0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views

Best Allocation of Cost 1 Engineering 2 Ba 3 Fine Arts 4 Aca 5 Tyk

1. The document contains sales data for different products over multiple periods. 2. An exponential smoothing method is applied to the data with alpha values of 0.2 and 0.5 to forecast demand and calculate forecast errors. 3. Metrics like mean absolute deviation (MAD) and mean squared error (MSE) are calculated to evaluate forecast accuracy for the different alpha values.

Uploaded by

Aj PotXzs Ü
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views

Best Allocation of Cost 1 Engineering 2 Ba 3 Fine Arts 4 Aca 5 Tyk

1. The document contains sales data for different products over multiple periods. 2. An exponential smoothing method is applied to the data with alpha values of 0.2 and 0.5 to forecast demand and calculate forecast errors. 3. Metrics like mean absolute deviation (MAD) and mean squared error (MSE) are calculated to evaluate forecast accuracy for the different alpha values.

Uploaded by

Aj PotXzs Ü
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Fine

ACA Engineering BA TYK


Arts
300 250 330 270 360
400 350 250 280 290
360 400 370 300 350
280 250 270 280 310
350 380 370 300 320

Fine
ACA Engineering BA TYK
Arts
1 50 0 80 20 110
2 150 100 0 30 40
3 60 100 70 0 50
4 30 0 20 30 60
5 50 80 70 0 20
COLUMN
(lowest) 30 0 0 0 20

Fine
ACA Engineering BA TYK
Arts
1 20 0 80 20 90
2 120 100 0 30 20
3 30 100 70 0 30
4 0 0 20 30 40
5 20 80 70 0 0

BEST ALLOCATION OF COST


1 Engineering 250
2 BA 250
3 Fine Arts 300
4 ACA 300
5 TYK 320
1420
ROW
(Lowest)
250
250
300
250
300
Row
Dogs Isetan Show Mart Robinsons
(lowest)
1 200 350 270 200
2 300 250 150 150
3 400 350 270 270

Dogs Isetan Show Mart Robinsons

1 0 150 70
2 150 100 0
3 130 80 0
COLUMN
(lowest)
0 80 0

Dogs Isetan Show Mart Robinsons


1 0 70 70
2 150 20 0
3 130 0 0

ALLOCATION OF COST
Dogs
1 Isetan 200
2 Robinsons 150
3 Show Mart 350
700
Row
Machines A B C D
(lowest
J 1 300 500 700 900 300
O 2 300 700 500 700 300
B 3 900 600 300 300 300
S 4 800 900 500 500 500

Machines A B C D
J 1 0 200 400 600
O 2 0 400 200 400
B 3 600 300 0 0
S 4 300 400 0 0
Column (lowest) 0 200 0 0

Machines A B C D
J 1 0 0 400 600
O 2 0 200 200 400
B 3 600 100 0 0
S 4 300 200 0 0

Machines A B C D
J 1 100 0 400 600
O 2 0 100 200 400
B 3 600 100 0 0
S 4 300 200 0 0

Machines A B C D Machines
J 1 0 0 400 600 J 1
O 2 0 200 200 400 O 2
B 3 600 100 0 0 B 3
S 4 300 200 0 0 S 4

OPTIMAL 2 OPTIMAL 1
Job Machine Cost Job
1 B 500 1
2 A 300 2
3 C 300 3
4 D 500 4
1600
A B C D
0 0 400 600
0 200 200 400
600 100 0 0
300 200 0 0

OPTIMAL 1
Machine Cost
B 500
A 300
D 300
C 500
1600
Accountants 1 2 3 4
A 14,000 12,000 13,000 15,000

