Bereavement and Complicated Grief: Geriatric Disorders (H Lavretsky, Section Editor)
Bereavement and Complicated Grief: Geriatric Disorders (H Lavretsky, Section Editor)
DOI 10.1007/s11920-013-0406-z
We begin by clarifying terminology. We use the term Dyregrov and Dyregrov [7] point out, however, that certain
bereavement to refer to the experience of having lost a loved difficult circumstances of a death can leave virtually everyone
one, not the response to such a loss. Grief refers to the desirous of professional support. For example, after a suicide,
psychobiological response to bereavement. Acute grief is the up to 80 % of bereaved people say that they want professional
initial response, often intense and disruptive. Integrated grief help [8]. When the bereaved do seek support, clinicians can
is the permanent response after adaptation to the loss in which add their voices to the chorus of support, bringing both their
satisfaction in ongoing life is renewed. Complicated grief is a professional expertise and their humanity to the encounter.
form of prolonged acute grief, where the term complicated is They can educate people about the rocky uncharted pathway
used in the medical sense of a superimposed process that ahead. However, they must be humble in their expertise.
impedes healing. Complicated grief is a distinct mental health Informed clinicians can provide Sherpa-like guidance to be-
disorder. Mourning denotes the array of psychological pro- reaved people, walking by their side as they navigate the
cesses set in motion by the loss to facilitate adaptation [5]. arduous path to rediscovery of meaning and purpose, and
new possibilities for joy and satisfaction.
Some say grief should not be pathologized, as though a It is important that any clinicians working with bereaved older
clinician would choose to create pathology when our whole adults be aware that bereavement in older adults can be
purpose is to relieve it. Inflammation is the painful, universal associated with a number of negative outcomes. Loss of a
response to exposure to certain bacteria, yet we do not debate loved one is associated with worsening health, including
whether a clinician is pathologizing a natural human experi- weight loss, increased rates of illness and functional impair-
ence by diagnosing and treating it. However, mental disorders ment [9, 10]. Mostofsky et al. [11•] analyzed data from the
carry the added burden of stigma, and there is the diagnostic Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study (mean
challenge that most mental disorders exist on a continuum age 61; MIOS) and documented a 21.1-fold (95 % CI 13.1–
with normal functioning. Perhaps for these reasons, a diagno- 34.1) increase in incidence of MI within 24 h of learning of the
sis can sometimes seem like a gratuitous negative judgment death of a loved one. Incidence declined each subsequent day
rather than a first step in accessing appropriate treatment. but remained significantly elevated for a month. Khanfer et al.
Again, Didion’s clearly articulated discourse is helpful. She [12•] studied older adults (average age 73) bereaved for
writes: “The power of grief to derange the mind has…been 2 months compared to age and sex-matched non-bereaved.
exhaustively noted…The mourner is in fact ill, but because this Bereavement was associated with lower neutrophil superox-
state of mind is common and seems so natural…we do not call ide production when challenged with bacteria or a protein
[it] an illness” (p.34, quoting Melanie Klein). Freud also felt kinase activator, and higher cortisol/DHEAS ratios that corre-
that grief should not be considered a mental disorder [6], and lated with elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms. Anoth-
many clinicians follow Freud and Klein and do not regard any er study assessed cardiovascular and immune functioning at
grief response as an illness. Yet, many bereaved people are 2 weeks and 6 months post-loss in bereaved relatives (average
suffering. What then is the role of clinicians in the management age 65) of patients who died in an ICU. The authors found
of grief? When and how should clinicians provide help? changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sleep, neuroendocrine
The answers to these questions are not clear-cut. Dyregrov and immune functioning [13]. Most of these changes normal-
and Dyregrov [7] stress the importance of relying on existing ized by 6 months post-loss, however.
