SECTION 7 EXAMPLE PROBLEMS Eleven sample problems have been selected to illustrate the modeling the use of the input nanelist techniques described in Section 4 as well and control cada. ‘The paragraphs below describe each of the exauple problens illustrating the program setup of the configurations described in Sections 4 and 5, The input data for each example problem ts presented, and the com rte ected for plete output is presented in the microfiche supplement to this rey 7.1 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1 Figure 28 shows three body configurations along with selected X coordi~ nates where shape parameters would be specified. Notice the concentration of points used to define curvature and abrupt changes in body contours. Config~ uration (¢) 1s chosen as the Problem 1 exanple to illustrate the body alone analysie at all speed regimes. Subsonic body analyses are obtained for an approximate axisymmetric body and for a cambered body. A sunmary of the four cases in problem 1 is given below: Case No. Configuration Mach No. Consents 1 Body 0.60 Axi symmetric solution 2 Body 0.60 Cambered solution Body 0.9,1.40,2.5 Supersonic analysis at Mack No, 1.4 and 25 4 Body 2.5 Hypersonic analysis This problem illustrates the use of the CASEID, DUMP CASE, SAVE, and NEXT CASE control cards. 107SELTCON NHACH=1.0,MACH(1) =0,60,ALPHASL1, /ALSCHD(1)#=6.0,-4.0,-2-0,0.0,2.0) 6.0,8.0,12.0, 16.0,20-0,24.0,ANUB (1) 04, 28668 SOPTINS SREFod.85,COARRE2, 46, 8LREFH4, 205 SSYNTHS KoCed.i4,2cG0~0- 208 Se00r axeis.0, X(1)#0.0,0.288,0.589,1.26,2.26,2.59,2,92,3,59,4.57,6.26, 5(1)+0:0,0-080,0.160,0.325,0.751,0, 603,0.939,1.032,1,032,1.032, B(1}40:0,1.00,1.42,2,01,3.08,3.34,3.44,3-61,3.61/3.615, s8O0Y BNOSEOL, /BiNez, 59, 0143-675 hy ease 2 Save DUMP case NeXt CASE ‘sa00¥ 2U(1) 372,+.138,0.200, 3345-343, .343,.343/.343, BL(1) 92,895) 0,715,0.754,0,808,~.868,-.860,~.860,-.868,~. 068 CASEIO ASTNNETRIC (CANBEAED) BODY SOLUTION, EAAMPLE PROBLEM 1, CASE Save Next cage 'SFLTEGH NHACHH3.0,AACH(1) =0.90,1.40,2.5,ANNUB(1) +6, 466,9. 9666, 17.8565 save CASEID ASYNNETRIC (CANBERED) BODY SOLUTION, EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1, CASE 3 Next cage 'SEETCON. NMACH=1.0, 4ACH (1) #2:5,ANNUB (1) #17. 86E6,HYPERS*.TRUE.S ‘$00DY ns=0.05 CASEID HYPERSONIC BODY SOLUTION, EXAMPLE PRCBLEM 1, CASE 4 Next case aces 108‘REFERENCE PLANE. a x (e) : coor roman 0 I xem i a wo oo oo 235 095 Ss tm tm le ae as ote if tm am am eae ie ee re ae ote te cae i ea a ts Sa 3 iz in on oe Ss ois ie un os te & ime ik an So fe FIGURE 28 BODY MODELING AND EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1 BODY DATA 109742. EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2 Wing alone models for straight-tapered and nonstraight-tapered planforns fare shown in Figure 29. The root and tip airfoil sections differ as shown in in Figure 30; therefore average values of section data are used where appro- priate. Calculation and determination of section input characteristics are re also fron the procedure and