BUSSINESS
B 16,000 10,000 12,000 14,000
C 13,000 16,000 15,000 11,000
D 12,000 13,000 14,000 11,000

Accountants 1 2 3 4 ROW
(lowest)
BUSSINESS

A 14 12 13 15 12
B 16 10 12 14 10
C 13 16 15 11 11
D 12 13 15 11 11

Accountants 1 2 3 4
A 2 0 1 3
BUSSINESS

B 6 0 2 4
C 2 5 4 0
D 1 2 4 0
COLUMN (lowest) 1 0 1 0

Accountants 1 2 3 4
A 1 0 0 3
BUSSINESS

B 5 0 1 4
C 1 5 3 0
D 0 2 3 0

OPTIMAL COST
BUSINESSACCOUNTANT COST
A 3 13,000
B 2 10,000
C 4 11,000
D 1 12,000
46,000
ROW
Yap Alvarez Artadi Tubid
(lowest)
Red Bull ₱150 ₱155 ₱145 ₱165 ₱145
Purefoods ₱165 ₱160 ₱155 ₱175 ₱155
FedEx ₱150 ₱155 ₱165 ₱160 ₱150
Talk N’ Text ₱160 ₱155 ₱165 ₱150 ₱150

Yap Alvarez Artadi Tubid


Red Bull 5 10 0 20
Purefoods 10 5 0 20
FedEx 0 5 15 10
Talk N’ Text 10 5 15 0

COLUMN(lowest)
0 5 0 0

Yap Alvarez Artadi Tubid


Red Bull 5 5 0 20
Purefoods 10 0 0 20
FedEx 0 0 15 10
Talk N’ Text 10 0 15 0

OPTIMAL COST Player Cost


Red Bull Artadi ₱145,000
Purefoods Alvarez ₱160,000
FedEx Yap ₱150,000
Talk N' Text Tubid ₱150,000
₱605,000
W X Y Z
1 3,800 2,800 2,400 3,600
2 2,000 2,400 3,000 2,000
3 3,200 1,800 2,200 2,800
4 4,000 3,200 2,600 3,400

ROW
W X Y Z
(lowest)
1 38 28 24 36 24
2 20 24 30 20 20
3 32 18 22 28 18
4 40 32 26 34 26

W X Y Z
1 14 4 0 12
2 0 4 10 0
3 14 0 4 10
4 14 6 0 8

W X Y Z
1 6 4 0 4
2 0 12 18 0
3 6 0 4 2
4 6 6 0 0

OPTIMUM ALLOCATION
TEAM PROJECT COST
1 Y 2,400
2 W 2,000
3 X 1,800
4 Z 3,400
9,600
EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING
alpha 0.2
MEAN ABSOLUTE DEVIATION

Actual Error Error


Period Forecast Error Period
Demand (a=0.20) (a=0.50)

1 20 1
2 35 20 15 2 15 15
3 46 23 23 3 23 18.50
4 40 27.60 12.40 4 12.40 3.25
5 50 30.08 19.92 5 19.92 11.63
6 55 34.06 20.94 6 20.94 10.81
7 45 38.25 6.75 7 6.75 4.59
8 39.60 -39.6 8
MAD 16.33413 10.63
alpha 0.5
MEAN SQUARED ERROR
Error
Actual Error
Period Forecast Error Period (squared)
Demand (a=0.20)
a=0.20
1 20 1
2 35 20 15 2 15 225.00
3 46 28 18.50 3 23 529.00
4 40 37 3.25 4 12.40 153.76
5 50 38 11.63 5 19.92 396.81
6 55 44 10.81 6 20.94 438.32
7 45 50 -4.59 7 6.75 45.55
8 47 -47.3 8
MSE 298.0715

LINEAR TREND (LEAST SQUARES METHOD)

X Y
Sales
Year Period (Unit) X^2 XY
1000
2001 1 3 1 3
2002 2 4.5 4 9
2003 3 4.8 9 14.4
2004 4 3.7 16 14.8
2005 5 4.6 25 23
2006 6 5 36 30
2007 7 4 49 28
2008 8 5 64 40
2009 9 6 81 54
SUM 45 40.6 285 216.2 n9
b 0.22
a 3.4111111111

T a + b(x)
T 3.41+0.22(x)

Demand for 2010 T10= 3.41+0.22(10)


5610 5.61

Demand for 2011 T11=3.41+0.22(11)


5830 5.83

REGRESSION ANALYSIS (LEAST SQUARES METHOD)

Y X
Dumlao’s
Sales Payroll (1M)
(100k)
3 2
2 3
3.5 2
2 5
3 4
DEVIATION

negative dapat pero absolute number

Error
Error
(squared)
(a=0.50)
a=0.50

15 225
18.50 342
3.25 11
11.63 135
10.81 117
4.59 21

141.8276

METHOD)
RES METHOD)

You might also like