0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views2 pages

Acd Fpe 006

This document is a faculty peer evaluation form used by Our Lady of Triumph Institute of Technology. The form contains sections to evaluate a colleague's personal traits and professional qualities using a 5-point rating scale. Faculty members are expected to complete an evaluation of their co-teachers based on direct observation and knowledge of their traits and professionalism. The form also includes spaces to note strengths, weaknesses, and an overall performance score. All evaluations are kept confidential by administrative processors.

Uploaded by

Junemar Jamolin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views2 pages

Acd Fpe 006

This document is a faculty peer evaluation form used by Our Lady of Triumph Institute of Technology. The form contains sections to evaluate a colleague's personal traits and professional qualities using a 5-point rating scale. Faculty members are expected to complete an evaluation of their co-teachers based on direct observation and knowledge of their traits and professionalism. The form also includes spaces to note strengths, weaknesses, and an overall performance score. All evaluations are kept confidential by administrative processors.

Uploaded by

Junemar Jamolin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Doc. No.

: ACD-FPE-006
OUR LADY OF TRIUMPH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, INC. Issue No: 03
Bañadero Highway, Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines Status: Revision 02
Document Title ISO 9001:2015 Date Issued: December 2017
FACULTY PEER EVALUATION Page 1 of 2

Observed Colleague: College/Department:

(Second Name/First Name/Middle Initial) Date of Observation:

Observing Colleague: Period of Observation:

(Second Name/First Name/Middle Initial) (MM / DD / YY – MM / DD / YY)

Direction: This evaluation is to be accomplished by every faculty member. Please check the space with
appropriate rating on the items about you co-teacher. Your evaluation must be based on your personal
knowledge of his/her traits and professional quality.

Rating Codes 5 – Superior/ Outstanding 2 – Needs Improvement

4 – Good 1 – Poor

3 – Fair

A. PERSONAL TRAITS 5 4 3 2 1
1. Works well with co-faculty and other employees.
2. Maintains relationships that are mutual, friendly and with respect.
3. Shows ethical manners in speech.
4. Cooperates effectively with administrators, colleagues and employees.
5. Displays sense of humor.
6. Makes practical common sense judgment.
7. Maintains appropriate emotional control.
8. Praise co-workers for their efforts.
9. Always well groomed.
10. Handles criticism without being defensive.

Mean: ________________

B. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES 5 4 3 2 1
1. Participates in all official school activities.
2. Handles discreetly professional information.
3. Takes personal responsibility in his/her professional growth.
4. Practices good relationship with community.
5. Develops warm and inspiring relationship with students.
6. Accepts committee assignments willingly.
7. Follows school policies and regulations.
8. Shows pride in being a faculty of OLT.
9. Contributes to the advancement of education.
10. Respects group decisions.

Mean: ________________
Over-all: ________________
Doc. No.: ACD-FPE-006
OUR LADY OF TRIUMPH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, INC. Issue No: 03
Bañadero Highway, Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines Status: Revision 02
Document Title ISO 9001:2015 Date Issued: December 2017
FACULTY PEER EVALUATION Page 2 of 2

STRENGTHS WEAKNESSESS

Signature of Observing Colleague: ______________________

Do not fill in the spaces below this line


____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________

Score : __________________________ Interpretation: ________________________


Over-all Conversion:
4.51 – 5.00 Outstanding 1.51 – 2.50 Needs Improvement
3.51 – 4.50 Very Satisfactory 1.00 – 1.50 Poor
2.51 – 3.50 Satisfactory

Name Administrative Processors I acknowledge that I held in Nature of Involvement


strict confidence the information (Facilitating, Processing) etc.
contained herein when the
instrument was in my custody.

Signature:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

You might also like