figures of Appendix B. These input variable ‘umarized in Figure 30. The configuration analysis consists of: Case Configuration Mach No. Comment: 1 Exposed wing 0.6,0.9,1.40 Straight-tapered-wing 25 duap A array 2 Exposed wing 0.60 Cranked ving 3 Exposed wing 0.60 Double delta This problem also illustrates the control of program looping using the variable LOOP in namelist FLICON to obtain the flight conditions. Note thet 6 2 and 3 use the sane inputs to FLTCO.!, but LOOP ts changed fron 2 to 3. « 1» SAYS 75.14 '38+ TOVCOHB. 124 X0VCOH CASEID EXPOSEU "CRANKED MiNG SOLUTIGNs EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2» CASE 2" NEXT case. “SFLICON LOOP=3.8 SUCPLNF TYPEA2.08 ‘CASEID EXPOSED DOUBLE DELTA WING SOLUTION, EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2+ CASE 9 no— 1334 MI uV swore TY vouvmoasay Tom naive we 1¥08/ ZZ aZ WA 1GOUd 3TdWVXa ‘STTEVINVA DIASIUSLOVEVHO HOduIV of 3uNDld ‘SamWA VL120 37200 Bo GaNNVED 40 3OVUBAY Twn’ SIMVACEUTEVL LOWES sro sore or amu. = waaay amu = u3RKVO © xvaNaeay 33s, YUU VOW = THoguIY gu 19-010 YoWN = tHOZaIV Loo ‘9 3NDL4 BHOSON ASITARYW LMM OL W334 a2 bei7.3 EXANPLE PROBLEM 3 Pertinent data for Example Problem 3 are presented in Figure 21. The problem consists of a wing-body-horizontal tail-vertical~tail configuration analyzed at a subscate and transonic Mach numbers. Results are obtained for various combinations of the vehicle components by using the BUILD cotton. The second case utilizes experimental body and wing-body data to update sub sequent Digital Datcom configuration analyses, The renatning cases illu- strate the use of the twin vertical panel, propeller power and jet power inputs. A sunmary of the various configurations analyzed 1s presented below. case _N Configuration 1 Wing + body + vertical-tail + hortzontal~tail configuration buildup 2 Wing + body + vertical~tatl + hortzontal-tatl with body and wing-body experimental data 3 Wing + body + vertical-tail + horizontal~ tail + twin-vertical-panels with body and wing body experimental data 4 Wing + body + vertical-tail + hortzontal~ tail + twin-vertical-panel + propeller power with body and wing-body experimental data 5 Wing + body + vertical-tail + horizontal- tail + tuin-vertical-tafl + jet power with body and wing-body experimental datasort HFLTCOM HAACHA2.0,NACH(1) 9.60, .80,NALPHAGS.0,ALSCHD(1)#-2,0,0.0,2,0, 20.0, 24.0, Ri1NUB(1)=2,20E6,3. 04868 RCH (1) #0.60,0,80,1.5,RNNUG(i) 94, 2626,6.4E6, 05 HOSE=20,TALLel 0,011.46 0LA01.97, 5322, 330, (850,12 460,2;50/3,43,3:97, 4:57, 2500347» 0220, 0491, 08929-1364 138, 2136, -0993, 0598, £262,823, 785,106, 1.305, 15905, 112,866, 0417; .0833, 1255-1665, 208, .208, sucpLur cinotrsd. 346, 33PuEci .29,23euei30,chaoRei.16,SAvS1e4S.. 'SHAPP00.0, WISTA*O.0,S5PNDD*0..0, DNDADi60-0,DNDADOWO.0,TYPE=1~1 SNGSCHR TOVC™.060, DELAY ELALPA(1) 00.131, 'GLAAX( 2), 62,CH0%0<0, UE ‘SVEPUMY Cuiotée, 420,83 PHE=. ICHSTAT=. 25,SHAPP4O.0,THISTA*O.0,1Y9E*1.08 $UTSCHN TOvee.09, x0VC=0.40,CLALPA (1) «0,141 ,LERT#,0075$ Swascun CLnaxied. 