Noise Modeling PDF
Noise Modeling PDF
Bipolar Devices
Noise Modeling - MOSFET Noise
1. Noise Concept
2. MOSFET Noise
• 1/f Noise in MOSFET (SPICE 2 & BSIM3)
• Thermal Noise in MOSFET (SPICE 2 & BSIM3)
• How to Model for 1/f noise
• Advanced Noise Model
2. Shot Noise
• Every reverse biased junction generates shot noise which is caused by random carriers
across the junction.
4. Generation/Recombination Noise
• Trapping centers in the bulk of the device can cause generation/recombination noise.
: empirical parameter
: Transconductance
Since : Width & length
Assuming that
Since in saturation
Assuming that
At Subthreshold Region
: At weak inversion below threshold
Since at subthreshold
Increases with
Assuming that
• Device Information: P-channel and n-channel MOS for analog applications (2 um technology)
2um process : Nwell(2um), XJ: 0.2um, Tox:400A, field oxide:4000A, Vt:0.7V (nmos), -0.9V
(pmos) Subthreshold slope : 85mV/decade
• Device Information: P-channel and n-channel MOS for analog applications (0.5um
technology) 0.5um process : Twin well, Tox: 115A, Leff=0.4um, Vt:0.55V(nmos) , -0.65V
(pmos) Tungsten silicide is formed over the polysilicon gate, subthreshold slope : 100mV/
decade
• The mobility fluctuation theory considers the flicker noise as a results of the fluctuation in
bulk mobility based on Hooge’s empirical relation for the PSD of flicker noise.
: Total number of carriers, I : mean current
: Hooge’s emperical parameter
Since , R=V/I
: Effective gate voltage
R : Channel resistance
Since
Since
is proportional to
is inversely proportional to
Since
In saturation region behavior is
Transconductance gm and drain current ID of n and p type MOSFETs biased with VD-0.1V. (Solid line is
device 41, dashed-dotted line is 47, dashed line is 31 and dotted line is 37), a). SID-0.6x10-8 A, 5.
ID-7.18x10-8 A. 6. ID-5.95x10-7 A, 7. ID-2.3x10-6 A, 8. ID-1.8x10-5 A, 9. ID-6.79x10-5 A, 10. is ID-2.47x10-4 A,
11. ID-7.38x10-4 A, 12. ID-10.07x10-4 A), b).
N type
P type
P type
N type
N type
N type
• Room temperature 1/f noise behaviour for NMOS and PMOS Device information : 0.5um
technology, Tox : 485A , W=12um , L=3um (Nmos)
Reference paper: Flicker noise in cmos transistors from subthreshold to strong inversion at
various temperature.
Input referred noise spectra in these n channel TR vary very little as the gate voltage changes, both in the linear and saturation
Regions of operation. The “independence” from gate bias voltage in the input referred noise suggests that flicker noise from these
n-channel devices is due to carrier-density fluctuation rather than mobility fluctuation.
LDD structure : short channel LDD n type devices, strong gate bias dependence was observed. The gate bias dependent component
of noise by attributing it to the voltage dependent series resistance of the LDD structure at the drain end of the device.
It very often shows gate voltage dependence in both the linear and saturation regions of operations. Input referred power in
p channel devices can be 10~100 times less as compared to n channel transistors. This noise is for mobility fluctuation.
This gate bias dependence has been explained by buried channel conduction in ion-implanted devices, where bulk mobility
fluctuation noise dominate.
Fig 5. Normalized input referred Fig 6. W=80um/L=6um nmos Fig 7. W=80um/L=6um pmos
noise at frequency 100Hz
NMOS device
The noise spectra shows an increase in slope at lower frequencies at very low temperatures . It probably due to a generation
– recombination noise source at low frequency. The flicker noise of nmos at low temperature does not decrease in any
significant order of magnitude!!
PMOS device
The noise power decreases as the temperature decreases to about 150K and the slope of the spectrum shows no change.
However, noise increases when the temperature is lowered beyond 150K. The slope of the sepctrum becomes very small.
NMOS device
It can be seen that input referred noise in the subthreshold region has the same behavior as that in the strong inversion.
No gate bias dependence is observed.
PMOS device
Input referred noise in pmos, the input referred noise decreases in magnitude as the device bias is varied from subthreshold
into Strong inversion.
- equ 1
- equ 2 - equ 3
The ratio of the fluctuation in carrier number to fluctuations in occupied trap number
is close to unity at strong inversion.
