Scribd
Upload
280 views

Comparison of Line Pack Calculation Using Aspen Plus Dynamics and by Using Manual Calculations

This document compares calculations of line pack, the quantity of natural gas contained in a pipeline segment, using Aspen Plus Dynamics simulation software and manual calculations. It describes building a steady state pipeline model in Aspen Plus, exporting it to Aspen Plus Dynamics for dynamic simulation. The line pack is calculated from the simulation results as 35.988 MMSCF. Manual calculations using pipeline specifications and gas property equations yield a line pack of 34.969 MMSCF, closely matching the Aspen Plus Dynamics results.

Uploaded by

Walid Ben Husein
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
280 views

Comparison of Line Pack Calculation Using Aspen Plus Dynamics and by Using Manual Calculations

This document compares calculations of line pack, the quantity of natural gas contained in a pipeline segment, using Aspen Plus Dynamics simulation software and manual calculations. It describes building a steady state pipeline model in Aspen Plus, exporting it to Aspen Plus Dynamics for dynamic simulation. The line pack is calculated from the simulation results as 35.988 MMSCF. Manual calculations using pipeline specifications and gas property equations yield a line pack of 34.969 MMSCF, closely matching the Aspen Plus Dynamics results.

Uploaded by

Walid Ben Husein
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

COMPARISON OF LINE PACK CALCULATION USING

ASPEN PLUS DYNAMICS AND BY USING MANUAL


CALCULATIONS
PREPARED BY:
MUHAMMAD WAQAS MANZOOR
PROCESS ENGINEER
Contact: [email protected]
LINE PACK

• The quantity of natural gas contained in a certain segment of a pipeline is


known as line pack.
• It is typically measured in MMSCF.
CALCULATION USING ASPEN PLUS DYNAMICS

• First of all, build a steady state


simulation of the pipe line
segment, in Aspen PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF PIPE SEGMENT IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF PIPE SEGMENT IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF VALVE ‘BV-1’ IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF VALVE ‘BV-1’ IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF VALVE ‘BV-2’ IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF VALVE ‘BV-2’ IN ASPEN PLUS
SPECIFICATIONS OF INLET STREAM ‘NG-1’ IN ASPEN PLUS
EXPORTING SIMULATION TO ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS

• After that, set ‘Input mode’ to


‘dynamic’ from ‘steady state’.
EXPORTING SIMULATION TO ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS

• After that, click on ‘File Menu’, and


select ‘Pressure Driven’ from
‘Update Aspen PLUS Dynamics
Menu’.
EXPORTING SIMULATION TO ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS

• These 03 files and a folder are


created in the same folder where
Aspen PLUS ‘.bkp‘ file was
previously stored.
SNAPSHOT OF ASPEN PLUS DYNAMICS WINDOW
INITIAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS
FINAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS
CONFIGURATION OF PIPE SEGMENT IN ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS
CALCULATION USING ASPEN PLUS
DYNAMICS
CALCULATION OF LINE PACK FROM SIMULATION
RESULTS OF ASPEN PLUS DYNAMICS
• Molar concentration of gas within the pipe segment = 0.160589 lbmol/cf
• Actual volume of pipe segment = 3.14 x {(14.314/12)^2} /4 x 528000 ft = 590042.558 cf
• Number of Moles of gas contained in the pipe segment = 0.160589 lbmol/cf x 590042.558 cf = 94754.344 lbmol
Calculation of Molar Volume at Standard Conditions:
• Molar Volume (Vmn) of any gas at normal conditions i.e. 0 C & 1 atm, is given by,
• Vmn = 22.414 Nm3 / kgmole = 22.414 Nm3 x (1 ft /0.3048 m)^3 x 0.454 kgmol/lbmol
• Vmn = 359.360 Ncf/lbmol
• Molar volume (Vms) at standard conditions i.e. 60 F (15.55 C) and 14.7 psia (1 atm), is given by
• 359.360 cf x 14.7 psi / 492 F = Vms x 14.7 / 520 F
• Or, Vms = 379.811 Scf/lbmol
Calculated Line Pack = 94754.344 lbmol x 379.811 Scf/lbmol = 35.988 MMSCF
EQUATIONS USED FOR MANUAL CALCULATION OF
LINE PACK

• Here Vb represents Line Pack,


calculated for a pipe segment
having an internal diameter D,
length L, and containing natural
gas at an average pressure and
temperature of Pavg, and Tavg,
respectively.
• Tb, and Pb represent thr base
temperature and base pressure,
respectively.

Ref: ‘Gas Pipeline Hydraulics’ by E. Shashi Menon


CALCULATION OF COMPRESSIBILITY FACTOR

Ref: ‘Gas Pipeline Hydraulics’ by E. Shashi Menon


CALCULATION OF AVERAGE PRESSURE AND
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE

• Here P1 and P2 are in absolute


pressure units.
• Average Temperature is
typically calculated by taking
arithmetic mean of inlet and
out temperatures (in absolute
units) of the pipe segment.

Ref: ‘Gas Pipeline Hydraulics’ by E. Shashi Menon


MANUAL CALCULATION OF LINE PACK
• Molecular Mass of gas used in Aspen PLUS simulation = 16.0427 lb/lbmol
• Specific gravity of gas = 16.0427 / 29 = 0.5531
• Pressure of gas at Inlet of pipe segment = 898.093 psia
• Pressure of gas at Outlet of pipe segment = 702.895 psia
. × .
• Average Pressure of gas across the pipe segment = 898.093 + 702.895 −
. .
= 804.460 psia = 789.76 psig (1 atm = 14.7 psia)

• Temperature of gas at Inlet of pipe segment = 74.1135 F = 534.1135 R


• Temperature of gas at Outlet of pipe segment = 63.44 F = 523.44 R
. .
• Average Temperature of gas across the pipe segment = = 528.776 R

• Average compressibility of gas across the pipe segment = . × .


. × ×
. .

= 0.90807
MANUAL CALCULATION OF LINE PACK
• Base Temperature = 60 F = 520 R
• Base Pressure = 14.7 psia
• Internal Diameter of pipe segment = 14.314 inches
• Total Length of pipe segment = 100 miles = 528000 ft
• Line Pack (Vb) calculated using CNGA* method is given by,
.
• Vb = 28.798 × × × 14.314 × 100
. . × .

• Vb = 34.969 MMSCF
• Line pack calculated using Aspen PLUS Dynamics = 35.988 MMSCF
• The calculated Line Pack ‘Vb’ closely matches with the line pack calculated using Aspen PLUS Dynamics.
• The difference between the two, may be attributed to the difference in physical properties calculation
methods and computational methods in Aspen PLUS Dynamics. However, results of Aspen PLUS Dynamics
are more accurate.

* California Natural Gas Association

You might also like