The Effects of Bladder Training On Bladder Functions After Transurethral Resection of Prostate
The Effects of Bladder Training On Bladder Functions After Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Prostate
Authors:
** Yeliz Culha, MSc (Research Assistant); Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Florence Nightingale Faculty
*** Hande Zümreler, (Nurse); University of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Training and Research
**** Murat Özer; MD; University of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital,
***** Mehmet Gökhan Culha, MD; University of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Training and Research
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may
lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
doi: 10.1111/jocn.14939
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
****** Alper Ötünçtemur, MD (Associate Professor); University of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı
Accepted Article Training and Research Hospital, Urology Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
Correspondence: Yeliz Culha, MSc (Research Assistant); Istanbul University Faculty of Nursing,
Turkey.
Address: Abide-i Hurriyet Cad, Istanbul Universitesi, Florence Nightingale Hemsirelik Fakultesi, 34381
E mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this was to examine the effect of bladder training on bladder
functions.
Design and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the urology clinic in
training(n=28) or control group(n=22). In the bladder training groups, the urinary catheters of
the patients were clamped at 4-hour intervals and then were left open for 5 minutes on the
second postoperative day. This study was created in accordance with TREND Statement
group (p=0.001).In addition, the evaluation of the patient bladder diaries in the first three
days after the discharge period revealed that the daily frequencies of micturition and nocturia
were lower(p=0.04) the mean duration of intervals between the micturition was longer(p=
0.006) and the mean voided urinary volume was higher(p=0.024) in the training group.
Conclusion: At the end of the study, it is observed that bladder training performed by
Relevance to Clinical Practice: Before removing the urinary catheter, bladder training
program affect positively to patients, especially pre-voiding and the voiding volumes, the
the surgical procedures and to monitor the urine output after urology operations.
• Clinical nurses are responsible for catheter insertion, removal, and routine care
practices.
Introduction
Indwelling urinary catheters are used in patients in order to monitor the urine output
appropriately, to prevent urinary retention in the bladder in the postoperative period or during
the course of their treatment in the hospital (Wood, 2013). Urinary catheterization is
frequently performed in order to evaluate the outcomes of the surgical procedures and to
monitor the urine output after urology operations. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a
common urologic condition and a health issue manifesting with lower urinary tract
complaints in men. The incidence of BPH increases with aging. The incidence reaches 50%
method” in the surgical treatment of BPH (Oelke et al., 2013). However, this widely used
retention, repeated hospitalization, and urinary incontinence (Starkman & Santucci, 2005).
Although the time and strategies for catheter removal after TUR-P have not been established
yet, it has been reported in the literature that the duration of stay of the indwelling urinary
catheters has become significantly shorter over the last 15 years. The benefits of short-term
catheterization are explained with the reduction in the incidence of known complications
(narrowing and infection in the urinary tract) originating from an existing catheter (Das
of the urine such as urgency, reduction of urine flow, urge incontinence, nocturia or urinary
retention. In addition, general anaesthetics used during the surgery are thought to contribute
to the impaired bladder functions. These agents may interfere with the autonomic nervous
system and cause bladder atony and retention (Baldini, Bagry, Aprikian, & Carli, 2009).
Bladder dysfunction and postoperative voiding disorder may also be seen after urinary
catheterization practices commonly applied in order to monitor urine output accurately in the
postoperative period (Griffiths & Fernandez, 2007). The incidences of these clinical
conditions are reported to vary from 5 to 35% in the literature (Nitti, Kim, & Combs, 1997).
Therefore, follow-up of the patients with urinary catheters is important as their postoperative
removal in the shortest possible time is critical for the prevention of urinary retention and
catheterization may cause problems such as bladder dysfunction and postoperative voiding
disorder with the potential of leading to urinary tract infections (Griffiths & Fernandez,
2007).Griffiths and Fernandez (2007) reported that these undesired consequences occurred
While the decision to insert or remove a urinary catheter was given by the physician; clinical
nurses are responsible for its insertion, removal, and routine care practices. It is reported in
the literature that bladder training by intermittent clamping is critical before the urinary
catheter is removed (Fernandez & Griffiths 2005; Zhengyonget al. 2014). It is emphasized
that this method stimulates the normal urinary filling and emptying processes, allowing for a
shorter period of time required for the urinary bladder to restore its normal functions
reports on the urinary catheter practices and its care in the literature, the information about
the bladder training prior to the catheter removal is limited in terms of how and how
Griffiths and Fernadez (2007) determined that delayed catheter removal were consistent with
a higher risk of voiding problems. In addition, this review concluded, there is little evidence
clamping). Gong, Zhao, Wang, and Wang (2016) showed residual urine volume was higher
in bladder training group, 24 hours following catheter removal. Other studies were
determined that indwelling urethral catheter clamping did not show any advantage or
disadvantage in stroke and hip fracture patients (Nyman, Joohansson & Gustafsson, 2010;
Moon, Chun, Lee & Kim, 2012; Zhengyong, Changxiao, Shibing, &Caiwen, 2014).