- equ 4 - equ 5
Typical values of is
To evaluate
- equ 8
- equ 9
Therefore, the power spectral density of the local current fluctuations can be written as:
- equ 10
- equ 11
- equ 12
- equ 13
- equ 14
With
Let - equ 15
A= B=
- eqn 17
with
- eqn 18
Substituting above equation into equ 17 and performing the integration yield
- eqn 19
- eqn 20
- equ 21
- eqn 22
with
Substituting equ 22 into equ 14 and after some manipulation yields:
- eqn 23 where
Fig 1. bias dependence of the drain Fig 2. Input referred noise power ( Svg )
current noise power
1. The input referred noise power is equal to the drain current noise power divided by the square of
the transconductance (gm2).
2. The input referred noise is almost independent of the bias point in both linear and saturation
regions.
Fig 3. bias dependence of the drain Fig 4. Input referred noise power ( Svg )
current noise power
The input referred noise power of the submicron technology shows strong
dependence on the bias point in both linear and saturation regions.
Fig 5. noise power measure in strong inversion, as well Fig 6. Bias dependence of noise power in the
as subthreshold regions for N channel MOSFET subthreshold and strong inversion regions
The input referred noise power of the submicron technology shows strong dependence on the bias point in
both linear and saturation regions
Fig 7. noise power measure in strong inversion, as well Fig 8. Bias dependence of noise power in the
as subthreshold regions for N channel MOSFET subthreshold and strong inversion regions
1. Short channel effects on the flicker noise characteristics are evident through comparison of Fig 6 and 8.
2. For short channel device, the drain current noise power continues to increase with the drain voltage beyond
the saturation point in both the strong inversion and subthreshold regions.
Fig 9. noise power measure in strong inversion, as Fig 10. Bias dependence of noise power in
well as subthreshold regions for P channel MOSFET the subthreshold and strong inversion regions
• The influence of the gate-oxide thickness, substrate dope, and the gate bias on the input-
referred spectral 1/f noise density
Reference paper : Impact of process scaling on 1/f noise in advanced cmos technologies.
Device information : W=10um, L=4um ( Nmos, Pmos) , Tox : 2, 3.6, 5, 7.5, 10, and 20nm
Na variants of and
Average at 100Hz
Fig 3. Svg versus Tox (NMOS) Fig 4. Svg versus Tox (PMOS)
For Large Tox, of PMOS shows a stronger dependence on Vgt than that of NMOS.
For small Tox, both NMOS and PMOS show a strong Vgt dependence. The substrate doing
concentration Na affectes as well. With a 10X increase of Na, it enlarges with a factor 3+/- 1.5.
with
Or simplified :
Constant
We apply a regression curve fitting. The parameter EF is the –slope.
Step 2: EF slope is now modeled, we can get rid of it by multiplying the
measured curve with the frequency point
Eqn 2
Sid (A2/HZ)
Sid (A2/HZ)
Sid@1Hz (A2/HZ)
Sid (A2/HZ)
Sid@1Hz (A2/HZ)
Sid@1Hz (A2/HZ)
Sid (A2/HZ)
: BSIM3 V3
Eqn 1
: BSIM3 V3 Eqn 3
: BSIM3 V3 Eqn 3
Since
Model, saturation
With
is the reduction in the electrical channel length due to the drain depletion into the
channel in saturation regime.
Eqn 4
: BSIM3 V3
Eqn 1
a is y-intercept point
Step 2: noise measurement are performed for various effective gate bias (Vgs-Vt)
in the ohmic range ( Typically Vds=50mV or 100mV). Then we obtained
vs Vgs-Vt, the obtained variations at low effective gate bias
allow us to extract the NOIB parameter. So knowing NOIB, the parameter
NOIC can be induced from the variation at large Vgs-Vt values.
Step 3: three noise parameters will be matched with the help of noise
measurements performed at higher Vds biases but always smaller than
Vds, sat, in fact in this case the noise is a function of the three noise
parameters and remains equal to zero
Step 4: in the saturation range, Litl and are calculated if the junction
depth is known, otherwise they deduced by a fit of the experimental data
• Experimental detail
Device information : N type and P type transistors with various gate geometries
W=20um, ,Tox: 16nm (0.8um CMOS technology)
For transistors with large area, straightforward 1/f noise have been observed and then EF=1.
For PMOS
Fig 3. variation of the parameter
NOIB vs the effective gate voltage. For NMOS
• Model verification
Noise measure : from subthreshold to strong inversion at Vds=4V.
Measured data are compared to simulated ones provided by below equation
The transistor is biased in saturation regime, we take into account the influence
of the reduction in the electrical channel length by fitting the “Litl” parameter.
For PMOS For NMOS
Two modification
1) The increase in generated interface traps.
