LEVELS of Knowledge
LEVELS of Knowledge
Using this example, we can see a standard pattern that occurs in any process of learning. This does
not mean there is a "cookbook" to be a 4-star pastry chef. It is a knowledge and ability that is
acquired over time, with discipline* and patience. (Note: This is also the point expounded by the
"Malcolm" character in Michael Crichton's "Jurassic Park." See pp. 306. - JW.) This leads to another
observation that may seem a bit off the wall, but I think has some points to be considered. To my
knowledge, there are few, if any, college or university programs where you can go to learn to
COACH gymnastics—Physical Education, yes, but few specifically for gymnastics. Gymnastics as it
presently exists, at least in the U.S., is effectively a guild system.
* (From Webster's: discipline—from the Latin disciplina,
meaning teaching, learning.)
Let's look at some background. Historically, the sport had always been the domain of big multi-sport
organizations like the AAU, "Y" programs, some multi-sport private clubs, and of small, local "mom
and pop" clubs. These local clubs started out renting a high school gym for three to five days a
week, setting up and breaking down equipment every day. These were individuals who loved the
sport; it was a "hobby." However, they were also highly competitive, and after a while realized that
they needed better training situations for their teams. Throughout the late 70's into the present,
they expanded into their own little gyms in warehouses where they could leave equipment up, set
up the gym in a way to fit in more equipment, etc. Now they had overhead, and needed to run
more class students through to pay the bills. Physical Education teachers were available, but you
likely would have to teach them the sport. Where do you find instructors on short notice? From your
own "ranks." Ex-gymnasts know the skills of the sport, and probably more than a few still had the
"bug" and would work for lower pay than the professional Physical Education instructor might (with
some notable exceptions).
In their off season, the elite and advanced level coaches need to take the time to teach all their
staff proper technique and progressions for the skills they are teaching. This investment in
education will save much time later, correcting errors in technique learned by less technically
knowledgeable instructors/coaches. Now you have an "apprentice" coach, working under the
direction and tutoring of a (hopefully) more experienced head coach. Now those individuals really
improve their coaching ability, and they start assisting the optional teams. They may even be in
charge of their own compulsory group as well.
Here is where the similarity with the "guild" system changes a bit. Traditionally, the apprentice
leaves his first "shop" and becomes a "journeyman." going out working at other shops, learning
from many different "masters" in his area. (The historical pre-cursor to "club-hopping!") However, in
our system, clinics and symposiums have replaced this to a great extent. It is possible for a coach to
learn from many other coaches without "hopping" around to other clubs. (While this happens, it
usually has little to do with advancing coaching knowledge.) Even now, the increase and
improvement of "professional" publications and programs (Athlete Wellness, PDP, Safety
Certification) are improving this educational situation for the "journeyman" part.
This is still an important point in the development of a "journeyman" coach in the gym as well. They
are increasing their knowledge and abilities through sessions with the head coaches, clinics and
symposiums. They are allowed freedom to develop their groups - write up the training schedules,
the competition schedule, strength and conditioning, etc. However, they still need to be guided at
certain points. They have to "stay on the same page" as the head coaches guidelines for the
program. Sometimes these "journeyman" coaches see this as restrictive. It may be, but it is of
necessity. The program must follow a set of "progressions" as much as the learning of a skill might.
Conversely, the head coach must also let the creativity and excitement of his junior staff have an
outlet. If there are some good ideas, he must let the junior staff try them. If there are some poor
ones, he must clearly explain why they are not to be tried or implemented in the program. This is a
fine line to walk - their enthusiasm versus sound judgement. The head coach must also continue
their staff's training into higher level skills as they are ready.
After a time, and with some luck, some of these coaches may go on to open their own gyms or,
become the head coaches in their "home" gym. They begin to develop their own programs,
becoming "masters," and in turn start training their own staff and starting the cycle again. From this
perspective, it is obvious that USA Gymnastics, as well as its' member associations, needs to
continue on its course of coaches education not only at the "grass roots" levels, but at the highest
levels of the "master" coaches as well, including them in the education process.
Acknowledgements:
The need for staff education in our sport is certainly not a new one. Staff education is an important
part of all the successful programs, and a good portion of this article came in part from my own
experiences and discussions with many friends and coaches throughout the years. This is as much
their article as mine. - JW