Furthermore, Liu et al. (2015) showed that early bladder training protocol is effective in
facilitating bladder function, reducing dysuria, and making patients feel more comfortable. In
addition, a systematic review and meta-analysis study concluded that intermittent clamping or
unclamping methods did not affect re-catheterization, and urinary retention (Wang, Tsai,
Han, Huang & Liu, 2016).Other methods are also employed to restore the normal bladder
functions, including a change in the usual timing of the removal (removal of the catheter at
night), catheterization for shorter periods, and prophylaxis with alpha-blockers (Griffiths &
Fernandez, 2007). The standard guidelines for care have not been established in the literature
yet. The model of practice based on the preferred methods of the clinical specialists and the
Griffiths, 2005).
urinary catheter removal. Furthermore, there are few studies about bladder training,
especially investigating the ways of shortening the period required for the recovery of the
bladder functions following the removal of indwelling urinary catheters inserted in patients
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bladder training on bladder functions in
patients who underwent TUR-P operation for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Within this
scope, the primary research hypothesis (H1) was to determine the effects of bladder training
on the first urgency time, first voiding time, volume of pre-voiding, voiding volume, and
post-voiding residual volume. Secondary hypothesis (H2) was to determine the effects of
bladder training in the 3-day patient bladder diary results after the hospital discharge.
1. What were the effects of postoperative bladder training prior to the removal of an
indwelling urinary catheter on the first urgency time and the first voiding time?
2. What were the effects of postoperative bladder training prior to the removal of an
residual volume?
3. What were the effects of postoperative bladder training prior to the removal of an
This quasi-experimental study was conducted during five months period (March to August,
2018) in the urology clinic of a university hospital in İstanbul, Turkey. The inclusion criteria
were defined as follows: (a) undergoing TUR-P due to BPH (b) 18 years of age or older
males (c) ability to communicate and to read and write Turkish, (d) freedom from cognitive,
affective, or verbal impairment as diagnosed by health care providers, (e) freedom from
another acute illness that caused pain or infection, and (f) lack of complications on
perioperative days.
The power analysis to estimate the sample size was performed based on a previous research
with a large cohort. Assuming a power of 0.80 and α value of 0.05, a sample size of 40 was
determined to be adequate. All eligible patients (N= 50) were invited to participate in the
study after the assessment whether they meet all of the inclusion criteria. The non-
bladder training) and 22 in the control group. This study was created in accordance with
A detailed medical history of all study patients was taken by the urologist at the time of the
hospital admission. The urologist and the registered nurse evaluated the physical examination
findings. According to the principles of surgical asepsis, 3-way latex Foley catheters were
inserted, with the specific size for all patients, by the urologist prior to the administration of
clinical practice procedures of the clinic (control group), then determined the effects of
In the experimental group (bladder training), the urinary catheters of the patients were
clamped at 4-hour intervals and then were left open for 5 minutes on the second postoperative
day by the registered nurse. This bladder training (intermittent clamping procedure) ordered
by the urologist in compliance with the literature (Griffiths & Fernandez, 2007; Nyman,
Joohansson&Gustafsson, 2010; Moon, Chun, Lee & Kim, 2012; Liu et al., 2015; Gong,
Zhao, Wang & Wang, 2016; Wang, Tsai, Han, Huang & Liu, Wei & Elliott, 2015;
Zhengyong, Changxiao, Shibing, &Caiwen, 2014). The clamping of urinary catheters in the
experimental group patients were opened when they reported the sense of urgency before
completing the four-hour intervals. This intermittent clamping procedure was repeated during
In the control group; the indwelling urinary catheters were removed according to the routine
clinical practice procedures of the clinic. So, urinary catheters were removed on the third
In both groups, first urgency time, and voiding time following the catheter removal were
noted by the registered nurse. Voiding volumes were collected in plastic handheld urinals for
male patients and calculated by the registered nurse. The pre-voiding and post-voiding
residual volumes were quantified with ultrasound by the urologist following the removal of
the urinary catheters. The volumes were measured by transabdominal ultrasound. The
Catheter associated Urinary Tract Infections (Gould et al. 2009). In addition, the researchers
developed bladder diary according to European Urology Association (Gratzke et al. 2015).
