Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design For Wireless Applications
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design For Wireless Applications
Abstract
1. Introduction
1
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Figure 1.
Configuration of the UWB antenna: (a) front view of structure and (b) back view of structure.
2
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
exist with length of 21.1 mm, width of 40 mm and thickness of 0.01 mm. Figure 1 shows
the configuration of the proposed antenna with a top view and bottom view.
The operational performance of the antenna is analyzed with variations in its
parameters such as ground slot dimensions (length l1 and width W1) are known as
the parametric study of the proposed design. This study is carried out by variations
in slot length l1 and width W1 while keeping other parameters constant. Slot length
l1 and width W1 is varied from 0 to 7 mm and 0.6 to 1.4 mm respectively, as depicted
in Figure 2. It is observed that, as variation are done in the value of l1 and W1, the
reflection coefficient (S11) is changes and the respective frequency band is also
changes accordingly. The optimized impedance matching for UWB band character-
istics is achieved at length l1 = 6.1 mm and width W1 = 1 mm.
Figure 2.
Simulated reflection coefficient S11 of the proposed antenna for different values of l1 and W1.
Figure 3.
Simulated and measured reflection coefficient S11 of the proposed UWB antenna.
3
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Figure 4.
Slotted structure on ground plane.
4
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
Figure 5.
Filter structures placed on the ground plane.
Figure 6.
Simulated reflection coefficient S11 of the antenna for filter structures in Figure 5.
5
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Figure 7.
Simulated reflection coefficient S11 of the antenna for different values of l2 and W2 in structure-III.
6
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
Figure 8.
Switchable filter structure on the ground plane (unit: millimeters).
Figure 9.
Equivalent circuit for p-i-n diode: (a) ON-state ( forward bias) and (b) OFF-state (reverse bias).
The simulated and measured reflection coefficients S11 for all five states are
shown in Figure 12. Comparison of simulated S11 with measured ones is indicated
as a good agreement between them. From Table 1, for narrowband states I achieve
the bandwidth of 16% (5.05–5.89 GHz) and 14% (5.01–5.79 GHz) in simulation and
measurement mode respectively. For state II (narrowband), obtained bandwidth
of 11% (8.76–9.80 GHz) and 10% (8.68–9.69 GHz) in simulation and measurement
7
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
III ON OFF OFF OFF OFF 2.21–2.52 2.20–2.50 13 and 15 12 and 15 Dual band
and and
5.07–5.89 5.05–5.90
IV OFF ON OFF OFF OFF 2.18–2.52 2.19–2.50 14 and 10 13 and 9 Dual band
and and
8.78–9.71 8.70–9.60
Table 1.
Details of combinations of p-i-n diodes with simulated and measured frequency band and bandwidth in each states.
Figure 10.
Images of the fabricated antenna: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.
mode respectively. For next state III, antenna resonant in dual band mode and
achieve impedance bandwidth of 13% (2.21–2.52 GHz) and 15% (5.07–5.89 GHz)
under simulation and 12% (2.20–2.50 GHz) and 15% (5.05–5.90 GHz) during
measurement. For State IV, antenna identifies the operating bandwidth of 14%
(2.18–2.52 GHz) and 10% (8.78–9.71 GHz) and 13% (2.19–2.50 GHz) and 9% (8.70–
9.60 GHz) during simulation and measurement mode respectively. For V state of
UWB mode, antenna indicates the operating bandwidth of 141% (2.87–16.87 GHz)
and 140% (2.97–16.80 GHz) under simulation and measurement mode respectively.
The resonant bands are achieved by switching states of diodes can serve sev-
eral wireless applications such as WLAN, WiMAX, WiFi and UWB. As per IEEE
standards the WLAN is identify for 802.11b/g/n (2.4–2.48 GHz), 802.11a/h/j/n
(5.2 GHz) and ISM band (2.4–2.5 GHz). Wireless standards WiMAX, WiFi and
UWB are identify for frequency bands of 2.3–2.4 and 5.15–5.85 GHz, 2.40–2.48
8
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
Figure 11.
Images of measurement setup for proposed antenna.
Figure 12.
Simulated and measured reflection coefficient S11 of the proposed antenna for states I-V (from (a)-(e) as per Table 1).
9
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Figure 13.
Surface current distribution of the proposed antenna for different frequencies.
and 5.15–5.85 GHz and 3.1–10.6 GHz respectively. Proposed design also covers the
airborne radar applications works at 9.2 GHz.
From Figure 12(e), the resonance is identified at the frequency of 3.0, 5.0, 7.0
and 9.6 GHz. As per the observation of Figure 13, it is found that the first reso-
nance is controlled by the inverted L shaped slot dimensions since the maximum
surface current is present across it. Second resonance 5.0 GHz is obtained due to the
octagonal shape of radiating element and the feedline attached to the patch. Third
resonance at 7.0 GHz is obtained due to the rectangular slot created on the ground
plane. The two rectangular slits dimensions of l2 and W2 are responsible to generate
tank circuit causes the fourth resonance at 9.5 GHz. The surface current distribution
is observed at theses resonance frequencies as shown in Figure 13.