social supports for bereaved people, and we concur with this Bereavement also appears to increase risk for mortality in
perspective. Providing comfort and support in the early be- the early period after the event. In a large primary care data-
reavement period is usually very natural for family, friends, base in the UK, bereavement was associated with increased
neighbors and others in the community. There are prescribed hazard of mortality, 1.25 (CI 1.21, 1.37), highest in the first
periods of contact such as visitation, funeral, sitting shiva and 90 days. This finding was stronger for those with no recorded
other ritualistic gatherings. Others can be helpful as caring chronic medical conditions prior to the loss and among those
listeners who share in reminiscence and join in seeking an- from high-income communities [14•]. Spouses bereaved by
swers to unanswerable questions; they must resist the urge to unexpected death also have a higher rate of mortality [15].
provide answers or gratuitous advice. As time goes on, These increased mortality rates appear to be attributed primar-
though, others can provide gentle encouragement to re- ily to suicide, accidents, heart disease and cancer [9].
engage in ongoing life, even when the bereaved person is In addition, bereavement is associated with changes in
not well motivated to do so. For most bereaved individuals, social and emotional factors in older adults, including a de-
natural social supports will be sufficient. crease in satisfaction and well-being and an increase in
Curr Psychiatry Rep (2013) 15:406 Page 3 of 7, 406
loneliness and social isolation [9, 16]. However, there appear testing diagnostic criteria, and Prigerson et al. published an
to be substantial variations in these outcomes based on socio- influential series of papers with an evolving set of proposed
economic factors. Arbuckle and De Vries [17] examined criteria (e.g., [24, 25]). However, the Prigerson criteria were
functioning, life satisfaction and hopefulness for the future based upon results of community studies with a small number
2–15 years after older adults lost a child or a partner. They of individuals with CG. Our group [26•, 27•] proposed a
found bereaved elders experienced less satisfaction and less slightly different set of diagnostic criteria based upon clinical
hopefulness but greater self-efficacy than controls who were experience and a much larger data set of individuals with CG
not bereaved. Negative social and health effects were signif- who sought help. The recently released fifth edition of the
icantly greater among women, and less education and income American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical
were also associated with worse bereavement outcomes. An- Manual (DSM-5) includes criteria for CG in the section on
other study found that, in households where married couples “Disorders Requiring Further Study.” Here, the condition is
had high-loss intra-household financial dependency, after called “Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder” [28]. Table 1
widowhood, in households with high financial dependency, outlines the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosis in adults.
bereaved men (the breadwinners) compared to married con- While these various criteria sets differ in some respects and
trols, experienced a significant loss in global well-being, consensus still needs to be reached, all proposals include symp-
whereas both widows and widowers experienced greater toms of prolonged acute grief, such as frequent intense yearning,
bereavement-related psychosocial distress. Bereaved women intense sorrow and emotional pain, preoccupation with the de-
experienced greater financial distress, regardless of pre-loss ceased and/or circumstances of the death, excessive avoidance of
dependency status [18]. reminders of the loss, difficulty accepting the death, feeling alone
and empty, and feeling that life has no purpose or meaning
without the deceased person. Identified CG symptoms also meet
Complicated Grief in Older Adults many of the criteria outlined by Stein and colleagues [29] needed
to confirm validity of a new diagnostic entity. We and others are
For most bereaved older adults, the health and emotional currently conducting a field trial of the proposed DSM-5 CG
consequences of bereavement resolve in a few months, and criteria, as well as alternative proposed criteria. We believe that
pre-loss functioning is restored [19]. However, for a clinically consensus will be reached in the near future.
significant minority, complications derail the natural mourn- As with all mood and anxiety disorders, the co-occurrence
ing process and prolong acute grief, resulting in a mental of CG and major depressive disorder (MDD) [30, 31] is
health condition. There is ongoing debate over what this common, with studies finding that 25 % of those with
condition should be called. Our group has used the term bereavement-related depression have CG, and 36-55 % of
“complicated grief” (CG) because (1) much of the literature those with CG have comorbid depression [32–34]. However,
has been published using that designation and (2) it is a non- CG has been found to constitute a distinct cluster of symptoms
pejorative yet descriptive term. that can be distinguished from depression [23, 35]. Table 2
George Engel [20] conceived of grief as analogous to outlines clinical differences between CG and MDD. It is
infection or injury, and we agree with this conceptualization important to identify CG even when it is comorbid with
[21•]. Thus, we also use the term “complicated” in the medical depression because CG has unique clinical features and ap-
sense of a superimposed condition that impedes the course of pears to require unique treatment. Treatment of CG in patients
another health problem (in this case, typical acute grief). For with depression is associated with reductions in depressive
some bereaved individuals, the natural healing process is symptoms [36] but the reverse is not true [37]. More detail on
interfered with by various complications, just as a wound does CG treatment is provided below.