The patient diary included that micturition/day, nocturia/day, time between micturition
(min.), and voiding volumes/day. In regards to keeping the patient diaries, the patients were
trained by two registered nurses at the time of the hospital discharge. The registered nurses
trained to patients about voiding in plastic handheld urinals, and keeping urine volumes in
measured clean cup for 24-hour intervals at home. At the end of the 24-hour period, the
diaries’ data recorded for three days by patients. Then, the follow-up visits were scheduled
for those patients to take place on the third day of the hospital discharge. The patients were
Data were collected by using a Patient Information Form (age, the presence of chronic
illnesses, and the levels of the prostate specific antigen-PSA-) and patients’ physical
outcome variables (first urgency time, first voiding time, volume of pre-voiding, voiding
volume and post-voiding residual volume) were recorded. All outcome variables were
recorded following the urethral catheter removal. The quantities of micturition/day and
nocturia/day, the time between the micturitions in minutes, and the average voiding volume
in ml were noted according to the diaries of the patient during follow-up visit.
Prior to this study, the patients were informed of the purpose of the research and signed an
appropriate consent form. Participants were assured of their right to refuse to participate or to
withdraw from the study at any stage and were guaranteed anonymity and confidentiality.
Data Analysis
The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences® for Windows®
version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). The demographic and outcome variables were
analyzed using frequency distributions for the categorical variables, mean, median and
standard deviation for the continuous variables. The normality test based on the skewness and
kurtosis value indicated that both group scores were normally distributed; thus, parametric
tests were used. Chi-square was used to examine differences in categorical variables.
Independent samples t-test was used to determine the difference between the groups.
Results
All study patients were males with a mean age of 65.92±9.46 years and with a mean PSA
level of 1.73±0.68. Of the study patients, 40%had histories of chronic diseases. The mean
IPSS was 22.86±2.43 and the mean prostate volume was 57.22±23.58 mL. There were no
differences between the groups in terms of age, the presence of any chronic diseases, the
levels of PSA, the mean IPSS or the mean volume of the prostate gland (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Research question 1: The first urgency time and the first voiding time
The data on the first urgency time and the first voiding time following the urinary catheter
removal are presented in Table 2. In the experimental group receiving the bladder training,
the means of the first urgency time, and the first voiding time following the removal of the
catheter were longer (152.14±54.73min, 184.29±57.31 min) than the control group
(75.45±31.58, 98.18±42.94 min), respectively. These time scores were showed statistically
volume
The data on pre-voiding, voiding, and post-voiding residual urinary volumes following the
urinary catheter removal are presented in Table 2. In the experimental group receiving the
and 184.29±107.09, and 57.32±32.38) than the control group (110.00±81.99, 66.36±38.85,
and 58.18±33.19) respectively. In the pre-voiding and voiding volumes were showed
statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.001). However, there was not a
are presented in Table 3. In the experimental group receiving the bladder training; the daily
frequencies of micturition and nocturia were lower (10.68±5.32/day, and 2.29±2.18/day) than
the control group (12.68±6.20/day, and 3.41±2.28/day) respectively. In addition, the intervals
between micturitions, and the mean of voiding volumes were longer/higher (136.79±65.83
min, and 146.79±58.50 ml) than the control group (87.27±40.73 min, and 111.36±44.54 ml),
respectively. There were significant differences between the groups in the daily frequencies
of micturition and nocturia (p=0.04), the intervals between micturition, and the mean of
Discussion
The present study was aim to investigate the effects of the bladder training on the bladder
functions in the patients who underwent TUR-P due to BPH. In this context, the effects of
postoperative bladder training that were implemented prior to the removal of an indwelling
urinary catheter on the first urgency time, first voiding time, volume of pre-voiding, voiding
volume, post-voiding residual volume, and the 3-day patient bladder diary results were
evaluated. TUR-P is “the gold standard method” in the surgical treatment of BPH (Oelke et
potential complications and to monitor the urine output accurately after TUR-P (Griffiths
and failure of the standards for best practices are caused to clinical problems including
bladder and postoperative voiding dysfunction. Therefore, it is reported in the literature that
In this study, the first urgency time and the time of the first void following the urinary
catheter removal were longer in the bladder training group. In addition, the pre-voiding and
the voiding volumes after the removal of the catheter were higher in the bladder training
group (p<0.01, Table 2). It is observed that bladder training performed by clamping the
is a significant positive effect on the storage symptoms of the patients. These results have
suggested that the patients not receiving bladder training prior to the urinary catheter removal
may experience more frequent urges to void and smaller volumes of urinary output,
Zhengyonget al. (2014), examining the effects of bladder training prior to the removal of the
urinary catheter in the patients with acute urinary retention due to BPH; and the study by
Moon et al. (2012) on stroke patients did not report any significant differences between the
two groups in regards to the first urgency time and the first voiding volume. The study
conducted by Liu et al. (2013) on the patients with neurosurgical problems demonstrated that
the first urgency time was shorter in the experimental group compared to the control group.
