NIV Study Bible, Fully Revised Edition Sampler
NIV Study Bible, Fully Revised Edition Sampler
R
E c dp
roo
PiLn uncorre
t e
F E AT U R E S :
• Complete text of the accurate, readable, and clear New International
Version (NIV)
• Over 21,000 bottom-of-the-page study notes, with icons to make important
information easy to spot
• Over 125 topical articles, 16 pages of full-color maps, the full NIV
concordance, and subject note indexes enable even deeper study
• Sixty-six book introductions and outlines along with six section
introductions provide valuable background information for each book of the
Bible
• In-text maps, charts, diagrams, and illustrations visually clarify the stories in
the Bible
• Words of Jesus in red
• Exclusive Zondervan NIV Comfort Print typeface
1:1–16 For a comparison of Matthew’s genealogy with Luke’s, Jos 2. Since quite a long time had elapsed between Rahab
see note on Lk 3:23–38. The types of people (including Gen- and David and because of Matthew’s desire for systematic
tiles) mentioned in this genealogy reveal the broad scope of organization (see note on v. 17), many of the generations
those who make up the people of God as well as the geneal- between these two ancestors were assumed, but not listed,
ogy of Jesus. by Matthew. Ruth. See note on v. 3.
1:1 son of David. A Messianic title (see Introduction: Recipi- 1:6 Solomon, whose mother. His mother was Bathsheba (see
ents; Purpose; see also note on 9:27) found several times in note on v. 3).
this Gospel (in 1:20 it is not a Messianic title). Jesus fulfills 1:8 Jehoram the father. Matthew calls Jehoram the father of
the Davidic covenant (see 2Sa 7:5–16 and note on 7:11). son of Uzziah, but from 2Ch 21:4—26:23 it is clear that, again, sev-
Abraham. Because Matthew was writing primarily to Jews, eral generations were assumed (Ahaziah, Joash and Ama-
it was important to identify Jesus in this way. Jesus fulfills ziah) and that “father” is used in the sense of “forefather”
the Abrahamic covenant (see Ge 12:2–3; 15:9–21; 17; 22:15–18; or “ancestor” (see NIV text notes on 1Ch 1:5,10).
Zec 9:10 and note). 1:11 Josiah the father. Similarly (see note on v. 8), Josiah is
1:3 Tamar. In Matthew’s genealogy five women are named: called the father of Jeconiah (i.e., Jehoiachin; see NIV text
Tamar (here), Rahab (v. 5), Ruth (v. 5), Bathsheba (not by name note), whereas he was actually the father of Jehoiakim and
but by description—“Solomon, whose mother had been Uri- the grandfather of Jehoiachin (2Ch 36:1–9). the exile to Bab-
ah’s wife,” v. 6) and, of course, Mary (v. 16). All these women ylon. In chs. 1–2 Matthew emphasizes the theme of Israel’s
were in some sense on the margins of society. At least three exile and return. In Jesus’ ministry, God’s people experience
of them were Gentiles (Tamar, Rahab and Ruth). Bathsheba the restoration that was associated with the return from
was probably an Israelite (1Ch 3:5) but was closely associated exile (see 2:18 and note).
with the Hittites because of Uriah, her Hittite husband. By 1:12 Shealtiel the father. See note on 1Ch 3:19.
including them (contrary to custom) in his genealogy, Mat- 1:16 husband of Mary. Matthew does not say that Joseph
thew indicates at the very outset of his Gospel that God’s was the father of Jesus but only that he was the husband
grace is not limited to the people of Israel. Also because all of Mary and that Jesus was born of her. In the genealogy
five of these women were associated, rightly or wrongly, and in the birth account (1:18–25), Matthew shows that, al-
with suspicions of sexual impropriety, Matthew is showing though Jesus is not the physical son of Joseph, he is the
that the Messiah’s genealogy is not limited to the upright. legal son and therefore a descendant of David (see Lk 2:33;
1:4 Amminadab. Father-in-law of Aaron (Ex 6:23). Jn 1:45 and notes). Mary . . . mother of Jesus. See note on v. 3.