not heal properly when it becomes infected. The injury anal- A recent population-based survey found 6.7 % of bereaved
ogy is apt for bereavement because healing requires painful individuals develop CG, and individuals 61 and older had
emotional activation similar to the physical pain of a wound. more than double the rate (9 %) of younger adults. Older
Grief becomes complicated when there are problems related to women in particular had a rate of CG (9.6 %), much higher
the circumstances, consequences or context of the loss or by than that of younger adults (2.7 %) [38••]. CG can be chronic
an internal problem with the adaptation process. Didion does and persistent, markedly interfering with functioning. For
not like the term “healing,” and the analogy is not perfect, but example, Stammel et al. [39] surveyed 775 Cambodians
considering a loss to be similar to a serious injury recognizes who had lost at least one family member during the Khmer
the severity of the pain and disruption, the possibility for Rouge regime and found 14 % endorsed CG 30 years later.
complications and the potential usefulness of clinical atten- CG can be reliably detected with standardized measures, such
tion, without implying an underlying problem. as the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) [40]. Reliable
CG was first proposed as a diagnostic entity for DSM IV by measures of CG have also recently been developed and tested
Hartz [22]. Horowitz et al. [23] published a seminal paper for people with intellectual disabilities [41] and validated in other
406, Page 4 of 7 Curr Psychiatry Rep (2013) 15:406
Table 1 DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder Table 2 Comparison of major depressive disorder and complicated grief
A. The individual experienced the death of someone with whom he or she Major depressive disorder Complicated grief
had a close relationship
B. Since the death, at least one of the following symptoms is experienced Pervasive sad mood Sadness related to missing the deceased
on more days than not and to a clinically significant degree and has Loss of interest or pleasure Strong interest in the deceased maintained
persisted for at least 12 months after the death in the case of bereaved in most activities
adults and 6 months for bereaved children: Pervasive sense of guilt Guilt related to the death or deceased
1. Persistent yearning/longing for the deceased Low self-esteem Self-criticism only related to the loss
2. Intense sorrow and emotional pain in response to the death Suicidal thoughts related to Suicidal thoughts focused on not wanting
3. Preoccupation with the deceased a range of negative to live without the deceased or a wish to
emotions and cognitions rejoin the deceased
4. Preoccupation with the circumstances of the death
Not seen in depression Avoidance of situations and people related
C. Since the death at least six of the following symptoms are experienced
to reminders of the loss
on more days than not and to a clinically significant degree, and have
persisted for at least 12 months after the death in the case of bereaved Not seen in depression Intense yearning for the person who died
adults and 6 months for bereaved children:
Adapted from Shear & Mulhare [73]
Reactive distress to the death
1. Marked difficulty accepting the death
2. Experiencing disbelief or emotional numbness over the loss as the ability to think optimistically, attend to the needs of
3. Difficulty with positive reminiscing about the deceased others, maintain plans and goals, remain calm, reduce painful
4. Bitterness or anger related to the loss emotions and be able to laugh. Golden and Dalgleish [46]
5. Maladaptive appraisals about oneself in relation to the deceased or studied three groups of midlife adults and found significant
the death (e.g., self-blame) relationships between CG symptoms and both self-
6. Excessive avoidance of reminders of the loss (e.g., avoidance of devaluation and negative self-related cognitions about the
individuals, places or situations associated with the deceased) future. Those with CG also had greater negative cognitions
Social identity disruption about the future for close others. Bereaved individuals had
7. A desire to die in order to be with the deceased high rates of self-related counterfactual thoughts about the
8. Difficulty trusting other individuals since the death death. Consistent with clinical observations, those with CG
9. Feeling alone or detached from other individuals since the death had these thoughts significantly more frequently, and the
10. Feeling that life is meaningless or empty without the deceased, or thoughts were associated with greater distress. Also consistent
the belief that one cannot function without the deceased with clinical observations, Boelen [47••] asked bereaved in-
11. Confusion about one’s role in life or a diminished sense of one’s dividuals to write a list of seven goals and found those with
identity (e.g., feeling that a part of oneself died with the deceased)
CG produced less specific goals, and reported lower sense of
12. Difficulty or reluctance to pursue interests since the loss or to
plan for the future (e.g., friendships, activities)
control and lower likelihood of achieving goals.