2) The shift in threshold voltage.
where
Technology 0.35um
CMOS process
• A new 1/f noise model of MOSFETs for circuit simulation down to 100nm
Tech.
Reference paper: Modeling of 1/f noise with HiSIM for 100nm CMOS technology
• Shortcoming of existing 1/f noise models
1) Hardly reproduce the strong gate length dependence
2) Hardly reproduce the bias dependence with a single model
3) Large increase of noise by reducing the gate length
4) Stronger channel length dependence than predicted by the conventional
1/LW linear relation
• HiSIM model developed !!
1) Carrier density distribution along the channel
2) 1/f noise valid for all gate lengths with a single parameter set
3) Accuracy for any bias conditions and gate lengths with a single model parameter set
Fig 1. drain current of nmos Fig 2. linear condition. Fig 3. saturation condition.
with different gate length under
linear condition.
• 1/f noise model Assumption
• Uniform trap density and energy distribution in the
Oxide layer
Fig 1. and Fig 2. show that trap density and energy distribution is spatially non-uniform in the
oxide layer !!
Lorentzian Noise
Lg=0.46um at f=100Hz
As a circuit-simulation model it is a
subject to describe only this averaged 1/f
noise characteristics with boundaries as
the worst and the best case.
• Model description
where
the ratio of the trap density to attenuation coefficient into the oxide.
To develop an precise 1/f noise model
HiSIM provides the carrier concentrations at the source No and drain side NL
determined by surface potentials consistently.
Fig 10. Comparison of the Vgs dependence of the measured and simulated
drain current noise with various Length ( 1u, 0.46u, 0.12u ) f=100Hz
Average N(x) model cannot reproduce the bias dependences of the Sid for all channel lengths
with a single model-parameter set.
Fig 11. Comparison of the Vds dependence of the measured and simulated drain current
noise with various Length ( 1u, 0.46u, 0.12u )and fixed width=10um.
The noise enhancement for larger Vds is not well reproduced.
GPIB address
SMU define
SMU
S3245A Calibration
No DC source
GPIB
System
Select_model
KF extraction
NLEV=0
NLEV=1
NLEV=2
NOIA,NOIB,NOIC
For NOIMOD=2
Should be set to
3, 4 for select_model
NLEV=0
NLEV=1
NLEV=2
NLEV=3
NOIMOD=1
NOIMOD=2
NOIMOD=3
NOIMOD=4
• Hardware setup
(Utmost v.21.12.3.R) setup screen
• VDS_start: Starting VDS
• VDS_step: VDS_step
• #_of_VDSstep: Number of step for VDS biasing
• VGS_start: Starting VGS
• #_of_VGSstep: Number of step for VGS biasing
• Amp_gain: S3245A amp gain (121)
• IDS_measured: Measured IDS current
• decade_sweep: The Utmost will measure at each decade
• gm_measured: during the DC biasing of the MOS . The gm is
measured
• gds_measured: during the DC biasing of the MOS. The gds is
measured
• VDS_ext: S3245A had a load resistor in series to the MOS device’s
drain. Due to the loading resistor the external VDS bias should be
higher than the actual VDS applied to the device. Utmost iterate the
external VDS bias until the internal VDS is reached to the specified VDS
• debias_DC: if set to 0 the final DC bias conditions will be applied to the
MOS device after the noise data is collected from the DSA. This is useful if the
same measurement needs to be repeated manually
NOIA, NOIB,
NOIC, EF, EM
Extracted
Optimization with
External
SmartSpice
Target
(Saturation mode)
Target
(Saturation mode)
?
(Linear mode)
Noise Modeling in MOSFET and Bipolar Devices - 88 -
Thermal Noise Concept
• The total average noise power of resistor in a certain frequency band is:
Uncorrelated signal
Transfer function
Old model
The correct expression for the noise has to take into account the effect of the
conductance due to channel modulation in saturation
SPICE2 model
where
if
if
1 SPICE2 SPICE2
2 BSIM3V3 BSIM3V3
3 BSIM3V3
SPICE2
4 SPICE2
BSIM3V3
For example
RD should be
Battery matching to gds
or gm
DUT
Spectrum
Analyzer
(HP35670A)
• Equivalent Circuit
Thermal Noise
Thermal Noise
VBIC95 model
By multiplying
where
iB=1uA, Vce=2V
The 1/f noise source of a bipolar transistor is located and modeled in the Base region
Therefore we have to divided the above obtained collector current noise spectral density
Sic by beta2.
Finally, we are ready to draw the 1HZ base noise data points against the DC bias.
Reference Paper : Accurate extraction method for 1/f noise parameters used in gummel-poon
type bipolar junction transistor models.
Final measured and simulated power spectra densities of low frequency noise.