1:5 Rahab. See notes on v. 3; Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25; see also 1:17 fourteen generations . . . fourteen . . . fourteen. These
divisions reflect two characteristics of Matthew’s Gospel: 1:23 See note on Isa 7:14. This is the first of about 50 quota-
(1) an apparent fondness for numbers and (2) concern for tions, many of them Messianic in some sense, that Matthew
systematic arrangement. The number 14 may have been tak
takes from the OT (see NIV text notes throughout Matthew).
chosen because it is twice seven (the number of complete- 1:24 angel of the Lord. See Lk 2:9 and note.
ness) and/or because it is the numerical value of the name 1:25 he did not consummate their marriage until she gave
David (see notes on Pr 10:1; Rev 13:17). For the practice of birth. Both Matthew and Luke (1:26–35) make it clear that
telescoping genealogies to achieve the desired number of Jesus was born of a virgin. Although this doctrine is often
names, see Introduction to 1 Chronicles: Genealogies. questioned, Jesus’ virgin birth is an essential truth of the
1:18—2:23 Matthew frames what he communicates about Christian faith. he gave him the name Jesus. Since it was the
Jesus’ infancy with five specific OT texts. father’s prerogative to name children (e.g., Lk 1:60), the emem-
1:18 pledged to be married. There were no sexual relations phasis on Joseph naming Jesus at the climactic moment of
during a Jewish betrothal period, but it was a much more the birth account highlights the act of adoption by Joseph
binding relationship than a modern engagement and could that makes Jesus his legal son.
be broken only by divorce (v. 19). In Dt 22:24 a betrothed 2:1 Bethlehem in Judea. A village about five miles
woman is called a “wife,” though the preceding verse speaks south of Jerusalem (see photo, p. 1499). Matthew
of her as being “pledged to be married.” Matthew uses the says nothing of the events in Nazareth (cf. Lk 1:26–56). Possibly
terms “husband” (v. 19) and “wife” (v. 24) of Joseph and Mary wanting to emphasize Jesus’ Davidic background, he begins
before their marriage was consummated (see note on Joel with the events that happened in David’s hometown. It is
1:8). the Holy Spirit. The common NT way of referring to the called “Bethlehem in Judea,” not only to distinguish it from the
divine Spirit, who in the OT was almost always called “the town of the same name about seven miles northwest of Naza-
Spirit of God” or “the Spirit of the LORD.” See Ps 51:11 and reth, but also to emphasize that Jesus came from the tribe
note. Christian reflection on the biblical testimony about the (Judah) and territory that produced the line of Davidic kings.
Spirit (see 3:16–17; 28:19; 2Co 13:14 and notes) led to the un- That Jews expected the Messiah to be born in Bethlehem and
derstanding that he is one of the three persons of the Trinity. to be from David’s family is clear from Jn 7:42. King Herod.
1:19 divorce her quietly. He would sign the necessary legal pa- Herod the Great (37–4 BC), to be distinguished from the other
pers but not have her judged publicly and stoned (Dt 22:23–24). Herods in the Bible (see chart, pp. 1592–1593). Herod was a non-
1:20 in a dream. The phrase occurs five times in the first two Jew, an Idumean, who was appointed king of Judea by the Ro-
chapters of Matthew (here; 2:12,13,19,22) and indicates the man Senate in 40 BC and gained control in 37. He was a ruthless
means the Lord used for speaking to Joseph. Joseph son of ruler, murdering his wife, three of his sons, his mother-in-law,
David. See notes on 1:1,16; perhaps a hint that the message his brother-in-law, his uncle and many others he suspected of
of the angel related to the expected Messiah. take Mary treachery—not to mention the male babies in Bethlehem
home as your wife. They were legally bound to each other (v. 16). His reign was also noted for splendor, as seen in the
but not yet living together as husband and wife. what is many theaters, amphitheaters, monuments, pagan altars, for-
conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. This agrees perfectly tresses and other buildings he erected or refurbished—
with the announcement to Mary (Lk 1:35), except that the including the greatest work of all, the rebuilding of the temple
latter is more specific (see note on Lk 1:26–35). in Jerusalem, begun in 19 or 20 BC and finished 68 years after
1:21 the name Jesus. See NIV text note; the meaning is more his death (see note on Jn 2:20). Magi. Probably astrologers, per-
specifically explained in the rest of the verse. save. See Lk haps from Persia or southern Arabia or Mesopotamia (“Be-
2:11 and note. tween the Rivers”), all of which are east of the Holy Land. Jeru-
1:22 fulfill. Twelve times (here; 2:15,23; 3:15; 4:14; 5:17; 8:17; 12:17; salem. Since they were looking for the “king of the Jews” (v. 2),
13:14,35; 21:4; 27:9) Matthew uses a fulfillment formula (e.g., they naturally came to the Jewish capital city (see maps,
“this took place to fulfill . . . ”) when speaking of the OT being pp. 1660, 2525).