D. The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in
CG is associated with negative health and mental health
social, occupational or other important areas of functioning consequences in older adults, beyond that of bereavement itself.
E. The bereavement reaction is out of proportion to or inconsistent with Prigerson et al. [48] found that the risk of hypertension is ten
cultural religious, or age-appropriate norms times greater among older adult widowed subjects who meet
Specify if: With traumatic bereavement: Bereavement due to homicide the criteria for CG compared to those who do not, and sleep
or suicide with persistent distressing preoccupations regarding the impairment is associated with CG in older adults [35].
traumatic nature of the death (often in response to loss reminders),
Suicidality is twice as high among widowed older adults with
including the deceased’s last moments, degree of suffering and
mutilating injury, or the malicious or intentional nature of the death CG than those without CG [49].
Recent reviews [50–56] summarize possible risk factors for
Reproduced with permission from the American Psychiatric Association CG and suggest these are seen across samples, nationalities and
[28]: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition.
age groups. CG is associated with female gender, low education
Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
level, older age, low socioeconomic status and low social support
both before and after the death. A history of anxiety disorders or
languages, such as Japanese [42]. Most people with CG are aware depression before the death and past history of multiple trauma or
that something is wrong but don’t know what it is and are relieved loss also appear to be risk fators. Several investigators found that
to receive a diagnosis [43]. spiritual belief systems may decrease the risk for developing CG
People with CG show a range of cognitive and affective [57–59]. Denckla et al. [60] compared ratings on healthy depen-
differences from bereaved people without CG. Gupta and dency, destructive overdependence and dysfunctional detach-
Bonanno [44] found the ability to flexibly enhance or suppress ment among a small group of bereaved middle-aged people with
emotional expression at will was reduced in CG. Burton et al. and without CG and found that those with CG were more likely
[45] found CG associated with less “forward coping,” defined to have dysfunctional detachment.
Curr Psychiatry Rep (2013) 15:406 Page 5 of 7, 406
CG also tends to occur after loss of a very close relationship encouraging and suggest that CG can be effectively treated by
with the deceased, such as loss of a spouse. Loss of a child identifying CG, addressing grief complications and facilitat-
poses an especially high risk [61]. Traumatic circumstances of ing the natural healing process.
the death, a lack of preparation or difficult interactions with Pharmacotherapy might also be helpful to people with CG.
medical or other staff at the time of the death can increase the Simon et al. (2008) found that patients taking antidepressants
risk of CG. Chiu et al. [59] found CG was associated with were more likely to complete CGT, with no such effect on
perceived general disapproval from others, longer duration of completion rates for IPT. Zygmont et al. [69] also found com-
caregiving and medical disease history in the caregiver. Use of bination treatment with paroxetine or nortriptyline administered
hospice care decreased the risk. Kramer et al. [53] found higher with CGT was effective in reducing grief symptoms. Results
CG symptoms in caregivers from families with low conflict with medication alone are more mixed. Pasternak et al. [70] and
before the end of life but higher conflict at the end of life, in Reynolds et al. [37] found treatment with antidepressant med-
those who had family members with difficulty accepting the ication reduced depression but not CG, whereas in an open
illness and among caregivers with greater fear of death. pharmacotherapy trial Hensley et al. [71] found that citalopram
improved depressive, anxiety and grief symptoms.
efforts are needed to help reduce the sizable negative health and 13. Buckley T, Morel-Kopp MC, Ward C, et al. Inflammatory and
thrombotic changes in early bereavement: a prospective evaluation.
mental health burden of CG for older adults.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19:1145–52.
