Chapter #7
Chapter #7
and Promotion
An Integrated Marketing
Communications Perspective
Chapter #7
Establishing Objectives and Budgeting for the Promotional
Program
While the task of setting objectives can be complex and difficult, it must be done
properly because Specific goals and objectives are the foundation on which all other
promotional decisions are made.
Budgeting for advertising and other promotional areas, as well as creative and media
strategies and tactics, evolves from these objectives.
The Value of Objectives
Communications
◦ Objectives facilitate coordination within
The company, Inside the ad agency, and between the two.
• Ex: To increase sales by 10 percent in the small- • Ex: create awareness, change perception, create
business segment of the market during the next favorable brand image
12 months
Sales VERSUS Communications Objectives
Many planners approach promotion from a communications perspective and believe
the objective of advertising and other promotional-mix elements is usually to
communicate information or a selling message about a product or service.
Other managers argue that sales or some related measure, such as market share, is the
only meaningful goal for advertising and promotion and should be the basis for setting
objectives.
These two perspectives have been the topic of considerable debate and are worth
examining further.
Sales VERSUS Communications Objectives
sales objectives
• Ex: Increase Sales volume, Increase market share, generate more profit.
FIGURE 7–1 Factors Influencing Sales
•Advertising can make consumer aware and interested in the brand. But it can not make them buy it.
•Money spent on advertising do NOT necessarily have an immediate impacts on sales (carryover
effect).
•A Review Of Econometric Studies that examined the duration of cumulative advertising effects
found that for mature, frequently purchased, low-priced products, advertising’s effect on sales lasts
up to nine months.
Where Sales Objectives are appropriate?
Direct-response advertising is one type of advertising that evaluates its
effectiveness on the basis of sales.
Retail advertising designed to attract consumers to stores during the sales period
(and to generate sales volume).
20% Trial
25% Preference
40% Liking
70% Knowledge/comprehension
90% Awareness
Communications Effects Pyramid
The communications pyramid can also
5% Use
be used to determine promotional
objectives for an established brand.
20% Trial
The promotional planner must
determine where the target audience 25% Preference
lies with respect to the various blocks
40% Liking
in the pyramid.
70% Knowledge/comprehension
90% Awareness
Communications Objectives
A Sales Goal Must Be Transformed Into A Communications Objective.
• Increasing the number of consumers in the target audience who prefer our product
over the competition’s.
• Encouraging new consumers who have never used our brand to try it.
Problems with Communications Objectives
•What is adequate level of awareness, knowledge, liking, preference, or conviction.
As a result, when times get tough, the advertising and promotional budget is
the first to be cut.
Even though there is strong evidence that exactly the opposite should occur.
Top-Down VERSUS Bottom-Up Approaches to
Budget Setting
Budgeting Approaches: Top-Down Approaches
The Affordable Method / All- you-can-afford method
• The firm determines the amount to be spent in various areas such as production and
operations. Then it allocates what’s left to advertising and promotion, considering this
to be the amount it can afford.
• This approach is common among small firms, and/ or firm with a primary focus on
product development.
• Unfortunately, it is also used in large firms, particularly those do not understand the
role of advertising and promotion. no consideration for communication objectives or
goal.
Budgeting Approaches: Top-Down Approaches
The Affordable Method / All- you-can-afford method
• The logic for this approach, if we know what we can afford and we do not exceed it,
we will not get into financial problems.
• Often this method does not allocate enough money to get the product off the ground
and into the market.
• There is no good explanation why this approach continues to be used. Yet budgets
continue to be set this way, and our purpose in discussing this method is to point out
only that it is used—NOT RECOMMENDED.
Budgeting Approaches: Top-Down Approaches
Percentage of Sales
• The most commonly used method for budget setting (particularly in large firms)
As the market changes, management must factor the effect of these changes on sales
into next year’s forecast rather than relying on past data. The resulting budget is more
likely to reflect current conditions and be more appropriate.
Percentage-of-sales Method
Advantage & Disadvantage
Advantages: It is financially safe and keeps ad spending within reasonable limits, as it
bases spending on the past year’s sales or what the firm expects to sell in the upcoming
year.
when sales Increases that leads to budget increases, and sales decreases resulting in
advertising decreases.
If the budget is depending on sales, decreases in sales will lead to decreases in budgets
when they most need to be increased.
Percentage-of-sales Method
Advantage & Disadvantage
Disadvantages: Difficult To Employ For NEW PRODUCT Introductions. If no sales histories
are available, there is no basis for establishing the budget. Projections of future sales may
be difficult, particularly if the product is highly innovative.
It is never wise to ignore the competition; managers must always be aware of what
competitors are doing. But they should not just emulate them in setting goals and
developing strategies.
Budgeting Approaches: Top-Down Approaches
Competitive Parity
Disadvantages:
• It ignores the fact that advertising and promotions are designed to accomplish specific
objectives by addressing certain problems and opportunities.
• It assumes that because firms have similar expenditures, their programs will be equally
effective.
• It ignores possible advantages of the firm itself; some companies simply make better
products than others.
Budgeting Approaches: Bottom-up Approach
•Bottom-up Approach, the budget is based on
consideration of the firm’s predetermined
communications objectives.
3. Estimating the coast associated with performance of these strategies and tasks.
Television advertising $ 575.000
Radio advertising $225.000 The Total Budget Is Based On
Newspaper advertising $175.000 The Accumulation Of These Costs.
Implementing the Objective and Task Approach
• Monitor – performance should be monitored and evaluated in light of the budget
appropriated.
• Re-evaluate objectives – once specific objectives have been attained, monies may be
better spent on new goals.
• If one has achieved the level of consumer awareness sought, the budget should be
altered to stress a higher-order objective such as evaluation or trial.
Implementing the Objective and Task Approach
Isolate objectives
Monitor
Reevaluate objectives
Implementing the Objective and Task Approach
Disadvantage:
The difficulty of determining which tasks will be required and the costs
associated with each.
For example, specifically what tasks are needed to attain awareness among
50 percent of the target market? How much will it cost to perform these
tasks?
It is not always possible to know exactly what is required and/or how much it
will cost to complete the job.