However, in these authors determined that the first voiding volumes were larger in the
experimental group. These differences were considered to result from the mucosal alterations
due to the chronic obstruction or they might be caused due to the bladder dysfunction
associated with the insufficient detrusor tonus(Chughtai, Simma-Chiang, & Kaplan, 2014).In
addition, the results of the control group were also acceptable. It is thought that this condition
may be due to the same surgical and clinical procedure follow-up. This statistical difference
The evaluation of the patients’ outcomes by the diaries in the first to three days after the
discharge period revealed that the daily frequencies of micturition and nocturia were lower in
the bladder training group (p<0.05). In addition, the mean duration of intervals between the
micturitions was longer (p<0.01) and the mean voided urinary volume was higher(p<0.05) in
this group (Table 3). This results are supportive in the sense that bladder training by
intermittent clamping procedure in the patients with indwelling urinary catheters improves
the bladder retention capacity. The tension in the detrusor muscle causes a degree of strain as
it occurs in all smooth muscles, allowing for developing the bladder tonus. As the detrusor
muscle responsible for the bladder tonus is not innervated by a specific neural network, direct
muscle fibre reactions will still be possible even if it is denervated completely (Crowe, Clift,
Limitations
There are some limitations to the study. First, the long-term results are not available.
Conclusion
Before removing the urinary catheter, bladder training program affect positively to patients,
for reaching normal bladder functions on postoperative periods. It is concluded that bladder
training allows for the rehabilitation of the normal bladder functions properly after the
especially pre-voiding and the voiding volumes, the daily frequencies of micturition and
Funding:
None.
References
Baldini, G., Bagry, H., Aprikian, A., & Carli, F. (2009). Postoperative urinary retention:
doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea
Chughtai, B., Simma-Chiang, V., & Kaplan, S. A. (2014). Evaluation and management of
post-transurethral resection of the prostate lower urinary tract symptoms. CurrUrol Rep,
Crowe, H., Clift, R., Duggan, G., Bolton, D., & Costello, A. (1994). Randomized study of the
Das Bhagia, S., Mahmud, S. M., & El Khalid, S. (2010). Is it necessary to remove foleys
catheter late after transurethral prostatectomy in patients who presented with acute urinary
60(9), 739-41.
329–336.
Gong, Y., Zhao, L., Wang, L., & Wang, F. (2017). The effect of clamping the indwelling
urinary catheter before removal in cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy. J Clin
Gould, C., Umscheid, C.A., Agarwal, R.K., Kuntz, G., Pegues, D.A. (2009). Guideline For
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/cauti/
Gratzke, C., Bachmann, A., Descazeaud, A., Drake, M.J., Madersbacher, S., Mamoulakis, C.,
Oelke, M., Tikkinen, K.A., Gravas, S. (2015). EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-
neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction.Eur
Griffiths, R., & Fernandez, R. (2007). Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3http://www.surveysystem.com/sample-size-
formula.htm
Liu, Y. S., Wei, S., & Elliott, M. (2015). The effects of a catheter clamping protocol on
bladder function in neurosurgical patients: a controlled trial. Int J NursPract, 21(1), 29-36.
doi:10.1111/ijn.12209
Moon, H. J., Chun, M. H., Lee, S. J., & Kim, B. R. (2012). The usefulness of bladder
reconditioning before indwelling urethral catheter removal from stroke patients. Am J Phys
Nyman, M.H., Johansson, J., Gustafsson, M. (2010). A randomized controlled trial on the
effect of clamping the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with hip fracture. J ClinNurs,
19, 405-413.
Oelke, M., Bachmann A., Descazeaud A., Emberton M., Gravas S., Michel M.C., N'dow J.,
Nordling J., de la Rosette J.J. (2013). EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-
neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur
Urol., 64(1),118-40.
Starkman, J.S. &Santuccı, R.A. (2005). Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the
prostate with Standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and
Wang, L.H., Tsai, M.F., Han, C.S., Huang, Y.C. & Liu, H.E. (2016). Is bladder training by
clamping before removal necessary for short-term indwelling urinary catheter inpatient? A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Nurs Res (Korean SocNursSci), 10, 173–181.
Wood, T.L. (2013). Urinary Elimination. Fundamentals of Nursing, Potter PA, Perry AG,
Stockert PA, Hall AM, eds. 8th ed. St Louis, Missouri, Elseiver Mosby, 1042-1087.
(n=28) (N=50)
Age,yrs, mean (SD) 66.27 (10.13) 64.07 (8.64) 65.92 (9.46) t= 1.582
p=0.12
PSA, Prostate-Specific Antigen 1.78 (0.56) 1.61 (0.88) 1.73 (0.68) t= 1.851
levels, mean (SD)
p=0.49
IPSS, International Prostate 22.00 (1.63) 21.96 (2.60) 22.86 (2.43) t= 3.202
Symptom Score, mean (SD)
p=0.63
Prostate volume (mL), mean (SD) 59.09 (27.10) 55.75 (20.79) 57.22 (23.58) t= 0.494
p=0.62
*p≤0.05 **p≤0.01