14. • Shah SM, Carey IM, Harris T, et al. Do good health and material
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines circumstances protect older people from the increased risk of death
after bereavement? Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:689–98. Provides
greater understanding of the pathways between bereavement and
Conflict of Interest M. Katherine Shear has received grants from the
mortality.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and American Foundation
15. Shah SM, Carey IM, Harris T, et al. The effect of unexpected
for Suicide Prevention, travel support from NIMH and compensation for
bereavement on mortality in older couples. Am J Public Health.
expert testimony from a private individual.
2013;103:1140–5.
Angela Ghesquiere is the recipient of an NIMH research fellowship in
16. Anderson KL, Dimond M. The experience of bereavement in older
geriatric mental health services (T32 MH073553, PI: Bartels).
adults. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22:308–15.
Kim Glickman declares that she has no conflict of interest.
17. Arbuckle NW, de Vries B. The long-term effects of later life spousal
and parental bereavement on personal functioning. Gerontologist.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does 1995;35:637–47.
not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any 18. • Hallerod B. Gender inequality from beyond the grave: Intra-
of the authors. household distribution and wellbeing after spousal loss. Ageing
Soc. 2013;33:783–803. Useful details exploring the associations
between bereavement and functioning.
19. Chentsova Dutton Y, Zisook S. Adaptation to bereavement. Death
References Stud. 2005;29:877–903.
20. Engel GL. Is grief a disease? A challenge for medical research.
Psychosom Med. 1961;23:18–22.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been 21. • Shear MK. Grief and mourning gone awry: pathway and course of
highlighted as: complicated grief. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012;14:119–28.
• Of importance Provides a useful overview, in more detail, of our groups' conceptu-
alization of the development of complicated grief.
•• Of major importance 22. Hartz GW. Adult grief and its interface with mood disorder: proposal
of a new diagnosis of complicated bereavement. Compr Psychiatry.
1. Didion J. The year of magical thinking. New York: A.A. Knopf; 1986;27:60–4.
2005. 23. Horowitz MJ, Siegel B, Holen A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for
2. Williams BR, Sawyer Baker P, Allman RM, Roseman JM. complicated grief disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:904–10.
Bereavement among African American and White older adults. J 24. Prigerson HG, Shear MK, Jacobs SC, et al. Consensus criteria for
Aging Health. 2007;19:313–33. traumatic grief. A preliminary empirical test. Br J Psychiatry.
3. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics: Older 1999;174:67–73.
Americans 2012: Key indicators of well-being. Retrieved August 30, 25. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, et al. Prolonged grief
2012, from http://www.agingstats.gov/agingstatsdotnet/Main_Site/Data/ disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V
2012_Documents/Docs/EntireChartbook.pdf and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000121.
4. Williams BR, Sawyer Baker P, Allman RM. Nonspousal family loss 26. • Simon NM, Wall MM, Keshaviah A, et al. Informing the symptom
among community-dwelling older adults. Omega. 2005;51:125–42. profile of complicated grief. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28:118–26.
5. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books; 1980. Exploration of diagnostic criteria for complicated grief.
6. Freud S. Mourning and melancholia. In: Strachy TJ, editor. The 27. • Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, et al. Complicated grief and related
standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud, 1953– bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28:103–17.
1974. 14th ed. London: Hogarth Press; 1917. p. 243–58. Gives a more detailed overview of the argument for including com-
7. Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A, Raundalen M. Effective grief and bereave- plicated grief in the DSM-5.
ment support: The role of family, friends, colleagues, schools, and 28. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual
support professionals. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric
Publishers; 2008. Association; 2013.
8. Dyregrov K. What do we know about needs for help after suicide in 29. Stein DJ, Phillips KA, Bolton D, et al. What is a mental/psychiatric
different parts of the world? A phenomenological perspective. Crisis. disorder? Psychol Med. 2010;40:1759–65.
2011;32:310–8. 30. Jacobs S, Hansen F, Kasl S, et al. Anxiety disorders during acute
9. Stroebe M, Schut H, Stroebe W. Health outcomes of bereavement. bereavement: risk and risk factors. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:269–74.
