Example Fire Report
Example Fire Report
2. Location
Resorcinol Production Facility, Iwakuni-Ohtake Works, Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
6-1-2 Waki, Waki-cho, Kuga-gun, Yamaguchi
4. Damages
(1) Casualties
1 dead, 25 injured
External areas
Residents of local communities: 14 injured
Employees of subcontractors at JX Nippon Oil & Energy Marifu Refinery: 2 injured
Within premises
Employees: 1 dead, 7 injured (2 seriously injured)
Employees of subcontractors: 2 injured
1
Within premises
Severe damage to resorcinol production plant around the oxidation reactor
The cymene plant and utilities piping rack were damaged by the force of the
explosion and subsequent fire and flying debris.
15 nearby plants were also damaged from the force of the explosion and flying
debris.
4
1
Reoxidation process
Cleavage process
Refining process
Oxidation process
m-DIPB
Product
Oxygen Resorcinol
2
6. Accident investigation structure
・On April 24, 2012, Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. formed a “Accident Investigation Committee” to
investigate the accident at the resorcinol production facility at Iwakuni-Ohtake Works
(hereinafter referred to as the Committee)” which comprised of four members from the
academia and external specialists from relevant organizations functioning as observers.
Committee members:
Dr. Terushige Ogawa Emeritus Professor, Yokohama National University
Executive Director, Research Institute for Safety Engineering
Dr. Kazuhiko Suzuki Professor, Okayama University Graduate School of Natural
Science and Technology
Mr. Jun Nakamura Director, Research Institute for Safety Engineering
Dr. Masayoshi Nakamura Professor, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology,
The Graduate School of Technology Management
Observers:
Nuclear Industrial Safety Agency, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
Disaster Prevention & Crisis Management Division, General Affairs Department,
Yamaguchi Prefecture
District Fire Fighters, Iwakuni Fire Department
High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan
・The committee met a total of 6 times (May 1, May 27, June 12, July 5, July 26 and Aug. 15,
2012) to determine the situation in which the accident occurred and the direct cause of the
accident. Additionally, it approved measures to prevent recurrences.
3
7. Events leading up to the accident
・As for the events leading up to the accident, based on operation data (DCS data),
testimonies from operators, thermal behavior measurements using adiabatic calorimeters
(ARC test devices), and analysis of flow simulation, we have estimated the following.
4
Gases
Gas
separator
Oxidation
reactor
Circulating
water
Air
Air compressor Emergency cooling water
・The following events leading up to the accident have been summarized in two parts. The
first starts with the emergency shutdown to release of the interlock. The second starts
with the release of the interlock to the explosion and fire.
5
(2) Release of interlock to explosion and fire
・With release of the interlock, the valve was automatically operated and nitrogen supply
and agitation in the oxidation reactor was stopped. At the same time, cooling water was
switched from emergency cooling water to circulating water.
・ The upper liquid phase of the oxidation reactor did not have a cooling coil and
decomposition heat from the organic peroxide could not be removed resulting in a gradual
rise in temperature. (Temperature continued to drop for the lower liquid phase where
there was a cooling coil.)
・Operators did not recognize the rise in temperature in the upper liquid phase. Organic
peroxide continued to generate decomposition heat and temperatures continued to rise.
・At around 2:10, the decomposition reaction of the organic peroxide accelerated,
temperatures rose and decomposition gas was also generated resulting in an increase in
pressure.
・The safety valve was triggered but pressure continued to increase.
・At 2:15, the oxidation reactor burst, ignited, and exploded, causing a fire..
6
(3) Secondary cause
a. Operator decided that it would be better to release the interlock.
・In order to secure the flow rate of emergency cooling water necessary to cool the reactor,
it is necessary to raise source pressure, however this is not automatic and is done on
request by resorcinol plant operators.
・Even after pressure of emergency cooling water was increased and the flow rate of the
emergency cooling water was secured, the temperature drop was very slow.
・The target temperature for maintaining stable conditions after an emergency shutdown
and target speeds for temperature drops were not provided in the operating manual.
・Based on operator’s experience with cooling after an oxidation reaction in normal
operation, operator decided that it would be better to switch from emergency cooling
water to circulating water.
・Conditions are confirmed by digital displays on the DCS main screen so it was difficult to
determine trends in temperature drops.
c. By releasing the interlock, nitrogen supplies were terminated for an extended period of
time and agitation stopped causing temperature to rise.
<Regarding stopping agitation>
・The system was such that if the interlock is released, nitrogen is stopped.
<Regarding rising temperature>
・Once agitation stopped, the upper liquid phase could not be cooled.
・The thermometer that triggers the interlock was only in the lower part of the oxidation
reactor and not in the upper part.
<Regarding stopping agitation and delay in noticing temperature was rising>
・There was no alarm to detect that gas for agitation had stopped.
・The main screen of the DCS did not show nitrogen flow rate.
・If agitation is stopped, it was difficult to determine temperature distribution in the
oxidation reactor by DCS screen.
・Operators did not recognize that the position of the thermometer failed to show
temperature rises in all parts of the oxidation reactor and as a result they failed to
recognize the abnormal rise in temperature.
・The operating manual and training materials did not state that nitrogen supply would be
stopped when the interlock is released.
7
・Operators were not aware of the importance of agitation so though they knew nitrogen
would stop when the interlock is released, they did not realize that it would affect
agitation.
・Temperature at which organic peroxide would start to decompose was not clearly
known to all workers resulting in a failure to notice rises in temperature.
・There was insufficient technical knowledge regarding heat decomposition behavior of
organic peroxide.
8
(2) Management of emergency operations and improvements in technology
a. Install multiple thermometers for triggering interlock in oxidation reactors
b. Create a DCS screen that makes it easier to notice abnormalities during emergency
shutdown and review alarms
・Agitation condition (display nitrogen flow rate, alarm for stopped agitation gas)
・Temperature distribution (improve display, alarm sound, etc.)
・Temperature trends
c. Compile training material regarding interlocks and conduct education and training
・Importance of agitation in oxidation reactor
・Rules within section and authorization for releasing interlocks
・Details of process operation after interlock is released
d. Review risks of operation procedures for emergency shutdown of oxidation reactor and
equipment
・Note that when resuming operations at the meta/para cresol (MPCR) and hydroquinone
(HQ) production plants, which are similar to the resorcinol plant, measures will be
securely implemented for the issues extracted in accordance with the characteristics of
each production plant and approval will be obtained from supervisory agencies.