes out to be 420/100 = 4.2 mm which is close to
the actual design value of 4 mm.
6
Figure 5: Effect of number of blades versus air flow
The noise due to obstructions is also influenced by the radial position along
the fan. The distances calculated above apply to obstructions near the outer
regions of the blade (near the tips) and can be significantly reduced for obstruc-
tions near the fan hub. As a guide, it is suggested that the distances calculated
be applied to the outer 50% of the blade radius. The distance can then be
linearly reduced until it is essentially zero at 10% of the fan radius. Near the
center of an axial fan, there is nearly zero flow, and therefore, little noise. This
spacing guide is shown in the figure 6.
In addition to the noise due to the vortex shedding around obstacles, the
noise caused by components such as grills should also be considered, which
cause a reduction in air flow and increase in system pressure. If a grill were to
increase system back pressure, the basic fan laws would predict a noise change
that is proportional to the 1.25 power of the pressure change. Thus a grill that
increases pressure by 25% will result in an increase in noise level of 2.4 dB. The
frequency generated by such an obstacle is:
0.2V
f= (10)
d
Where V = Flow Velocity in ft/sec and d = Obstruction size (e.g., one
bar in a grill) in feet. For Example, if the flow velocity = 300 ft/second and
Obstruction = 1.2 inches (0.1 ft), then f = 0.2(300) / 0.1 = 600 Hz.
7
Figure 6: Minimum distance to obstructions as a function of fan radius
8
Figure 8: Horsepower requirement verus blade chord angle, 6-blade truck fan at
2600 rpm
9
Figure 9: Horsepower requirement verus blade chord length, large truck fan at
3000 rpm
the velocity!). In practice, airflow generated noise can be ignored when velocities
are below 3 m/s in the ventilation ducts.
3 Fan Laws
There are several simple relationships between fan capacity (CFM or cubic feet
per minute), pressure, speed (rpm), and power, which are referred to as the fan
laws. The first three fan laws are the most useful and are stated as follows:
• CFM (Flow Rate) varies directly with (rpm) and (fan diameter)3 .
• P (Static and Total Pressure) varies with the (rpm)2 and (fan diameter)2 .
• HP (Power Consumed) varies with the (rpm)3 and (fan diameter)5 .
Fans of the same basic design and proportions operate theoretically in accor-
dance with certain fan laws. In practice, these laws do not apply exactly because
of design considerations and manufacturing tolerances, but they are useful in
estimating approximate outputs of similar fans of different diameters and speeds
as applied to normal ventilation work. It is important to note, however, that
these laws apply to the same point of operation on the fan characteristic. They
cannot be used to predict other points on the fan’s curve. These laws are most
often used to calculate change in flow rate, pressure, and power of a fan when
the size, rotational speed or gas density is changed.
4 Fan Curves
These are characteristics curves of a fan typically showing pressure difference
δP versus volumetric flow rate Q and fan efficiency µf versus volumetric flow
10
Figure 10: Effect of operating conditions/system design
11
rate Q.
Pi = dpQ (12)
Where dp is the pressure drop across the fan (Pascals) and Q is the air
volume flow rate delivered by the fan (m3 /s).
6 Fan Efficiency
Fan efficiency is the ratio between power transferred to the airflow and the power
used (P ) by the fan. Fan efficiency is in general independent of the air density
and can be expressed as:
µf = dpQ/P (13)
where µf = fan efficiency (values between 0 - 1), dp = pressure difference
across the fan (Pascals) and Q = air volume flow delivered by the fan (m3 /s).
12