Lancet. 2007;370:1960–73. 31. Simon NM, Shear KM, Thompson EH, et al. The prevalence and
10. Manzoli L, Villari P, MP G, Boccia A. Marital status and mortality in correlates of psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with complicated
the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. grief. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48:395–9.
2007;64:77–94. 32. Sung SC, Dryman MT, Marks E, et al. Complicated grief among
11. • Mostofsky E, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, et al. Risk of acute individuals with major depression: prevalence, comorbidity, and
myocardial infarction after the death of a significant person in one's associated features. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:453–8.
life: the Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study. 33. Neria Y, Gross R, Litz B, et al. Prevalence and psychological corre-
Circulation. 2012;125:491–6. Provides up-to-date details on the lates of complicated grief among bereaved adults 2.5-3.5 years after
health consequences of bereavment. September 11th attacks. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20:251–62.
12. • Khanfer R, Lord JM, Phillips AC. Neutrophil function and cortisol: 34. Shear KM, Jackson CT, Essock SM, Donahue SA, Felton CJ.
DHEAS ratio in bereaved older adults. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25: Screening for complicated grief among Project Liberty service recip-
1182–6. Provides novel information on the biology of changes in health ients 18 months after September 11, 2001. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:
after bereavement. 1291–7.
Curr Psychiatry Rep (2013) 15:406 Page 7 of 7, 406
35. Prigerson H, Frank E, Kasl SV, et al. Complicated grief and 54. Kristensen PL, Weisaeth L, Heir T. Predictors of Complicated Grief
bereavement-related depression as distinct disorders: preliminary After a Natural Disaster: A Population Study Two Years After the
empirical validation in elderly bereaved spouses. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 South-East Asian Tsunami. Death Stud. 2010;34:137–50.
1995;152:22–30. 55. Lombardo L, Morelli E, Luciani M, et al. Pre-loss demographic and
36. Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds 3rd CF. Treatment of compli- psychological predictors of complicated grief among relatives of termi-
cated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:2601–8. nally ill cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81:256–8.
37. Reynolds 3rd CF, Miller MD, Pasternak RE, et al. Treatment of 56. Tomarken A, Holland J, Schachter S, et al. Factors of complicated
bereavement-related major depressive episodes in later life: a con- grief pre-death in caregivers of cancer patients. Psychooncology.
trolled study of acute and continuation treatment with nortriptyline 2008;17:105–11.
and interpersonal psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:202–8. 57. Schaal S, Jacob N, Dusingizemungu JP, Elbert T. Rates and risks for
38. •• Kersting A, Brahler E, Glaesmer H, Wagner B. Prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in a sample of orphaned and widowed
complicated grief in a representative population-based sample. J genocide survivors. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:55.
Affect Disord. 2011;131:339–43. Describes one of the few large 58. Seirmarco G, Neria Y, Insel B, et al. Religiosity and mental health:
population-based studies of complicated grief prevalence. Changes in religious beliefs, complicated grief, posttraumatic stress
39. Stammel N, Heeke C, Bockers E, et al. Prolonged grief disorder three disorder, and major depression following the September 11, 2001
decades post loss in survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime in attacks. Psychol Relig Spiritual. 2012;4:10–8.
Cambodia. J Affect Disord. 2013;144:87–93. 59. Chiu YW, Huang CT, Yin SM, et al. Determinants of complicated grief
40. Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds 3rd CF, et al. Inventory of in caregivers who cared for terminal cancer patients. Support Care
Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Cancer. 2010;18:1321–7.
Psychiatry Res. 1995;59:65–79. 60. Denckla CA, Mancini AD, Bornstein RF, Bonanno GA. Adaptive and
41. Guerin S, Dodd P, Tyrell J, et al. An initial assessment of the maladaptive dependency in bereavement: distinguishing prolonged and
psychometric properties of the Complicated Grief Questionnaire for resolved grief trajectories. Personal Individ Difer. 2011;51:1012–7.
People with Intellectual Disabilities (CGQ-ID). Res Dev Disabil. 61. Fujisawa D, Miyashita M, Nakajima S, et al. Prevalence and deter-
2009;30:1258–67. minants of complicated grief in general population. J Affect Disord.
