0% found this document useful (0 votes)
271 views3 pages

Opcrf 2019-2020 Scoring Guide: Means of Verification 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Rating

This document provides a scoring guide for evaluating performance in key result areas (KRAs) such as instructional leadership, learning environment, and human resource management and development. Performance is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 based on objectives and criteria met within set timelines. Evidence is required to support scores. The guide outlines specific requirements and expectations for levels 3 through 5 performance in each KRA to maximize scores.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
271 views3 pages

Opcrf 2019-2020 Scoring Guide: Means of Verification 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Rating

This document provides a scoring guide for evaluating performance in key result areas (KRAs) such as instructional leadership, learning environment, and human resource management and development. Performance is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 based on objectives and criteria met within set timelines. Evidence is required to support scores. The guide outlines specific requirements and expectations for levels 3 through 5 performance in each KRA to maximize scores.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Page 1 of 3

OPCRF 2019-2020 SCORING GUIDE


INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Score
per KRA 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T RATING

Instructional a. Accounted for learning


Average of 4% gain in all Average of 3% gain in all Average of 2% gain in all Average of 1% gain in all No gain in all applicable
Leadership outcomes of school centers 5%
applicable assessments applicable assessments applicable assessments applicable assessments assessments
(35%) vis-à-vis goals and targets

91%-100% of teachers 81%-90% of teachers 71%-90% of teachers 61%-70% of teachers 1%-60% of teachers were
b. Performed instructional
were observed per quarter were observed per quarter were observed per quarter were observed per quarter observed per quarter and
supervision to achieve 10%
and were given relevant and were given relevant and were given relevant and were given relevant were given relevant
learning outcomes
feedback feedback feedback feedback feedback

All the 5 requirements


were satisfied with
evidences
1 - Collected, analyzed
and utilized data to identify
and plan needed
interventions
2 - Recommended
localized curriculum for
instruction
3 - Developed standards
for outstanding teacher
c. Initiated and implemented and pupil
localized curricular programs 4 - Organized 4 of 5 requirements were 3 of 5 requirements were 2 of 5 requirements were 1 of 5 requirements were
10%
and interventions within the appropriate class satisfied with evidences satisfied with evidences satisfied with evidences satisfied with evidences
rating period programs
5 - Consolidated reports
on learning difficulties,
home visitations and
peculiar

d. Provided
91% - 100% of identified 81% - 90% of identified 71% - 80% of identified 61% - 70% of identified 1% - 60% of identified
coaching/mentoring to
teachers with need for TA teachers with need for TA teachers with need for TA teachers with need for TA teachers with need for TA
improve teaching learning 10%
were coached and were coached and were coached and were coached and were coached and
performance throughout the
mentored mentored mentored mentored mentored
rating period

All the 5 requirements


were met
1 - Adhered to child-friedly
standards and programs
2-
Institutionalized child
protecttion mechanisms
a. Provided safe and child-
amd processes (per DO
2. Learning friendly learning and school
40, s. 2012) 4 of 5 requirements were 3 of 5 requirements were 2 of 5 requirements were 1 of 5 requirements were
Environment environment for 15%
3 - Provided met met met met
(15%) students/learbers throughout
ICT facilities/ workshop
the rating period.
rooms as learning support
system 4-
Implemented clear DRRM
mobilization plan
5-
Adopted and implemented
OK sa DepEd programs

a. Conducted at least one


Human SPPD-based INSET and 3 or
Resource more SLACs within rating
Management period with the following All the 4 requiements were 3 of 4 requiements were 2 of 4 requiements were 1 of 4 requiements were No INSET and SLAC
10%
and requirements: Approved met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences conducted
Development Project Proposal, HGDG
(20%) Compliance, Training Design
and Terminal Report