fulfilled in the events of Jesus’ life. Some of these are uniquely 2:2 king of the Jews. Indicates the Magi were Gen-
fulfilled by Jesus, while others are typological, where Jesus is tiles. Matthew wants to show that people of all na-
the ultimate fulfillment of an OT type (see note on 2:15). tions acknowledged Jesus as “king of the Jews” and came
child Jesus and his mother are mentioned together, he infant nation went down into Egypt,and
so theillustrations
child Jesus
is mentioned first (vv. 11,13–14,20–21). gold . . . frankin- went there. And as Israel was led by God out of Egypt, so
cense . . . myrrh. Three gifts perhaps gave rise to the leg- also was Jesus.
end that there were three Magi. But the Bible nowhere 2:16 kill all the boys ....
. . two years old and under. The num-
indicates
tes the number of the Magi, and they were almost ber killed has often been exaggerated as being in the thouthou-
certainly not kings (see note on v. 1). myrrh. See note on sands. In so small a village as Bethlehem, however (even
Ge 37:25. with the surrounding area included), the number was
2:13 angel of the Lord. See note on Lk 2:9. large—though
probably not large— though the act, ofo course, was no less
2:15 the death of Herod. In 4 BC. Out of Egypt I called brutal.
my son. This quotation from Hos 11:1 refers in that 2:18 Originally referencing mothers in Judah lamenting
context to God’s calling the nation of Israel out of Egypt their sons being exiled to Babylonia (see note on Jer 31:15).
in the time of Moses. But Matthew, under the inspiration The OT contexts of all three citations in Mt 2 so far (2:6,15,18)
of the Spirit, applies it also to Jesus thus identifying focus on the promise of return from exile. Matthew seems
Jesus as the new w Israel coming out of Egypt. Matthew to be using these quotations to highlight Jesus as fulfill-
sees the history of Israel (God’s “son”) recapitulated in ment of Scripture and to signal that Jesus brings about the
God’s unique Son). Just as Israel as an
the life of Jesus (God’s end of his people’s exile.
N ew Testament writers understand Jesus to be the fulfillment of the Jewish story told in
the Jewish Scriptures. One way they emphasize Jesus as this fulfillment is by highlighting
an OT figure, object, or event, and then connecting it to Jesus.
In this correspondence, the OT “type” is shown to be brought to completion in Jesus (who is
sometimes called the “antitype”). For example, Matthew connects Jesus with Israel by citing
Hos 11:1, which speaks of God’s son, Israel, coming out of Egypt. Matthew shows that Jesus,
like Israel of old, will be delivered from Egypt by God (see Mt 2:15 and note; 2:20–21). Therefore
Israel is “a type” for Jesus (with Jesus as the “antitype”).
For another example, consider the temple in John’s Gospel. Jesus fulfills the purposes of the
temple (God’s presence with his people; cf. Jn 1:14–18). And according to Jn 2:13–22, Jesus could
speak of his body (his self) as the temple (Jn 2:20–21). John also goes on to show how various
Jewish festivals are types for Jesus’ person and work. For instance, John understands the Feast
of Tabernacles as typological for Jesus’ identity as light and the living water, key elements of
this festival (Jn 8:12; 7:37–38; cf. 4:10,14).