42. Ito M, Nakajima S, Fujisawa D, et al. Brief measure for screening 2010;127:352–8.
complicated grief: reliability and discriminant validity. PLoS One. 62. Boelen PA, de Keijser J, van den Hout MA, van den Bout J.
2012;7:e31209. Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive-
43. Johnson JG, First MB, Block S, et al. Stigmatization and receptivity behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. J Consult Clin
to mental health services among recently bereaved adults. Death Psychol. 2007;75:277–84.
Stud. 2009;33:691–711. 63. • Acierno R, Rheingold A, Amstadter A, et al. Behavioral activation
44. Gupta S, Bonanno GA. Complicated grief and deficits in emotional and therapeutic exposure for bereavement in older adults. Am J Hosp
expressive flexibility. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011;120:635–43. Palliat Care. 2012;29:13–25. Describes a trial testing behavioral
45. Burton CL, Yan OH, Pat-Horenczyk R, et al. Coping flexibility and activation treatment for complicated grief.
complicated grief: a comparison of American and Chinese samples. 64. Asukai N, Tsuruta N, Saito A. Pilot study on traumatic grief treatment
Depress Anxiety. 2012;29:16–22. program for Japanese women bereaved by violent death. J Trauma
46. Golden AM, Dalgleish T. Facets of pejorative self-processing in Stress. 2011;24:470–3.
complicated grief. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80:512–24. 65. Rosner R, Pfoh G, Kotoucova M. Treatment of complicated grief.
47. •• Boelen PA. Personal goals and prolonged grief disorder symptoms. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2011, 2.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18:439–44. Provides new understanding 66. Papa A, Sewell MT, Garrison-Diehn C, Rummel C. A randomized
of the ability to form goals among individuals with complicated grief. open trial assessing the feasibility of behavioral activation for path-
48. Prigerson HG, Bierhals AJ, Kasl SV, et al. Traumatic grief as a risk factor ological grief responding. Behavior Therapy. 2013.
for mental and physical morbidity. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:616–23. 67. • Supiano KP, Luptak M. Complicated Grief in Older Adults: A
49. Szanto K, Prigerson H, Houck P, Ehrenpreis L, Reynolds 3rd CF. Randomized Controlled Trial of Complicated Grief Group Therapy.
Suicidal ideation in elderly bereaved: the role of complicated grief. Gerontologist. 2013. Describes the adapatation of Shear et al.'s
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1997;27:194–207. complicated grief treatment for group therapy.
50. Piper WE, Ogrodniczuk JS, Joyce AS, Weideman R, editors. Risk 68. Wagner B, Knaevelsrud C, Maercker A. Internet-based cognitive-
factors for complicated grief. Washington: American Psychological behavioral therapy for complicated grief: a randomized controlled
Association; 2011. trial. Death Stud. 2006;30:429–53.
51. Lobb EA, Kristjanson L, Aoun SM, et al. Predictors of complicated grief: 69. Zygmont M, Prigerson HG, Houck PR, et al. A post hoc comparison
A systematic review of empirical studies. Death Stud. 2010;34:673–98. of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief. J
52. Hibberd R, Elwod LS, Galovski TE. Risk and protective factors for Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:241–5.
posttraumatic stress disorder, prolonged grief, and depression in survivors 70. Pasternak RE, Reynolds 3rd CF, Schlernitzauer M, et al. Acute open-
of the violent death of a loved one. J Loss Trauma. 2010;15:426–47. trial nortriptyline therapy of bereavement-related depression in late
53. Kramer BJ, Kavanaugh M, Trentham-Dietz A, Walsh M, Yonker JA. life. J Clin Psychiatry. 1991;52:307–10.
Complicated grief symptoms in caregivers of persons with lung 71. Hensley PL, Slonimski CK, Uhlenhuth EH, Clayton PJ.
cancer: the role of family conflict, intrapsychic strains, and hospice Escitalopram: an open-label study of bereavement-related depression
utilization. Omega (Westport). 2010;62:201–20. and grief. J Affect Disord. 2009;113:142–9.