A Note On Finding The Mean Variance Efficient (MVE) Portfolio: The Case With Two Risky Assets and One Risk-Free Asset
A Note On Finding The Mean Variance Efficient (MVE) Portfolio: The Case With Two Risky Assets and One Risk-Free Asset
Risk-free
rate 0.0500
US UK France Germany Japan
US 1.0000 0.5003 0.4398 0.3681 0.2663
UK 0.5003 1.0000 0.5420 0.4265 0.3581
France 0.4398 0.5420 1.0000 0.6032 0.3923
Germany 0.3681 0.4265 0.6032 1.0000 0.3663
Japan 0.2663 0.3581 0.3923 0.3663 1.0000
We can plot the mean-variance frontier that can be constructed from US and Japan,
as we have seen before:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Portfolio of US-Japan (no short-
selling
1-w (Japan Standard Sharpe
w (US-weight) weight) E[r] Variance Deviation ratio
0 1 0.150 0.053 0.230 0.4339
0.1 0.9 0.148 0.045 0.211 0.4648
0.2 0.8 0.147 0.038 0.194 0.4986
0.3 0.7 0.145 0.032 0.179 0.5340
0.4 0.6 0.144 0.027 0.165 0.5691
0.5 0.5 0.143 0.024 0.154 0.6004
0.6 0.4 0.141 0.021 0.146 0.6227
MVE 0.698 0.302 0.140 0.020 0.14232 0.6309
0.7 0.3 0.140 0.020 0.142 0.6309
0.754 0.246 0.139 0.020 0.14169 0.6281
0.8 0.2 0.138 0.020 0.142 0.6216
0.9 0.1 0.137 0.021 0.146 0.5955
1 0 0.136 0.024 0.154 0.5570
Columns 2 and 3 are the portfolio weights for US and Japan, respectively. Columns 4
through 6 show the expected return, variance and volatility for various portfolio
combinations. You can of course choose to plot more combinations if you wanted by
varying the weights in a more fine fashion.
Finally, column 6 gives the Sharpe ratio. What we are looking for is the mean
variance efficient (MVE) portfolio with the maximum Sharpe ratio. How can you find
this? Well, we can again use the EXCEL Solver to find the portfolio weights that will
maximize the Sharpe ratio.
Once we have found the weights for the MVE, we can draw the Capital Allocation
Line by constructing portfolios by combining the MVE portfolio with the risk free
asset:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
CAPITAL ALLOCATION LINE
Standard Sharpe
w_MVE w_riskfree E[r] Variance Deviation Ratio
0 1 0.050 0.000 0.000 -
0.1 0.9 0.059 0.000 0.014 0.6309
0.2 0.8 0.068 0.001 0.028 0.6309
0.3 0.7 0.077 0.002 0.043 0.6309
0.4 0.6 0.086 0.003 0.057 0.6309
0.5 0.5 0.095 0.005 0.071 0.6309
0.6 0.4 0.104 0.007 0.085 0.6309
0.7 0.3 0.113 0.010 0.100 0.6309
0.8 0.2 0.122 0.013 0.114 0.6309
0.9 0.1 0.131 0.016 0.128 0.6309
1 0 0.140 0.020 0.142 0.6309
1.1 -0.1 0.149 0.025 0.157 0.6309
1.2 -0.2 0.158 0.029 0.171 0.6309
1.3 -0.3 0.167 0.034 0.185 0.6309
1.4 -0.4 0.176 0.040 0.199 0.6309
1.5 -0.5 0.185 0.046 0.213 0.6309
1.6 -0.6 0.194 0.052 0.228 0.6309
1.7 -0.7 0.203 0.059 0.242 0.6309
Column 1 shows the weight of the optimal risky portfolio in the capital allocation
decision; column 2 shows the weight of the risk-free asset. Columns 3 through 5
show the expected return, variance and volatility of the different portfolios along
the Capital Allocation Line. Notice that regardless what the allocation is they all have
the maximum Sharpe ratio because the optimal risky portfolio is the same
regardless. Of course, where along the CAL an investor would choose will depend on
her risk aversion. But we already know the solution to that problem. The weight in
the risky portfolio in the optimal capital allocation problem is given by:
𝐸 𝑟! − 𝑟!
𝑤=
𝐴𝜎!!
The second tab depicts the mean-variance frontier, the MVE and the Capital
Allocation Line constructed based on these data.