b. Provided technical
assistance to teachers on
91% - 100% of both 81% - 90% of both 71% - 8% of both teaching 61% -70% of both 1% - 60% of both teaching
matters pertaining to
teaching and non-teaching teaching and non-teaching and non-teaching were teaching and non-teaching and non-teaching were
enhancement of classroom
were provided technical were provided technical provided technical were provided technical provided technical
management skills and 5%
assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their
instructional competence and
identified development identified development identified development identified development identified development
to non-teaching personnel for
needs needs needs needs needs
support services within the
RPMS Cycle
Page 2 of 3

b. Provided technical
assistance to teachers on
91% - 100% of both 81% - 90% of both 71% -INDICATORS
8% of both teaching 61% -70% of both 1% - 60% of both teaching ACTUAL RESULTS
matters pertaining to Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE teaching and non-teaching teaching and non-teaching and non-teaching were teaching and non-teaching and non-teaching were MEANS OF VERIFICATION Score
enhancement of classroom per KRA were provided
5 technical were provided 4 technical provided3technical 2 technical
were provided provided1technical Q E T RATING
management skills and 5%
assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their assistance on their
instructional competence and
identified development identified development identified development identified development identified development
to non-teaching personnel for
needs needs needs needs needs
support services within the
RPMS Cycle

All 4 requirements were


met once with evidence
1 - 100% of teachers
were sent to trainings
2 - 50% of teachers
pursued graduate or post-
graduate degree courses
3-
30% of teachers were
c. Provided opportunity to promoted from three years
seek personal and ago up to present 3 of 4 requiements were 2 of 4 requiements were 1 of 4 requiements were None of the requiements
5%
professional growth within the 4 - 10% of met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences were met
set time frame teachers were granted
scholarship within the
rating period

All of the 4 requirements


were met with evidence:
1 - Established functional
organizations (such as
GPTA, SGC, CPP
Committee, etc) co-
participated by the school,
communit and other
stakeholders 2
- Conducted 4 or more
quarterly PTA meetings
within the rating period
(bakced up with
Parents’ documentation reports)
a. Established school and 3-
Involvement
family and community Organized programs with 3 of 4 requiements were 2 of 4 requiements were 1 of 4 requiements were None of the requiements
and Community 5%
partnership for school stakeholders especially met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences were met
Partnership
performance the parents for academic
(5%)
and other purposes
4 - Obtained
resources for the school
through stakeholders
partnership

1 - Maintaned updates
school's Education
Management Information
System (EMIS) and
regulary submits reports to
the SDO
2 - Prioritized physical
facilities improvement and
maintenance in the AIP
and ensures quality
standards for facilities
given to the school
3 - Liquidated and
submitted school's
financial report on time
and in accordance with
Deped policies and
guidelines
4 - Organized/
School
implemented clear
Leadership, a. Performed school
structures and work 4 of 5 requiements were 3 of 5 requiements were 2 of 5 requiements were 1 of 5 requiements were
Management leadership and management 10%
arrangements that met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences met with evidences
and Operation and operations functions
promote shared
(20%)
leadership and
governance and define
roles and responsibilities
of school personnel
5 - Organized
functional grievance
machinery as conflict
management measure.

b. Conducted at least one


Implemented at the school Crafted a research Crafted a research
action or full-blown research Implemented at the school
level and oresented to and proposal presented to the proposal presented to the No action/ full-blown
related to any school 10% level and funded by the
approved at the divison District Research School Research research at all.
concerns within the rating BERF (RO)
level. Committee Committee
period
Page 3 of 3

INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS


Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Score
per KRA 5 4 3 2 1 Q E T RATING
Any 1 of the identified
requirements
- With at least 1 academic
recognition ranging from
district to international level
competition -
Served as speaker/ consultant
to any training/ workshop/
summit/ conference (district,
division, regional.
international) within the rating
period -
School award (district ,
Plus Factor division, region, natonal level)
5%
(5%) within the rating period
- Authorhsip quality
assured at the Division,
Regon or Central Office

You might also like