768. ‘Supine Cunote>. 3 sah “ASTAT=0.25, 67 cURDR, 42,SAVSI=43.0,CHSTATSE 'SSPND0~0.0,0HOAD{=0.0,0HDAS0%0.0,TYPE°1. 08, 1, ALPIAE®O,OyCLALPA(1): ASETO‘Conrsctnition sviuade, weanéce MOSLEN 3, CASE 2 ReKt case, SEREROL cua (1)2,0575,cmn40 (2) (004,00, 7004, 008,012,020, 060,088, -10, }2;007%, :0038, «020, 038, .660, 083,110, 140, ‘SEXPNG2 Ciawn(i}*.06,LAB{i) =.002,chAB(1)=.0033, ALPuved, B,ACLAMAL2,01,CLMieL. 39, SALPLite6. 2,ACLAMM=10.10,CLaHo1 02,5 CASEID INCLUDES soDY AND WING-GODY EXPERIMENTAL OATA, EXAMPLE PROBLEN 3, CASE 2 1655 'STVTPAN BvP0O.40,BY.60,20V,36,0401,10,5Vs,360,V71TE%20,0,VLP61.04,2P40.08 gAgeto" nets sdor hno’winas20br ekéenineniAt Shon, EXAMiLE Phosien’3, CASE 2 san ‘i-detHstco+0.13,PUALOC*0 0, PAVLOC+0.0,PRPRADSO.40, -NOPEPE*4.0,BAPR7S-18.0,1P+0.0,CROT*,PALSE.§ SAGETO TncLiDEs soor Aio'Winc-200Y"EXPERTAEVTAL DATA, EXAMPLE PROOLEN 3, CASE 4 .0,MACH(1) =. 6 ,RNMUB(1) 92, 25868 x sGyNENGEI~i 97h 35,aTALoce ‘SINLTASD 0, JEANGLA15. ‘Serore=s000, ,annsr?e: casero Tacuupis Sooy Aub WiNG"BOOY EXPERIMENTAL OATA, EXAMPLE PROBLEN 3, CASE 5 wext case 14FLIGHT CONDITIONS: MACH NUMBERS = 060, 0.9 RCYNOLOS MUMDERE PER FT = 2.28 «108, 3.01 x16 SCHEDULED ANGLES OF ATTACK ~20, 0, 20, .0, 80, 120, 160, 200, 28.0 REFERENCE PARANETERS: REFERENCE AREA = 2.25 ‘LONG, REF. LENGTH = 0.822 LATERAL REF. LENGTH = 3.00 SENSPAN EXPOSED SEMISPAN a = »—_—_| ER ATA MACH 0D (Cody ™ 0.082 (Cng)gt 200, MACH= 080 (6g 082, (Gog), 0.03, (CLdyp™ 09575 (Cnglyg “2.05 (CL dye™ 0050 ALPHA (Cog (Cig (Calg (CoWvg (CLs (Colng (Calg, 2 012 0004 tom ons ais an10 ane a aol 09 © ooo cou op on 10 2 oo dom oom ols os -t010 ore 4 0013 000s one oni 02s a0 ois 4 cou oo tse 07-008 ant 2 tos oom oan gs “naz ts 1% tm to 026 076 +0013 0 cow ons oa ost “903 soe 4 007 O00 Oe asi FIGURE 31 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 3 DATA ns7.4 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4 Pertinent information for Example Problem 4 1s presented in Figure 32, In this ex speed regine (Case 1), Canard and wing section data are calculated using the ple a wing~body-canard configuration is analyzed in the subsonic Airfoil Section Module (Appendix B). Case 2 illustrates the use of the supersonic airfoil option of the Airfoil Section Module, nonzero body nose ordinate, vehicle scale factor, and use of metric inputs. Note that since the NACA control cards are being used, RNNUB and NACH must be used to define the flight conditions. SILICON WHACH=1.0,HACH(1)=0,60,RALPUASS. ,ALSCHD(1)=0.0,5.0,10.0/15.0,20.04 ENNUB(1) 03.1668 soPtiNS SheP=694.2,C04 SomNTNS xcrH36, 68, fc0~0 Sidr hxeis.a,dnoséease 18,07, BLREF#4S.65 8 FarLs2.0,U4i020-0,BLA00.0, HU) 30. 995,412.47, 15.97.19 .47,22-09, 26,49 ,30-0,33+51,37-02, 13, 44,03,47-53,81-08 84252, 37-99,60-0, sthi20c8seabyasaardds a8 dese, 17. 9¢¢10203,21.0,21.91,22.20,21.90, 2140519491936, 14,6412, 31,942,228 PEL 90.0,1.84, 4.92, 7-21,9- 32,11, 05;12, 41, 13-36 13-94, 14614,13.94, 12636518. 41,1105 79232;9-21,4.92,4,04,000, (A) noo, 2935952521551 68,1. 