From Figure 14, the 3D-gain of the antenna is observed at different resonant
frequencies, where the maximum radiation is identify at the various values of angles
(theta and phi). It is noticed that at higher frequency, the directivity is improved so that
the gain is increased. Figure 15 represents the measured antenna gain in single band,
dual band and UWB modes for various switching states. It is analyzed that at lower
frequency range gain is reduced whereas at higher frequencies (above 6 GHz) gain is
improved as compared to reference gain level of 4 dB. It is also observed that antenna
exhibit the acceptable gain in narrowband and dual-band modes. Figure 15(b) shows
the average gain of 3.9 dB is achieved for UWB mode of the proposed antenna.
Figure 16(a) indicates the variation of the simulated radiation efficiency from
96.9 to 79.5% and from 97.2 to 70.3% for switching states I and II respectively, for the
proposed antenna. The variation of the simulated radiation efficiency from 95.5 to
73.3% and from 94.0 to 78.1% is observed for state III and IV respectively. Figure 16(b)
shows the simulated radiation efficiency variation from 98.9 to 85.8% for UWB
10
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
Figure 14.
Simulated gain (dB) of the proposed antenna for different frequencies.
Figure 15.
Measured gain of the proposed antenna for different switching states: (a) single-band and dual-band modes
and (b) UWB.
mode. It is noticed that the radiation efficiency is stay above the 70% in all the
narrow band, dual band and UWB band. Another observation is that at higher
frequency range the simulated radiation efficiency is decreases.
11
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Figure 16.
Simulated radiation efficiency of the proposed antenna for different switching states: (a) single-band and
dual-band modes and (b) UWB.
Figure 17.
Simulated and measured AR (axial ratio) (along θ = 78° and Ф = −89°) of the proposed antenna.
The axial ratio (AR) measurement of the proposed antenna is done inside an
anechoic chamber by using antenna measurement system with VNA. To obtain
maximum ARBW (axial ratio bandwidth), the antenna measurement system is
aligned along the directions of θ = 78° and Ф = −89°, where AR is stay below the
3 dB reference level. The simulated ARBW of 38% is achieved for frequency range
from 4.65 to 6.85 GHz as shown in Figure 17. The measured ARBW is slightly less
than the simulated one at the center frequency 5.65 GHz.
12
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
Patterns are analyzed at operating frequencies 2.4, 5.4, 7.5, and 10 GHz for E and
H plane (principal plane). From Figure 18, there is dumb bell shape and quasi-
omnidirectional like radiation patterns in H-Plane and E-Plane respectively, which
represents that the proposed design is a good candidate for wireless communica-
tion. There is a good agreement seen between the measured and simulated radia-
tion patterns for E and H plane with the slight difference caused due to assembly
Figure 18.
Measured and simulated E and H plane radiation patterns.
13
14
Ref. Year Antenna size Bandwidth (in %) Gain (in dBi) Radiation efficiency (in %) No. of Covered wireless standards Frequency Band
(in mm3) operating Reconfigurability
modes (in Achieved
GHz)
(1.5/2.4/3.5/5.4)
Ref [24] 2017 50 × 50 × 1.6 2/12/18.2 6.35/5.57/3.9 82.1/84.9/90.9 3 (WLAN/ X Band) (4.8/5.8/9.2) No
Ref [25] 2018 40 × 40 × 1.6 11.49/3.37/8.61 1.78/3.5/4.4 75.62/72/73 3 (WLAN/ WiMAX Band) (2.4/3.5/ No
5.5)
Table 2.
Comparison of propose designed with those in the state-of-art literature.
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
5. Conclusion
Conflict of interest
15
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
Author details
© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
16
Frequency Reconfigurable UWB Antenna Design for Wireless Applications
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86035
References
[1] Zhang C, Yang S, Pan HK, Fathy AE, antennas. IEEE Transactions
Nair VK. Frequency reconfigurable on Antennas and Propagation.
antennas for multi radio wireless 2012;60(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1109/
platforms. IEEE Microwave Magazine. TAP.2011.2167929
2009;10(1):66-83. DOI: 10.1109/
MMM.2008.930677 [10] Gardner P, Kelly JR, Hall PS.
Integrated wide-narrow band antenna
[2] FCC (Federal Communications for switched operation. In: Processing
Commission). First Report and order. IEEE EuCAP; 2009; Berlin, Germany.
2002 2009. pp. 3757-3760
[7] Li RL, Jin GP, Zhang DL. Optically [14] Ahsan MR, Islam M, Ullah MH.
controlled reconfigurable antenna for Computational and experimental
cognitive radio applications. Electronics analysis of high gain antenna for
Letters. 2011;47(17):948-950. DOI: WLAN/WiMAX applications. Journal
10.1049/el.2011.1958 of Computational Electronics.
2015;14(2):634-641. DOI: 10.1007/
[8] Gardner P, Hamid MR, Hall PS, s10825-015-0699-8
Ghanem F. Vivaldi antenna with
integrated switchable band pass resonator. [15] Rajabloo H, Kooshki VA, Oraizi H.
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Compact microstrip fractal Koch
Propagation. 2011;59(11):4008-4015. slot antenna with ELC coupling load
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2011.2164197 for triple band application. AEU-
International Journal of Electronics and
[9] Ghafouri-Shiraz H, Tariq A. Communications. 2017;73:144-149. DOI:
Frequency-reconfigurable monopole 10.1016/j.aeue.2016.12.027
17
UWB Technology - Circuits and Systems
18