76,1.97,2013,2.2252625,2.22,2612) 1.97176, 18, +0, ONDADI=0..0, DHOADO=0.0,7YPE= (064, 2420-0 ,ALTWA0 05 +1 ,CHRDROL2.87 SAUSI*60.08 /CHRDRO26.62,SAVSI=38,52,CHSTAT=0,0, §Rits1420-0,S5PG0%0,0,DHOADTOD.0,DHDADONO.0,T¥PE=1.0,8H8 (1)479.5, serdy=73. ) gpStlo aor SL08'CING!eLbs tawano, exaneve oeten 4, case 1 Din n SELTCON WHACHeI.0,AACH(1)=2,00,NALPHA®S. /ALSCHD(1)#0.0,5.0,10.0)154 uwun(1)o6. 5666, MALT=L. sALE( i) 029600,9 SOPEINS shernge-G)3,cottnes. $077, aLAGP=12.911¢ Ssuitus xcani2,i800,zc0e0.0,Scaues0-0¢ MCD 9160,12613,2.672.3, 7344 815-86 Te 200 35. 384ylaces0c15. abd ieesdi ty BUdde0s5 3605 68541,052,1360,1.615,1.01) 114 -613,12 36012083, .609, 268.0. i 36h i 0353-198, 840 8 3eas fa 249, 4.310,4.249, 4 6093051509, $. 300, Seas Lede i9e, fy 439¢ 36 REL 90,5008 5.2295 0351, 451 58, 677,649, 25260451, 381099, .003,0.8 WACA=M-ie3=30.0-9.5-20.0, WACAcH=§-i=50,0-2.5 custir=0.0, 0, T1STA*0..0,SSPNDD0.0,DHDADT#0.0,DHDA00%0.0,YPE61.08 gStuts iu23.4579,2W0,0,aLtw0d, 08 Pe0,G,SsPib=1.891),SEPN=2,4614,CHRORSA.2276, SAVST=6 SStvtHe Xhe9,9672,ine0,0,AcIN60. 08 5044, SSpin6.9585, CHROR 1136, Savsr=98,52,CHSTAR 8, THLStA*0..0,5SNDD%0.0,0H0A0T+0,.0,DH0AD060.0,7FPE=1, 284 PCS) 14 41705 WING PLUS CANARD, EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4, CASE 2 i casetD 000" | Wext case usREFERENCE DATA TREFERENCE AREA = 6942 LONGITUDINAL REF. LENGTH = 18.07 LATERAL REF. LENGTH = 45.64 LIGHT conDITON DATA 'WACH NUNBER = 0.60 REYHOLOSNOJFT= A118 SCHEDULED ANGLES OF ATTACK = 0, DY OATA x 3 oo “to 22 soe ise no Me B77 we 8 na a0 ae mo 2M Ba 290 me 10 as isa 4 1 as Me a Ls we Tae ou ao ae JWNG AND CANARD DATA AIRFOIL WACA 6SADO4 09,150, 08 sengge™ 2 La Ls 0782 ams 00 FIGURE 32 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4 DATA uy745° EXAMPLE PROBLEM $ The wing-body portion of the configuration used in Example Problem 3 1s nodified hy attaching plain trailing~edge flaps to the wing. This example problen is uted to illustrate partial owpute and dynamic derivative input and output. A sunnary of Example Problem 5 analysis is as follows: Gase No. Configuration Mach No. Comments 1 Body + wtag 0.60 PART, DAMP, DUMP DYN 2 Body + wing + 0.60 DUMP FCN. plain trating edge flaps The Digital Datcom output data, including @ duap of the DYN and FCM common arrays, are presented in the microfiche supplement. The flap configuration 4s shown in Figure 33. SILICON NALPHAA9.0,ALSCHO(1) #=2.0,0,0,2-0,4.04 12-0, 16,0,20,0,24.05 shitcbn iinkenel “Benaen cy Sorting snere2.35;coanneo. le dAvEte4s.o,cns0an~. 25, 10 CLALPA(1) 90-131, secsehs ANP "GUTnELE NOELTA=6..0,DELTA(1) =0, 10. ,20. 20. 40,160. ,PHETE*.0522,CHROPT=..2094, Chnoros-15S4,aPanea, 200,SPaNFOs. 308, F2¥PEeL-O,cas.01125, 70.0235, pueteps,oaai wrveee 0: DAMPING OBRIVATIVES, EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5, CASE 1 H CASEID PLAIN FLAPS ON WING, EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5, CASE 2 Bete Ease uaee { FLIGHT CONDIIONS: MACH NUMBER = 0560 IEYNOLDS NUMBERS PER FT = 426 x 108 SCHEDULED ANGLES OF ATTACK= 20, 00,20, 40,80, 120,160, 200, 260 REFERENCE PARAMETERS: REFERENCE AREA = 225 a ‘LONG. REF. LENGTH = 0822 LATERAL REF. LENGTH = 200 PLAIN FLAP OETPIL | | ‘ FIGURE 33 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5 DATA us7.6 EAAMPLE PROBLEM 6 The wing-body configuration of Exanple P:-blen 5 -r used to {llustrate aileron and spoiler input and output data, Figure 34 chows the geonetry. SFLTCON NALPUA®S.0,ALSCHOX-2.0,0.0,2.0, 12.0,16.0,20.0,24. 05, 2 ‘SSrwTHS KOGE2. 60, CGe0-0, e170, 2420.0, ALTH=0, 05 ‘SbODY.Nxw16, 0, BNOSE%2_0,8TAILAL.0,OLNS1.46,00K—1.97, KUL) 20,05 01755322, 53050054146, 2050, 3-434 3097, 4574 (1) 40.0, .0419, .0853, .125, 1665, .208, 208, 298, -178, .1385 SHCPLNP clitorP“d. 346, S2PNESI, 29, S20hel |50,CiRORSL. 16 SAVET=45.0,[email protected], (0, TW1STA*0,0,SS0400-0.6,CHDADi=0-0, DUDADO+0.0,TYPEM1 08 SHCSCHR TOVCs.060,DELTAY=1. 30. 30VC%0,40,CLI20.0,ALPHAT#0,0,CLAUPA(1) 90.231, 'CLMAL(1} 2.82 /CH0%0-0,CERI20, 0025 ,CLAMO=. 1058 SASYPEP CELTAL(L)©8. 10-420» ,30. 540+ /DELTAR(L) #2. y-5. p10, 401524920, 1126 ,chroros.0692,SPANPIH1,108,SPANFO*1, 50, PHETES, C5228 CASED PLAIM FLAP AILERON, EXAMPLE. PROBLEM 6, CASE’ save NEXT CASE. 'SASYPLP STYPE*3.0,0¢LTAD(1)«,0130, .0261,.0380, .0513, 0630, .0750, DELTAS(1)#,013, 0261, .038, .0513, 063.075, x50C(1} 0.6380, 10955, 6580, .6638, .6656, .6280,x5PAKE*,$5,NGOC(1)*.0357, 0710, .0956,.1162, 213655 313598) caStio SPOILER-sLoT-DEPLECTOR ON WING, EXAMPLE PROBLEN 6, CASE 2 Next ease 120FLIGHT CONDITIONS: MACH NUMBER «0.60 REYNOLDS NUMBERS PER FT =4.26 x 108 SCHEDULED ANGLES OF ATTACK = -20, 0.0, 20,40, 80, 120, 160 200, 240 REFERENCE PARAMETERS: REFERENCE AREA = 225 ‘LONG. REF. LENGTH = 0.822 LATERAL REF. LENGTH = 3.00 PLAIN FLAP AILERON DETAIL | | i | |7.7 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 7 The wing-hody-tail configuration of Example Problen 3 1s used to {1lu- strase trim control with an elevator on the horizontal tail. In addition, the effect of plain tratling-edge flaps on the wing (see Example Probie 5) 1s included via experinental data input to tLlustrate » proceduie for aulti- ple bigh-life and control device analysis. The wing high Life incresent output iw used Lo update wing-body undeflected totals via naneliet EXPRan. The geometry is sketched in Figure 35. [SPLTCOM wHACHSL. 0, MACH(1) =. 60,ALPHAG9..0,ALSCHD(1)*-2.0,0.0,2.0, 12.0,16,0,20,0,24.0, aMNUB{1) 22,20 soprtis SReP=2.35,CBARRH0. 62 1s rine: 0cSW=.0ALIW=0.0,3H.93,2000.0,ALIHED 206,208, 208,176,118 99, Gpnel Su, CiRDReis1e-SA0BT 43.0, } {SHCSCUR CLAAAESO. 785, svtscun Tove~,09,x0vc=0. IRIS, 0025,CLANO~. 1035. 9. DELTA) 60. 4040, Puegere 523, SpAgria. 395, 1,070,1.100,1.1748 rin EASEID INCLUDES HIGH LIFT EFFECT OW WING, EXAMPLE PROBLEN 7 Next Case 122—s | FLIGHT CONDITIONS: MACH NUMBER = 0.60 REYNOLDS NUMBERS PER FT = 2.28 x 10° ‘SCHEDULED ANGLES OF ATTACK™= 20, 00,20, 4.0, 80. 120, 160, 200, 260 REFERENCE PARAMETERS: REFERENCE AREA = 228 ‘LONG. REF. LENGTH = 0.822 LATERAL REF. LENGTH = 3.00 SEMSPAN EXPOSED SEMISPAN FIGURE 35 EXAMPLE PROBLEM 7 DATA 123